Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism

on

  • 3,385 views

Taught a class of college students the essence of Categorical Syllogism.

Taught a class of college students the essence of Categorical Syllogism.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,385
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
3,385
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
82
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism Presentation Transcript

    • Categorical SyllogismTeam Tanner:Tanner Yorgason, Cristan Sanchez, Stephanie Stewart, OdehOndoma, Jordan Andruski, and Dave Alexander
    • Categorical Syllogism- a deductive argument consisting of three categorical propositions with exactly three shared terms, two terms per proposition.
    • The Structure of Syllogism
      One of those terms must be used as the subject term of the conclusion of the syllogism, and we call it the minor term of the syllogism as a whole. The major term of the syllogism is whatever is employed as the predicate term of its conclusion. The third term in the syllogism doesn't occur in the conclusion at all, but must be employed in somewhere in each of its premises; hence, we call it the middle term.
    • Standard form
      A categorical syllogism in standard form always begins with the premises, major first and then minor, and then finishes with the conclusion.
      Here’s an example of standard form.
      No geese are felines.
      Some birds are geese.
      Therefore, Some birds are not felines.
    • Another Premise of Syllogism
      An example of the premise of syllogism looks like this:
      M P P M M P P M
      1 2 | 3 | 4 /
      S M S M M S M S
    • Form and Validity
      If a syllogism is valid, it is impossible for its premises to be true while its conclusion is false, and that can be the case only if there is something faulty in its general form.
      Here’s an example…
      All philosophers are professors.
      All philosophers are logicians.
      Therefore, All logicians are professors.
      Every syllogism of the form AAA-1 is valid, for example, while all syllogisms of the form OEE-3 are invalid.
      But since this is a categorical syllogism whose mood and figure are AAA-3, and since all syllogisms of the same form are equally valid or invalid, its reliability must be the same as that of the AAA-3 syllogism:
      All terriers are dogs.
      All terriers are mammals.
      Therefore, All mammals are dogs.
    • Diagramming Syllogisms
      There are three steps to follow:
      1. First draw three overlapping circles and label them to represent the major, minor, and middle terms of the syllogism.
      2. Next, on this framework, draw the diagrams of both of the syllogism’s premises.
      Always begin with universal proposition, no matter
      whether it is the major or the minor premise.
      Remember that in each case you will be using only two
      of the circles in each case; ignore the third circle by
      making sure that your drawing (shading or  × ) straddles it.
      3. Finally, without drawing anything else, look for the
      drawing of the conclusion. If the syllogism is valid,
      then that drawing will already be done.
      Consider, for example, how it could be applied, step by step, to an evaluation of a syllogism of the EIO-3 mood and figure,
      No M are P.
      Some M are S.
      Therefore, Some S are not P.
    • The Example
      Here’s an example of what they should look like:
    • Mood and Figure
      Consider these two arguments each of which has
      a mood of AAA.
      Major premise: All men are mortal.
      Minor premise: All preachers are men.
      Conclusion: All preachers are mortal.
      Major premise: All Christians are men.
      Minor premise: All preachers are men.
      Conclusion: All preachers are Christians.