Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace

1,004

Published on

Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace:: Using a knowledge representation language to describe and reason about toxic workplace interpersonal relations in the knowledge intensive workplace.

Toxicity In The Knowledge Workplace:: Using a knowledge representation language to describe and reason about toxic workplace interpersonal relations in the knowledge intensive workplace.

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,004
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
17
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Using a knowledge representation language to describe and reason about toxic workplace interpersonal relations in the knowledge intensive workplace.
  • 2.
    •  
    • This research in systems sciences concerns using knowledge representation and reasoning languages to model and simulate knowledge in knowledge intensive workplaces. Knowledge intensive workplaces such as universities, high technology firms, law offices, or government workplaces are workplaces, where knowledge or know-how is applied to knowledge products to produce new knowledge.
    •  
    • In this brief paper the modeling of toxic interpersonal relationships in the workplace is attempted. There is no illusion to expertise in the psychology of interpersonal relationships or a clinical definition of toxic interpersonal relationships involved. We will review these more common ways of viewing toxic relationships as a way of constructing a small knowledge base problem. The knowledge base will be a workplace modeled in a knowledge representation language and the problem will be toxicity of the workplace in terms of interpersonal relations. The problem will be a conditional for certain actions in the reasoning process.
    •  
    • My research involves inferences or simulated thought. It will be assumed that toxic workplaces degrade thought and that inferences are no longer reliable. There will be stress in this workplace beyond normal. Simulations of solutions to the toxic workplace will be attempted and reported on.
    •  
    • This research may interests workers first and foremost, who face such relations, industrial psychologists or workplace counselors, and students of management.
    •  
    • Peter Timusk graduate student in systems sciences.
  • 3.
    • Drawing from the paper:
    • Emotions in Organisation: An Integral perspective by Wendelin Küpers and Jürgen Weibler from the International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion Vol. 2, No. 3, 2008.
  • 4.
    •  
    • Coordinate structure
    •  
    • Example Shelia’s emotions lead her to plan her work day
    •  
    • Regulate human perception and understanding of events,
    •  
    • Shelia thinks the picnic will be fun because her work has not been fun for the past few months.
    •  
    • Other people
    • Shelia likes her coworker because the coworker agrees the boss is toxic.
    •  
    • the world in general
    •  
    • Shelia feels happy with the weather today and her family and is proud to have paid the rent again on time. Because she is happy she is looking forward to the future. If she was not happy she would not look forward to the future.
  • 5.
    • inform us of social surrounding and
    • concomitant attitudes and expectations and
    • and possible actions.
    • Generally people at work are not happy yet they must work hard. The workplace seems quiet except for the bosses outbreaks and personal attacks. It is like walking on egg shells around the boss.
    • Shelia feels under valued because her work is hard and she is not getting positive feedback for this hard work. Only labour regulations are allowing breaks and this seems the only relief in the workday at this workplace.
    • Shelia is not sure what to expect with her latest research paper. Her supervisor has not even commented on it.
    • Shelia hopes her paper gets noticed by someone “out there” so she can gain some recognition and at least feel her work is of value. She keeps writing and revising.
  • 6.
    • Tactic Knowledge
    • -craft person
    • Explicit Knowledge
    • - work manual
    • - recorded on intranet
    • Operational Knowledge
    • - keeps the company working
    • - experienced workers have this
    • Know how
    • -experience workers know how to produce the products
    • Know who
    • - experienced workers know who to call
    • - a person knows the partner company and the company know the person
    • Stable
      • - allow good mental health
      • - allow predicable results
    • Uncertain
    • - causes anxiety
    • - does not allow predication
    • Affect Levels
    • - high levels like angry outbursts
    • - low levels such as steady work
    • Sustained or temporary stressors
    • - sustained stress perhaps more predictable
    • - stress that is temporary can be coped with
    Knowledge Emotions
  • 7.
    • From Overcome Toxic Management, by Heather Kimura, Nursing Management, 34,1, Jan. 2003.
  • 8.
    • Poisons healthy processes
    • Breaks down planning, organizing, problem solving, clarifying, motivating.
    • Causes despair, anger, depression,
    • Leading to poor work performance high absenteeism and increased turn over.
    Kimura quoting Kotter, J from The Harvard Business Review on Leadership (Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Business school, 1998) at 37-60.
  • 9.
    • These managers are pleasing to their own supervisors, damaging to employee morale, plan only for the bottom line, are allowed to do this because it looks good on paper.
  • 10.
    • Employees should be well developed and are an important part of the company not a cost to be minimized.
    • Managers should challenge their own assumptions.
    • Staff should be valued to reduce toxic behaviours.
  • 11.
    • How a knowledge base (KB) might look for a small unit with a toxic manager in a larger company.
  • 12.
    • A collection of logical statements that define a domain and entailments(inferences or reasoning).
    • Logical language or knowledge representation language is used to write this specification.
  • 13.
    • George the chief
    • Sally a senior clerk
    • Wendy a junior clerk
    • Sam a junior clerk
    • The rest of the company is “out there” outside of our research frame.
    • George gives feed back in some way and at some time.
    • Sally organizes work loads for Wendy and Sam.
    • Wendy and Sam process leave requests for the company.
  • 14.
    • George gives encouraging feedback
    • George empowers everyone else
    • George empowers one other employee named X.
    • George offers advice and support
    • George explodes
    • George is critical of employee X in front of other workers
    • George gives no feedback
    • George gives direct orders
    If George behaves with this list of behaviours the workplace is not toxic. If George behaves with this list of behaviours the workplace is toxic.
  • 15.
    • Wendy processes 10 leave requests a day if work is non toxic
    • Sam processes 10 leave requests a day if the work is non toxic
    • If the workplace is toxic a clerk doubts their abilities
    • If a clerk doubts their abilities they process only 5 leave requests a day.
  • 16.
    • We will look at some simple logic statements
  • 17.
    • Definite Knowledge
    • Indefinite Knowledge
    • p ⋀ q ⇒ r
    • If George gives no feedback(p) and Wendy doubts her abilities(q) then , Wendy only processes five leave requests a day(r).
    • p ⋀ q ⇒ r ⋁ s
    • If Wendy only processes five leave requests a day(p) and George is toxic(q) then either, ) George gives feedback(r) or, George gives no feedback(s) .
  • 18.
    • We could use logic statements to model the workplace to some extent.
    • Like surveys and other research models we would need expert input on toxic workplaces.
    • I am still learning these languages and the use of computer programs like Otter to prove theories and do automated reasoning.
    • I did not try these suggested models in a computer.
  • 19.  

×