Presentation Amsterdam Sako Musterd

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Presentation Amsterdam Sako Musterd - Presentation Transcript

    1. Accommodating creative knowledge Sako Musterd Urban Geography University of Amsterdam
    2. or: The (preferably) Overnight Making of the Creative City Source: Built Environment 2004, 30 (3)
    3. ACRE project objective
      • Objective:
      • learn more about the conditions that are important to the development of creative and knowledge intensive industries in various European urban regions
    4. Creative industries
      • Advertising, architecture, arts and antiques, crafts, design, designer fashion, video, film, music, photography, visual and performing arts, publishing, computer games, software and electronic publishing, radio and TV
    5. Knowledge intensive industries
      • Law (legal sector, accounting, bookkeeping, auditing, etc), financial sector, R&D, ICT, higher education
    6. ACRE project focus
      • What are the development paths of creative knowledge regions and how are these informed by the wider economic and societal contexts?
      • How important are hard (classic), soft and other conditions for the creative and knowledge intensive industries in European urban regions?
      • What are the settlement considerations of managers, highly skilled employees and transnational migrants in the creative knowledge sector when they decide to settle in an urban area?
    7. ACRE – Accommodating Creative knowledge – Competitiveness of European Metropolitan Regions
      • EU 6 th framework programme, Integrated Project
      • October 2006-2010
      • 4.5 Million Euro
      • 13 urban regions / partners
      Amsterdam Barcelona Birmingham Budapest Dublin Helsinki Leipzig Milan Munich Poznan Riga Sofia Toulouse
    8.  
    9. Development paths: wider economic and social contexts; main factors
      • Position due to the development of the European city system
      • The impact of the industrial revolution on the urban region
      • The question whether the urban region has a key political or economic decision-making function
      • The question whether urban regions are pushed forward by policies aimed at stimulating regional economies
    10. Hypothetical ranking of urban regions on deep structural positions Known as (inter)national political and economical decision making centres Internationally known historical-cultural centres Cities with good governance and financial & organisational resources Cities with high-tech or early service profile, never dominated by just one sector Active innovation and technology policy Welcoming and pluralistic
    11. Theory and Reality: Confronting theoretical positions based on deep structural positions with employment and GDP information per region 13 European metropolitan regions (data for 2000-2006)
    12. Employment in creative and knowledge intensive industries in 13 European metropolitan regions (data for 2000-2006) 0 - + 0 - - - - + + + + + Theoretical top (structural positions) Medium 19 6 Birmingham Low 11 7 Poznan Medium 16 6 Toulouse Low 16 9 Leipzig Low 19 8 Sofia Low 23 6 Riga Medium 17 14 Milan Low (< 25,000) 16 13 Budapest Medium 18 13 Helsinki High 21 8 Munich High 10 11 Dublin Medium (25-50,000) 10 12 Barcelona High (50,000+) 18 8 Amsterdam GDP per capita in the region in knowledge intensive industries (%) Employment in creative industries (%) City regions
    13. Discrepancy perhaps due current ‘hard’ or ‘classic’ conditions …
      • agglomeration economies (clustering)
      • connections (road, air, water, rail, telecommunications)
      • capital
      • labour (jobs available)
      • wider institutional setting (including taxes regimes, etc.)
    14. Estimated position on hard conditions
      • Milan, Munchen, Amsterdam
      • Helsinki, Barcelona, Dublin, Leipzig
      • Birmingham, Budapest, Riga, Toulouse
      • Poznan, Sofia
    15. … or current ‘soft conditions’ …
      • Attractiveness (urban atmosphere; housing availability and affordability)
      • Diversity
      • Welcoming
      • Historical assets
      • Tolerance
      • Openness
      • Safe
    16. Estimated position on ‘soft’ conditions
      • W.Europa: Amsterdam, Munich, Barcelona
      • E. Europa: Budapest, Leipzig, Riga
    17. … or ‘network’ conditions …
      • Born in the region
      • Family lives here
      • Studied in the city
      • Proximity to friends
    18. First empirical results based on our ACRE large-scale surveys among high-skilled employees, managers, and transnational migrants
    19. Percentage of highly skilled employees that ranked indicators as most important, classified as indicators for networks, hard, and soft factors ( red : > 1 st. dev. above the mean). (n) 100,0% 7,9% 12,5% 15,3% St.dev. (2580) 100,0% 13,9% 32,5% 53,6% Total (229) 100,0% 10,0% 40,2% 49,8% Dublin ( 191) 100,0% 8,4% 30,4% 61,3% Milan ( 192) 100,0% 10,9% 42,2% 46,9% Toulouse ( 198) 100,0% 31,8% 15,2% 53,0% Riga ( 193) 100,0% 16,6% 23,8% 59,6% Poznan (186) 100,0% 14,0% 57,0% 29,0% Munich (180) 100,0% 14,4% 47,8% 37,8% Leipzig (222) 100,0% 10,2% 38,2% 51,1% Helsinki (197) 100,0% 5,1% 24,4% 70,6% Budapest (171) 100,0% 5,8% 39,2% 55,0% Birmingham (200) 100,0% 11,0% 27,0% 62,0% Barcelona (221) 100,0% 26,2% 35,3% 38,5% Amsterdam City Total &quot;soft factors&quot; &quot;hard factors&quot; “ networks&quot; Ranked 1 under networks, hard factors and soft factors
    20. Some conclusions
      • Difference is key word
      • No systematic divide between E. and W. Europe
      • Networks are highly important
      • Hard and soft and networks
      • Not just deep structural conditions
      • Policies may matter
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + CreativeCitiesCreativeCities Nominate

    custom

    177 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 177
      • 177 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories