• Save
The perspective of a Cochrane Review Group Editor
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The perspective of a Cochrane Review Group Editor

on

  • 1,030 views

Bernd Richter speaking at the Symposium on the 10th Anniversary of the German Cochrane Centre

Bernd Richter speaking at the Symposium on the 10th Anniversary of the German Cochrane Centre

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,030
Views on SlideShare
1,013
Embed Views
17

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 17

http://www.cochrane.org 12
http://www2.cochrane.org 5

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

The perspective of a Cochrane Review Group Editor The perspective of a Cochrane Review Group Editor Presentation Transcript

  • Bernd Richter [email_address] Symposium anlässlich des 10-jährigen Bestehens des Deutschen Cochrane Zentrums “ The perspective of a Cochrane Review Group Editor”
  •  
  • www.cochrane.org
  • Cochrane Collaboration: structure
    • Co-ordinating Editor
    • Review Group Coordinator (RGC)
    • Assistant RGC
    • Trial Search Coordinator
    • Research Associates
    • Feedback Editor
    • Editorial Board
    • External Peer Referees (content, methods, consumer …)
    Infrastructure of a Cochrane Review Group
  • Cochrane Review Groups
  • Cochrane title
  •  
  • Cochrane protocol/review/update
    • New horizons
    Old and new challenges
  • Review Manager 5
    • New horizons
    • New software
    Old and new challenges
  • Review Manager 5
  • Review Manager 5
  • GRADEprofiler
    • New horizons
    • New software
    • Editorial issues
    Old and new challenges
  • Cochrane information management system (IMS)
  • Time tracking / Editorial management systems
  • Time tracking / Editorial management systems
  •  
    • New horizons
    • New software
    • Editorial issues
    • Quality assurance
    Old and new challenges
  • Review Manager 5: room for improvement
  • Review Manager 5: room for improvement
  • Quality assurance issues
    • Patient-oriented/reported outcomes (PRO)
    • Good structured reviews with mandatory features: - report on PRO in plain language summary & abstract - standard data in abstract & plain language summary - standard ‘characteristics of included studies’ table - standard ‘risk of bias’ table - study population data
    • Provide data extraction forms (appendices) - standard: baseline characteristics, adverse events …
    • Check of search strategies
    • The Editorial Board Initiative
    • Implement decisions to improve quality of reviews
    • Long-term strategic vision for developing the CLIB
    • Support for authors, editors and bases
    • Improve and increase communication
    • New horizons
    • New software
    • Editorial issues
    • Quality assurance
    • Updates of Cochrane reviews
    Old and new challenges
  • Updates of Cochrane reviews
    • Support by CRGs (Trial Search Coordinators)
    • Improvement of Review Manger 5 software …
    • Focus on patient-oriented outcomes
    • Focus on longer-term studies
    • Focus on key study data
    • Special CRG funding
  •  
  • Summary
    • 10 years German Cochrane Centre : ‘achievements & shortfalls’ ( collective liability ) and beyond …
    • Initiation of the Cochrane movement
    • Networking with EbM activities
    • Constant support for contributors
    • Steady workshop activities
    • Still not enough German authors
    • Infrastructural funding of Cochrane activities in Germany
    • Academic anchorage?
    • Low in staff and haunted by work intensification: How about quality?
    • Are our reviews really patient-oriented?
  •