Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill
#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill
#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill
#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill
#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

#Digital Caribbean: Electronic Crime Bill

216

Published on

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
216
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Electronic Crime Bill According to the Electronic Crimes Act 2013, those found guilty of “sending offensive messages through [electronic] communication services, etc.” face up to one year in prison and a fine of up to EC$100,000 (US$37,000/€28,000).
  • 2. Electronic Crime Bill In addition to the undefined “offensive” language, the law also covers information known to be false that is intended to cause, among others, “annoyance, inconvenience, insult, or ill-will.” 
  • 3. Electronic Crime Bill  The law appears intended to address defamation not only via social media, but also via user-generated content on news Web sites, usually in “comment sections.”  These sections, which can be important avenues for average citizens to express opinions, have become controversial in the Caribbean and elsewhere as a forum for the proliferation of potentially libelous of even insightful material.
  • 4. Int. Press Institute Responds  IPI executive director Alison Bethel McKenzie said “IPI absolutely appreciates that the advent of social media and the proliferation of user- generated comment have presented challenges for protecting the right to reputation.  But we are disappointed that the Grenadian government has chosen to enact a new criminal law as a response, especially since just last year the government agreed with IPI that civil litigation, not criminal action, is appropriate for handling libel and defamation cases.”  
  • 5. Int. Press Institute Responds She added: “Any additional law aimed at regulating this type of content is not only superfluous but also threatens to limit press freedom beyond what is necessary in a democratic society.”

×