Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Alexco feb13presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Alexco feb13presentation

2,009
views

Published on


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,009
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. NYSE‐MKT:AXU February 1, 2013 TSX:AXRCanada sCanada’s Only Primary Silver Producer
  • 2. 1 Forward Looking StatementThis presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 andforward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws (together, “forward-looking statements”) concerningAlexcos business plans, including but not limited to anticipated results and developments in Alexco’s operations in future periods, plannedexploration and development of its mineral properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future, made as of thedate of this presentation Alexco does not intend and does not assume any obligation to update these forward looking statements except as presentation. intend, obligation, forward-looking statements,required by applicable law.Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future remediation and reclamation activities, futuremineral exploration, the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the realization of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates,future mine construction and development activities, future mine operation and production, the timing of activities, the amount of estimatedrevenues and expenses, the success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, requirements for additional capital and sources and uses offunds.fundsForward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual eventsor results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, risks related toactual results and timing of exploration and development activities; actual results and timing of mining activities; actual results and timing ofenvironmental services operations; actual results and timing of remediation and reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations;changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of silver, gold, lead, zinc and other commodities; possible variations inmineable resources grade or recovery rates; failure of plant equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents labour disputes and resources, plant, accidents,other risks of the mining industry; First Nation rights and title; continued capitalization and commercial viability; global economic conditions;competition; and delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development activities. Furthermore, forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of Alexco or other future events orconditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors,including but not limited to those referred to in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in the MD&A included in Alexco’s most recent interim and annualfinancial reports, its current AIF and U.S. Form 40-F, and various of its other continuous disclosure documents. a c a epo ts, ts cu e t a dUS o 0 , a d a ous o ts ot e co t uous d sc osu e docu e tsForward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable at the time they are made. In makingthe forward-looking statements included in this presentation, Alexco has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, theassumption that: (1) the proposed development of its mineral projects will be viable operationally and economically and proceed as planned;(2) market fundamentals will result in sustained silver, gold, lead and zinc demand and prices, and such prices will be materially consistent with ormore favourable than those anticipated in the Bellekeno Development Plan, (3) the actual nature, size and grade of its mineral resources arematerially consistent with the resource estimates reported in the supporting technical reports; and (4) any additional financing needed will beavailable on reasonable terms.
  • 3. 2 WHO is Alexco? NYSE‐MKT:AXU / TSX:AXR   60.4 Million Shares Issued & OutstandingEstablished in 2005Now Canada’s only primary silver producer: ‐ 2 2 million ounces silver production in 2012 2.2 million ounces silver production in 2012Sole owner of Keno Hill Silver DistrictDeveloping 2 new mines, near‐termIndicated silver resources of 51.3 million ounces*: ‐ A 52% increase in 2012 over 2011Inferred silver resources of a further 7.7 million ounces* plus historical silver resources of a further 5.4 million ounces*Environmental subsidiary *Please see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide for full mineral resource disclosure.
  • 4. 3 WHY Alexco?Safe jurisdiction – Yukon, Canada100% owner of       Keno Hill Silver DistrictHistorical Avg Grade:          40 ounces silver/tonGood infrastructure:                 On the power grid All‐weather roads All th dSupportive political climateExperienced managementE i d t
  • 5. Healthy Cash Position 4 No DebtCash at Sept 30, 2012: $26.7 millionNet Working Capital: $29.4 millionNo Long Term Financial Debt2011 Year Cash from Ops: $20.3 million2012 Q3 YTD Cash from Ops: $16.1 million
  • 6. 5 Financial Results Nine Nine Months  Months  Ended ded Ended ded Third d Seco d Second  Sept. 30 Sept. 30 Quarter QuarterIn $000s, except per share amounts 2012 2011 2012 2012Revenue 64,399 63,971 20,089 19,565Gross Profit 13,989 20,332 5,031 1,744Income Before Taxes 7,242 9,937 7,250 (2,986)Net Income 3,939 7,329 5,265 (2,666)Earnings Per Share – Basic and diluted $0.06 $0.12 $0.09 ($0.04)
  • 7. Keno Hill Silver District – 6 A Larger Vision 233 square km  property position Lucky Queen Elsa Tailings Flame & Moth Onek Keno 700 Keno 700 Onek District MillMcQuesten Bermingham Bellekeno Silver King Husky -Elsa
  • 8. 7 Bellekeno Mine Long Section AME BC ‘Excellence in Mine Development’ Award – 2011 3 years discovery to commercial production Delivered on time and on budget Delivered on time and on budget 1200m Silver Wheaton Agreement Historical  1100m 500L Workings79.6 opt Ag/ 0.4m* SW 780  750L 1000m Exploration  Drift 99 Zone SW Main  Ramp 900m SW Zone Mined areas and workings 0 100 200 2012/2013 planned production areas metres Identified resource 800m*See news release dated November 30, 2010 entitled “Alexco Discovers Extension of Bellekeno Deposit, Further Underground Drilling Planned”
  • 9. 8 Bellekeno Mine Long Section AME BC ‘Excellence in Mine Development’ Award – 2011 3 years discovery to commercial production Delivered on time and on budget Delivered on time and on budget 1200m Silver Wheaton Agreement Historical  1100m 500L Workings79.6 opt Ag/ 0.4m* SW 780  750L 1000m Exploration  Drift 99 Zone SW Main  Ramp 900m SW Zone Mined areas and workings 0 100 200 2012/2013 planned production areas metres Identified resource 800m*See news release dated November 30, 2010 entitled “Alexco Discovers Extension of Bellekeno Deposit, Further Underground Drilling Planned”
  • 10. 9 Bellekeno by the Numbers  224,100 tonnes @913 gpt Bellekeno Indicated Resource 224 100 tonnes @913 gpt – Bellekeno Indicated Resource 4 year LOM – Bellekeno mine, 250 tpd design* (currently recalculating resource)  (currently recalculating resource) 2012 silver production of 2.2 million ounces Cash costs ($/oz Ag):  2011 full‐year:  $10.17 2012 Q3 YTD:    $12.18 2012 Q3 YTD $12 18 2012 Q3:            $10.48*See technical report filed on SEDAR dated December 2, 2009 entitled "Bellekeno Project – Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report”
  • 11. 10 2012 Full Year Production Results Calendar Calendar Year Year 2012 2011Silver Grade Processed  (g (grams per tonne) p ) 760 834Ore Tonnes Processed  94,810 81,064Production: Contained Metal Silver (ounces) 2,150,959 2,020,644 Lead  (pounds) 18,183,755 16,454,334 Zinc   (pounds) 5,676,284 7,220,514
  • 12. 11 Focusing on the MillImproved  Replace &  Personnel: Controls Optimize ‐‐Training Cone  Crusher ‐‐Retention Coarse Ore Surface  Refurbish  Dry Stack  Lead  Zinc  Agitators Rougher  Rougher  Tailings Flotation Flotation Crushing  Tailings  Tailings  Grinding  Lead  Thickening Filtration Zinc Classification Cleaner  Cleaner  Cleaner Flotation Flotation Underground  BackfillAdd Cyclones Lead Con  Zinc Con  Increase  Thickening  Thi k i Thickening  Thi k i Filter Press  Filt P & Filtration & Filtration Capacity  by 30% Lead Con d Zinc Con Zi C *All water recycled
  • 13. Under Development: 12 Lucky Queen, Onek, Elsa Tailings 233 square km  property position Lucky Queen Elsa Tailings District Mill Keno 700McQuesten Flame & Moth Bermingham g Onek
  • 14. 13 Lucky Queen Development ProjectCurrent Resource Lucky Queen   Tonnes Ag Au Pb Zn Ag ozs. Historical  (gpt) (gpt) (%) (%) (000) WorkingsgIndicated 124,000 1,227 0.2 2.6 1.7 4,891Inferred 150,000 571 0.2 1.4 0.9 2,753 (see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) Proposed  Development Historical Production: 10.96 Moz Ag 10 96 Moz Ag 123,530 tons @ 88.7opt Ag Lucky Queen    500 Level  Rehabilitation  Workings Essentially Completed 0 200 400 metres
  • 15. 14 Onek Development Project 15.4opt Ag, 7.0% Pb, 8.8opt Ag, 2.3% Pb, 13.8% Zn over 2.77m * 20.8% Zn over 3.5m* Near-Term N T Development>1000Grams/t Ag 24.3opt Ag, 6.7% Pb, 21.8% Zn over 7.30m * 44.3opt Ag, 17.9% Pb, 3.2% Zn over 10.4m * 200 Exploration Target Mineralization Current Resource Trend Tonnes Ag Au Pb Zn Ag ozs. (gpt) (gpt) (%) (%) (000) 0 50 100 metres Indicated 585,000 194 0.7 1.2 13.7 3,648 *See news releases dated October 6, 2010 entitled “Alexco Intersects 10.4 Meters Inferred 236,000 203 0.4 1.1 11.5 1,540 of 44.3 Ounces Per Ton Silver, Expands Onek Zinc‐Silver Deposit at Keno Hill” and dated November 1, 2010 entitled “Alexco Receives Balance of Assays from Onek(see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) Zinc–Silver Deposit; Indium Association Confirmed”
  • 16. 15 Historical Elsa Tailings Alexco Sonic Drill Program Extents Tailings N t D ill d T ili Not Drilled By Alexco ProgramInitial Resource Estimate:Initial Resource Estimate:*2.49 million tonnes grading 119 g/t Ag 9,526,000 ounces silver*Area drilled = 77 ha.  Impoundment area  = 100 ha 0 200 400(see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) metres
  • 17. Development and Exploration 16 Project Pipeline ‐ 2012 Production Construct and Operate Bellekeno Development  Detail Economics Detail Economics Onek Tails Lucky Queen Silver Flame & King Bermingham Moth -Advanced Exploration - Extensions Extensions Grow Resources Elsa Husky Ruby Christal Lake Corridor – HC Onek SW McQ K700Exploration Priority Discovery Matrix Discovery Matrix CW 17V GK SLD Leo NC BC TS SH
  • 18. Development and Exploration 17 Project Pipeline ‐ 2012 Production Construct and Operate Bellekeno Development  Detail Economics Detail Economics Onek Tails Lucky Queen Silver Flame & King Bermingham Moth -Advanced Exploration - Extensions Extensions Grow Resources Elsa Husky Ruby Christal Lake Corridor – HC Onek SW McQ K700Exploration Priority Discovery Matrix Discovery Matrix CW 17V GK SLD Leo NC BC TS SH
  • 19. Development and Exploration 18 Project Pipeline ‐ 2013 Production Construct and Operate Bellekeno Lucky Onek Queen Development  Flame & Detail Economics Detail Economics Bermingham - Moth - Tails Extensions Extensions Christal Lake Silver Corridor – Husky H k King Onek SWAdvanced Exploration Grow Resources Elsa Ruby HC McQ K700Exploration Priority Discovery Matrix Discovery Matrix CW 17V GK SLD Leo NC BC TS SH
  • 20. Adding More Resource: 19 Flame & Moth, Bermingham 233 square km  property position Flame & Moth Keno 700 Onek District MillMcQuesten Bermingham
  • 21. 20 2012 Flame & Moth Update2013 Updated Resource Estimate1: Indicated = 22,859,000 Inferred = 1,081,000 Mill bedrock surface(1 see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) probable  Christal Zone offsetting fault Vein V i Lightning Zone Hangingwall Vein 2010/2011 Intercepts 2011/2012  2nd Vein  500m 2012 Completed Holes H1 2012 Completed Holes H1 2012 Completed Holes H2 Longitudinal Section of Flame Vein viewed to NW   Indicated Resource Area per 2 See technical report filed on SEDAR dated August 8, 2012 entitled “Technical Report 2012 initial resource estimate2 on the Flame & Moth Deposit, Flame & Moth Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”
  • 22. 21 2012 Flame & Moth Update2013 Updated Resource Estimate1: Indicated = 22,859,000 Inferred = 1,081,000 Mill bedrock surface(1 see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) Christal Zone probable  offsetting fault Vein V i Hangingwall Vein Inferred Category 2010/2011 InterceptsLightning Zone 2011/2012  2nd Vein  800m 2012 Completed Holes H1 2012 Completed Holes H1 2012 Completed Holes H2 Longitudinal Section of Flame Vein viewed to NW   Indicated Resource Area per 2 See technical report filed on SEDAR dated August 8, 2012 entitled “Technical Report 2012 initial resource estimate2 on the Flame & Moth Deposit, Flame & Moth Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”
  • 23. 22 Bermingham Longitudinal Section of Bermingham veins viewed to NW  2012 Initial Resource Estimate: Indicated = 3,800,000 Inferred = 1,220,000 Historic Open Pit area(see appended Summary of(see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) Bermingham Vein Etta Zone 2009‐2011 intercepts Arctic Zone 2012 completed holes H1 2012 completed holes H2 Indicated Resource area 3,800,000 Oz Ag Footwall Vein 500m
  • 24. Exploration Success!               23 Resource Growth Keno Hill Silver District 60 50 SILVER  SILVER 40RESOURCES in HistoricalMillions of 30Millions of  Indicated Ounces Inferred 20 10 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  • 25. 24 Alexco Environmental GroupEnvironmental remediation business with mining focusMine water treatmentMine water treatmentStrong track record for timely project permittingMajor industry and government clientsEnables timely redevelopment of mining in historical districts
  • 26. Keno Hill Silver District – 25 A “Win‐Win” Partnership  Alexco – A unique business model         combining mine operations/                  development and environmental           remediation expertiseremediation expertise A “Win‐Win” partnership between Alexco/Canada/Yukon/First Nations             through a cooperative District                         through a cooperative DistrictClosure Plan Alexco has contributed $22M to   date to remediate historic                   date to remediate historicenvironmental liabilities Alexco has reduced zinc release to            the environment from the historic Galkeno 300 i tf th hi t i G lk 300 mine by 99.5% and reduced the concentration of zinc in Christal Creek by 75% Taxpayer liability reduced
  • 27. 26 Contributing to the Community $53 million contribution to the region via Donations and Business with Yukon‐based vendors and suppliers  200+ direct jobs  ‐‐ over $22M per year in payroll 50% Yukon employment Comprehensive Cooperation  Comprehensive CooperationBenefits Agreement ‐ FNNND
  • 28. The Next 12 Months: 27 Events To Watch For 233 square km  Lucky Queen into production property position Onek into production k d Update Flame & Moth resource estimate Update Bermingham resource estimate Bellekeno resource recalculation District Mill Onek Elsa Tailings Engineering/Development PEA McQuesten BerminghamNext  Year, a Different CompanyNext Year, a Different Company ‐‐ 3 Operating Mines ‐‐ Expanded Throughput ‐‐ Rapidly Growing Silver Resource Rapidly Growing Silver Resource 27
  • 29. 28Alexco Resource Corp.APPENDIX SLIDES
  • 30. 29 Alexco – A History of Success2005 Company Founded2006  Listed with TSX; symbol AXR2006  Acquired Keno Hill Silver District, initiated exploration2007  Listed with NYSE‐MKT; symbol AXU                                      “Discovery” of Bellekeno deposit2008 Silver Wheaton Agreement ‐ $50 million and $3.90/oz for 25%  g of future silver mined ff l d2009  Bellekeno Construction Begins2010 Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement with First Nation Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement with First Nation 2011 Bellekeno Mine Production – Three years discovery to  production2012  52% Increase in Indicated Silver Resources
  • 31. Summary of Silver Resources:  30 Keno Hill Silver DistrictCategory1,2,10 Property Tonnes Ag (g/t) Au (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%) Contained Ag (oz) 3Indicated Bellekeno 224,100 913 0.5 7.3% 7.1% 6,577,000 Lucky Queen4 124,000 1,227 0.2 2.6% 1.7% 4,891,000 Onek5 585,000 194 0.7 1.2% 13.7% 3,648,000 Flame & Moth6 1,378,000 516 0.4 1.7% 5.7% 22,859,000 Bermingham7 257,000 460 0.1 2.0% 2.1% 3,800,000 Total Indicated – Sub-Surface Deposits 2,568,100 506 0.4 2.2% 7.1% 41,775,000 Elsa Tailings8 2,490,000 2 490 000 119 0.1 01 1.0% 1 0% 0.7% 0 7% 9,526,000 9 526 000 Total Indicated – All Deposits 5,058,100 316 0.3 1.6% 3.9% 51,301,000Inferred Bellekeno3 111,100 320 0.3 3.1% 17.9% 1,143,000 Lucky Queen4 150,000 571 0.2 1.4% 0.9% 2,753,000 Onek5 236,000 203 0.4 1.1% 11.5% 1,540,000 Flame & Moth6 107,000 313 0.3 0.9% 4.2% 1,081,000 Bermingham7 102,000 372 0.1 1.1% 1.8% 1,220,000 Total Inferred 706,100 341 0.3 1.4% 7.8% 7,737,000Historical Silver King9 Resources - Proven, probable and indicated 98,998 1,354 n/a 1.6% 0.1% 4,310,000 - Inferred 22,581 1,456 n/a 0.1% n/a 1,057,000Notes:1. All mineral resources are classified following the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (December 2005), in accordance with the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines and the guidelines of NI 43-101.2.2 Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates viability. estimates.3. The resource estimates for Bellekeno are based on the geologic resource estimate made effective November 9, 2009, supported by the technical report dated December 2, 2009 entitled “Bellekeno Project – Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report”. The Bellekeno indicated resources are as at December 31, 2012, and reflect the geologic resource less estimated subsequent depletion from mine production.4. The resource estimates for Lucky Queen have an effective date of July 27, 2011, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated July 27, 2011 entitled “Alexco Announces Initial Resource Estimates for Lucky Queen and Onek” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR dated September 8, 2011 entitled “Technical Report on the Lucky Queen Deposit, Lucky Queen Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”.5. The resource estimates for Onek have an effective date of July 27, 2011, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated July 27, 2011 entitled “Alexco Announces Initial Resource Estimates for Lucky Queen and Onek” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR dated September 8, 2011 entitled “Technical Report on the Onek Deposit, Onek Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”. Yukon .6. The resource estimates for Flame & Moth have an effective date of January 30, 2013, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated January 31, 2013 entitled “Alexco Expands Flame & Moth Indicated Resource to 22.9 Million Ounces of Silver; Resource Grade Increased, Deposit Remains Open”.7. The resource estimates for Bermingham have an effective date of June 27, 2012, and are supported by disclosure in the news release dated June 28, 2012 entitled “Alexco Announces Initial Resource Estimates for Flame & Moth and Bermingham” and by a technical report filed on SEDAR and signature dated August 8, 2012 entitled “Technical Report on the Bermingham Deposit, Bermingham Property, Keno Hill District, Yukon”.8. The resource estimate for the Elsa Tailings has an effective date of April 22, 2010, and is supported by the technical report dated June 16, 2010 entitled “Mineral Resource Estimation, Elsa Tailings Project, Yukon, Canada”.9. Historical resources for Silver King were estimated by United Keno Hill Mines Limited, as documented in an internal report entitled “Mineral Resources and Mineable Ore Reserves” dated March 9, 1997. The historical resources were estimated based on a combination of surface and underground drill holes and chip samples taken on the vein and calculated using the polygonal (block) method and the 1997 CIM definitions for resource categories. These estimated historical resources include a total of 55,674 tonnes classified as proven and probable reserves and 43,324 tonnes classified as indicated resources, plus an additional 22,581 tonnes classified as inferred resources. Though believed by Alexco management to be relevant and reliable, this estimate of historical resources has not been verified by Alexco, pre-dates NI 43-101 and is not compliant with NI 43-101 resource categories. Verification of the estimate would require new drill holes into a statistically significant number of the historical resource blocks and/or a combination of on-vein sampling. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify this estimate of historical resources as current, nor is Alexco treating this historical estimate as a current mineral resource.10. The disclosure regarding the summary of estimated resources for Alexco’s mineral properties within the Keno Hill District has been reviewed and approved by Scott Smith, P.Eng., Bellekeno Mine Manager with Alexco and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.
  • 32. 2013 Updated Flame & Moth 31 Resource Estimate Deposit Class1,2,3 Tonnes Ag Au Pb Zn Ag (g ) (g/t) (g ) (g/t) ( ) (%) ( ) (%) (Troy ( y ounces) ) Flame & Indicated 1,378,000 516 0.42 1.72 5.70 22,859,000 Moth4 Inferred 107,000 313 0.27 0.86 4.21 1,081,000 Notes: 1. The effective date of these mineral resource estimates is January 30, 2013. See news release dated January 31, 2013 entitled “Alexco Expands Flame & Moth Indicated R titl d “Al E d Fl M th I di t d Resource t 22 9 Milli O to 22.9 Million Ounces of Sil f Silver; R Resource Grade Increased, Deposit Remains Open”. 2. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. 3. Reported at a contained metal value cut-off grade of CAD $185.00/t (0.96 USD = 1 CAD) using consensus long term metal prices and recoveries developed for the nearby Bellekeno deposit (Ag US$24.00/oz, recovery 96%; Pb US$0 85/lb recovery 97%; Zn US$0 95/lb recovery 88%; Au US$1 400/oz recovery 72%) US$0.85/lb, US$0.95/lb, US$1,400/oz, 72%). 4. Ag grades capped at 3,000 g/t; Pb capped at 15%; Zn capped at 20%; Au grades not capped.(see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide)
  • 33. 32 2012Q3 YTD Financial Results First Nine  Calendar Months Year In $000s, except per share amounts 2012 2011 Revenue 64,399 64 399 84,231 84 231 Gross Profit 13,989 24,059 Income Before Taxes Income Before Taxes 7,242 7 242 10,590 10 590 Net Income 3,939 5,979 Earnings Per Share  Earnings Per Share – Basic and diluted $0.06 $0.11Full year financial results to be released after close of market trading on Wednesday, March 27, 2013Full year financial results to be released after close of market trading on Wednesday March 27 2013followed by an audio webcast conference call at 11 a.m. Eastern (8 a.m. Pacific) on Thursday, March 28, 2013
  • 34. 33 Fiscal Results Six Month Twelve  First Fiscal Year Months  Nine Calendar  Ended  ded Ended  ded Months Year December 31 June 30In $000s, except per share amounts 2012 2011 2011 2011Revenue 64,399 84,231 42,515 45,102Gross Profit 13,989 24,059 10,148 14,853Income Before Taxes 7,242 10,590 4,496 3,309Net Income 3,939 5,979 1,723 3,097Earnings Per Share – Basic and diluted $0.06 $0.11 $0.03 $0.05
  • 35. 34 Strong Investor SupportTrading Symbol: NYSE‐MKT:AXU      TSX:AXRIssued & Outstanding: 60.4 million shares Fully diluted: 65.7 million sharesInstitutional andInsider Ownership:Insider Ownership: Approximately 45% Approximately 45%Major Shareholders:    Alexco Directors & Officers Sprott Inc. Van Eck Associates Columbia Wanger Asset Mgt. Share Price Targets: Canaccord  C$7.00/share Cormark  C$5.25/share Stonecap C$5.55/share Global Hunter  US$5.00/share Beacon Rock   US$8.75/share
  • 36. 35 Operating Structure ALEXCO RESOURCE CORP. NYSE‐MKT: AXU                              TSX:AXR ALEXCO ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP ALEXCO KENO HILL MINING CORP.Environmental Consulting, Remediation g, Mine Operations, Development, Exploration p , p , p Access Consulting Group (Canada) Bellekeno Mine Operations Environmental Services, Consulting  Elsa Reclamation & Development  Keno District Exploration Co. Ltd. (Canada) District Wide Closure Planning,  Execution New Mine Development Alexco Resource (US) Corp. Remediation, Technology
  • 37. Bellekeno Operations FlowsheetUnderground Ore Stope Drill/Blast Ore Load Ore Ore HaulageFlotation Classification Grinding Crushing Thickening/Filtration Concentrate Storage Concentrate Shipment  (Ag, Pb, Zn) Dry Stack Tailings  Storage
  • 38. 37 Silver King: Development Planning Historical Resource: gp g121,579 tonnes @ 1,373 gpt Ag  and 1.3% Pb (see appended Summary of Silver Resources slide) Historical Mined-out Stopes 5 Vein Historical Resource Blocks Exploration Target 0 50 100 metres
  • 39. 2012 Surface Exploration Targets  38 25,000 m Surface Drilling Sadie Ladue Ruby Elsa Keno 700 Husky Onek Silver KingMcQuesten Christal Lake  Bermingham Corridor Flame & Moth Flame & Moth
  • 40. 39 ManagementSENIOR MANAGEMENTClynton R. Nauman, B.Sc. (Hons.)  ‐ President & CEO  Brad A. Thrall, B.Sc., MBA  ‐ Executive Vice President & COO David E. Whittle, C.A. ‐ Senior Vice President & CFO Al McOnie, M.Sc. (Geology), FAusIMM ‐ Vice President, ExplorationTim Hall, B.Sc. ‐ Vice President – General Manager, Keno Hill DistrictRob McIntyre, RET, CCEP ‐ Vice President , Corporate Affairs & CommunicationsJim Harrington, M.Sc. ‐ President, Alexco Environmental GroupBOARD OF DIRECTORSGeorge Brack,  ChairmanMichael WinnDavid H. Searle, C.M., Q.C.Terry Krepiakevich, C.A.Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, M.Sc.Rick ZimmerClynton R. Nauman, B.Sc. (Hons.)
  • 41. Qualified Persons & Cautionary Note 40 Concerning Reserve & Resources EstimateExcept where specifically indicated otherwise, the disclosure in this presentation of scientific and technical information regarding exploration projects on Alexco’smineral properties has been reviewed and approved by Alan McOnie, FAusIMM, Vice President, Exploration, while that regarding mine development andoperations has been approved by Scott Smith, P.Eng., Bellekeno Mine Manager, both of whom are Qualified Persons as defined by National Investment 43-101 -Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). All material technical information included herein has previously been disclosed by Alexco, and theviewer Is particularly directed to the company’s most recently filed AIF and U.S. Form 40-F and its most recently filed interim and annual financial reports; as wellas the remaining filings completing Alexco’s continuous disclosure records.This presentation has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S.securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification System. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators whichestablishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. NI 43-101 permits thedisclosure of an historical estimate made prior to the adoption of NI 43-101 that does not otherwise comply with NI 43-101, using the historical terminology, if thedisclosure: (a) identifies the source and date of the historical estimate; (b) comments on the relevance and reliability of the historical estimate; (c) to the extentknown, provides the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to prepare the historical estimate; (d) states whether the historical estimate uses categoriesother than those prescribed by NI 43-101 and if so includes an explanation of the differences; (e) includes any more recent estimates or data available to theissuer; (f) comments on what work needs to be done to upgrade or verify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves; and (g) stateswith equal prominence that a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves andthat the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the United States Securities andExchange Commission (“SEC”) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and resource and reserve information contained herein may not becomparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does notequate to the term “reserves”. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that themineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SECs disclosure standards underIndustry Guide 7 do not define the terms and normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineralresources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S.standards in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. Investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as totheir existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever feasibility. inferred resourcebe upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studiesexcept in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable.Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to reportmineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements ofNI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC’s Industry Guide 7, and reserves reported by the Corporation in compliancewith NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under Industry Guide 7 standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not becomparable with i f bl ith information made public b companies th t report i accordance with U S standards. ti d bli by i that t in d ith U.S. t d d
  • 42. 41 Alexco Contact InformationInvestor Relations:Clynton R. Nauman, President and CEO y ,David Whittle, CFOPhone: (604) 633‐4888Email: info@alexcoresource com info@alexcoresource.comWebsite:www.alexcoresource.comwww alexcoresource comVancouver Office:1150 ‐ 200 Granville StreetVancouver, BC  V6C 1S4 P. 604‐633‐4888F. 604‐633‐4887