Ruby V Ms A Comparison

Ruby VMs Jason Seifer, RailsEnvy.com 1

“DeFacto” Standard 6

Production Ready? 7

YARV 9

Production Ready? 10

No. 11

MacRuby 12

No. 14

XRuby 15

No. 17

“The GemStone/S object server provides an advanced platform for developing, deploying and managing scalable, mission- critical applications. It provides the robust, scalable, secure and ﬂexible environment required for mission-critical applications, and supports the high-availability online environment demanded by 24X7 operations.” 19

No. 21

Rubinius 22

Rubinius VM • “Ruby in Ruby” • Used to be C and Ruby • New VM written in C++ • Better Organized • Better Tested • More Potential 23

LLVM “The Low Level Virtual Machine, generally known as LLVM, is a compiler infrastructure, written in C++, which is designed for compile-time, link-time, run- time, and quot;idle-timequot; optimization of programs written in arbitrary imperative programming languages.” Wikipedia 24

WTF does that mean? 25

No. 27

IronRuby 28

Iron Ruby •Ruby on .Net •Released under MPL •Committed to making IronRuby a ﬁrst-class Ruby implementation. •Major milestone: 1.0 29

IronRuby runs on the DLR 30

DLR Supported Languages • IronPython • Javascript • IronRuby • Dynamic VB 31

DLR runs on top of the CLR 33

No. 36

JRuby 37

JRuby Wins 38

Fatality 39

YES 41

JRuby Beneﬁts • Corporate backing. • Use existing Java code. • Existing Java infrastructure. • Most performant Ruby implementation. • Multi-threaded. 42

Right now, using JRuby is the only way to have true multi-threaded Ruby programs. 43

$ cd <application> $ glassfish 44

Use JRuby for your enterprise Ruby applications. 45

Thank you. 46

Ruby V Ms A Comparison

by ConSanFrancisco123 on May 12, 2009

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

1 Embed 1

Statistics

Ruby V Ms A Comparison Presentation Transcript