EU Competition Law: Does media pluralism fit?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

EU Competition Law: Does media pluralism fit?

on

  • 1,101 views

Konstantina Bania

Konstantina Bania
http://cmpf.eui.eu/events/policy-conference.aspx
PhD Candidate, EUI
Research Assistant, CMPF-EUDO, RSC, EUI

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,101
Views on SlideShare
1,049
Embed Views
52

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
20
Comments
0

1 Embed 52

http://cmpf.eui.eu 52

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

EU Competition Law: Does media pluralism fit? Presentation Transcript

  • 1. EU Competition Law: Does media pluralism fit? Konstantina Bania PhD Candidate, EUIResearch Assistant, CMPF-EUDO, RSC, EUI Konstantina.Bania@eui.eu
  • 2. EU Competition Law: Does media pluralism fit?• Outline:1. How does the European Commission perceive the relationship between EU competition law and media pluralism?2. How should the European Commission perceive the relationship between EU competition law and media pluralism?3. Conclusions
  • 3. 1. How does the European Commission perceive the relationship between EU Competition Law and media pluralism?
  • 4. 1. Media pluralism is a spontaneous result delivered bythe undistorted functioning of the markets (1) – See, for instance, EC Issue Paper for the Liverpool Audiovisual Conference, p. 2 (2005); EC SWD on media pluralism in the MS of the EU, SEC(2007) 32, p. 7: “The application of European competition law plays an important role not only in respect of the preventing the creation or the abuse of dominant positions, but also with regard to ensuring market access for new entrants. […] Thus, in applying antitrust and merger control principles competition policy can make an important contribution to maintaining and to developing media pluralism, both in traditional television markets and in new upcoming markets”
  • 5. 1. Media pluralism is a spontaneous result delivered bythe undistorted functioning of the markets (2) – E.g. Bertelsmann/Planeta/Circulo, Case COMP/M.5838 [2010] OJ C 228, para. 122: “Círculo has a small presence in the various markets analyzed. The notified operation will not have any significant impact on the diversity of books made available to consumers and is therefore unlikely to threaten consumer choice and cultural diversity” – E.g. Bertelsmann/KKR, Case COMP/M.5533 [2009] OJ C 240/01, para. 79: “[I]t can be concluded from the competitive assessment that the transaction is unlikely to have a negative impact on cultural diversity”
  • 6. 2. Media pluralism is not the Commission’s problemto solve• E.g. Newscorp/BSkyB Case COMP/5932 [2011] OJ C 37/02 , paras. 307 and 309: “The purpose and legal frameworks for competition assessments and media plurality assessments are very different. The focus in merger control is whether there is […] the ability of the merged entity to profitably increase prices on defined antitrust markets post-merger […] The present decision is based solely on competition-related grounds under the Merger Regulation”
  • 7. Why does the Commission go down that path?1. Impact of U.S. antitrust policy on EU competition decision-making (how decisive are non-economic considerations?)2. Media pluralism a fuzzy concept and a highly controversial issue: See, for instance, OECD PRR on media mergers (2003), p. 103. Article 21(4) EC MR: MS are better placed to deal with pluralism concerns
  • 8. What does the Commission do?Supply diversity = Competitive media markets = Media pluralism? (1)• The objective? Market access• How? Access to premium content and infrastructure
  • 9. Supply diversity: a proxy for content diversity (?) (2) Impact of an operation on content diversity?• E.g. Bertelsmann/Kirch/Premiere, para. 122: ‘[s]ince the parties will wall off and control the market, other potential providers of digital pay-TV and multimedia services will be unable to develop freely and without restriction’• E.g. Newscorp/Telepiù, para. 37: if the merged undertakings restrict access to premium content, ‘potential competitors will not be in a position to create an alternative successful pay-TV platform’
  • 10. 2. How should the Commission perceivethe relationship between EU competition law and media pluralism?
  • 11. Rethinking the Commission’s competition practice: Applying EU Competition law in a pluralism-friendly manner (1)• Does the integration of content diversity considerations comply with EU law? – Article 167(4) TFEU – Article 11(2) and 51(1) CFR – Recital 23 and Article 2(1) EC Merger Regulation
  • 12. Rethinking the Commission’s competition practice: Applying competition law in a pluralism-friendly manner (2)• Is the integration of content diversity considerations a legitimate subject for competition law enquiries? – Competition has non-price dimensions: high quality, wide selection of goods and services and innovation; – Commission’s job is to check “the ability of one or more undertakings to profitably increase prices, reduce output, choice or quality of goods and services or diminish innovation” (EC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, [2004] OJ C 31/3, para. 8)
  • 13. 3. Conclusions• The EU framework is not clear-cut• The Commission’s duty to develop a pluralism- friendly merger practice is not an easy taskBUT,• The EU’s limited competence to regulate for media pluralism is NOT an excuse to violate the Treaties
  • 14. Thank you for your attention.Konstantina.Bania@eui.eu