Systematic Innovation

618 views

Published on

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
618
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
10
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Systemlink looked at a range of limitations and inconvenience factors in determining how to improve SystemZone.Multigenerational product roadmap first MultiZone then ZoneAloneProduct cost and installation time issues with SystemZone dominated the development of MultioneZoneAlone is a more radical product innovation which introduces new physical effects to provide radically better regulation of zone outflow temperatureStaged adoption of hydrolysis-resistant plastic materials by lowest risk route possibleProgressive integration of discrete hydronic components e.g. nonreturn valves and pumps
  • Hydronic Manifolds SummaryMain Useful Function:Pressure ‘neutralisation’ - allow parallel connection and operation of hydronic sub-circuits without ‘crosstalk’Uses:Integrate diverse heat sources with minimal control complexityFacilitate deployment of zoned systems Two distinct generations seen so far:Tank-like systems – employ principle of buoyancy (thermal stratification) to segregate hotter and cooler fluid regions in common vessel. Disadvantages: size, cost, convenience, energy efficiency (heat transfer between hotter and cooler fluid masses) DUNSLEY-BAKER NEUTRALISER c.1982; Patent EP00085475 etcSegmented systems – employ twin fluid manifolds interlinked for pressure equalisation to segregate hotter and cooler fluid regions in common vessel. Smaller, cheaper, easier to plumb, improved efficiency. But… still costly, uses many discrete components, no modularity, heavy… SYSTEMZONE c. 1996; US06092734 etcThird generation systems being introduced now driven by usual cleantech drivers - material and energy waste reduction.3. Highly segmented systems – modular, lighter materials, much improved temperature regulation, improved energy efficiency, additional HVAC applications.MULTIZONE™ Q1 2010MINIZONE™, ZONEALONE™ 2010 Q3, Q4Others 2011
  • Computational fluid dynamic simulation used extensively during product development to understand:Internal pressure lossesThermal mixing behaviourNon-return valve behaviourThermal capacity of manifoldStructural simulation using finite element methods used to determine:Pressure vessel performance of metal caseworkApproximate non- return valve component behaviour, forces and stressingPresent development efforts aimed at validating simulation results and implementing accelerated life tests.Field testing commencement by year-end 2009.
  • Initial collaboration focused on proof of principle modelling, performance and life testing.Symbiotic relationship with active Thermo-Fluids research group led by Dr Anthony Robinson.Strong support from the State enterprise support agency Enterprise Ireland.Systemlink anticipates a bright future for high level RD&I in Ireland.Thank You!
  • Systematic Innovation

    1. 1. SYSTEMATIC INNOVATIONCLEANTECH IRELAND4th May 2010<br />pragmatic innovation solutions<br />
    2. 2. How do most people solve problems?<br />Technical Data from our field of knowledge<br />Revert to our own experiences<br />Ask people<br />2<br />
    3. 3. THE DIFFERENCE IN APPROACH<br />Typical approach<br />-random iterative solution<br />-ask people I know<br />-accept the first good concept<br />-accept problems as presented<br />-the future is unknowable<br />-features are fundamental<br />-focus on the present<br />-search Google and tech pubs<br />-focus on ‘relevant’ experience<br />-trial and error<br />-simulation and optimisation<br />-individual genius<br />-redundancy is good<br />-‘search and destroy’<br />Systematic Innovation<br /><ul><li>systematic and methodical
    4. 4. use knowledge databases too
    5. 5. work up many concepts
    6. 6. dig until root problem is found
    7. 7. evolution has predictable patterns
    8. 8. functions are fundamental
    9. 9. examine past present and future
    10. 10. search patents too
    11. 11. focus on successful past solutions
    12. 12. understand system behaviour
    13. 13. eliminate trade-offs by design
    14. 14. teamwork and an effective method
    15. 15. simplicity is best
    16. 16. ‘find and kill’</li></ul>3<br />
    17. 17. SYSTEMATIC INNOVATION The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving<br />Solutions change - functions stay the same<br />The evolution of systems is not random - it follows repeatable patterns<br />Somebody, somewhere has faceda similar problem to yours and managed to solve it…<br /> …all you need to do is find and adapt their solution<br />4<br />
    18. 18. SYSTEMATIC INNOVATIONHow it works:<br />WORLD’S<br />BEST <br />SOLUTIONS<br />A<br />Generic<br />Solution<br />A<br />Problem<br />Like Mine<br />My Specific<br />Problem<br />My Specific<br />Solution<br />5<br />
    19. 19. Innovation Analytics<br />Technology Trends<br />Regulatory Trends<br />Innovation Arena<br />Stakeholder Demands<br />Organisation’s Preferences<br />6<br />
    20. 20. Systematic Innovation Philosophy<br />7<br />Ideality<br />Conflict<br />Evolution<br /> Time / Space / Interface<br />Resources<br />Functionality<br />
    21. 21. Ideality<br />8<br />
    22. 22. Ideality<br />time<br />Without SysInno:<br />Infinite options<br />Ideal final result<br />‘perfect, free, now’<br />With SysInno:<br />Best practice<br />Game changing<br />High <br />impact<br />Medium<br />impact<br />Finite options<br />9<br />
    23. 23. Conflict<br />10<br />
    24. 24. How specifically should manifolds be improved?<br />ZoneAlone™<br />MultiZone™<br />11<br />
    25. 25. Emergence - Trend towards Webs & Fibres<br />12<br />?<br />riveted steel tank<br />FRP cistern<br />ferro-concrete tank<br />?<br />rolled metal tube<br />CFRP driveshaft<br />pultruded tube<br />3D mesh<br />with optimised<br />fibre orientation<br />homogenous sheet<br />2D mesh<br />active elements<br />
    26. 26. S-Curve Assessment<br />Make it reliable<br />Need more functionality<br />Eliminate the learning curve<br />Complicated and Inefficient<br />Commoditised - Price Pressure<br />‘Interesting – does it work?’<br />Established product<br />innovation should focus on:<br /><ul><li> simplifying the customer experience (ease of acquisition, use, care and disposal)
    27. 27. reduced cost of ownership, reduced waste
    28. 28. adaptivity, automation, ergonomics, simplification</li></ul>Maturity (Ideality)<br />New product<br />innovation should focus on:<br /><ul><li> adding/enhancing functionality
    29. 29. more reliability
    30. 30. trimming complexity (component amalgamation, platform engineering etc)</li></ul>time<br />13<br />
    31. 31. S-Curve Innovation Priorities<br />Identifying disruptive Innovations<br />Identify functions achieved by other technologies <br />Technology transfer (out)<br />Incremental Innovation <br />Process Innovation<br />Problem solving micro – cost, efficiency<br />Problem solving macro - Performance<br />Technology Transfer (in)<br />Maturity (Ideality)<br />IP analysis<br />IP fencing<br />Problem solving – Main useful Function<br />time<br />14<br />
    32. 32. Maturity Curves<br />Modularadaptivesystems<br />INCREASING IDEALITY<br />3rd GEN…..<br />Compactsegmentedsystems<br />2nd GEN<br />The timing and characteristics of each S-curve jump is predictable<br />Stratifiedtank systems<br />1st GEN<br />TIME<br />15<br />
    33. 33. Resource & Stakeholder Research<br />Explore prevailing attitudes, trends & aspirations among the relevant:<br />Technologies<br />Regulatory authorities<br />Markets<br />Stakeholders<br />16<br />
    34. 34. SUPER-SUPER-<br />SYSTEM<br />SUPER-<br />SYSTEM<br />SYSTEM<br />Space<br />SUB-<br />SYSTEM<br />SUB-SUB-<br />SYSTEM<br />Time<br /> PRESENT<br />NEAR-TERM<br />PAST<br />MID-TERM<br />PAST<br />LONG-TERM<br />PAST<br />NEAR-TERM<br />FUTURE<br />MID-TERM<br />FUTURE<br />LONG-TERM<br />FUTURE<br />17<br />
    35. 35. 18<br />
    36. 36. 19<br />Intellectual Property<br />
    37. 37. Functionality<br />20<br />
    38. 38. R&D<br />
    39. 39. Research Collaboration<br />Dept of Mechanical & Manufacturing EngineeringTrinity College Dublin<br />Enterprise Ireland<br />22<br />
    40. 40. Results..<br />23<br />2 PCT patent applications<br />Clear technology roadmap<br />Commercial collaborators<br />New markets identified<br />Platform technology<br />40% cost reduction<br />Situational awareness<br />
    41. 41. Thank you!<br />Contact:<br />Tony Owens, Director<br />Shibumi Consulting Ltd<br />++353 (0)1 442 9609 <br />towens@shibumi-consulting.net<br />www.shibumi-consulting.net<br />pragmatic innovation solutions<br />

    ×