Data-Driven Architectures

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    I would like to spend the next thirty minutes describing Data-Driven tool architecture and demonstrating how it has enabled Axcelis and Cimetrix to implement high speed data collection on the Axcelis Integra RS photo resist strip cluster tool. I will give examples of process control, fault detection and classification (FDC), predictive preventative maintenance (PPM) and component and system health.

    1 Favorite

    Data-Driven Architectures - Presentation Transcript

    1. Data-Driven Tool Architectures The Gateway to Quality Equipment Data Authors: Glen Gilchrist , Senior Systems Engineer, Axcelis Technologies Larry Bourget , Director Product Management, Axcelis Technologies Kourosh Vahdani , Vice President Global Services, Cimetrix, Inc.
    2. The Challenge
      • A higher quality and quantity of data is necessary to achieve optimized equipment and process control performance, resulting in higher wafer yield and equipment reliability.
      • Current tool architectures do not allow for high frequency data collection from lowest levels of the tool.
    3. What is Tool Control? Supervisory Control User Interface Server User Management Job Management Standard / Custom UIs Data Visualization Data Analysis Scheduler Configuration Management Alarm Management Recipe Management Status Message Logging Factory Automation Equipment Control EFEM Loadports Loadlocks Transfer Module Process Module Sub-systems Device Logic Modules I/O Services I/O Level Simulation Implemented Standards E5 – SECS E30 – GEM E37 – HSMS E39 – OSS E40 - PJM E94 - CJM E87 - CMS E90 – STS E95 – UI E116 - EPT E84 – AMHS PIO E99 – Carrier ID E120 – CEM E125 – EqSD E132 – CA&A E134 – DCM Integra RS™
    4. What is Data Distribution?
      • Process Performance
      • Process Parameters
      • Equipment Parameters
    5. Old Way…..
    6. Data-Driven Architecture
    7. Data-Driven Architecture Enables Advanced Features
      • High-speed, high quality diagnostic and processing data are fed to factory interfaces, an on-tool database, and the GUI to optimize productivity.
      • This data speed and quality is required for:
        • Equipment Data Acquisition (EDA)/ Interface A
        • Advanced Process Control (APC)
        • Fault Detection & Classification (FDC)
        • Run-to-Run Control (R2R)
        • Predictive & Preventative Maintenance (PPM)
        • Enhanced Equipment Quality Assurance (EEQA)
        • Enhanced Equipment Quality Management (EEQM)
    8. Integra Using CIMControlFramework™
      • Data-Driven architecture provides high-speed access to higher quality and quantity data
      • Simple interfaces ensure extensibility for future enhancements
      • Uses the latest Microsoft™ .NET technology
      • Uses WCF and SOA for scalability and distribution
      • Use Cases…
    9. Analysis of Integra Development Data for PPM
      • High quality data can be analyzed from a local database using a commercial package
      • Data can be published at a high throughput via Interface A
      • Data is also available via traditional
      • SECS interface
    10. Data Analysis Capabilities
      • Process Control
      • FDC / PPM and Plasma Characteristics
      • Vacuum System Characteristics (“health”)
      • MW Power and Source
      • Gas Box and Manifold
      • Chamber, Chuck and Pin Lifter
      • Transfer Module and Load Locks
      • Wafer Handling and Robots
      Use Cases
        • EP signal charting and statistics
        • Plasma ignition time, plasma ignition retry counter
        • Preheat pressure control
    11. Process Control: EP Signal Charting
      • Initial process control provided through EP signal matching
      • Drill down to investigate out of specification cases
      Time 3 Minutes 25 Wafers 6 Hours 2000 Wafers 10 Seconds Single Process
      • Overlay signals or tool operating parameters
      Process Control: EP Signal Charting Times Signal Intensity Parameter Value
      • Track Vital Statistics
        • provide warning at low (or high) end of specification
        • provide alarm for out of specification condition
      Process Control: EP Signal Statistics Signal Area Signal Height terminal failure caused process module to error out and shut down Wafer Number
      • Time from power supply command to plasma detected
      • Delays and multiple retries indicate defective system
      FDC / PPM: Plasma Ignition Time and Retry Counter Times MW Power and Plasma Signal Daily Statistics Table Daily Box Plot Ignition Time Single Wafer Ignition out of control ignition times
      • Use daily statistics to create time series plot
      • Investigate out of specification and adverse trends
      FDC / PPM: Plasma Ignition Time
    12. Preheat Pressure Control
      • Setting requires interaction between vacuum and gas supply systems
      Time Series: showing 2 processes in 2 chambers Leaky vacuum valve identified Daily Statistics Table Pressure, Torr Box Plot: showing distribution and outliers
    13. Preheat Pressure Control
      • Setting requires interaction between vacuum and gas supply systems
      PM1CH1 recipe 1-5 PM1CH2 recipe 1-5 PM2CH1 recipe 1-5 PM2CH2 recipe 1-5 Pressure, Torr Bar Chart: showing chamber and recipe PM1CH1 PM1CH2 PM2CH1 PM2CH2 Box Plot: showing variation of preheat pressure around set point experimental flow control component
      • Leak isolation valve and change in flow control affect preheat pressure
      Preheat Pressure Control
    14. Conclusions
      • With Integra’s Data-Driven architecture, based on CIMControlFramework, the capability to meet the stringent tool performance and reliability requirements of the future is available today.
      • As presented in the Use Cases, Process Control, FDC/PPM and Equipment “health” monitoring is possible due to the availability of quality data.
    15. Acknowledgement
      • This work was part of a successful joint development project between Axcelis Technologies and Cimetrix.
      • Significant contributions were made by both teams, led by Dan Mattrazzo (Axcelis, Project Manager) and Bill Grey (Cimetrix , Director of R&D).
    16. Questions?

    + DeAnn RowanDeAnn Rowan, 2 years ago

    custom

    554 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Slides of presentation given by Axcelis Technologie more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 554
      • 536 on SlideShare
      • 18 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 30
    Most viewed embeds
    • 18 views on http://info.cimetrix.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 18 views on http://info.cimetrix.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories