Upcoming SlideShare
×

# Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism

4,336 views
4,079 views

Published on

Taught a class of college students the essence of Categorical Syllogism.

Published in: Education, News & Politics
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
• Full Name
Comment goes here.

Are you sure you want to Yes No
• Be the first to comment

Views
Total views
4,336
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
105
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

### Power Point Presentation For Categorical Syllogism

1. 1. Categorical SyllogismTeam Tanner:Tanner Yorgason, Cristan Sanchez, Stephanie Stewart, OdehOndoma, Jordan Andruski, and Dave Alexander<br />
2. 2. Categorical Syllogism- a deductive argument consisting of three categorical propositions with exactly three shared terms, two terms per proposition.<br />
3. 3. The Structure of Syllogism<br />One of those terms must be used as the subject term of the conclusion of the syllogism, and we call it the minor term of the syllogism as a whole. The major term of the syllogism is whatever is employed as the predicate term of its conclusion. The third term in the syllogism doesn't occur in the conclusion at all, but must be employed in somewhere in each of its premises; hence, we call it the middle term. <br />
4. 4. Standard form <br />A categorical syllogism in standard form always begins with the premises, major first and then minor, and then finishes with the conclusion.<br />Here’s an example of standard form.<br />No geese are felines. <br /> Some birds are geese. <br /> Therefore, Some birds are not felines.<br />
5. 5. Another Premise of Syllogism<br />An example of the premise of syllogism looks like this:<br />M P P M M P P M<br />1 2 | 3 | 4 / <br /> S M S M M S M S<br />
6. 6. Form and Validity<br />If a syllogism is valid, it is impossible for its premises to be true while its conclusion is false, and that can be the case only if there is something faulty in its general form.<br />Here’s an example…<br />All philosophers are professors. <br />All philosophers are logicians. <br />Therefore, All logicians are professors. <br />Every syllogism of the form AAA-1 is valid, for example, while all syllogisms of the form OEE-3 are invalid. <br />But since this is a categorical syllogism whose mood and figure are AAA-3, and since all syllogisms of the same form are equally valid or invalid, its reliability must be the same as that of the AAA-3 syllogism: <br />All terriers are dogs. <br />All terriers are mammals. <br />Therefore, All mammals are dogs.<br />
7. 7. Diagramming Syllogisms<br />There are three steps to follow:<br />1. First draw three overlapping circles and label them to represent the major, minor, and middle terms of the syllogism.<br />2. Next, on this framework, draw the diagrams of both of the syllogism’s premises.<br />Always begin with universal proposition, no matter <br /> whether it is the major or the minor premise. <br />Remember that in each case you will be using only two <br /> of the circles in each case; ignore the third circle by <br /> making sure that your drawing (shading or  × ) straddles it. <br />3. Finally, without drawing anything else, look for the <br /> drawing of the conclusion. If the syllogism is valid, <br /> then that drawing will already be done. <br /> Consider, for example, how it could be applied, step by step, to an evaluation of a syllogism of the EIO-3 mood and figure, <br />No M are P. <br />Some M are S. <br />Therefore, Some S are not P.<br />
8. 8. The Example<br />Here’s an example of what they should look like:<br />
9. 9. Mood and Figure<br />Consider these two arguments each of which has<br /> a mood of AAA.<br />Major premise: All men are mortal.<br />Minor premise: All preachers are men.<br />Conclusion: All preachers are mortal.<br />Major premise: All Christians are men.<br />Minor premise: All preachers are men.<br />Conclusion: All preachers are Christians.<br />