Accentuating the Positives: Umbrella 2011 Conference Report
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Accentuating the Positives: Umbrella 2011 Conference Report

on

  • 239 views

A conference report from CILIP Umbrella 2011. Originally published in Sunrise: Newsletter of the CILIP East of England Branch, Issue 3, November 2011

A conference report from CILIP Umbrella 2011. Originally published in Sunrise: Newsletter of the CILIP East of England Branch, Issue 3, November 2011

Statistics

Views

Total Views
239
Views on SlideShare
239
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Accentuating the Positives: Umbrella 2011 Conference Report Document Transcript

  • 1. Accentuating the positives – a report on Umbrella 2011 Umbrella 2011 was my first experience of such a large library conference, and I was more than a little daunted at the prospect. I shouldn’t have worried as people were welcoming and eager to discuss the latest developments. There seemed to be a real ‘can do’ attitude at the conference, which makes a welcome change from some of the defeatist talk about the information profession that I have been hearing. EBLIDA president Gerald Leither’s opening session focused on libraries in a European context. Leither acknowledged that there was no cohesive library policy for Europe and that now was the time to start working together to fight for the profession. His conclusion was that librarians should be more proactive than reactive, a statement that set the tone for the whole event. The promotion of libraries was discussed in many sessions. This subject takes on a sense of urgency as everyone knows that these are uncertain times for libraries. Ned Potter and Laura Woods discussed the need to take talk of promotion out of the ‘echo chamber’ in order to reach a broader audience, which is an excellent point. There are many excellent promotional efforts happening and these need to be broadcast to a much wider audience than the one we currently seem to be reaching. The growing use of social media to both provide and promote services was another theme. Going beyond the traditional approaches to social media was the theme of presentations made by Dave Puplett and David Gill. The first highlighted the fact that the social web should be about interaction with users rather than merely a distribution of content. People who do not use traditional communication channels such as comments boxes are using social media to communicate, enabling libraries to rectify problems they are unaware they are having. David Gill went on to reinforce the message about interaction by showing that just because users ‘like’ you on social media sites, it doesn’t mean that you have achieved a relationship with them. Through several innovative projects Solihull Central Library was able to turn online interaction into real-life interactions, a great way to use social media to build relationships. Much was also discussed about the need to demonstrate the impact that libraries have. Christine Rockey-Browne’s literature review into methods for demonstrating value gave examples from both the UK and abroad. The main conclusion from this extensive review was that there is a definite need to go beyond the economic and show the social value of libraries. Lucy Gildersleeves and David Streetfield followed this by outlining two studies which assessed school libraries from a student perspective. The most interesting finding for me was the importance that students place on the library as a physical space. They want a place to study in peace and meet with friends, things that are becoming increasingly hard to find in today’s hectic world. Kathryn Mckee and Ryan Cronin talked about outreach efforts at St. John’s College in Cambridge. Most of the activity discussed was aimed at using the collection to teach school children in relation to various parts of the curriculum. Not only is outreach a chance to mould young minds but it has several benefits for staff, such as enhanced knowledge of the
  • 2. collection and a new skill set. Above all it was emphasised that having fun and thinking outside the box were the best ways to reach out to external audiences. The popularity of these outreach sessions shows that the college library is having a definite impact in the larger community, somewhat dispelling the ‘Town vs. Gown’ myth. Each of these sessions showed very effectively that librarians need to convince others of what we all know – that libraries really do make a difference. Two of the sessions associated with social media and professional development presented interesting counterpoints. Phil Bradley led a workshop which gave ideas on how to develop a professional presence online and keep up to date with the latest developments. He highlighted the importance of using social media to share ideas and showed that it was important to get involved in the conversations that our users are having about us, otherwise we run the risk of not existing in their sphere. In contrast to this, Meg Silver and Sue Fordham hosted a thought provoking session which focused on the problems brought about through a lack of access to technology, focusing especially on prison libraries. It was certainly eye-opening to hear of the problems with the digital divide in the information sector. The session offered practical tips on how to stay up to date such as reading the professional print literature and borrowing teenagers to teach you! The conference gala dinner featured a touching after dinner speech by author Bonnie Greer. She talked about how libraries had influenced her personally and the fond memories she has of trips to the library with her father. She also pledged her support in doing whatever she can to aid in the ‘Save Our Libraries’ campaign. The conference concluded with the presentation of the Libraries Change Lives Award which was given to Kent Libraries and Archives. “Making a Difference” is a project which encourages adults with learning disabilities to use libraries as a way of leading more active lives in the community. All of the projects were really inspiring and showed that libraries really are an important part of society. Everyone that I spoke to from across a range of library sectors had such positive things to say about the conference and the future of libraries in general. The presentations given at the conference proved to be a good inspiration and I am sure that many people came away as keen as I am. The main message that I personally will take away from the conference is that libraries really can make a difference and now is definitely the time to act to show people what a difference that can be. Claire Sewell Cambridge University Library