The Politics of Crime
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The Politics of Crime

on

  • 994 views

The New Moral Panics

The New Moral Panics

Statistics

Views

Total Views
994
Views on SlideShare
992
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
16
Comments
0

2 Embeds 2

http://www.slideshare.net 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • [1] It is helpful to remember that until the 1990's Canadian cities had very few homeless people, in sharp contrast to American cities for example, and street begging was rare; That is, if these youth remained in school, they received social assistance to cover rent and food
  • Although children who were made wards of the state before their fourteenth birthday may still be eligible for support and assistance until they reach twenty one, there is almost no protection in the child welfare system for older youth. Very little is available for those who enter care when they are over fourteen, even if the reasons involve abuse or sexual exploitation, and those over sixteen are, for all intents, considered  adults  with almost no claim to protection under child welfare legislation.
  • drop out kids are a liability
  • For example, in the 1998 provincial election in Ontario, an aggressive and punitive approach to young offenders was identified by a political pollster as,  a good issue for the  PCs  to trot out as an election issue because it tends to appeal more to the PC voters. ... Everybody likes a tough stance on crime. ... If the PCs want to make it an issue and say,  Look, the place has gone to hell in a hand basket,  they could possibly do that  (Rusk 1998).
  • . In the United States,  Megan  s Laws  (sex-offender notification laws) are being passed in state after state. In Ontario we have a  Christopher  s Law  to create a registry of known sex offenders, and a  Brian  s Law  to force mentally ill persons into treatment (Mallan 2000). These laws are identified with a victim  s name  in effect a brand-name  and not by content.
  • Para 3; 18 – 36; 40-57
  • which guarantees everyone the right not to be deprived of life, liberty and security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice
  • 75-77
  • 67-71; 88-97
  • 91-92

The Politics of Crime The Politics of Crime Presentation Transcript

  • THE POLITICS OF CRIME THE NEW ‘MORAL PANICS’
  • Demonizing Youth, Marketing Fear: The New Politics of Crime
    • Crime rates are dropping,
    • the economy is booming
    • Canada is once again, according to the United Nations, one of the ‘best countries’ in the world.
  • IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP?
    • Yet fear of crime is a crippling concern
    • the new millennium is witnessing the sharpest distinction between the living conditions of the rich and poor since the Great Depression
  • Sharp Paradox: In a Time of Plenty
    • thousand's of adults, children and youth live on the streets,
    • reduced to begging,
    • marginal efforts at work
    • petty crime
    • Hundreds of thousands more live in shelters or a step away from shelters.
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Why has a harsh approach to crime and disorder become a central feature of our culture?
  • Purpose of the Criminal Law
    • to ‘protect society’
    • guarantee security and safety for individuals
    • provide prompt retribution for victims of crime
    • Under the rule of law
  • But:
    • It is relatively easy to politicize crime:
    • crime, and
    • fear of crime
    • is part of the culture
  • HOW?
    • Crime is fascinating
    • A commodity for writers, artists, the media
    • Political interests of all stripes are carefully attentive to issues of criminal justice
  • The ways that crime is:
    • defined
    • prosecuted
    • punished
    • Are being influenced by ever more overtly political ends
  • The ‘new’ welfare state
    • Both
    • neo-conservative
    • and
    • neo-liberal
  • Neo-conservative Positions
    • family and church (not the state) give charity support for the unfortunate
    • state entitlements such as welfare weaken family and church
    • social assistance is not a right
    • Should rarely go to children, youth and single mothers
    • a ‘law and order’ retributive approach to social disorder and dysfunction
  • Neo-liberal Positions
    • ‘ survival of the fittest’
    • rely on market forces.
    • The state should ‘get out of the way’
    • Market will decide which regions, which people, prosper and which don’t.
    • The only assistance the State should be providing are ‘incentives’ to work.
    • private security, policing and correctional services expand
    • treatment and social services are privatized,
  • Results
    • Major cuts to social assistance
    • strict new rules limiting entitlement introduced suddenly
    • Rents deregulated
    • social housing programmes cancelled and cut back
  • Results?
    • an increase in homelessness in general
    • new presence of homeless and disenfranchised young adults on the street
    • ‘ student welfare’ cancelled
    • most of the youth who leave home today have few options available for the basics of survival: food, clothing and shelter
  • More results?
    • a significant number turn to or are captured by street prostitution
    • juggle part time minimum wage jobs
    • panhandle
    • squeegee windshields
    • engage in crime
    • or starve
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Cuts to Children’s Aid Society budgets have removed another strand in the safety net
  • The education system is also being reformed
    • Fewer teachers for students with special needs
    • Reduced resources for support programs
    • Alternative schools and alternative programs are being cut
    • Adult education courses closed
    • School funding formulas are changing
    • School boards funded based on the students who remain enrolled for a full year.
  • Zero tolerance to school violence
    • policies which ensure that students engaged in almost any sort of violence may be expelled
    • some young people have nowhere to go but the street
    • demonized and marginalized
    • young people expelled from school under zero tolerance very rapidly run out of options
    • except for property crime, prostitution, drugs or all three
  • The Commodification of Crime
    • Crime has become a valuable political commodity
    • concern about crime has become a feature in literally all political campaigns today, even in the face of significant declines in the rate of crime
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Crime sells newspapers.
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Crime is no longer simply something with marketing power.
    • Crime itself, or more accurately, the fear of crime, is being marketed for political purpose s.
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Demand is fostered for:
    • more safety
    • more control
    • more order
    • more punishment.
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Middle class markets are targeted
    • new laws are developed
    • new fears are identified.
    • And each time, a political benefit is extracted.
  • Common perceptions about what ‘crime’ is are shaped:
    • ‘ crime’ is limited to street crime and disorder,
    • and to random acts of extreme violence.
    • But:
    • corporate or so called ‘white collar’ deviance causes as much or more social harm than street crime
  • The criminal justice system is broken
    • Crime is ‘out of control’
    • Criminals are ‘getting away’ with murder
    • Courts are too ‘soft’ on crime
    • Criminals have more rights than victims
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • Law’s reach against corporate deviance (from environmental crimes to economic misconduct) is diminished:
    • investigative and prosecutorial infrastructures are dismantled
    • ‘ cutting red tape’
    • ‘ getting government out of the boardrooms of the nation
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • On the other hand:
    • Street youth
    • Beggars
    • Squeegee kids
    • Prostitutes
    • increasingly demonized and criminalized.
  • Political Crimes and Misdemeanors
    • redundant exercises of quasi-criminal legislation enacted with overtly political goals in mind
    • clearly marketed to serve political, not legislative, interests.
    • not needed (if existing legislation were actually used)
  • A similar strategy names a piece of legislation with its message
    • . The ‘ Safe Streets Act’
    • An Act to promote safety in Ontario by prohibiting aggressive solicitation, solicitation of persons in certain places and disposal of dangerous things in certain places and to amend the Highway Traffic Act to regulate certain activities on roadways
  • The new ‘moral panics’
    • . Debate or critique is almost impossible with this technique.
    • Who wishes to re-victimize Brian and family or Christopher and his?
    • Who wants unsafe streets?
    • Who would refuse to protect children?
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • homelessness and poverty is articulated as a decline in moral values and an increase in sexual and other disorder.
    • nothing of substance is done to make streets safer
    • the sight of poverty is criminalized. ‘
    • Aggressive’ begging is outlawed
    • invisible, begging is not.
    • Begging in any location where the solicitation is hard to ignore, near automated bank machines for example, is criminalized
    • begging where the beggar can be ignored is not.
    • None of these provisions were needed in any real sense. The police have ample powers and plenty of crimes to choose from in the Criminal Code to curtail harassment, loitering and nuisance.
  • R. v. Parker
    • (2002) 146 C.C.C. (3d) 19 3 (OCA)
  • Facts
    • The accused was charged with cultivating marijuana and with possession of marijuana.
    • The accused suffered from a very severe form of epilepsy.
    • Surgery had failed to control his frequent serious and potentially life‑threatening seizures, and conventional medication was only moderately successful in doing so.
    • The accused found that by smoking marijuana, he could substantially reduce the incidence of seizures.
    • As he had no legal source of marijuana, he grew it himself.
    • The charges resulted when on two occasions the police searched the accused's home and seized marijuana
  • Procedural History
    • The accused challenged the constitutionality of the marijuana prohibition
    • claimed that it infringed his rights under s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights of Freedoms
    • the trial judge agreed and stayed the cultivation and possession charges
    • The trial judge read into the legislation an exemption for persons possessing or cultivating marijuana for their personal medically approved use.
    • The trial judge also ordered that the marijuana plants seized from the accused should be returned to him.
    • The Crown appealed
  • Issues
    • 1. Is the prohibition on the cultivation and use of marihuana for medically necessary reasons unconstitutional?
    • 2. If so, is the remedy to “read in” am exemption or to leave the matter to parliament?
  • Rules
    • S. 7 of the Charter
    • Cases interpreting s. 7
    • Medical authorities
  • Analysis: First Steps
    • The evidence led at trial demonstrated the therapeutic value of marijuana for treating a number of very serious conditions including epilepsy, glaucoma, the side effects of cancer treatments and the symptoms of AIDS.
    • The threat of criminal prosecution and possible imprisonment amounted to a risk of deprivation of liberty.
    • Liberty includes the right to make decisions of fundamental personal importance. This includes the choice of medication to alleviate the life‑threatening effects of an illness.
    • Deprivation by means of a criminal sanction of access to medication reasonably required for the treatment of a medical condition that threatens life or health also constitutes a deprivation of security of the person.
  • Next Steps:
    • The state has an interest in protecting against the harmful effects of marijuana
    • The blanket prohibition on possession and cultivation, without an exception for medical use, did little or nothing to enhance the state interest.
    • The practical unavailability of a defence under the legislation also infringed the principles of fundamental justice
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • The Crown did not attempt to establish that the violations of the accused's rights could be saved under s. 1 of the Charter
  • The Politics Of Crime
    • THE NEW ‘MORAL PANICS’
    • [email_address]