Dickerson Chief Justice Rehnquist Decision Chart

Coalition Join New Opinion Drafter 6A FIGURE 1.1 CHIEF JUSTICE S OPINION Splinter Dissent from New Opinion 6C 5A FLOWCHART Write Concur in Part / Dissent in Part 6E Majority Opinion Coalition Sustained Chief s Opinion is for the Court 6G 4A 5C Vote With Join New Opinion Drafter 6I Majority Coalition Dissent from New Opinion 6K 3A Assign Splinter Majority 5E Concur In Part / Dissent in Part 6M 5 or More Votes Opinion Against the Chief s 4C Coalition Preferred Outcome Sustained Join Assignee Opinion 6O 2A 5G Vote Dissent from Assignee Opinion 6Q With Minority Dissent from Majority Opinion 6S 3C Coalition Join New Opinion Drafter 6B Splinter Write 5B Dissent from New Opinion 6D Court Votes Majorityto Grant Cert Opinion Concur in Part / Dissent in Part 6F 1 4B Coalition Sustained Chief s Opinion is for the Court 6H Vote 5D With Join New Opinion Drafter 6J Majority Coalition Dissent from New Opinion 6L 3B Splinter Assign Concur In Part / Dissent in Part 6N 4 or More Votes 5F Majority for the Chief s Opinion Coalition Preferred Outcome Join Assignee Opinion 6P 2B 4D Sustained Vote 5H Dissent from Assignee Opinion 6R With Minority Dissent from Majority Opinion 6T 3DStage 1: Stage 2: Stage 3: Stage 4: Stage 5: Stage 6:The Cert Decision- Conference The Chief s Assignor CJ s Post Opinion CJ s Final ObservedGoverned by the Proceeding and Tentative Opinion Assignment Assignment Behavior Rule of Four Tentative Vote Tally Conference Vote Decision Bargaining and Coalition Maintenance

Dickerson Chief Justice Rehnquist Decision Chart

by Daniel Katz on Sep 14, 2011

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

Dickerson Chief Justice Rehnquist Decision Chart — Presentation Transcript