How Low Can We Go: Nitrogen in Dairy Rations- Mike Van Amburgh
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

How Low Can We Go: Nitrogen in Dairy Rations- Mike Van Amburgh

on

  • 3,151 views

Mike Van Amburgh presented this material during DAIReXNET's March 7, 2011 webinar on nitrogen in dairy rations. He discussed how low we can formulate nitrogen in rations, as well as what this means ...

Mike Van Amburgh presented this material during DAIReXNET's March 7, 2011 webinar on nitrogen in dairy rations. He discussed how low we can formulate nitrogen in rations, as well as what this means for the cost of the ration and for environmental impact.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,151
Views on SlideShare
3,145
Embed Views
6

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
182
Comments
1

3 Embeds 6

http://dairyinventory.blogspot.com 3
http://dairyinventory.blogspot.com.br 2
http://dairyinventory.blogspot.in 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • This material was presented as part of DAIReXNET’s March 7, 2011 webinar entitled 'How Low Can We Go: Nitrogen in Dairy Rations'. The recorded versions of all of our webinars are located at http://www.extension.org/pages/15830/archived-dairy-cattle-webinars.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

How Low Can We Go: Nitrogen in Dairy Rations- Mike Van Amburgh How Low Can We Go: Nitrogen in Dairy Rations- Mike Van Amburgh Presentation Transcript

  • Protein Formulation for High Producing Lactating Dairy Cattle: What are our practical limits?
    Mike Van Amburgh
    Department of Animal Science
  • Outline
    • What are the efficiencies of nitrogen utilization
    for lactating dairy cattle and what that might
    mean for ration formulation
    • Discuss some of what we have learned about
    nitrogen metabolism
    • Some research studies and farm examples
    • Summary
  • Improving Efficiency of Use of Intake Nitrogen
    Opportunities exist – need refining
    On farm N efficiencies (milk N:feed N)
    20 to 32%
    Theoretical efficiency limit 40 to 45% in lactating dairy cattle (Van Vuuren and Meijs, 1987; Hvelplund and Madsen, 1995)
    Practical limit is ~ 38 to 40% (groups are achieving this)
    Requires refinement of current ration formulation models – better balancing for rumen N and post-ruminal amino acids
    Requires refinement of feeding management – reduce variation associated with feed, management
  • Improving Efficiency of Nitrogen Use
    Milk protein output is a function of energy supply and amino acid balance
    Urine N is variable and is a function of excess nitrogen intake and recycling
    Urine N is most volatile form – so reducing it will reduce the environmental impact and improve efficiency
    High levels of urinary indicate:
    Overfeeding total protein
    High rumen N balance relative to microbial demand
    Can use monitoring tools like milk urea nitrogen to diagnose independent of production responses
  • Value of the “Safety Factor”
    500 cows
    With forage availability, ration can be balanced at 15% CP for level of production (85 lbs/d, 52.5 lb DMI)
    Nutritionist level decision – “safety factor” – doesn’t want cows to lose milk, doesn’t want to lose customer
    Management considerations - variation
    Cost of 15% vs 15.5% in SBM equiv. ~1 lb = $0.20/cow/d or $36,500/year
  • Impacts of source and amounts of CP on intestinal supply of N and performance of cows
    Ipharraguerre and Clark, 2005
  • Urinary N is variable form of excreted N Fecal N is fairly constant
  • Nitrogen excretion in milk, feces and urine based on N intake in lactating dairy cattle – under controlled conditions of energy as first limiting: 88 lb milk/d @53 lb DMI range in CP intake 14 to 18.7%
  • CNCPS v6.1 Nutrient Excretion – Manure
    and Manure Nitrogen
  • RDP Required in Diet DM
    • Determined by the amount and type of fermentable carbohydrates in the diet
    • Dairy NRC (2001): 9 – 11% of diet DM
    • For diets common to the Northeast: 10.4 – 10.8%
    • Rely on feed intake and MUN to make final decision
    • MUN levels of 8 to 10 mg/dl are ideal – need to manage well
    • CNCPSv6.1 RDP levels as low as 7.6% with good performance – again need to manage well
  • Blood Urea
    Ammonia
    N intake
    Urinary
    Urea
  • Effect of forage preservation method on urea N production and recycling (Ouellet et al., 2004)
    6 cows, 3x3 Latin square
    Diets:
    60% forage, 40% concentrate (14.5% CP) fed 12x/d
    3 different forages:
    Sun-cured hay, 10.1% CP
    Formic acid-treated silage (12.0% CP)
    Microbial inoculated silage (12.2% CP)
  • Ouellet et al., 2004
    Form of forage preservation had little effect on urea N
    production and recycling
  • Lysine and Methionine ratios
    • Current recommendations
    Rulquin
    • MET: 2.50% of metabolizable protein supply
    • LYS: 7.30% of metabolizable protein supply
    • These are similar to 2001 Dairy NRC (2.40 and 7.20%)
    Current Recommendations
    • MET: >2.20% of MP supply
    • LYS: >6.80% of MP supply
    • While maintaining a 3:1 ratio of LYS:MET
    With new implementation of CNCPS v6.1, factorial calculations appear more in line with ratios.
  • Limiting amino acids in lactating dairy cows
    Met, Lys, and His identified most often as first limiting (but His is questionable in US diets)
    Met: when most RUP is provided by oilseed meals, animal-derived proteins, or a combination of the two
    Lys: when corn or feeds of corn origin provide most or all dietary RUP
    His: when grass silage, barley and oat diets are fed with or without feather meal as sole source of supplemental RUP
    Chuck Schwab
  • Herd Level Examples of Improved Nitrogen Efficiency
  • Example Herd A – 54 lb DMI, 92 lb Milk
  • Example Herd Ingredients – 54 lb DMI, 92 lb Milk
  • Example herd B - 53 lb DMI, 89 lb milk
  • Example herd B - 53 lb DMI, 89 lb milk
  • Herd C
    Current stats
    DMI 50 lb
    CP 15.8%
    NDF 30.2%
    Actual milk 84 lb
    ME allowable 83.5 lb
    MP allowable 91 lb
    True protein 3.1%
    Fat 3.7%
    Met 2.3% MP
    Lys 6.77% MP
  • Herd C
    Concentrate mix contains Smartamine and Alimet
  • Herd C
  • Herd C
  • What was the impact on N excretion?
    Our calculations indicate ~60 g N/cow/d
    less urinary excretion
    1100 cows = ~26.5 tons N less in the
    environment over 365 d lactation
    In 2009, that was $0.40/cow/d reduced
    feed costs
  • Herd Example - D
    1050 cows – High group characterized
    1,542 lb BW
    ~100 DIM
    59.5 lb DMI
    15.8% CP
    60% Forage
    120 lb milk/d
    Milk:Feed (Feed efficiency): 1.99
  • Herd Example - D
    NDF, %DM: 30.9
    Starch, % DM: 28.7
    Sugar, % DM: 5.4
    Ether extract, % DM: 5.1
    %Forage: 60.1
    Forage NDF, %BW: 0.94
  • Herd Example - D
    Productive N : N Intake – 38%!
    Remember – most farms are
    25 to 30%
    Productive N: Urinary N – 1.33:1
    Most farms are 0.6 to 0.8:1
  • Summary:We have the opportunity to lower protein intakes to reduce the environmental impact of dairy farms and improved income over feed costsWe are getting better at balancing at the limits of protein requirements for lactating cowsAs we approach the absolute requirement, it provides us with the opportunity to estimate the opportunity cost of feed and nutrient managementAny effort to do this will require greater intensity of management and adherence to SOP’s