• Like
  • Save
Broad Street Subway Ridership Study
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Broad Street Subway Ridership Study

on

  • 3,168 views

Broad Street Subway Ridership Study

Broad Street Subway Ridership Study

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,168
Views on SlideShare
3,163
Embed Views
5

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
28
Comments
0

1 Embed 5

http://www.phila.gov 5

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Document Transcript

    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Prepared For: Philadelphia City Planning Commission Prepared By: In Association With: Date: June 30, 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................1 List of Figures .....................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................................................1 Project Area .......................................................................................................................................2 Project Stakeholders...........................................................................................................................3 Ridership Survey.................................................................................................................................7 Purpose..........................................................................................................................................7 Survey Methodology.......................................................................................................................7 Survey Schedule .............................................................................................................................9 Survey Sample Size and Weighting...................................................................................................9 Key Findings and Selected Tables from the Final Weighted Database ...............................................12 Origins-and-Destinations ...........................................................................................................12 Access and Egress Modes...........................................................................................................18 Trip Purpose and Trip Frequency................................................................................................34 Identified Issues and Recommended Actions......................................................................................44 Traffic Flow and Parking ................................................................................................................46 Buses and Shelters........................................................................................................................50 Pedestrian Facilities/Green Space ..................................................................................................52 Intermodal Transfers and Wayfinding ............................................................................................56 Bicycle Accommodation ................................................................................................................59 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................................64 List of Tables Table 1 Sample Size ..........................................................................................................................10 Table 2 Study Area Bus Routes ..........................................................................................................25 Table 3 Recommendations Matrix .....................................................................................................65 Page i - 1 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study List of Figures Figure 1 Study Area.............................................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Ridership by Hour - Weekday ...............................................................................................11 Figure 3 Ridership by Hour - Saturday ................................................................................................11 Figure 4 City Planning Commission Planning Analysis Sections.............................................................12 Figure 5 Origin of Weekday Passengers boarding trains at Pattison Station..........................................13 Figure 6 Origin of Weekday Passengers boarding trains at Oregon Station ...........................................14 Figure 7 Origin of Weekday Passengers boarding trains at Snyder Station............................................14 Figure 8 Exiting Station - Weekday.....................................................................................................15 Figure 9 Exiting Station - Saturday .....................................................................................................16 Figure 10 Final Destination of Weekday Passengers boarding trains at Pattison Station ........................17 Figure 11 Final Destination of Weekday Passengers boarkding trains at Oregon Station........................17 Figure 12 Final Destination of Weekday Passengers boarding trains at Snyder Station ..........................18 Figure 13 Access Mode - Weekday.....................................................................................................19 Figure 14 Access Mode - Saturday .....................................................................................................19 Figure 15 Access Mode - All Three Stations- Weekday.........................................................................21 Figure 16 Access Mode - All Three Stations - Saturday ........................................................................21 Figure 17 Access Bus Route - Pattison Station - Weekday....................................................................22 Figure 18 Access Bus Route - Pattison Station - Saturday.....................................................................22 Figure 19 Access Bus Route - Oregon Station - Weekday .....................................................................23 Figure 20 Access Bus Route - Oregon Station - Saturday......................................................................23 Figure 21 Access Bus Route - Snyder Station - Weekday......................................................................24 Figure 22 Access Bus Route - Snyder Station - Saturday.......................................................................24 Figure 23 Parking Locations - Pattison Station - Weekday....................................................................26 Figure 24 Parking Locations - Pattison Station - Saturday ....................................................................27 Figure 25 Parking Locations - Oregon Station - Weekday.....................................................................27 Figure26 Parking Locations - Oregon Station - Saturday ......................................................................28 Figure 27 Parking Locations - Snyder Station - Weekday......................................................................28 Figure 28 Parking Locations - Snyder Station - Saturday ......................................................................29 Figure 29 Was there a Bike brought On-board - Weekday ...................................................................30 Figure 30 Was there a Bike brought On-board - Saturday....................................................................30 Page i - 2 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 31 Egress Mode - Weekday .....................................................................................................31 Figure 32 Egress Mode - Saturday......................................................................................................32 Figure 33 Egress Mode by Trolley Routes - Weekday...........................................................................33 Figure 34 Egress Mode by Trolley Route - Saturday.............................................................................33 Figure 35 Trip Purpose – All Three Stations - Weekday........................................................................35 Figure 36 Trip Purpose – All Three Stations - Saturday ........................................................................35 Figure 37 Trip Purpose - Pattison Station - Weekday...........................................................................36 Figure 38 Trip Purpose - Pattison Station - Saturday............................................................................36 Figure 39 Trip Purpose - Oregon Station - Weekday ............................................................................37 Figure 40 Trip Purpose - Oregon Station - Saturday.............................................................................37 Figure 41 Trip Purpose - Snyder Station - Weekday.............................................................................38 Figure 42 Trip Purpose - Snyder Station - Saturday..............................................................................38 Figure 43 Trip Frequency – All Three Stations - Weekday ....................................................................40 Figure 44 Trip Frequency – All Three Stations - Saturday .....................................................................40 Figure 45 Trip Frequency - Pattison Station - Weekday........................................................................41 Figure 46 Trip Frequency - Pattison Station - Saturday ........................................................................41 Figure 47 Trip Frequency - Oregon Station - Weekday.........................................................................42 Figure 48 Trip Frequency - Oregon Station - Saturday .........................................................................42 Figure 49 Trip Frequency - Snyder Station - Weekday .........................................................................43 Figure 50 Trip Frequency - Snyder Station - Saturday ..........................................................................43 Figure 51 Restriped Parking Along West Moyamensing Avenue...........................................................47 Figure 52 – Reconfiguration of West 13th and West 15th Streets...........................................................47 Figure 53 – Improvements to West Passyunk Avenue and South Broad Street......................................48 Figure 54 – Shared Parking Opportunities ..........................................................................................48 Figure 55 Bike Lane Recommendations for South 13th and South 15th Streets.......................................61 Page i - 3 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Executive Summary Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates (EWT) in association with Portfolio Associates, Inc. – the project team – was retained by the Philadelphia City Planning Commission (PCPC) to prepare the Broad Street Subway Ridership Study for Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations. The study has been funded by an allocation from the Federal Transit Administration through PENNDOT and the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) and via a local match of 20 percent which was met through in-kind services provided by PCPC. The Broad Street Subway Ridership Study: Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations concerns an approximately two-mile-long corridor within the City of Philadelphia focused within half-mile radii of each of the three subway stations (or approximately between 11th and 17th Streets). It is bounded by Mifflin Street on the north, Terminal Avenue/I-95 overpass on the south, 11th Street on the east, and 17th Street on the west (see Figure 1) Figure ES-1 Study Area Page ES - 1 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study The purpose of this study is to develop a better understanding of how the existing transportation network is being utilized, in order to inform a number of ongoing planning and marketing efforts. The study tasks included meetings with an advisory committee, a review of existing studies, a ridership survey of Broad Street Subway passengers at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder stations, stakeholder interviews and recommendations of strategies and actions for improved transportation and access. Key findings from the ridership survey of passengers boarding trains at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations include: • Over 90 percent of the passenger origins are from the South Philadelphia area with most in either the 19145 or 19148 zip codes. • About 45 percent of the weekday and 37 percent of the Saturday passengers exit the Broad Street line at the City Hall Station • About 40 percent of the passengers have destinations in Center City • Over 60 percent of the passengers access the subway station by walking • About 24 percent of the weekday passengers and 28 percent of the Saturday passengers come to the station by bus • About 66 percent of weekday passengers and almost 58 percent of the weekend passengers walk to their final destination after leaving the Broad Street Subway line. • Work commute was the trip purpose for almost 62 percent of the weekday passengers and nearly 43 percent of the Saturday passengers • About 61 percent of the weekday passengers travel on the Broad Street Line about 4 to 5 days a week. Detailed tabulation and cross tabulation tables can be found in the Appendix. Based on all of the inputs to the study (a review of existing field conditions, review of past and ongoing studies, Advisory Committee input, Stakeholder interviews, and the ridership survey results), the study area problems/issues that have been identified and the resulting recommendations fall under the following categories: • Traffic flow and parking, • Buses and shelters • Pedestrian facilities/green space, • Intermodal transfers and wayfinding, and • Bicycle accommodation. Each of the recommendations is listed in the recommendations matrix (see Table ES-1). The recommendations matrix lists the implementing agency for each action to help facilitate the next steps toward implementation. Page ES - 2 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Table ES-1 Recommendations Matrix Page ES - 3 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Table ES-1 Recommendations Matrix (Continued) Page ES - 4 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Introduction Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates (EWT) in association with Portfolio Associates, Inc. – the project team – was retained by the Philadelphia City Planning Commission (PCPC) to prepare the Broad Street Subway Ridership Study for Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations. The study has been funded by an allocation from the Federal Transit Administration through PENNDOT and the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) and via a local match of 20 percent which was met through in-kind services provided by PCPC. Project Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a better understanding of how the existing transportation network is being utilized, in order to inform a number of ongoing planning and marketing efforts. The first step was to identify trip patterns. There has been no recent attempt to collect/analyze such data for Broad Street Line riders. Furthermore, current fare technology cannot precisely track riders who use transfers. The southernmost stations on the Broad Street Line have a certain amount of patronage from NJ residents commuting to/from Center City each business day. This may be witnessed by the unusually large number of cars with NJ license plates on nearby residential side streets particularly surrounding Oregon Station and occupying the parking spaces at the Sports Complex surrounding Pattison Station. Snyder Station is the layover point for Bus Route 37 providing direct service to all terminals at Philadelphia International Airport (PHL), and beyond to PHL Business Center, and the City of Chester. In addition to four cross-town bus routes and two bus routes serving PHL and beyond, transfers may also be made to/from a connecting shuttle bus (SEPTA Route 71) at Pattison Station serving the Navy Yard complex. Knowing subway rider origins and destinations provides a better understanding of subway ridership and intermodal connections, and what current and potential trip generators are being addressed/under- served. This data complements and helps to inform various studies and initiatives including: Page 1 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study • future SEPTA marketing efforts and communication strategies with riders; • the PIDC Broad Street Subway Extension Feasibility Study to improve access into the Navy Yard; • PCPC’s Stadium Area Transit Study which recommended various phased approaches toward creating a more transit-oriented and pedestrian-friendlier experience; and • the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA) PATCO Extension Study, currently underway, which has a large Philadelphia component including the concept of a light rail connector along the Delaware Riverfront with potential extensions to the Sports Complex (Pattison Station) and Navy Yard. Given the multi-functionality of the South Broad Street corridor, there are several transportation-related problems affecting the different populations who live and work along it, and travelers who pass through it that the study has examined from a planning perspective including traffic congestion, transit accessibility and intermodal connectivity, parking, pedestrian safety, bicycle use and wayfinding/signage. Finally, the findings of the study look to add value to the current planning for the corridor, by recommending strategies and actions for improved transportation and access. Project Area The Broad Street Subway Ridership Study: Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations concerns an approximately two-mile-long corridor within the City of Philadelphia focused within half-mile radii of each of the three subway stations (or approximately between 11th and 17th Streets). It is bounded by Mifflin Street on the north, Terminal Avenue/I-95 overpass on the south, 11th Street on the east, and 17th Street on the west (see Figure 1) These three station areas comprise the “core” of the gateway area that connects the Delaware Valley region’s metropolitan center (Philadelphia’s Center City) with several neighborhoods in South Philadelphia and beyond including the Sports Complex and Navy Yard. Broad Street is a transit corridor for the Broad Street Subway as well as portions of five surface bus routes that follow its alignment. There are also several intersecting transit routes within the study area. It is worth noting that all five surface transit routes that partially operate on South Broad Street have partial or full-time terminals/layovers along South Broad within the study area. The northernmost subway station of the study area at Snyder Avenue is a major transfer point to other SEPTA routes. Flanking the South Broad Street corridor are several residential neighborhoods that are in a state of flux with some transitioning from middle income to lower income but with most undergoing substantial revitalization with market-rate housing development. These neighborhoods include Girard Estate, Packer Park, the Reserve at Packer Park, The Villas, Siena Place, and Hoffman Estates. Many of the residents of these areas patronize and make regular use of facilities along South Broad Street including commercial establishments, religious and educational institutions, social-service providers, and transit. Page 2 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 1 Study Area Project Stakeholders The Broad Street Subway Ridership Study: Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations builds upon ongoing efforts focused on South Broad Street. The plans and processes already established by PCPC, PIDC, DRPA, and the Sports Complex served as starting points for continued involvement of and cooperation by stakeholders and advisors. An Advisory Committee was identified to guide the project and provide feedback during the course of the project. Four meetings were held with the Advisory Committee at key points in the project. The Advisory Committee was comprised of representatives from PCPC, DVRPC, SEPTA, PIDC, Philadelphia Streets Department, the Philadelphia Parking Authority, Comcast-Spectacor, Office of Economic Opportunity, Mayor’s Office of Transportation & Utilities (MOTU), and Philadelphia City Council (Districts 1and 2). In addition to the Advisory Committee meetings, three targeted focus group-style Stakeholder interviews were held during the course of the project. Overall Stakeholder Interview objectives aimed to accomplish the following: Page 3 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study 1. Inform elected officials, community based organizations, community residents, commuters, businesses, institutions, agencies and other stakeholders about the Broad Street Subway Ridership Study. 2. Facilitate stakeholder conversations to: a. Inform stakeholders about the project b. Understand specific impacts each station’s ridership and facilities has on stakeholders and their constituents c. Identify the community assets that stakeholders want to emphasize as affected by the Broad Street Subway’s ridership and facilities i. parks, shopping centers, services, schools, institutions, intersections, etc. that are important d. Community values, transportation-related values, values unique to South Philadelphia e. Identify new projects, plans or initiatives including i. residential projects, ii. plans for new or improved infrastructure, iii. initiatives to promote local shopping, iv. Improvements to transit, etc. f. Discuss how future improvement projects impact or may be impacted by the community values identified g. Help stakeholders articulate the community’s perceived value of the Broad Street Subway and its ridership h. Ascertain the transit/travel connections made possible by the Survey component of this study i. Transportation-related problems, improvements or additional transportation-related amenities needed j. Identify needed transportation-related improvements in the study area (with special focus on transit facilities, operations and accessibility; traffic congestion, bicycle use, pedestrian safety, parking, wayfinding/signage, etc.) To facilitate more targeted discussions three Stakeholder interview/focus groups were convened. The Stakeholder groups included: • Group 1: Philadelphia Parking Authority (PPA), Comcast-Spectacor, Sports Complex Special Services District (SCSSD), City Council Districts 1& 2 • Group 2: Streets Dept., MOTU, SEPTA, PADOT, DVRPC, PIDC • Group 3: Methodist Hospital, St. Agnes Hospital, funeral homes, churches, School District Page 4 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Some key discussion points from the three Stakeholder interviews are summarized below by station and overall discussion points for the corridor. Sample Discussion Points – Pattison Station • The proposed Philly Live is to begin development after the Spectrum is demolished in Fall 2009. The build out is envisioned to include mixed use, retail, entertainment, and a 300-room hotel. • The Stadium District Traffic Study is examining the traffic impacts of the sports complex since the new Phillies and Eagles venues were completed five years ago. The study is expected to be completed by end of 2009. • Pedestrian access by the sports complex is challenging. Many people park in Roosevelt Park so there are numerous attempted mid-block crossings which are dangerous • Wayfinding is limited or nonexistent. Signage both inside and outside of the station is limited and does not provide a clear path to/from the subways and the various stadium venues. • Vehicles pull up onto sidewalk areas surrounding the station limiting pedestrian circulation. • Limited use of all headhouses is confusing, especially when approaching on-foot from a distance. Sample Discussion Points – Oregon • Red light camera and countdown pedestrian signals have been installed at the intersection of Oregon Avenue and Broad Street and have been working successfully. • There have been discussions about beautifying the triangle area at the northwest corner of Oregon Avenue and Broad Street. Currently vehicles park in that area. • The intersection of Oregon Avenue and Broad Street is not a pedestrian-friendly environment. There are many buses stopping in the vicinity of the station (although not all buses have stops at the corners – some are midblock) along with trucks traveling on Broad Street which make that area unsafe and difficult to navigate. • Vehicles temporarily park in the bus stop area to drop-off passengers at subway. • The sidewalk is very narrow along the subway head house on north east side of Broad Street. Page 5 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study • There is vehicle parking on the sidewalk plaza area surrounding the headhouse at the northeast corner of Broad Street and Oregon Avenue. Sample Discussion Points – Snyder • A study has been conducted regarding gateway improvements at the intersection of Broad Street, Passyunk Avenue, and McKean Street. • South Philadelphia High School and Methodist and St. Agnes Hospitals generate subway riders. • Vehicles parked in the center median on Broad Street encroach on the left turn lane. • Route 37 buses have a difficult time making turns at station. • The parking lot for South Philadelphia High School has a lot of parking spaces and neighbors park there at night but there is no knowledge of a formal agreement regarding parking. • People don’t use Snyder Station because they don’t feel comfortable or safe – particularly the elderly. • Passyunk Avenue and S. Broad Street is a challenging Intersection to navigate for motorists as well as pedestrians and bicyclists. • The fate of the recently vacated large apartment building just beyond the northwest corner is unclear. Sample Discussion Points – Corridor • SEPTA is in the process of implementing a Smart Stations program which includes safety and security upgrades, lighting improvements, etc. at all Broad Street Subway stations. • Corridor traffic is sluggish but that calms traffic which makes it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Civic groups are getting more organized; several routinely operate as coalitions when issues are faced that affect areas beyond individual civic boundaries. • Seniors living in area are afraid of using the subways. • Wayfinding improvements are needed – there are not good wayfinding landmarks in the corridor. The findings from the Stakeholder interviews along with the findings from the ridership surveys and feedback from the Advisory Committee was used to develop the recommended actions which are discussed in the final section of this report. Page 6 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Ridership Survey Purpose The purpose of the survey is to identify trip patterns at the three South Philadelphia subway stations -- Pattison, Oregon and Snyder -- and to better understand transfers between travel modes as the current fare technology cannot precisely track riders who use transfers. Knowing subway rider origins and destinations will provide for a better understanding of how the existing transportation infrastructure is being utilized, and which current and potential trip generators are being satisfied or are served. Such data will complement and provide information for various studies and initiatives including future SEPTA marketing efforts and communication strategies with riders. Survey Methodology The survey was administered as customers entered each of the stations. Survey agents were positioned at strategic locations along the platforms to randomly intercept and interview customers before they boarded trains. Customers were selected in a random manner to ensure that interviewer bias (interviewing only those that appear “approachable” or bias by gender and/or age) would be held to a minimum and that a representative sample of customers was surveyed at each station. The survey instrument was programmed into Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) which were used to record the data. The PDAs are an important quality control measure to minimize the amount of data cleaning and editing needed and also to ensure data consistency and reliability. As a surveyor prepared to conduct interviews at a specific station, he/she began by selecting the survey instrument for that station. For example, if the Pattison survey was selected, all survey records were then coded with Pattison Station as the “boarding station.” The PDA also recorded the time and date of each survey by time stamping each survey record. When surveyors moved to a different station, they logged out of the survey and logged into the survey for the new station. Page 7 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study A customized survey was created for each station so that the survey question script was specific to that station. For example, the Oregon Station survey did not include Oregon Station as a choice for “Exit Station” and the “Access Mode” bus route response options included routes that serve Oregon Station. The survey included the following questions and response options: 1. Exit Station: At which station will you leave the Broad Street Line? (response options included all stations on the Broad Street Line) 2. Destination: What is your final destination when you leave _______ (station name to be filled- in based on response to Q.1) Station?(Zip code, address or nearest intersection was recorded ) 3. Egress Mode: After you leave the Broad Street Line, how will you travel to your final destination? 1. Auto: Driver 2. Auto: Passenger 3. Commuter Van 4. Taxi 5. Walk ONLY 6. Bicycle 7. Bus  What bus company/route? 8. SEPTA Regional Rail 9. PATCO High Speed Line 10. Trolley Route Which Route (10, 11, 13, 15, 34, or 36)? 11. Market-Frankford Line 12. Other  specify 4. Origin: Where did you begin your trip (Zip code, address or nearest intersection was recorded) 5. Access Mode: How did you get to THIS Broad Street Station? 1. Auto: Driver Where did you park Parking lot, On-Street at the curb, On-Street in the center median, dropped off, other (specify) 2. Auto: Passenger  Where did you park Parking lot, On-Street at the curb, On-Street in the center median, dropped off, other (specify) 3. Commuter Van Where did you park Parking lot, On-Street at the curb, On-Street in the center median, dropped off, other (specify) 4. Taxi 5. Walk ONLY 6. Bicycle 7. Bus  What bus company/route If Snyder Station (37, 79, or other), if Oregon Station (7, 68, G, or other); If Pattison (17, 71, or other) 8. Other  specify 6. Trip Purpose: What is the main purpose of your trip? 1. Work Commute Page 8 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study 2. Business travel 3. Travel to/from school 4. Shopping 5. Entertainment/Recreation 6. Visit family or friends 7. Medical 8. Other (specify) 7. Trip Frequency: How often do you make THIS trip? 1. 6 or more days a week 2. 4 to 5 days a week 3. 1 to 3 days a week 4. Less than once a week Survey Schedule The Broad Street Subway Ridership Survey was conducted over three weekdays and one Saturday as per the following schedule: • Tuesday April 21, 2009 – 5AM to 11AM • Wednesday April 22, 2009 – 11AM to 6PM • Thursday April 23, 2009 – 6PM to Midnight • Saturday April 25, 2009 – 5AM to Midnight The weekday survey was split over three days so each day consisted of one shift of six to seven work hours and over the course of the three days surveys were conducted between 5AM and midnight at all three stations. While there were events scheduled at the venues near the Pattison Station during each of the weekday survey days, none of the events began or ended during our survey period so the data is that of a “typical” non-event weekday. The Saturday survey was conducted over one day by staffing several survey shifts throughout the day. The Saturday survey was conducted over the same time period (5:00 AM and midnight) as the weekday survey at all three stations except at the Pattison Station. At Pattison Station, the survey was concluded Survey Sample Size and Weighting at 10 pm because the platform was overcrowded since an event had just finished. Over 1,800 surveys were conducted including 1,391 weekday surveys and 441 weekend surveys (see Table 1). The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) provided turnstile data in half hour intervals for each station on each survey date which showed that 9,978 people entered the stations during the weekday survey periods and 6,599 people entered the three stations on Saturday. Responses to the survey were expanded or “weighted” so that they would reflect their true proportion in the riding population, and thus could be expanded to that population. This was necessary because various “real-world” conditions (such as crowding and population characteristics) caused response rates to vary from station to station and from time period to time period. The turnstile data was used to Page 9 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study weight the 1,832 surveys to represent 16,577 people that entered the stations. In general, the weekday data was weighted in half hour intervals by dividing the station entry count for a particular half hour by the number of surveys conducted during that same 30 minute period. There were some exceptions where the weekday data was expanded based on one hour intervals because there were no surveys conducted in that 30-minute period. Through weighting, the survey results depict proportional response rates across the study. Table 1 Sample Size Total Weekday Total Weekday Weekday Weekday Saturday Saturday and Saturday and Saturday Interviews Passengers Interviews Passengers Interviews Passengers Station (between 5AM and Midnight) Pattison 377 1,476 111 1,953 488 3,429 Oregon 503 3,192 121 1,780 624 4,972 Snyder 511 5,325 209 2,866 720 8,191 Total 1,391 9,993 441 6,599 1,832 16,592 A review of the SEPTA weekday turnstile data for the survey period reveals that the AM peak hour occurs between 7AM and 8AM at Oregon Station (about 585 passengers) and between 8AM and 9AM at Pattison (235 passengers) and Snyder (nearly 770 passengers) Stations (see Figure 2). During the weekday afternoon, volumes are relatively flat without any notable PM peak hour at Pattison and Oregon Stations from about noon until about 7PM. At the Snyder Station volumes begin to increase with some fluctuations between noon and 6PM with a slight peak (370 passengers) at 3PM. On Saturdays, volumes entering Snyder (about 100 to 215 passengers each hour) and Oregon Station (about 60 to almost 175 passengers per hour) remain relatively flat for most of the day (see Figure 3). At Pattison Station volumes were also flat (about 30 to about 115 passengers per hour) until they began to increase between 4 and 7PM with a peak of 600 passengers at 6PM. Page 10 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 2 Figure 3 Page 11 June 2009
    • Key Findings and Selected Tables from the Final Weighted Database Broad Street Subway Ridership Study The following sections contain key findings and selected tables that were prepared from the final weighted database. Specific findings including origins and destinations, boarding and exiting stations, access and egress modes, trip purpose, and trip frequency are discussed. Detailed tabulation and cross tabulation tables can be found in the Appendix including information about the connecting bus routes used by subway passengers. Origins-and-Destinations One of the key pieces of data obtained from the survey effort was the passenger’s origin (prior to boarding the train) and final destination after exiting the Broad Street Line. Data was obtained at the zip code level. If a passenger did not know their origin and/or final destination zip code, surveyors asked for the nearest intersection, address, or a landmark so that zip codes could be determined during survey post processing. For reporting purposes, the zip codes were aggregated approximating the City Planning Commission Planning Analysis Sections (PAS) as shown in Figure 4; however, two PAS’s (Near Northeast Philadelphia and Far Northeast Philadelphia) were combined and are called Northeast Philadelphia due to low origins/destinations in these PAS’s. Figure 4 City Planning Commission Planning Analysis Sections Page 12 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Weekday passengers at Pattison Station (see Figure 5) primarily came from the South Philadelphia PAS (nearly 70 percent) with most from the 19148 zip code (almost 35 percent) followed by the 19145 zip code (almost 20 percent) and 19112 (about 15 percent). Less than five percent came from the Southwest Philadelphia PAS, and less than 1 percent from the West Philadelphia PAS. Almost eleven percent came from other Pennsylvania Counties and almost 15 percent came from outside Pennsylvania. At Oregon Station, most of the weekday passenger origins (almost 94 percent) were from South Philadelphia with most (58 percent) from zip code 19148, followed by zip code 19145 with 32 percent (see Figure 6). About 4 percent came from the Southwest Philadelphia PAS. Similar to the findings at Pattison and Oregon Stations, the passengers boarding trains at Snyder Station (see Figure 7) had origins primarily in the South Philadelphia PAS (about 94 percent) with most (almost 45 percent) from the 19148 zip code followed by the 19145 zip code (almost 44 percent). About 4 percent came from the Southwest Philadelphia PAS. On Saturday, the pattern was similar at all three stations. Nearly all the origins (90 to almost 98 percent) of passengers boarding trains at the three stations were from the South Philadelphia PAS with most (about 42 to 45 percent) from the 19148 zip code followed by the 19145 zip code (41 to 50 percent). Figure 5 Page 13 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 6 Figure 7 Page 14 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Most of the passengers boarding weekday trains at Pattison, Oregon and Snyder stations were exiting the Broad Street Line at City Hall (41 to almost 49 percent) as shown in Figure 8. The Walnut-Locust Station is the next highest (12 to 14 percent) exiting station. City Hall is located in the heart of Center City Philadelphia and is a major transportation hub with access to many connecting transit routes. The Walnut-Locust stop is just to the south of the City Hall Station with access to the PATCO Line and various universities, hospitals, museums, etc. The Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Station is the exiting station for almost 9 percent of the passengers boarding trains at Snyder Station, about 7 percent of the passengers boarding trains at Oregon Station and about one percent of the passengers boarding trains at Pattison Station. The remaining stations are each exited by five or less percent of the passengers boarding trains at Pattison, Oregon, or Snyder Station. The almost 7 percent of Oregon Station passengers exiting at Allegheny Station may be due to the presence of hospitals and their staff using both stations. Figure 8 On Saturday a similar pattern occurs (see Figure 9). The City Hall Station has the highest percentage of exiting passengers (36 to 40 percent), and the Walnut-Locust Station has the next highest percentage (8 to almost 15 percent). The exiting percentages at the remaining stations vary from the weekday pattern with the Pattison Station serving as the exiting station for about 9 percent of the passengers boarding at Page 15 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Oregon Station and 9 percent of the Snyder Station passengers. This can be attributed to weekend events at the sports complex and recreational activities at FDR Park/Golf Course. Figure 9 Since more than half of the weekday passengers boarding trains at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations are destined for either the City Hall or Walnut-Locust Station, it is not suprising that the Center City PAS (see Figures 10 to 12) is the final destination for most of those passengers. About 48 percent of the Pattison Station passengers are destined for the Center City PAS, almost 13 percent stay in the South Philadelphia area, 11 percent travel to Lower North Philadelphia, 6 percent to West Philadelphia, and 5 percent to Olney/Oak Lane. In addition, almost 4 percent travel to other Pennsylvania Counties. At Oregon Station about 50 percent of the weekday passengers are destined for Center City, 14 percent travel to Lower North Philadelphia, 9 percent stay in South Philadelphia, 7 percent are destined for West Philadelphia, 6 percent travel north to Olney/Oak Lane, and four percent go to Upper North Philadelphia. Almost 32 percent of the weekday passengers boarding trains at Snyder Station have final destinations in Center City while nearly 21 percent travel to Lower North Philadelphia and 20 percent have destinations in the South Philadelphia area. About 9 percent of the Snyder Station weekday passengers have final destinations in West Philadelphia, 4 percent in Olney/Oak Lane and nearly 4 percent travel to Upper North Philadelphia. Page 16 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 10 Figure 11 Page 17 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 12 On Saturday, Center City continues to be the top destination from all three stations although it commands a lower share (25 to 36 percent) of the passengers because about 21 to 23 percent of the passengers stay in the South Philadelphia area. About 14 to 16 percent are destined for Lower North Philadelphia, 6 to 7 percent to Olney/Oak Lane, about 3 to 6 percent travel to Upper North Philadelphia and about 2 to 6 percent are destined for Northeast Philadelphia. Access and Egress Modes To better understand transfers between travel modes and how the existing transportation infrastructure is being utilized, passengers were asked about the access mode they used to reach their boarding Broad Street Subway station and the egress mode when they exited the Broad Street Subway line. Depending on their response, specific follow-up questions were asked which are also discussed in this section. Overall, at all three stations weekday and Saturday passengers responded that they “walk only” from their origin (almost 61 percent and 63 percent, respectively) as shown in Figures 13 and 14. Bus (24 and 28 percent) followed by auto drivers (about 9 percent and 4 percent) and auto passengers (nearly 5 percent and almost 3 percent) were the next highest modes. On weekdays and Saturdays, about 1 percent come by bicycle and less than one-half a percent come by taxi. On weekdays less than one percent come by commuter van. Page 18 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 13 Figure 14 Page 19 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study When examining the access mode by station on weekdays (see Figure 15), the walk share at Oregon (nearly 60 percent) and Snyder (68 percent) Station is higher than at Pattison Station (almost 37 percent). The bus shares at Oregon (about 25 percent) and Snyder (27 percent) are similar while at Pattison Station (nearly 12 percent) it is lower. At Pattison Station where there is easy access to the off- street parking lot at the stadium, the auto driver (nearly 36 percent) and the auto passenger (almost 11 percent) shares are higher than at Oregon (driver – 8 percent, passenger – 6 percent) and Snyder (driver – almost 2 percent, passenger about 2 percent) Stations. The commuter van share comprises 5 percent at Pattison Station with most commuter vans serving the Navy Yard. At all three stations the bicycle share is about one percent (or about 85 total bicycles) and the taxi share is less than one-half percent to zero at Snyder Station. On Saturdays, the walk only and bus mode shares are somewhat more balanced between the stations (see Figure 16). Snyder Station has the highest walk only share (nearly 68 percent), followed by Pattison Station (63 percent) and Oregon Station (nearly 56 percent). The bus share is highest at Oregon Station (almost 33 percent), followed by Snyder Station (27 percent) and Pattison Station (26 percent). The combined auto share (driver and passenger) is highest at Oregon Station (about 5 to 6 percent each) followed by Pattison Station (6 percent – auto driver, 2 percent – auto passenger) and Snyder Station (2 percent each). It is important to note that the off-street parking lot at the stadium at Pattison Station is open on the weekend. If there is an event an attendant is present, the cost of parking is $12 and it is open to anyone (event attendees and others). If there isn’t an event, there are no attendants and parking is free. Also, Methodist Hospital has an agreement with the parking lot operator that allows hospital employees who display a special hang tag to park in a designated area of the lot during the week and on weekends. At Pattison Station, the Saturday bicycle share is nearly 3 percent while it is lower at Oregon (about 1 percent) and Snyder (less than one-half percent) Stations. Taxi use is also low – less than one-half percent at Snyder Station and zero at the other two stations. Passengers that indicated they came to the station by bus were asked what bus route they used (see Figures 17 thru 22). This question was customized by station to include only the buses that served each station. Unfortunately, a number of passengers either didn’t answer the question or responded that they “didn’t know” or that they would use “whatever bus came by.” Several bus routes serve each station or have stops within walking distance of the station as show in Table 2 on page 25. An explanation for this rather high rate of no response could be use/abuse of transfer privileges and therefore an unwillingness of passengers to give an accurate answer. For instance, passengers who live near Packer Avenue may find it easier to board a “C” bus to connect to the subway at Oregon Station. During the weekday almost 65 percent of the passengers that boarded trains at Pattison Station and came by bus used the Route 71 bus. About 3 percent each used the Route C, Route 17 and Route G with about 26 percent not responding. On Saturdays the Route 71 bus does not run so other routes were used including the Route 68 (14 percent), Route G (nearly 13 percent), Route 17 (6 percent) and Routes 37 and Route C (about one-half percent each). About 66 percent of the passengers did not respond or did not know what bus route they used. Page 20 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 15 Figure 16 Page 21 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 17 Figure 18 Page 22 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 19 Figure 20 Page 23 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 21 Figure 22 Page 24 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Table 2 Study Area Bus Routes Stations Served Saturday Bus Route Service Area Description Pattison Oregon Snyder Service Route 7 Strawberry Mansion to Pier 70 X Yes Route 17 South Philadelphia to Penn's Landing X Yes Route 23 Chestnut Hill to South Philadelphia X Yes South Philadelphia to Eastwick and Chester Route 37 Transportation Center via Philadelphia International Airport X Yes Route 68 South Philadelphia to UPS X Yes Route 71 Pattison Station To The Navy Yard X No Route 79 South Philadelphia Crosstown via Snyder Avenue X Yes Center City and South Philadelphia to Fern Rock Route C Transportation Center and West Oak Lane X X Yes South Philadelphia to Overbrook and Lankenau Route G Hospital X Yes Greyhound Lucky Streak service from Philadelphia to Bus Line Atlantic City Casinos X Yes At Oregon Station, Route 7 is the most heavily used bus route capturing almost 26 percent of the weekday riders and almost 30 percent of the Saturday riders. Route 68 is the next highest with 9 percent of the weekday riders and about 2 percent of the Saturday riders. Three routes -- Route 23 (almost 4 percent), Route 79 (about 1 percent) and Route C (less than one-half percent) –captured the rest of the weekday riders. The non-response was high at this location – 60 percent on the weekday and almost 68 percent on the weekend. At Oregon Station, the high rate of no response is possibly attributable to the many connecting bus routes, most of which run in parallel alignments on the segments of Oregon Avenue between Front and 24th Streets. As such, a great many bus-to-subway transferees may honestly not pay attention to the bus route(s) they use to get to Oregon Station. These assumptions have an even greater validity when considering the lower rate of no response at Snyder Station which has only a single cross-town connection serving it and another longer-distance bus to International Airport and beyond. At Snyder Station, most of the bus passengers used Route 79 (75 percent on weekdays and almost 59 percent on Saturday). The next highest route was Route 37 with almost 16 percent of the weekday bus riders and 13 percent of the Saturday riders. On weekdays the remaining bus transfers were from the Route C (almost 3 percent), the Greyhound bus (about 1 percent), and Route’s 68 and 71 (one-half percent each). Almost 5 percent of the bus passengers on weekdays did not respond. On Saturdays the remaining bus transfers were from the Greyhound bus which serves Atlantic City (6 percent), and Route C, G, 7, and 23 each about one and one-half to two percent. About 15 percent of the bus passengers did not respond. Page 25 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study This study also looked to identify where subway passengers were parking since parking is in such high demand in the South Philadelphia area. Passengers that accessed the subway as an auto driver or as an auto passenger were asked where they parked. Four response options were available – parking lot, on- street at the curb, on-street in the center median, or else they were dropped-off (see Figures 23 to 28). At Pattison Station, 72 to 74 percent of the passengers were parked in the parking lot on a weekday and Saturday. About 24 percent were dropped-off on a weekday and nearly 20 percent were dropped off on a Saturday. About 2 percent were parked on-street at the curb on a weekday and 8 percent on Saturday while no one was parked in the center median on either day since there isn’t a center median area near the Pattison Station where one is able to park. At Oregon Station, almost 51 percent of the weekday passengers coming by auto were dropped off and about 45 percent of the Saturday passengers were dropped off. Nearly 39 percent of the weekday passengers were parked on-street at the curb and 32 percent of the Saturday passengers. About 6 percent of the weekday passengers and nearly 23 percent of the Saturday passengers coming by auto said they parked in a parking lot. About 4 percent of the weekday passengers were parked on-street in the center median and none of the Saturday passengers. Figure 23 Page 26 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 24 Figure 25 Page 27 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 26 Figure 27 Page 28 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 28 At Snyder Station 60 percent of the weekday and Saturday passengers that came by auto were dropped off at the station. About 36 percent of the weekday passengers and 20 percent of the Saturday passengers parked on-street at the curb. About 2 percent of the weekday passengers and 10 percent of the Saturday passengers parked in a parking lot and about 2 percent of the weekday passengers and 10 percent of the Saturday passengers parked on-street in the center median. SEPTA staff requested that the survey capture information regarding bicycles that are brought on-board trains. If a passenger responded that they came to the station by bicycle, the survey agent recorded whether or not they had a bicycle with them at the platform. About 20 percent (2 bicyclists) of the weekday passengers and nearly 15 percent (8 bicyclists) of the Saturday passengers that came by bicycle to the Pattison station had the bicycle with them at the platform (see Figures 29 and 30). All of the weekday and Saturday passengers that used a bicycle as their access mode to Oregon station brought the bike with them on the platform and almost 42 percent (22 bicyclists) of the weekday and one hundred percent of the Saturday passengers that came to Snyder Station by bicycle brought the bicycle on-board. Page 29 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 29 Figure 30 Page 30 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Passengers were asked to identify the egress mode they would be using to reach their final destination once they exit the Broad Street Subway. Since the passengers that were surveyed as they boarded trains at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations could exit the subway at any of the stations along the line, there was wide variety of egress mode responses (see Figures 31 and 32). However, a majority of the weekday (66 percent) and Saturday (nearly 58 percent) of the passengers indicated that they “walk only” to their final destination. Transferring to a bus had the second highest response – nearly 13 percent of the weekday passengers and about 17 percent of the Saturday passengers. More details about the bus routes used can be found later in the Appendix. On weekdays, the Market-Frankford Line is the third highest mode (12 percent) with the remaining modes (trolleys, auto drivers and passengers, SEPTA Regional Rail, PATCO High Speed Line, bicycle, taxi, and commuter van) each representing three percent or less. On Saturdays, passengers transferring to the Market-Frankford Line is the third highest mode (nearly 10 percent) followed by SEPTA Regional Rail (5 percent), auto drivers (4 percent) and the remaining modes (trolleys, auto passengers, bicycle, and PATCO High Speed Line) representing three percent or less. Figure 31 Page 31 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 32 Passengers that exited Broad Street Subway trains and said they were using a trolley to get to their final destination were asked to identify the trolley route they expected to ride. The top trolley routes (see Figures 33 and 34) that were identified include the Route 10 (weekday -- almost 28 percent, Saturday -- 34 percent), Route 11 (weekday – almost 20 percent, Saturday – 31 percent), Route 13 (Weekday – 18 percent, Saturday – 13 percent), and the Route 15 (weekday – nearly 13 percent, Saturday – almost 6 percent). About 10 percent of the weekday respondents and 14 percent of the Saturday respondents did not answer or did not know which trolley route they would be taking. This is more than likely due to a destination somewhere between 19th and 40th Streets on Routes 11, 13, 34, and 36 in which case a passenger may simply board whatever route comes next (except for Route 10 in some instances). Page 32 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 33 Figure 34 Page 33 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Trip Purpose and Trip Frequency Passengers were asked to identify the purpose of their trip and how frequently they make the trip. During both the weekday and Saturday surveys most passengers boarding trains at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations were commuting to work (see Figures 35 and 36) although as expected the weekday percentage (nearly 62 percent) is higher than Saturday (almost 43 percent). On weekdays, traveling to and from school has the next highest percentage (about 14 percent) followed by visiting family and friends (8 percent) and entertainment/recreation (5 percent). The remaining trip purposes accounted for three or less percent each. On Saturday trip purposes are somewhat different. After commuting to work, entertainment/recreation is the next highest (30 percent), followed by visiting family and friends (almost 10 percent), shopping (nearly 8 percent) and traveling to/from school (about 4 percent). The remaining trip purposes each accounted for less than 2 percent. A look at the trip purpose by station reveals additional insights into each station’s ridership characteristics (see Figures 37 to 42). Commuting to work is the highest trip purpose at Pattison Station (weekday – nearly 78 percent, Saturday --45 percent) and entertainment/recreation was the second highest trip purpose (weekday – almost 7 percent, Saturday – nearly 44 percent). It is important to note that there was an event during the evening of the Saturday survey which is likely the reason for the high entertainment/recreation percentage. All other trip purposes are 6 percent or less each. At Oregon station commuting to work is again the highest trip purpose (weekday – 68 percent, Saturday – almost 49 percent). On weekdays, traveling to/from school is the second highest trip purpose (12 percent) followed by entertainment/recreation (almost 6 percent) and visiting family and friends (almost 4 percent). All other trip purposes are less than 3 percent each. On Saturdays, the second highest trip purpose is entertainment/recreation (27 percent) followed by shopping (12 percent), traveling to/from school (nearly 5 percent) and visiting family and friends (4 percent). The remaining trip purposes account for less than 2 percent each. At Snyder Station commuting to work is the highest trip purpose (weekday – 53 percent, Saturday – almost 38 percent). With South Philadelphia High School at the corner of Broad Street and Snyder Avenue, it’s not surprising that traveling to/from school is the second highest weekday trip purpose (17 percent). Visiting family and friends is the third highest weekday trip purpose (nearly 13 percent) with all others accounting for less than 4 percent each. On Saturdays, entertainment/recreation trips represent the second highest trip purpose (23 percent) followed by visiting family and friends (16 percent), shopping (8 percent) and traveling to/from school (almost 5 percent). All other trip purposes account for less than 4 percent each. Page 34 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 35 Figure 36 Page 35 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 37 Figure 38 Page 36 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 39 Figure 40 Page 37 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 41 Figure 42 Page 38 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Passengers were also asked how often they make this trip to determine trip frequency. Since most people boarding trains at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations on a weekday responded that they were commuting to work, it is not surprising that most people (61 percent) said they make this trip 4 to 5 days a week (see Figure 43). About 17 percent of the weekday passengers at the three stations said they travel 1 to 3 days a week, 12 percent travel less than once a week and about 9 percent make the trip 6 to 7 days a week. On Saturday, the trip frequency is more proportional among the choices (see Figure 44). Almost 30 percent make the trip less than once a week, about 28 percent travel 4 to 5 days a week, 24 percent make the trip 1 to 3 days a week and almost 19 percent said they make the trip 6 to 7 days a week. A look at the trip frequency results by station shows some of the trip making patterns (see Figures 45 to 50). At all three stations most weekday passengers travel 4 to 5 days a week (59 to 68 percent) while the remaining trip frequency percentages vary by station. At Pattison Station 12 percent of the passengers travel less than once a week, almost 11 percent travel 1 to 3 days a week and about 8 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week. At Oregon Station, 15 percent of the weekday passengers travel 1 to 3 days a week, 12 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week and 10 percent travel less than once a week. At Snyder Station, 20 percent travel 1 to 3 days a week, 13 percent travel less than once a week and almost 8 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week. On Saturday, the trip frequency percentages are fairly proportional at Oregon and Snyder Stations but not at Pattison Station. On Saturdays, 43 percent of the Pattison Station customers said they travel less than once a week (most likely since this station serves the Stadium area and people don’t travel there regularly), about 25 percent travel 4 to 5 days a week, 21 percent travel 1 to 3 days a week and almost 11 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week. About 27 percent of the Saturday Oregon Station passengers said they travel 4 to 5 days a week and another 27 percent said they travel less than once a week, 22 percent travel 1 to 3 days a week and nearly 23 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week. At Snyder Station, almost 30 percent of the passengers travel 4 to 5 days a week, nearly 27 percent travel 1 to 3 days a week and about 22 percent travel less than once a week and another 22 percent travel 6 to 7 days a week. Page 39 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 43 Figure 44 Page 40 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 45 Figure 46 Page 41 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 47 Figure 48 Page 42 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 49 Figure 50 Page 43 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Identified Issues and Recommended Actions One of the study goals is to utilize the findings to add value to current corridor planning by recommending strategies and actions for improved transportation and access. Given the multi-modal aspects of the South Broad Street corridor, there are several transportation-related problems affecting the different populations who live and work along it, and travelers who pass through it. Study area issues were identified through field visits, Advisory Committee meeting discussions, stakeholder interviews, the ridership survey results, and a review of recent studies and planned activities. There are several efforts underway that address associated problems of South Broad Street including: • SEPTA subway station upgrades to all three of the stations in the study area (recently completed or programmed); • Streets Department’s recent improvements to the streetscape, lighting, signals, etc., in the stadium vicinity; • PPA’s new red-light cameras at the intersection of Broad Street and Oregon Avenue; • South Broad Street Neighbors Association (SBSNA) and Central South Philadelphia Civic Association Alliance (CSPCAA) study of the physical form of South Broad Street between Washington and Oregon Avenues, currently underway; • PIDC Commercial Corridors study of Broad & McKean, currently underway; • Community Design Collaborative: Infill Philadelphia Commercial Corridors conceptual design study of gateway treatment for East Passyunk corridor, 2006; • Community Design Collaborative: Infill Philadelphia Commercial Corridors Broad & Passyunk Strategies for a Gateway, 2007; and • PCPC’s Urban Design Study for the East Passyunk Avenue and Reed Street Community Gateway. These studies have been reviewed by the consultant team to identify issues and recommendations related to the Broad Street Survey study area. Most of these efforts touch on transportation and access issues; however, the study focus is generally on discrete locations within the Study Area, not necessarily associated with the subway stations exclusively. There are also several ongoing studies/initiatives (which have also been reviewed by the consultant team) that may benefit from the ridership survey results and the recommended actions including: • future SEPTA marketing efforts and communication strategies with riders; • the PIDC Broad Street Subway Extension Feasibility Study to improve access into the Navy Yard; • DVRPC’s Airport Transportation Study, which is examining regional access to/from Philadelphia; • PCPC’s Stadium Area Transit Study which recommended various phased approaches toward creating a more transit-oriented and pedestrian-friendlier experience; and • the DRPA PATCO Extension Study, currently underway, which has a large Philadelphia component including the concept of a light rail connector along the Delaware Riverfront with potential extensions to the Sports Complex (Pattison Station) and Navy Yard. Page 44 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study A key requirement of this study was that the recommendations be realistic, that they have not been developed in a vacuum, and that they are based on conditions specific to Philadelphia and the neighborhoods surrounding the stations. Based on all of the inputs to the study (a review of existing field conditions, review of past and ongoing studies, Advisory Committee input, Stakeholder interviews, and the ridership survey results), the study area problems/issues that have been identified and the resulting recommendations fall under the following categories: • Traffic flow and parking, • Buses and shelters • Pedestrian facilities/green space, • Intermodal transfers and wayfinding, and • Bicycle accommodation. The next sections describe each of these problem areas/issues along with recommended solutions and/or further study based on the study findings. The report is concluded with a recommendations matrix which lists the recommendations and the implementing agency(s). Page 45 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Traffic Flow and Parking The study area section of South Broad Street is a congested roadway serving multiple uses. It serves as a connector to major highways like I-95 and the Schulykill Expressway (I-76) and as a local arterial from the Stadium District to Center City Philadelphia. It is flanked by many land uses including parks, Stadiums, retail, residential, schools, institutional, etc. The corridor is multimodal with the Broad Street Subway running underground, numerous surface bus routes, autos, trucks, bicyclists, and pedestrians all attempting to utilize the same tight corridor. Parking is in great demand and nearly every available space is utilized including unconventional parking areas like the center median. Although parking in the center median is unconventional, it is accepted and “unofficially” allowed. While one would expect to hear complaints about slow travel speeds, that did not occur during this study. When Stakeholders were asked about traffic, it was just accepted that the corridor was sluggish because of all the demand on it. However, parking was a topic of conversation by the Stakeholders who indicated that more parking was needed and questioned who was utilizing existing parking – particularly parking in the center median. Although the ridership survey results showed that less than 10 percent of the Subway passengers are accessing the station by auto, that still amounts to several hundred each day. The density and confines of much of the areas around the tree subway stations often leads to parking in the medians, sidewalks, and in left-turn lanes. Several areas were identified where additional parking may be allocated by restriping (see Figures 51 and 52). Along the triangle section of West Moyamensing Avenue near the corner of Broad Street and Oregon Avenue it may be possible to remove part of the island and restripe with back-in angle parking to create about five additional spaces. West Moyamensing Avenue near Marconi Plaza could also be restriped to create 10 additional spaces. Restriping along South 13th and South 15th Streets (and adding a bicycle lane which will be discussed in the bicycle accommodation section) could add about 9 parking spaces. Vehicles park along the north side of Passyunk Avenue west of Broad Street in a disorganized manner because parking stalls are not striped and technically parking is not permitted in this area. Since parking occurs and has been allowed, the Philadelphia Parking Authority in conjunction with the Department of Streets and the Philadelphia Police, should examine whether parking may continue to be prohibited or whether that regulation can be rescinded. If parking is allowed, it should be striped on both sides of the street to allow back-in angled parking so that the maximum number of vehicles can park (see Figure 53). Additional parking may also be provided through a public/private shared parking agreement with some of the nearby schools and hospitals (see Figure 54). Stakeholders informed us that on weekends residents informally park in the South Philadelphia High School parking lot. Also, in the past there was an agreement with Methodist Hospital and the community to let residents use available parking in their garage for a nominal monthly fee. Agreements like these should be explored with the High School, Methodist and Saint Agnes Hospitals and other community neighbors with available parking. Page 46 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 51 Restriped Parking Along West Moyamensing Avenue Figure 52 Reconfiguration of South 13th and South 15th Streets Page 47 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Figure 53 Improvements to West Passyunk Avenue and South Broad Street Figure 54 Shared Parking Opportunities Page 48 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Beyond the concerns about parking, Stakeholders indicated that the intersection of Broad Street and West Passyunk Avenue was difficult for both pedestrians and vehicles to navigate since five roadway approaches come together. Improved and re-painted crosswalks along with additional signage and lane extension pavement markings through the intersection could improve navigation and safety at the intersection. Page 49 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Buses and Shelters The Broad Street corridor is well served by buses. About 10 routes have stops in the vicinity of one or more of the three study area Subway stations. The ridership survey results showed that bus travel was the second highest access mode (24 percent on weekdays and about 28 percent on Saturdays). Improvements to the bus facilities and intermodal connections will benefit Subway riders, bus riders and the general community. During the Stakeholder interviews, several bus-related issues were identified and these issues were confirmed during field visits including: • buses not pulling up to the curb; • vehicles illegally parked or dropping off passengers at signed bus stops; • limited information about buses serving particular bus stops; • poorly maintained or inadequate/non-existent bus shelters; • lack of coordination between bus and subway transfers; and • limited or no weekend service on some bus routes. A bus observed not pulling fully to the curb A bus unable to pull fully to the curb because of a car parked in the bus lane Extensive public outreach as part of the City's preparation of the DRAFT Greenplan Philadelphia report included recommendations for the South Philadelphia area to "improve transit systems and infrastructure" and to "improve policing and enforce laws" which is supported by this study. Recommendations include SEPTA operations staff working with bus drivers via training sessions to encourage them to pull to the curb so that passengers can board buses safely. By encouraging buses to pull to the curb, traffic flow is not impeded. Additional Philadelphia Police force enforcement of parking regulations by ticketing and towing vehicles that are illegally parked or dropping off/picking up at bus stops is recommended. More passenger information about buses serving the areas around the stations is needed. Existing bus shelters could be upgraded or enhanced and new shelters could be constructed to include service routes Page 50 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study and schedules. Consideration should also be given to improving the Casino bus stop near Snyder Station and better marketing and signage of that service. Stakeholders and subway passengers both mentioned that there is a lack of coordination between buses and subways. Almost 65 percent of the Subway passengers that arrive at Pattison Station by bus are riding the Route 71 bus which serves the Navy Yard. In addition, several companies in the Navy Yard operate private shuttle service between Pattison Station and the Navy Yard. With the potential development and expansion of the Navy Yard, further study should be given to expanding the service hours and starting weekend operation of the Route 71 bus. An existing bus stop near the corner of Snyder Avenue and An existing bus stop along South Broad Street South Broad Street that does not have a bus shelter A example of a high-tech bus shelter An example of a low-tech bus shelter Page 51 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Pedestrian Facilities/Green Space Improvements to the pedestrian facilities surrounding the stations and additional green space will benefit subway passengers since the ridership survey data showed that over 60 percent of the passengers access the subway by walking only and most have origins close to the stations. Pedestrian facility improvements will also benefit the neighboring community near Snyder and Oregon Stations since both station areas have a shopping district adjacent to the station that appears to be patronized by both residents and people who work in the area. Visitors to and employees of the Stadiums near Pattison Station and people visiting FDR Park would benefit from pedestrian improvements in that area. At the Stakeholder group interviews, representatives said that the intersection of Broad Street and Oregon Avenue is not a pedestrian-friendly environment. The crosswalks and sidewalks – particularly near Snyder and Oregon Stations are in poor condition. An existing faded crosswalk at the corner of Oregon An existing faded crosswalk at the corner of Snyder Avenue and South Broad Street Avenue and South Broad Street The Stakeholders also commented that people did not feel safe using the subway. Security issues are often less of an actual problem and more of a perceived problem. Improvement to the pedestrian environment and additional green space in the station areas, particularly at Snyder Station, would certainly make the area more inviting and active, potentially providing a “safer” perception of the area. Another safety concern that was mentioned by Stakeholders was attempted midblock crossings near Pattison Station. Broad Street is very wide and vehicles often travel at high speeds through this area so attempted crossings at midblock can be very dangerous. Both the 2004 Stadium Area Transit Study and the Infill Philadelphia: Commercial Corridors Study discuss the inadequate pedestrian facilities and the lack of green space in the study area and have recommendations to remedy the situation. The Stadium Area Transit Study recommends: • widening the Pattison Avenue sidewalk • adding pedestrian-scale lighting and landscaping • Installing attractive fencing and/or perhaps bollards along both sides of Pattison Avenue to guide pedestrians to designated mid-block crossing locations Page 52 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study The Infill Philadelphia: Commercial Corridors Study stated that East Passyunk’s gateway intersection at Broad Street is difficult to navigate and lacks the flavor of the rest of the corridor and that this intersection can be confusing, even intimidating for both drivers and pedestrians because it is a five- point intersection. Some of the recommendations from Infill Study that are supported by this study’s findings include: • Create gateways to enhance commercial corridor visibility • Redesign intersection and public areas to create outdoor amenities and improve the pedestrian experience • Re-engineer the Broad and Passyunk intersection to permit left-hand turns by southbound Broad Street drivers, making the Avenue easier to access • Add bump outs to shorten walking distances for pedestrians crossing Broad Street and slow down drivers entering the East Passyunk Avenue commercial corridor. Pedestrians are at risk whenever they cross Broad Street. The degree of risk depends on the complexity of the vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns and the effectiveness of supplementary information provided regarding the crossing location, direction, and duration. At intersections, turning vehicles and the speed at which they travel pose the greatest threat to pedestrians because the motorist's attention is focused primarily on other motorists. In addition to the geometric design of the intersection, pedestrian safety also relies heavily on the information that is provided to pedestrians (e.g., signs or signals). All pedestrians, including people with vision impairments, need the same information at an intersection. Providing vital information in multiple, accessible formats (e.g., visual, auditory, tactile) also benefits all pedestrians since information is better recognized and remembered if it is understood by multiple senses. Generally, the more complex the crossing, the more important it is to have accessible information about the crossing location, direction, and duration. Techniques that can help improve pedestrian conditions and access at intersections and should be considered and evaluated for study area intersections (with priority given to crosswalks adjacent to the Subway headhouses) through a follow-up study include: • Provide curb extensions to decrease crossing distances and increase pedestrian visibility; • Increase the pedestrian crossing times to accommodate people who walk slow including physically challenged individuals; • Restrict right turns on red; • Install accessible pedestrian signals to assist people with vision impairments; • Consider midblock signalized crossings with accessible pedestrian signal opportunities near busy intersections to encourage people to cross where there are fewer potential points of conflict with motorists; and • Add pedestrian countdown signal indicators if they do not already exist. Page 53 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study A pedestrian countdown signal similar to what has been An existing crosswalk in the corridor near the stadium installed at select locations in the corridor. district At a minimum the crosswalks and sidewalks near the stations need to be improved, even if this just involves rehabilitating the sidewalks and repainting the crosswalks using the current continental layout. This layout consists of the ladder layout with the transverse lines removed and is most visible to motorists and to those with low vision and cognitive impairments. There are also several opportunities around the Snyder and Oregon Stations to provide additional green space or streetscape improvements. At Snyder Station, the classic subway entrances provide an opportunity to advertise transit. The Subway entrance on the southeast corner may provide an opportunity for the School District in conjunction with SEPTA to do something creative (glass canopy, replica of cast-iron subway kiosk, etc.). The generous apron on that same corner would provide excellent bike parking/bike-share opportunities or even adding some planters and streetscape improvements. It may be possible to support and/or fund these improvements and the necessary maintenance through a public/private partnership with Walgreen's, CVS and/or other surrounding businesses. The newer glass and concrete subway headhouses and recent SEPTA station renovations at Oregon Station provide an excellent opportunity to reflect those investments back to the community by providing an actual gateway to the neighborhood. The underutilized and barren concrete "plaza" surrounding the subway headhouse at the northeast corner of Broad Street and Oregon Avenue provides a wonderful opportunity to celebrate the subway beneath it and the buses alongside it while providing a useful and aesthetically-pleasing bit of open- space for the cramped neighborhood. Possibilities could include: a small dog park, aerobics station, bicycle facility, sculpture garden, designated outdoor classroom/recreation space for the new Charter grade school just opposite the site and the new Daycare facilities that have sprung up nearby. It is noteworthy that the dense rowhouse neighborhoods north of Oregon and south of Snyder on the east side of Broad have no open space or recreational opportunities nearer than Mifflin Square at 6th & Page 54 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Ritner Streets, or about one mile east of Broad Street so utilizing the existing station around the space in a more creative/public-friendly way would provide an amenity to the community that is not readily available. The triangle on the west side of Broad Street at the northwest corner of Oregon Avenue provides another potential "complementary" community space for the neighbors on the west side of Broad Street. In addition to or instead of creating more parking options, it may be possible to incorporate a small area of community space like a garden, a few higher-quality benches, a chess table or two, etc. An example of streetscape improvements. An example of a gateway treatment. Page 55 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Intermodal Transfers and Wayfinding Throughout the corridor and specifically at the stations there is a lack of wayfinding information. This is most prominent near Pattison Station. The Stadium District is a valuable asset for the City of Philadelphia and its surrounding metropolitan region. With four vibrant sports/entertainment venues located in such close proximity to each other and with access to multiple transportation modes, the District displays some of the unique characteristics of a downtown area despite its distance from Philadelphia’s Center City. Visitors to the various venues are likely to be infrequent customers who require more guidance and direction to reach their venue. The level of activity associated with the various attractions at these multiple venues, coupled with prospective redevelopment plans for the area, present a number of challenges involving the safe and efficient movement of and intermodal transfers between the various transportation modes serving the area. Many stadiums give the highest priority to pedestrians, from street closures (in many cities) to provision of a pedestrian “walk” (e.g., “Ravens Walk” in Baltimore) which could be achieved and should be considered in the Stadium District. Wayfinding signage near Heinz Field in Pittsburgh. Pedestrian safety zones within parking fields in Seattle. The Stadium Area Transit Study states the existing wayfinding and signage system and the lack of direct pedestrian connectivity to certain venues from the Pattison Station pose obstacles to promoting transit access to the Sports Complex. The Stadium Area Transit Study recommends, and the findings from this study support, maximizing the utility of Pattison Station through better pedestrian circulation including sidewalk, crosswalk, and landscaping enhancements, accommodation of direct pathways, traffic calming, wayfinding, and lighting improvements. Specific recommendations for improving the overall pedestrian experience include: • Provide enhanced directional signage and information at the platform and surface levels. It is especially important to direct emerging subway riders to the appropriate staircase/headhouse in order to avoid or minimize grade-level crossings. • Install/improve pedestrian pathways to shorten and/or enhance the walking environment between the Pattison Station and the four venues. One option involves installing a “shortest Page 56 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study distance” pathway that cuts diagonally across the Spectrum-Wachovia Center parking area and links the station to Lincoln Financial Field. A second option involves installing and widening walkways to improve orthogonal linkages. Both options include installation of various amenities such as street trees, landscaping, and pedestrian-scale lighting, to enhance the walking experience (see the figure below from the Stadium Area Transit Study P. 51, Fig. 4-16). • For both options, improvements would also be made to the transit plaza that includes Headhouses #3 and #4 (on the southeast corner of the intersection of Pattison Avenue and Broad Street). Currently most transit riders exit the plaza through the gate and walk to the fence surrounding the perimeter of the parking area adjacent to the Spectrum and then walk across the Spectrum parking lot. The Stadium Area Transit Study recommends closing this gate and channeling pedestrians to an expanded pedestrian plaza at the southeast corner of the existing Headhouse #4 (see the figure below from the Stadium Area Transit Study P. 50, Fig. 4-15). • Better coordinated marketing efforts for transit services. Stadium Area Transit Study P. 51, Fig. 4-16 Sta dium Area Tra nsit Study P. 50, Fi g. 4-15 In addition to specific improvements at Pattison Station, overall wayfinding improvements in the corridor are recommended. Customers, especially first time customers or visitors, trying to reach the stations on foot, bike, or automobile have relatively few, if any, wayfinding signs to guide them to the station. The relationship between the station and downtown points of interest is not clear. There is no neighborhood map to help orient and guide visitors or to pinpoint the specific locations of other transportation providers. Page 57 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study There is limited information about the bus schedules and bus stop locations for other transit providers. Each of the stations is served by multiple bus routes. However, not all these bus routes are obviously located from the station exit doors. With the diverse and numerous customers using the station, a transportation directory is needed. Directories or Information Kiosks at Pattison, Oregon, and Snyder Stations that include intermodal transfer information, neighborhood information, and appropriate directional signage is recommended. A wayfinding/branding system along the Broad Street corridor is recommended. A branding system like the Avenue of the Arts pylons (such as at Broad Street & Washington Avenue) or a wayfinding signage system signifying this portion of the corridor is "downtown South Philly" will help develop a sense of community spirit and pride and help visitors gain a sense of direction and an idea of what the community has to offer. Wayfinding Examples In addition to wayfinding improvements, intermodal connections should be studied at Oregon station. In particular, internal and external pedestrian circulation should be studied related to the available entrances and exits and intermodal transfers. Maintaining the north headhouse of Oregon Station as an entrance at least during peak hours will facilitate quicker and safer transfers and reduce street level congestion and pedestrian/auto conflicts. Page 58 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Bicycle Accommodation Bicycling is one of the most efficient forms of transportation. It is good for your health, good for the environment, and cost effective. It is also fun, and helps create more vibrant and safe communities. SEPTA has recently launched a dedicated initiative to educate and encourage the Greater Philadelphia region to live green by riding public transportation. The effort, entitled “Go Green Go SEPTA,” uses community events, strategic partnerships and advertising to educate the public on the vital role public transportation plays in preserving the environment and promoting cleaner air. While this initiative is encouraging people to use transit, a supplemental initiative to walk or use a bicycle to access transit would be consistent with this environmentally conscious campaign and is recommended. To support bicycle access to the Subway and nearby bus routes, bicycle accommodations are needed. A covered bicycle storage area. While the ridership survey results showed only a small portion of the riders access transit by bicycle, bicycle usage in the surrounding community seems fairly high (as shown by the photos on the next page) and is supported by a bicycle lane on Oregon Avenue and “Share the Road” signs on Broad Street near the Stadiums. To support the existing bicycle usage and to encourage additional bicycle trips, several measures are recommended including bicycle parking and additional bicycle lanes. All three stations have ample apron area outside the head houses to add bicycle racks. This recommendation concurs with the Bicycling Advisory Task Force Report which recommended “continued installation of bike racks” and “bike parking in employment centers.” The Bicycle Coalition’s Bicycle Parking: Key to a Green Philadelphia - May 2008 recommended that SEPTA create bike parking shelters at stations and stops that serve park-and-ride commuters and that the City of Philadelphia encourage and install signage to indicate where bike parking is available. At Pattison Station, there is potential to use vast concrete aprons and/or some asphalt parking for a major bicycle hub, prototype bike station or bike-share facility. A “signature” bike station could be developed through a public/private partnership (possibly in conjunction with the Philly Live proposal) and could offer free bike parking during the hours of operation, and paid memberships for 24-hour access to secure parking. Enhanced services could also be offered like bicycle repairs, bicycle and commute sales & accessories, rental bikes for local and tourist needs, and restroom/changing rooms. Page 59 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study A cyclist traveling on South Broad Street. A passenger on the platform waiting with their bicycle for the Broad Street Subway. A bicycle chained to a parking meter along South Broad A cyclist traveling on South Broad Street. Street. The existing bike lane along Oregon Avenue near the An existing “Share the Road” sign on South Broad Street Oregon Station. near Pattison Station. Page 60 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Additional bicycle lanes should be considered. From an engineering perspective, adding bicycle lanes on Broad Street, while needed, would be difficult (particularly near Snyder and Oregon Stations) without removing parking which is also needed. However, South 13th and South 15th Streets are wide (about 47 feet) enough to accommodate bike lanes and run parallel to Broad Street on either side of Marconi Plaza (see Figure 55). This would require converting South 13th Street to one-way northbound, removing parking from one side of each street and reconfiguring to back-in angled parking on the other side of the street to allow for a bike lane along the park on either side. These new bike lanes could serve as an extension to the existing bike lane on Oregon Avenue. Another potential location for bike lanes is Pattison Avenue to encourage biking to stadium events.. An example of a well-defined bike lane. Figure 55 Bike Lane Recommendations for South 13th and South 15th Streets Page 61 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study A recommendations matrix (see Table 3) that includes each of the recommendations and the reviewing and implementing agencies has been developed to help facilitate the next steps toward implementation. Table 3 Recommendations Matrix Page 62 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study Table 3 Recommendations Matrix (Continued) Page 63 June 2009
    • Broad Street Subway Ridership Study APPENDIX June 2009
    • TABLE A 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY BOARDING STATION Weekday Saturday Station Location 9,993 6,599 Total 1,476 1,953 Pattison Percent 14.8 29.6 Total 3,192 1,780 Oregon Percent 31.9 27.0 Total 5,325 2,866 Snyder Percent 53.3 43.4
    • TABLE B 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY GENDER Weekday Saturday Gender 9,993 6,599 Total 4,381 3,102 Female Percent 43.8 47.0 Total 5,612 3,497 Male Percent 56.2 53.0
    • TABLE C 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EXITING STATION Weekday Saturday Station Location 9,993 6,599 Total 369 167 Allegheny Percent 3.7 2.5 Total 688 309 Cecil B. Moore/Temple Percent 6.9 4.7 Total 4,456 2,469 City Hall Percent 44.6 37.4 Total 135 164 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 1.4 2.5 Total 176 231 Erie Percent 1.8 3.5 Total 132 136 Fairmount Percent 1.3 2.1 Total 199 61 Fern Rock Percent 2.0 0.9 Total 111 138 Girard Percent 1.1 2.1 Total 48 23 Hunting Park Percent 0.5 0.4 Total 105 0 Logan Percent 1.0 0.0 Total 231 363 Lombard-South Percent 2.3 5.5 Total 142 69 North Philadelphia Percent 1.4 1.0 Total 321 305 Olney Percent 3.2 4.6 Total 186 203 Oregon Percent 1.9 3.1 Total 230 413 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 2.3 6.3 Total 259 64 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 2.6 1.0 Total 122 42 Snyder Percent 1.2 0.6 Total 347 145 Spring Garden Percent 3.5 2.2 Total 150 138 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 1.5 2.1 Total 176 245 Tasker-Morris Percent 1.8 3.7 Total 1,343 843 Walnut-Locust Percent 13.4 12.8 Total 68 68 Wyoming Percent 0.7 1.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE D 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EXITING STATION BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Station Location 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 54 216 99 369 Allegheny Percent 3.7 6.8 1.9 3.7 Total 20 208 460 688 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 1.4 6.5 8.6 6.9 Total 716 1,550 2,191 4,456 City Hall Percent 48.5 48.5 41.1 44.6 Total 14 46 76 135 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 13 38 124 176 Erie Percent 0.9 1.2 2.3 1.8 Total 4 25 103 132 Fairmount Percent 0.3 0.8 1.9 1.3 Total 14 94 90 199 Fern Rock Percent 1.0 3.0 1.7 2.0 Total 8 36 66 111 Girard Percent 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.1 Total 14 25 9 48 Hunting Park Percent 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.5 Total 6 26 73 105 Logan Percent 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.0 Total 74 53 104 231 Lombard-South Percent 5.0 1.6 2.0 2.3 Total 33 40 69 142 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 2.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 Total 19 30 272 321 Olney Percent 1.3 0.9 5.1 3.2 Total 22 0 164 186 Oregon Percent 1.5 0.0 3.1 1.9 Total 0 77 153 230 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 0.0 2.4 2.9 2.3 Total 53 134 72 259 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 3.6 4.2 1.4 2.6 Total 70 52 0 122 Snyder Percent 4.7 1.6 0.0 1.2 Total 50 78 219 347 Spring Garden Percent 3.4 2.5 4.1 3.5 Total 25 18 108 150 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 1.7 0.6 2.0 1.5 Total 46 44 87 176 Tasker-Morris Percent 3.1 1.4 1.6 1.8 Total 210 384 748 1,343 Walnut-Locust Percent 14.3 12.0 14.1 13.4 Total 10 20 38 68 Wyoming Percent 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE E 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EXITING STATION BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Station Location 1,953 1,780 2,866 6,599 Total 81 24 62 167 Allegheny Percent 4.1 1.4 2.2 2.5 Total 111 69 128 309 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 5.7 3.9 4.5 4.7 Total 724 715 1,030 2,469 City Hall Percent 37.1 40.2 35.9 37.4 Total 75 27 63 164 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 3.8 1.5 2.2 2.5 Total 48 95 88 231 Erie Percent 2.5 5.3 3.1 3.5 Total 3 59 75 136 Fairmount Percent 0.1 3.3 2.6 2.1 Total 48 0 13 61 Fern Rock Percent 2.5 0.0 0.4 0.9 Total 48 65 25 138 Girard Percent 2.5 3.6 0.9 2.1 Total 10 0 13 23 Hunting Park Percent 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.4 Total 151 73 139 363 Lombard-South Percent 7.7 4.1 4.8 5.5 Total 69 0 0 69 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 3.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total 47 98 159 305 Olney Percent 2.4 5.5 5.6 4.6 Total 120 0 84 203 Oregon Percent 6.1 0.0 2.9 3.1 Total 0 162 252 413 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 0.0 9.1 8.8 6.3 Total 0 0 64 64 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.0 Total 28 14 0 42 Snyder Percent 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.6 Total 0 70 75 145 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 3.9 2.6 2.2 Total 64 10 64 138 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 3.3 0.6 2.2 2.1 Total 142 40 62 245 Tasker-Morris Percent 7.3 2.3 2.2 3.7 Total 165 260 418 843 Walnut-Locust Percent 8.4 14.6 14.6 12.8 Total 18 0 50 68 Wyoming Percent 0.9 0.0 1.7 1.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE F 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Origin 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 1,261 3,159 5,304 9,724 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 85.5 99.0 99.6 97.3 Total 1,100 3,129 5,258 9,487 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 74.5 98.0 98.7 94.9 Total 65 131 231 427 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.3 Total 1,030 2,999 5,027 9,056 South Philadelphia Percent 69.8 93.9 94.4 90.6 Total 4 0 0 4 West Philadelphia Percent 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 161 29 46 237 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 10.9 0.9 0.9 2.4 Total 14 0 0 14 Chester County, PA Percent 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 138 29 46 213 Delaware County, PA Percent 9.3 0.9 0.9 2.1 Total 4 0 0 4 Lancaster County, PA Percent 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 6 0 0 6 York County, PA Percent 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 215 33 21 269 OTHER TOTAL Percent 14.5 1.0 0.4 2.7 Total 107 6 0 113 New Castle County, Delaware Percent 7.3 0.2 0.0 1.1 Total 6 0 0 6 Kent County, Delaware Percent 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 6 14 14 33 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 Total 0 3 0 3 Burlington County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total 19 5 8 32 Camden County, NJ Percent 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 Total 7 0 0 7 Cumberland County, NJ Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 57 0 0 57 Gloucester County, NJ Percent 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total 0 5 0 5 Ocean County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total 13 0 0 13 Salem County, NJ Percent 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE G 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Origin 1,953 1,780 2,866 6,599 Total 1,943 1,770 2,779 6,492 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 99.5 99.4 97.0 98.4 Total 1,923 1,756 2,766 6,445 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 99.0 99.2 99.6 99.3 Total 10 155 113 279 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.5 8.7 3.9 4.2 Total 1,912 1,600 2,653 6,166 South Philadelphia Percent 97.9 89.9 92.6 93.4 Total 20 14 13 47 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.7 Total 10 14 13 37 Delaware County, PA Percent 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.6 Total 10 0 0 10 Lancaster County, PA Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 10 10 87 107 OTHER TOTAL Percent 0.5 0.6 3.0 1.6 Total 0 10 87 97 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.6 3.0 1.5 Total 10 0 0 10 Gloucester County, NJ Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE H 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 1,433 3,176 5,299 9,908 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 97.1 99.5 99.5 99.1 Total 1,381 3,113 5,213 9,707 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 93.5 97.5 97.9 97.1 Total 22 26 145 194 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 1.5 0.8 2.7 1.9 Total 186 288 1,085 1,559 South Philadelphia Percent 12.6 9.0 20.4 15.6 Total 710 1,600 1,686 3,997 Center City Percent 48.1 50.1 31.7 40.0 Total 91 229 497 816 West Philadelphia Percent 6.1 7.2 9.3 8.2 Total 164 461 1,098 1,723 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 11.1 14.4 20.6 17.2 Total 32 133 194 358 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 2.1 4.2 3.6 3.6 Total 26 69 95 190 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 1.7 2.2 1.8 1.9 Total 35 44 83 162 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 2.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 Total 72 192 234 498 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 4.9 6.0 4.4 5.0 Total 44 70 96 211 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 3.0 2.2 1.8 2.1 Total 52 63 86 201 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 3.5 2.0 1.6 2.0 Total 0 19 11 30 Berks County, PA Percent 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.3 Total 3 3 15 22 Chester County, PA Percent 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 Total 28 18 46 92 Delaware County, PA Percent 1.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 Total 4 0 0 4 Lancaster County, PA Percent 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 17 23 14 54 Montgomery County, PA Percent 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.5 Total 43 16 26 85 OTHER TOTAL Percent 2.9 0.5 0.5 0.9 Total 7 0 0 7 New Castle County, Delaware Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 14 0 14 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 Total 7 0 0 7 Burlington County, NJ Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 18 2 16 37 Camden County, NJ Percent 1.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 Total 3 0 0 3 Essex County, NJ Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3 0 0 3 Salem County, NJ Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 9 9 Union County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total 6 0 0 6 New York (Other) Percent 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE I 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,953 1,740 2,866 6,559 Total 1,953 1,726 2,866 6,545 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 100.0 99.2 100.0 99.8 Total 1,817 1,712 2,753 6,281 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 93.0 99.2 96.0 96.0 Total 18 22 32 72 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.1 Total 402 378 652 1,431 South Philadelphia Percent 20.6 21.7 22.7 21.8 Total 480 574 1,016 2,071 Center City Percent 24.6 33.0 35.5 31.6 Total 183 72 141 397 West Philadelphia Percent 9.4 4.2 4.9 6.0 Total 316 236 439 990 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 16.2 13.6 15.3 15.1 Total 122 78 76 277 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 6.3 4.5 2.7 4.2 Total 26 87 75 188 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 1.3 5.0 2.6 2.9 Total 45 40 100 185 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 2.3 2.3 3.5 2.8 Total 134 120 165 419 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 6.8 6.9 5.8 6.4 Total 91 103 57 251 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 4.7 5.9 2.0 3.8 Total 136 14 113 264 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 7.0 0.8 4.0 4.0 Total 45 0 25 71 Berks County, PA Percent 2.3 0.0 0.9 1.1 Total 91 0 62 153 Delaware County, PA Percent 4.7 0.0 2.2 2.3 Total 0 14 26 40 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.6 Total 0 14 0 14 OTHER TOTAL Percent 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Total 0 14 0 14 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Total 0 0 0 0 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 New York (Other) Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE J 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Origin 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 1,261 3,159 5,304 9,724 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 85.5 99.0 99.6 97.3 Total 1,100 3,129 5,258 9,487 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 74.5 98.0 98.7 94.9 Total 65 131 231 427 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.3 Total 22 77 146 245 Zip Code: 19142 Percent 1.5 2.4 2.7 2.5 Total 10 34 66 111 Zip Code: 19143 Percent 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.1 Total 33 20 18 71 Zip Code: 19153 Percent 2.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 Total 1,030 2,999 5,027 9,056 South Philadelphia Percent 69.8 93.9 94.4 90.6 Total 235 0 0 235 Zip Code: 19112 Percent 15.9 0.0 0.0 2.4 Total 276 1,026 2,307 3,609 Zip Code: 19145 Percent 18.7 32.1 43.3 36.1 Total 3 24 221 248 Zip Code: 19146 Percent 0.2 0.8 4.1 2.5 Total 7 91 116 214 Zip Code: 19147 Percent 0.5 2.9 2.2 2.1 Total 510 1,858 2,383 4,750 Zip Code: 19148 Percent 34.5 58.2 44.8 47.5 Total 4 0 0 4 West Philadelphia Percent 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 4 0 0 4 Zip Code: 19104 Percent 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 161 29 46 237 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 10.9 0.9 0.9 2.4 Total 215 33 21 269 OTHER TOTAL Percent 14.5 1.0 0.4 2.7 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE K 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Origin 1,953 1,780 2,866 6,599 Total 1,943 1,770 2,779 6,492 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 99.5 99.4 97.0 98.4 Total 1,923 1,756 2,766 6,445 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 98.4 98.6 96.5 97.7 Total 10 155 113 279 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.5 8.7 3.9 4.2 Total 0 88 13 101 Zip Code: 19142 Percent 0.0 5.0 0.4 1.5 Total 10 54 50 114 Zip Code: 19143 Percent 0.5 3.1 1.7 1.7 Total 0 12 51 63 Zip Code: 19153 Percent 0.0 0.7 1.8 1.0 Total 1,912 1,600 2,653 6,166 South Philadelphia Percent 97.9 89.9 92.6 93.4 Total 0 0 13 13 Zip Code: 19112 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 Total 980 731 1,233 2,944 Zip Code: 19145 Percent 50.2 41.0 43.0 44.6 Total 45 14 45 105 Zip Code: 19146 Percent 2.3 0.8 1.6 1.6 Total 76 59 140 275 Zip Code: 19147 Percent 3.9 3.3 4.9 4.2 Total 811 797 1,222 2,830 Zip Code: 19148 Percent 41.5 44.8 42.6 42.9 Total 20 14 13 47 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.7 Total 10 10 87 107 OTHER TOTAL Percent 0.5 0.6 3.0 1.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE L 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 1,433 3,176 5,299 9,908 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 97.1 99.5 99.5 99.1 Total 1,381 3,113 5,213 9,707 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 93.5 97.5 97.9 97.1 Total 22 26 145 194 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 1.5 0.8 2.7 1.9 Total 0 14 48 62 Zip Code: 19142 Percent 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.6 Total 16 12 90 119 Zip Code: 19143 Percent 1.1 0.4 1.7 1.2 Total 6 0 7 13 Zip Code: 19153 Percent 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total 186 288 1,085 1,559 South Philadelphia Percent 12.6 9.0 20.4 15.6 Total 0 22 36 58 Zip Code: 19112 Percent 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.6 Total 58 66 193 317 Zip Code: 19145 Percent 3.9 2.1 3.6 3.2 Total 66 68 123 256 Zip Code: 19146 Percent 4.4 2.1 2.3 2.6 Total 36 64 104 204 Zip Code: 19147 Percent 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 Total 27 67 629 724 Zip Code: 19148 Percent 1.8 2.1 11.8 7.2 Total 710 1,600 1,686 3,997 Center City Percent 48.1 50.1 31.7 40.0 Total 6 39 7 52 Zip Code: 19101 Percent 0.4 1.2 0.1 0.5 Total 125 319 429 872 Zip Code: 19102 Percent 8.5 10.0 8.0 8.7 Total 292 505 483 1,280 Zip Code: 19103 Percent 19.8 15.8 9.1 12.8 Total 0 3 0 3 Zip Code: 19104 Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total 6 16 0 21 Zip Code: 19105 Percent 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.2 Total 40 159 119 318 Zip Code: 19106 Percent 2.7 5.0 2.2 3.2 Total 224 509 610 1,343 Zip Code: 19107 Percent 15.2 16.0 11.4 13.4 Total 2 35 0 37 Zip Code: 19108 Percent 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.4 Total 17 16 39 71 Zip Code: 19109 Percent 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.7 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE L (CONTINUED) 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 91 229 497 816 West Philadelphia Percent 6.1 7.2 9.3 8.2 Total 64 199 350 613 Zip Code: 19104 Percent 4.3 6.2 6.6 6.1 Total 6 0 20 26 Zip Code: 19131 Percent 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.3 Total 15 30 109 154 Zip Code: 19139 Percent 1.0 0.9 2.1 1.5 Total 6 0 18 23 Zip Code: 19151 Percent 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.2 Total 164 461 1,098 1,723 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 11.1 14.4 20.6 17.2 Total 23 28 221 272 Zip Code: 19121 Percent 1.6 0.9 4.1 2.7 Total 16 189 292 498 Zip Code: 19122 Percent 1.1 5.9 5.5 5.0 Total 5 56 141 202 Zip Code: 19123 Percent 0.3 1.8 2.7 2.0 Total 70 47 198 315 Zip Code: 19130 Percent 4.7 1.5 3.7 3.2 Total 31 103 168 302 Zip Code: 19132 Percent 2.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 Total 18 37 78 133 Zip Code: 19133 Percent 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.3 Total 32 133 194 358 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 2.1 4.2 3.6 3.6 Total 6 14 17 38 Zip Code: 19129 Percent 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 Total 25 119 177 321 Zip Code: 19140 Percent 1.7 3.7 3.3 3.2 Total 26 69 95 190 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 1.7 2.2 1.8 1.9 Total 8 28 51 87 Zip Code: 19125 Percent 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 Total 17 37 44 99 Zip Code: 19134 Percent 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.0 Total 0 4 0 4 Zip Code: 19137 Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE L (CONTINUED) 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 35 44 83 162 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 2.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 Total 2 3 0 5 Zip Code: 19118 Percent 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total 10 8 6 23 Zip Code: 19119 Percent 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total 0 5 0 5 Zip Code: 19127 Percent 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total 7 0 20 27 Zip Code: 19128 Percent 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.3 Total 16 28 58 101 Zip Code: 19144 Percent 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0 Total 72 192 234 498 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 4.9 6.0 4.4 5.0 Total 24 53 52 128 Zip Code: 19120 Percent 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.3 Total 3 14 5 21 Zip Code: 19126 Percent 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 Total 10 20 15 44 Zip Code: 19138 Percent 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.4 Total 31 94 156 281 Zip Code: 19141 Percent 2.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 Total 5 11 7 23 Zip Code: 19150 Percent 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.2 Total 44 70 96 211 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 3.0 2.2 1.8 2.1 Total 7 0 10 17 Zip Code: 19111 Percent 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 Total 0 11 0 11 Zip Code: 19114 Percent 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 Total 0 3 0 3 Zip Code: 19115 Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total 3 0 0 3 Zip Code: 19116 Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 9 26 68 103 Zip Code: 19124 Percent 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.0 Total 52 63 86 201 OTHER PA COUNTIES (SUB-NET) Percent 3.5 2.0 1.6 2.0 Total 7 0 0 7 Burlington County, NJ Percent 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 18 2 16 37 Camden County, NJ Percent 1.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 Total 3 0 0 3 Essex County, NJ Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3 0 0 3 Salem County, NJ Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 9 9 Union County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total 6 0 0 6 New York (Other) Percent 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE M 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,953 1,740 2,866 6,559 Total 1,953 1,726 2,866 6,545 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 100.0 99.2 100.0 99.8 Total 1,817 1,712 2,753 6,281 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 93.0 98.4 96.0 95.8 Total 18 22 32 72 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.1 Total 3 0 0 3 Zip Code: 19142 Percent 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 12 12 32 57 Zip Code: 19143 Percent 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.9 Total 3 10 0 13 Zip Code: 19153 Percent 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.2 Total 402 378 652 1,431 South Philadelphia Percent 20.6 21.7 22.7 21.8 Total 0 0 13 13 Zip Code: 19112 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 Total 113 36 95 244 Zip Code: 19145 Percent 5.8 2.1 3.3 3.7 Total 165 74 114 353 Zip Code: 19146 Percent 8.5 4.3 4.0 5.4 Total 82 88 114 284 Zip Code: 19147 Percent 4.2 5.0 4.0 4.3 Total 41 179 316 537 Zip Code: 19148 Percent 2.1 10.3 11.0 8.2 Total 480 574 1,016 2,071 Center City Percent 24.6 33.0 35.5 31.6 Total 0 12 0 12 Zip Code: 19101 Percent 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 Total 94 49 316 459 Zip Code: 19102 Percent 4.8 2.8 11.0 7.0 Total 271 207 330 808 Zip Code: 19103 Percent 13.9 11.9 11.5 12.3 Total 0 0 13 13 Zip Code: 19105 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 Total 58 12 45 116 Zip Code: 19106 Percent 3.0 0.7 1.6 1.8 Total 57 294 305 655 Zip Code: 19107 Percent 2.9 16.9 10.6 10.0 Total 0 0 7 7 Zip Code: 19108 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total 183 72 141 397 West Philadelphia Percent 9.4 4.2 4.9 6.0 Total 70 59 103 232 Zip Code: 19104 Percent 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.5 Total 55 0 0 55 Zip Code: 19131 Percent 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 12 14 26 52 Zip Code: 19139 Percent 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 Total 45 0 13 58 Zip Code: 19151 Percent 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.9 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE M 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,953 1,740 2,866 6,559 Total 316 236 439 990 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 16.2 13.6 15.3 15.1 Total 36 59 58 153 Zip Code: 19121 Percent 1.9 3.4 2.0 2.3 Total 131 35 141 307 Zip Code: 19122 Percent 6.7 2.0 4.9 4.7 Total 6 28 114 148 Zip Code: 19123 Percent 0.3 1.6 4.0 2.3 Total 58 114 38 210 Zip Code: 19130 Percent 3.0 6.6 1.3 3.2 Total 85 0 25 110 Zip Code: 19132 Percent 4.4 0.0 0.9 1.7 Total 0 0 63 63 Zip Code: 19133 Percent 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.0 Total 122 78 76 277 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 6.3 4.5 2.7 4.2 Total 0 10 0 10 Zip Code: 19129 Percent 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 Total 122 68 76 267 Zip Code: 19140 Percent 6.3 3.9 2.7 4.1 Total 26 87 75 188 Frankford / Kensington Percent 1.3 5.0 2.6 2.9 Total 8 14 50 72 Zip Code: 19125 Percent 0.4 0.8 1.7 1.1 Total 18 73 25 116 Zip Code: 19134 Percent 0.9 4.2 0.9 1.8 Total 45 40 100 185 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 2.3 2.3 3.5 2.8 Total 45 14 50 109 Zip Code: 19119 Percent 2.3 0.8 1.7 1.7 Total 0 26 50 76 Zip Code: 19144 Percent 0.0 1.5 1.7 1.2 Total 134 120 165 419 Oak Lane Percent 6.8 6.9 5.8 6.4 Total 20 24 51 95 Zip Code: 19120 Percent 1.0 1.4 1.8 1.4 Total 0 44 0 44 Zip Code: 19126 Percent 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.7 Total 13 0 0 13 Zip Code: 19138 Percent 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 79 38 51 168 Zip Code: 19141 Percent 4.1 2.2 1.8 2.6 Total 21 14 64 99 Zip Code: 19150 Percent 1.1 0.8 2.2 1.5 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE M 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION ZIP CODES BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Destination 1,953 1,740 2,866 6,559 Total 91 103 57 251 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 4.7 5.9 2.0 3.8 Total 0 10 0 10 Zip Code: 19111 Percent 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 Total 0 44 0 44 Zip Code: 19135 Percent 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.7 Total 91 0 62 153 Delaware County, PA Percent 4.7 0.0 2.2 2.3 Total 0 14 26 40 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.6 Total 0 14 0 14 OTHER TOTAL Percent 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Total 0 14 0 14 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Total 0 0 0 0 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 New York (Other) Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE N 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY DESTINATION: WEEKDAY New Castle Southwest South West Chester Delaware Lancaster York County, Kent County, Camden Gloucester Salem Cumberland Atlantic Burlington Ocean County, Total Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia County, PA County, PA County, PA PA Delaware County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ Delaware 427 9,056 4 14 213 4 6 113 6 32 57 13 7 33 3 5 9,993 Total 427 8,989 4 14 213 4 6 106 6 32 57 13 7 22 3 5 9,908 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 100.0 99.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 94.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 65.9 100.0 100.0 99.1 Total 427 8,792 4 14 213 0 6 106 6 32 57 13 7 22 3 5 9,707 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 100.0 Destination 97.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 94.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 65.9 100.0 100.0 97.1 Total 52 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 12.3 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Total 64 1,486 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1,559 South Philadelphia Origin Percent 15.0 16.4 0.0 30.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 Total 161 3,447 4 10 148 0 6 101 6 32 53 6 7 8 3 5 3,997 Center City Percent 37.8 38.1 100.0 69.2 69.4 0.0 100.0 88.8 100.0 100.0 92.8 47.5 100.0 24.9 100.0 100.0 40.0 Total 7 801 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 816 West Philadelphia Percent 1.7 8.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 Total 107 1,583 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 7 0 0 1,723 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 25.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 52.5 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 17.2 Total 7 345 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 358 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 1.7 3.8 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 Total 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Total 10 138 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 2.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total 19 450 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 498 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 4.3 5.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 5.0 Total 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 Total 0 197 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 OTHER PA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Total 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Berks County, PA Percent 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Chester County, PA Percent 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 Delaware County, PA Percent 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Lancaster County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 85 OTHER TOTAL (NET) Percent 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 New Castle County, Delaware Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 14 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Burlington County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Essex County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Salem County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Union County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New York (Other) Percent 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE O 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY DESTINATION: SATURDAY Southwest South Delaware Lancaster Gloucester Atlantic Total Philadelphia Philadelphia County, PA County, PA County, NJ County, NJ Destination 279 6,166 37 10 10 97 6,599 Total 279 6,112 37 10 10 97 6,545 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Origin Percent 100.0 99.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.2 Total 279 5,848 37 10 10 97 6,281 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 100.0 94.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 95.2 Total 13 60 0 0 0 0 72 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 4.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total 33 1,351 10 0 0 37 1,431 South Philadelphia Percent 11.7 21.9 27.6 0.0 0.0 38.4 21.7 Total 35 2,003 13 10 0 10 2,071 Center City Percent 12.6 32.5 34.0 100.0 0.0 10.4 31.4 Total 0 382 14 0 0 0 397 West Philadelphia Percent 0.0 6.2 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 Total 108 870 0 0 0 13 990 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 38.8 14.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 15.0 Total 0 277 0 0 0 0 277 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 Total 0 188 0 0 0 0 188 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 Total 12 173 0 0 0 0 185 Northwest Philadelphia Percent 4.5 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 Total 33 339 0 0 10 37 419 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 11.9 5.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 38.4 6.4 Total 44 207 0 0 0 0 251 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 15.9 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Total 0 264 0 0 0 0 264 OTHER PA COUNTY (SUB-NET) Percent 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Total 0 71 0 0 0 0 71 Berks County, PA Percent 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total 0 153 0 0 0 0 153 Delaware County, PA Percent 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total 0 40 0 0 0 0 40 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total 0 54 0 0 0 0 54 OTHER TOTAL (NET) Percent 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total 0 14 0 0 0 0 14 New York Percent 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE P 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ACCESS MODE Weekday Saturday Mode 9,993 6,599 Total 876 288 Auto: Driver Percent 8.8 4.4 Total 469 192 Auto: Passenger Percent 4.7 2.9 Total 85 80 Bicycle Percent 0.9 1.2 Total 2,395 1,869 Bus Percent 24.0 28.3 Total 73 0 Commuter Van Percent 0.7 0.0 Total 15 13 Taxi Percent 0.2 0.2 Total 6,080 4,157 Walk ONLY Percent 60.8 63.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE Q 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ACCESS MODE BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Mode 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 528 267 80 876 Auto: Driver Percent 35.8 8.4 1.5 8.8 Total 155 194 120 469 Auto: Passenger Percent 10.5 6.1 2.3 4.7 Total 73 0 0 73 Commuter Van Percent 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total 3 12 0 15 Taxi Percent 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 Total 539 1,906 3,635 6,080 Walk ONLY Percent 36.5 59.7 68.3 60.8 Total 8 24 53 85 Bicycle Percent 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 Total 170 788 1,437 2,395 Bus Percent 11.5 24.7 27.0 24.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE R 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ACCESS MODE BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Mode 1,953 1,780 2,866 6,599 Total 117 107 64 288 Auto: Driver Percent 6.0 6.0 2.2 4.4 Total 41 89 63 192 Auto: Passenger Percent 2.1 5.0 2.2 2.9 Total 0 0 13 13 Taxi Percent 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 Total 1,232 992 1,933 4,157 Walk ONLY Percent 63.1 55.7 67.5 63.0 Total 53 14 13 80 Bicycle Percent 2.7 0.8 0.4 1.2 Total 510 579 781 1,869 Bus Percent 26.1 32.5 27.3 28.3 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE S 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY ACCESS MODE: WEEKDAY Kent New Castle South Southwest West Chester Delaware Lancaster York County, Atlantic Burlington Camden Cumberland Gloucester Ocean Salem County, County, Total Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia County, PA County, PA County, PA PA County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ County, NJ Delaware Delaware Mode 9,056 427 4 14 213 4 6 33 3 32 7 57 5 13 6 113 9,993 Total 389 97 4 14 141 4 6 6 3 32 7 45 5 13 6 105 876 Auto: Driver Percent 4.3 22.8 100.0 100.0 66.2 100.0 100.0 16.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 77.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.3 8.8 Total 425 3 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 3 469 Auto: Passenger Percent 4.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 4.7 Total 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Bicycle Percent 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total 2,092 223 0 0 49 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2,395 Bus Percent 23.1 52.2 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 75.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 24.0 Total 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 Commuter Van Percent 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Taxi Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 5,977 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,080 Walk ONLY Percent 66.0 24.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.8 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE T 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ORIGIN BY ACCESS MODE: SATURDAY South Southwest Delaware Lancaster Atlantic Gloucester Total Philadelphia Philadelphia County, PA County, PA County, NJ County, NJ Mode 6,156 289 37 10 97 10 6,599 Total 196 44 37 10 0 0 288 Auto: Driver Percent 3.2 15.4 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 Total 169 13 0 0 0 10 192 Auto: Passenger Percent 2.8 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2.9 Total 80 0 0 0 0 0 80 Bicycle Percent 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Total 1,597 175 0 0 97 0 1,869 Bus Percent 25.9 60.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 28.3 Total 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 Taxi Percent 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 4,100 57 0 0 0 0 4,157 Walk ONLY Percent 66.6 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE U 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ACCESS BUS ROUTE BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Mode 170 788 1,437 2,395 Total 6 0 0 6 Route 17 Percent 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 0 29 0 29 Route 23 Percent 0.0 3.7 0.0 1.2 Total 0 0 225 225 Route 37 Percent 0.0 0.0 15.7 9.4 Total 0 71 7 78 Route 68 Percent 0.0 9.0 0.5 3.3 Total 0 204 0 204 Route 7 Percent 0.0 25.9 0.0 8.5 Total 110 0 7 117 Route 71 Percent 64.7 0.0 0.5 4.9 Total 0 7 1,082 1,090 Route 79 Percent 0.0 0.9 75.3 45.5 Total 5 3 35 43 Route C Percent 3.2 0.3 2.5 1.8 Total 5 0 0 5 Route G Percent 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 0 0 14 14 Greyhound Bus Line Percent 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.6 Total 44 473 67 585 Unknown / No Answer Percent 25.9 60.1 4.7 24.4 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE V 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY ACCESS BUS ROUTE BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Mode 510 579 781 1,869 Total 30 0 0 30 Route 17 Percent 6.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total 0 0 13 13 Route 23 Percent 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.7 Total 3 0 102 105 Route 37 Percent 0.5 0.0 13.1 5.6 Total 73 14 0 87 Route 68 Percent 14.4 2.4 0.0 4.7 Total 0 173 13 185 Route 7 Percent 0.0 29.9 1.6 9.9 Total 0 0 458 458 Route 79 Percent 0.0 0.0 58.6 24.5 Total 3 0 13 15 Route C Percent 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.8 Total 64 0 13 77 Route G Percent 12.5 0.0 1.7 4.1 Total 0 0 50 50 Greyhound Bus Line Percent 0.0 0.0 6.4 2.7 Total 337 392 120 849 Unknown / No Answer Percent 66.1 67.7 15.4 45.4 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE W 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY PARKING LOCATION BY BOARDING STATION BASE: ACCESS MODE "AUTO: DRIVER" OR "AUTO: PASSENGER" Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Weekday 683 461 193 1,337 Total 505 29 3 537 Parking Lot Percent 73.9 6.3 1.6 40.2 Total 16 178 70 264 On-street at the curb Percent 2.4 38.5 36.3 19.7 Total 0 20 3 23 On-street (center median) Percent 0.0 4.4 1.6 1.7 Total 162 234 117 513 Dropped off Percent 23.7 50.8 60.4 38.4 Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Saturday 158 196 127 480 Total 114 44 13 172 Parking Lot Percent 72.3 22.7 10.4 35.7 Total 13 63 26 101 On-street at the curb Percent 8.2 32.0 20.4 21.1 Total 0 0 13 13 On-street (center median) Percent 0.0 0.0 9.9 2.6 Total 31 89 75 195 Dropped off Percent 19.6 45.3 59.4 40.5 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE X 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY PARKING LOCATIONS BASE: ACCESS MODE AUTO: DRIVER OR AUTO: PASSENGER Auto: Auto: Driver Total Passenger Weekday 876 462 1,337 Total 528 9 537 Parking Lot Percent 60.3 2.0 40.2 Total 264 0 264 On-street at the curb Percent 30.1 0.0 19.7 Total 16 7 23 On-street (center median) Percent 1.8 1.6 1.7 Total 68 445 513 Dropped off Percent 7.7 96.5 38.4 Auto: Auto: Driver Total Passenger Saturday 288 192 480 Total 161 10 172 Parking Lot Percent 56.1 5.3 35.7 Total 101 0 101 On-street at the curb Percent 35.2 0.0 21.1 Total 13 0 13 On-street (center median) Percent 4.3 0.0 2.6 Total 13 182 195 Dropped off Percent 4.3 94.7 40.5 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE Y 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY BICYCLES ON BOARD TRAIN BY BOARDING STATION BASE: ACCESS MODE "BICYCLE" Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Weekday 8 24 53 85 Total 2 24 22 48 Yes Percent 20.2 100.0 41.5 56.0 Total 6 0 31 37 No Percent 79.8 0.0 58.5 44.0 Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Saturday 54 14 13 81 Total 8 14 13 35 Yes Percent 14.8 100.0 100.0 42.9 Total 46 0 0 46 No Percent 85.2 0.0 0.0 57.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE Z 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE Weekday Saturday Mode 9,993 6,599 Total 3 0 Amtrak Percent 0.0 0.0 Total 151 271 Auto: Driver Percent 1.5 4.1 Total 101 114 Auto: Passenger Percent 1.0 1.7 Total 72 42 Bicycle Percent 0.7 0.6 Total 1,254 1,149 Bus Percent 12.6 17.4 Total 12 0 Commuter Van Percent 0.1 0.0 Total 1,239 654 Market-Frankford Line Percent 12.4 9.9 Total 68 38 PATCO High Speed Line Percent 0.7 0.6 Total 176 351 SEPTA Regional Rail Percent 1.8 5.3 Total 35 0 Taxi Percent 0.3 0.0 Total 277 182 Trolley Route Percent 2.8 2.8 Total 6,604 3,799 Walk ONLY Percent 66.1 57.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE AA 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE BY EXITING STATION: WEEKDAY Market- Auto: Commuter PATCO High SEPTA Amtrak Auto: Driver Bicycle Bus Frankford Taxi Trolley Route Walk ONLY Total Passenger Van Speed Line Regional Rail Line Station Location 3 151 101 72 1,254 12 1,239 68 176 35 277 6,604 9,993 Total 0 17 0 10 136 0 0 0 4 0 0 202 369 Allegheny Percent 0.0 4.7 0.0 2.6 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 54.8 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 645 688 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.7 100.0 Total 3 55 13 18 305 0 1,239 0 148 0 277 2,398 4,456 City Hall Percent 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.4 6.8 0.0 27.8 0.0 3.3 0.0 6.2 53.8 100.0 Total 0 0 4 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 135 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.7 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 176 Erie Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.9 100.0 Total 0 6 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 132 Fairmount Percent 0.0 4.6 7.3 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.0 100.0 Total 0 21 26 0 27 5 0 0 19 18 0 83 199 Fern Rock Percent 0.0 10.6 13.1 0.0 13.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 9.4 9.1 0.0 41.6 100.0 Total 0 0 0 18 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 111 Girard Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.9 100.0 Total 0 2 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 48 Hunting Park Percent 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.6 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 105 Logan Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.0 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 6 0 216 231 Lombard-South Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 93.4 100.0 Total 0 0 5 0 40 0 0 0 6 0 0 92 142 North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 64.4 100.0 Total 0 7 31 12 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 321 Olney Percent 0.0 2.1 9.7 3.7 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.0 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 186 Oregon Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.4 100.0 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Total 0 13 0 0 65 7 0 0 0 0 0 145 230 Complex Percent 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 28.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.0 100.0 Total 0 6 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 236 259 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90.9 100.0 Total 0 2 0 6 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 122 Snyder Percent 0.0 2.0 0.0 4.8 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.3 100.0 Total 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 332 347 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.7 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 150 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.8 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 176 Tasker-Morris Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.9 100.0 Total 0 19 12 9 125 0 0 68 0 11 0 1,099 1,343 Walnut-Locust Percent 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.7 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 81.8 100.0 Total 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 68 Wyoming Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.7 100.0 *Percents are calculated by Row *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE BB 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE BY EXITING STATION: SATURDAY Market- Auto: PATCO High SEPTA Auto: Driver Bicycle Bus Frankford Trolley Route Walk ONLY Total Passenger Speed Line Regional Rail Line Station Location 271 114 42 1,149 654 38 351 182 3,799 6,599 Total 0 45 0 35 0 0 0 0 87 167 Allegheny Percent 0.0 40.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.5 Total 13 13 0 69 0 0 0 0 215 309 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 4.6 11.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.7 Total 58 0 14 359 654 0 351 182 852 2,469 City Hall Percent 21.4 0.0 33.5 31.2 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 22.4 37.4 Total 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 100 164 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.5 Total 0 45 0 100 0 0 0 0 86 231 Erie Percent 0.0 40.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 3.5 Total 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 122 136 Fairmount Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.1 Total 45 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 61 Fern Rock Percent 16.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 Total 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 113 138 Girard Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.1 Total 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 10 23 Hunting Park Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Logan Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 353 363 Lombard-South Percent 0.0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 5.5 Total 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 48 69 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.0 Total 0 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 65 305 Olney Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 4.6 Total 45 10 10 67 0 0 0 0 71 203 Oregon Percent 16.8 8.9 24.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 3.1 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 413 413 Complex Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 6.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 64 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.0 Total 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 42 Snyder Percent 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 Total 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 133 145 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.2 Total 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 94 138 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.1 Total 91 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 93 245 Tasker-Morris Percent 33.6 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.7 Total 0 0 8 0 0 38 0 0 797 843 Walnut-Locust Percent 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 12.8 Total 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 56 68 Wyoming Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.0 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE CC 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION BY EGRESS MODE: WEEKDAY Market- Auto: Commuter PATCO High SEPTA Amtrak Auto: Driver Bicycle Bus Frankford Taxi Trolley Route Walk ONLY Total Passenger Van Speed Line Regional Rail Line Location 3 151 101 72 1,254 12 1,239 68 176 35 277 6,604 9,993 Total 0 141 101 72 1,235 12 1,239 16 176 35 277 6,604 9,908 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 0.0 92.9 100.0 100.0 98.5 100.0 100.0 23.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 Total 0 141 97 72 1,213 12 1,171 11 110 35 277 6,567 9,707 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (NET) Percent 0.0 92.9 96.3 100.0 96.7 100.0 94.5 16.7 62.6 100.0 100.0 99.4 97.1 Total 0 20 0 0 31 0 14 0 0 0 43 86 194 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 1.3 2.0 Total 0 2 29 24 358 7 68 0 39 6 6 1,020 1,559 South Philadelphia Percent 0.0 1.6 29.0 33.0 28.5 57.8 5.5 0.0 22.2 15.8 2.2 15.4 16.1 Total 0 35 17 22 84 0 387 0 13 11 87 3,341 3,997 Center City Percent 0.0 23.0 16.7 30.3 6.7 0.0 31.2 0.0 7.3 32.6 31.4 50.6 41.2 Total 0 3 0 2 144 0 400 0 17 0 105 146 816 West Philadelphia Percent 0.0 1.9 0.0 2.2 11.5 0.0 32.3 0.0 9.9 0.0 37.8 2.2 8.4 Total 0 25 8 0 199 0 35 0 6 0 32 1,418 1,723 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 16.4 8.2 0.0 15.8 0.0 2.9 0.0 3.3 0.0 11.5 21.5 17.7 Total 0 0 0 10 104 0 3 11 0 0 0 230 358 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 8.3 0.0 0.3 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.7 Total 0 0 0 0 24 0 100 0 7 0 0 58 190 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 8.1 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.0 Total 0 14 10 15 88 0 5 0 17 0 0 13 162 Northwest philadelphia Percent 0.0 8.9 9.6 21.2 7.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.7 Total 0 30 33 0 171 5 9 0 4 18 0 229 498 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 0.0 20.1 32.8 0.0 13.6 42.2 0.7 0.0 2.2 51.6 0.0 3.5 5.1 Total 0 11 0 0 11 0 150 0 7 0 5 27 211 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 12.1 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.6 0.4 2.2 Total 0 0 4 0 23 0 68 5 66 0 0 37 201 OTHER PA COUNTY (NET) Percent 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 1.8 0.0 5.5 6.6 37.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.0 Total 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 16 30 Berks County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 3 0 0 6 22 Chester County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Total 0 0 0 0 12 0 58 5 12 0 0 6 92 Delaware County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.7 6.6 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Lancaster County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 44 0 0 6 54 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 Total 3 11 0 0 19 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 85 OTHER TOTAL Percent 100.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 76.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 New Castle County, Delaware Percent 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 Burlington County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 37 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Essex County, NJ Percent 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Salem County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 Union County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New York Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE DD 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY DESTINATION BY EGRESS MODE: SATURDAY Market- PATCO Auto: SEPTA Auto: Driver Bicycle Bus Frankford High Speed Trolley Route Walk ONLY Total Passenger Regional Rail Line Line Location 271 114 42 1,149 654 38 351 182 3,799 6,599 Total 271 114 42 1,136 654 10 337 182 3,799 6,545 PENNSYLVANIA (NET) Percent 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 26.4 96.0 100.0 100.0 99.2 Total 225 114 42 1,124 615 10 241 182 3,729 6,281 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY (NET) Percent 83.2 100.0 100.0 97.8 94.0 26.4 68.7 100.0 98.1 95.2 Total 0 0 0 32 0 0 10 18 13 72 Southwest Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.9 9.9 0.3 1.1 Total 109 10 10 288 7 0 0 0 1,006 1,431 South Philadelphia Percent 40.4 8.9 24.0 25.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 21.7 Total 12 0 22 103 236 0 35 89 1,573 2,071 Center City Percent 4.6 0.0 52.0 8.9 36.0 0.0 10.0 49.1 41.4 31.4 Total 0 0 0 130 75 0 118 60 13 397 West Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 11.5 0.0 33.6 33.2 0.3 6.0 Total 0 13 0 178 68 0 0 0 732 990 Lower North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 11.0 0.0 15.5 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 15.0 Total 45 45 0 47 0 0 0 0 139 277 Upper North Philadelphia Percent 16.8 40.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 4.2 Total 0 0 0 0 114 0 51 14 8 188 Bridesburg / Kensington / Port Richmond Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 0.0 14.7 7.8 0.2 2.8 Total 0 45 0 76 0 0 26 0 37 185 Northwest philadelphia Percent 0.0 40.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 1.0 2.8 Total 58 0 10 180 14 10 0 0 148 419 Olney / Oak Lane Percent 21.4 0.0 24.0 15.6 2.1 26.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 6.4 Total 0 0 0 91 101 0 0 0 60 251 Northeast Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 3.8 Total 45 0 0 13 39 0 96 0 70 264 OTHER PA COUNTY (NET) Percent 16.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 6.0 0.0 27.4 0.0 1.9 4.0 Total 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 58 71 Berks County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.1 Total 45 0.0 0 13 13 0.0 83 0.0 0 153 Delaware County, PA Percent 16.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.9 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total 0 0.0 0 0 14 0.0 13 0.0 13 40 Montgomery County, PA Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.3 0.6 Total 0 0 0 12 0 28 14 0 0 54 OTHER TOTAL Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 73.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 Atlantic County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 28 14 0 0 42 Camden County, NJ Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 New York Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE EE 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY WHAT TROLLEY ROUTE DID YOU USE? BASE: EGRESS MODE AS TROLLEYS Weekday Saturday Trolley Route 277 182 Total 77 61 Route 10 Percent 27.7 33.7 Total 55 56 Route 11 Percent 19.7 31.0 Total 50 26 Route 13 Percent 18.2 14.1 Total 35 10 Route 15 Percent 12.5 5.5 Total 13 3 Route 34 Percent 4.8 1.5 Total 19 0 Route 36 Percent 7.0 0.0 Total 28 26 No Answer Percent 10.1 14.2 *all egress mode trolley exit at City Hall
    • TABLE FF 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY TRIP PURPOSE Weekday Saturday Purpose 9,993 6,599 Total 6,161 2,826 Work Commute Percent 61.7 42.8 Total 192 101 Business Travel Percent 1.9 1.5 Total 1,374 232 Travel to/from school Percent 13.7 3.5 Total 239 524 Shopping Percent 2.4 7.9 Total 462 1,996 Entertainment/Recreation Percent 4.6 30.2 Total 798 655 Visit Family or Friends Percent 8.0 9.9 Total 296 66 Medical Percent 3.0 1.0 Total 210 90 Personal Percent 2.1 1.4 Total 261 108 No Answer Percent 2.6 1.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE GG 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY TRIP PURPOSE BY BOARDING STATION: WEEKDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Purpose 1,476 3,192 5325 9,993 Total 1,149 2,172 2,840 6,161 Work Commute Percent 77.9 68.0 53.3 61.7 Total 71 46 75 192 Business Travel Percent 4.8 1.4 1.4 1.9 Total 66 394 913 1,374 Travel to/from school Percent 4.5 12.3 17.1 13.7 Total 6 90 143 239 Shopping Percent 0.4 2.8 2.7 2.4 Total 98 174 190 462 Entertainment/Recreation Percent 6.6 5.5 3.6 4.6 Total 10 116 672 798 Visit Family or Friends Percent 0.7 3.6 12.6 8.0 Total 11 86 199 296 Medical Percent 0.7 2.7 3.7 3.0 Total 23 23 164 210 Personal Percent 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.1 Total 41 91 129 261 No Answer Percent 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE HH 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY TRIP PURPOSE BY BOARDING STATION: SATURDAY Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Purpose 1,953 1,780 2866 6,599 Total 884 863 1,078 2,826 Work Commute Percent 45.3 48.5 37.6 42.8 Total 0 26 75 101 Business Travel Percent 0.0 1.5 2.6 1.5 Total 18 81 133 232 Travel to/from school Percent 0.9 4.5 4.7 3.5 Total 77 213 235 524 Shopping Percent 3.9 12.0 8.2 7.9 Total 852 486 658 1,996 Entertainment/Recreation Percent 43.6 27.3 23.0 30.2 Total 107 77 471 655 Visit Family or Friends Percent 5.5 4.3 16.4 9.9 Total 3 0 63 66 Medical Percent 0.1 0.0 2.2 1.0 Total 3 24 63 90 Personal Percent 0.1 1.3 2.2 1.4 Total 10 10 88 108 No Answer Percent 0.5 0.6 3.1 1.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE II 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY TRIP FREQUENCY Weekday Saturday Frequency 9,993 6,599 Total 936 1,237 6 to 7 days a week Percent 9.4 18.7 Total 6,125 1,824 4 to 5 days a week Percent 61.3 27.6 Total 1,715 1,582 1 to 3 days a week Percent 17.2 24.0 Total 1,217 1,957 Less than once a week Percent 12.2 29.7 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE JJ 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY TRIP FREQUENCY BY BOARDING STATION Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Weekday 1,476 3,192 5,325 9,993 Total 124 397 416 936 6 to 7 days a week Percent 8.4 12.4 7.8 9.4 Total 1,010 1,982 3,133 6,125 4 to 5 days a week Percent 68.4 62.1 58.8 61.3 Total 160 489 1,065 1,715 1 to 3 days a week Percent 10.9 15.3 20.0 17.2 Total 182 323 711 1,217 Less than once a week Percent 12.3 10.1 13.4 12.2 Pattison Oregon Snyder Total Saturday 1,953 1,780 2,866 6,599 Total 211 405 620 1,237 6 to 7 days a week Percent 10.8 22.8 21.6 18.7 Total 478 489 857 1,824 4 to 5 days a week Percent 24.5 27.4 29.9 27.6 Total 415 398 768 1,582 1 to 3 days a week Percent 21.3 22.4 26.8 24.0 Total 848 488 621 1,957 Less than once a week Percent 43.4 27.4 21.7 29.7 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE KK 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY PURPOSE OF TRIP BY FREQUENCY: WEEKDAY 6 to 7 days a 4 to 5 days a 1 to 3 days a Less than Total week week week once a week Purpose 936 6,125 1,715 1,217 9,993 Total 698 4,703 523 237 6,161 Work Commute Percent 74.6 76.8 30.5 19.5 61.7 Total 9 24 35 124 192 Business Travel Percent 1.0 0.4 2.0 10.2 1.9 Total 66 1,002 287 18 1,374 Travel to/from school Percent 7.1 16.4 16.8 1.5 13.7 Total 16 17 89 117 239 Shopping Percent 1.7 0.3 5.2 9.6 2.4 Total 11 70 176 205 462 Entertainment/Recreation Percent 1.2 1.1 10.3 16.8 4.6 Total 86 128 335 249 798 Visit Family or Friends Percent 9.2 2.1 19.5 20.5 8.0 Total 35 22 119 120 296 Medical Percent 3.7 0.4 6.9 9.9 3.0 Total 7 29 50 124 210 Personal Percent 0.7 0.5 2.9 10.2 2.1 Total 9 129 101 23 261 No Answer Percent 0.9 2.1 5.9 1.9 2.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE LL 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY PURPOSE OF TRIP BY FREQUENCY: SATURDAY 6 to 7 days a 4 to 5 days a 1 to 3 days a Less than Total week week week once a week Purpose 1,237 1,824 1,582 1,957 6,599 Total 874 1,401 389 162 2,826 Work Commute Percent 70.7 76.8 24.6 8.3 42.8 Total 26 50 12 13 101 Business Travel Percent 2.1 2.8 0.8 0.6 1.5 Total 39 76 96 21 232 Travel to/from school Percent 3.1 4.2 6.1 1.1 3.5 Total 13 38 221 253 524 Shopping Percent 1.0 2.1 14.0 12.9 7.9 Total 182 154 423 1,237 1,996 Entertainment/Recreation Percent 14.7 8.4 26.8 63.2 30.2 Total 65 70 334 187 655 Visit Family or Friends Percent 5.3 3.8 21.1 9.5 9.9 Total 25 0 16 25 66 Medical Percent 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 Total 13 13 40 25 90 Personal Percent 1.0 0.7 2.5 1.3 1.4 Total 0 23 50 35 108 No Answer Percent 0.0 1.2 3.2 1.8 1.6 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals
    • TABLE MM 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE BY EXITING STATION: WEEKDAY BASE: EGRESS MODE BUS Route 12 Route 17 Route 18 Route 21 Route 23 Route 26 Route 27 Route 29 Route 31 Route 32 Route 33 Route 37 Route 38 Route 39 Route 40 Route 42 Route 43 Route 44 Route 1 Route 3 Total** Station Location 22 9 2 16 17 11 14 30 64 43 10 10 10 9 7 9 7 48 13 4 1,254 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 Allegheny Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Total 0 0 2 0 17 11 0 30 0 0 10 10 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 4 305 City Hall Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 24.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 Erie Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Fairmount Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Fern Rock Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Girard Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Hunting Park Percent 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Logan Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 Lombard-South Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 Total 0 0 0 12 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 Olney Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.6 0.0 0.0 78.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Oregon Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Snyder Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 1.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Tasker-Morris Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 Total 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 125 Walnut-Locust Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Wyoming Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals **This is a two page table. The total column is the row sum of both pages.
    • TABLE MM (CONTINUED) 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE BY EXITING STATION: WEEKDAY BASE: EGRESS MODE BUS Greyhound No Answer Bus Line Route 48 Route 54 Route 55 Route 56 Route 57 Route 60 Route 61 Route 64 Route 68 Route 70 Route 71 Route 75 Route 79 Route G Route 6 Route 7 Route 8 HXH Total** Station Location 19 40 3 25 8 20 69 4 20 18 13 12 54 63 25 49 30 2 34 392 1,254 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 136 Allegheny Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 10.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Total 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 305 City Hall Percent 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.3 24.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 17 76 Erie Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.2 6.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Fairmount Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 Fern Rock Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 Girard Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Hunting Park Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 3 49 Logan Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 Lombard-South Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 Total 0 0 3 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 22 117 Olney Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 9.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 53 Oregon Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.4 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 54 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 65 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 27.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 1.4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 2 0 0 36 Snyder Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Tasker-Morris Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 125 Walnut-Locust Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 9.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Wyoming Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals **This is a two page table. The total column is the row sum of both pages.
    • TABLE NN 2009 BROAD STREET SURVEY STUDY EGRESS MODE BY EXITING STATION: SATURDAY BASE: EGRESS MODE BUS No Answer Route 17 Route 21 Route 23 Route 27 Route 29 Route 30 Route 38 Route 39 Route 43 Route 48 Route 52 Route 54 Route 55 Route 56 Route 60 Route 61 Route 64 Route 66 Route 68 Route 70 Route 75 Route G Route R Route 1 Route 3 Route 6 Route 7 Route 8 Total Station Location 13 7 3 25 13 24 59 13 13 43 13 10 45 21 32 75 88 10 14 51 45 7 16 13 13 43 31 13 396 1,149 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 35 Allegheny Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 3.1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 69 Cecil B. Moore/Temple University Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 6.0 Total 0 7 3 25 13 0 0 13 13 0 0 10 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 172 359 City Hall Percent 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 43.4 31.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 64 Ellsworth-Federal Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 5.6 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 100 Erie Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 8.7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Fairmount Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 Fern Rock Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 Girard Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 2.2 Total 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Hunting Park Percent 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Logan Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lombard-South Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 North Philadelphia Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 76 240 Olney Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 20.9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 31 0 13 67 Oregon Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.2 5.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pattison Sports & Entertainment Complex Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Race-Vine/Convention Center Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Snyder Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Spring Garden Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Susquehanna-Dauphin Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 61 Tasker-Morris Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 5.3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walnut-Locust Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13 Wyoming Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 *Due to rounding, rows may not add to exact totals