• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Middleton
 

Middleton

on

  • 437 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
437
Views on SlideShare
437
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Middleton Middleton Presentation Transcript

    • Choose Clean Water Chesapeake Bay Restoration ConferenceJanuary 12, 2011 Piedmont Regional Pilot Project Chesapeake Bay TMDL Phase II Stakeholder engagement and preparation for Phase II WIPs Steering Committee Culpeper SWCD and Thomas Jefferson SWCD Thomas Jefferson PDC Rivanna River Basin Commission (local government, watershed) The Nature Conservancy Southern Environmental Law Center Three elected officials (from three counties)
    • Urban core, suburban growth Two “Phase 2” MS4 communities Outlying rural areas Two fast growing counties One significant discharge Multiple non-significant Multiple industrial Three major Virginia tributaries primarily Middle James Average land cover 2 - 3% imperviousness 30% in Charlottesville 55 - 70% forest cover including forest plantations 20-30% open land The Pilot Project Region TJPDC -15
    • Many Meetings! Local government as Phase II implementers Goal: to provide accurate information, obtain feedback, assess interest in crafting a local/regional response in Phase II WIP development Sector focus groups and participants selected for representativeness and constructive criticism Agriculture/forestry/viticulture Builders/developers and economic development Permit holders (MS4s, point sources) Elected officials and staff Meetings concurrent with development of draft Virginia WIP and draft BAY TMDL, EPA backstop measures
    • Messages from Focus Groups Provide us accurate and timely information Show us that this will be fair Use accurate local numbers for all source sectors to communicate about equity Let us craft our own local response Regional planning sounds attractive Trading and offsets between source sectors locally “could work” Use available local data and engage localities in verification Concern about costs (everyone)
    • Local Water Quality is the Major Concern Above the Fall Line The Bay is remote to many in Virginia Piedmont Protecting existing healthy waters is key message Cost effectiveness of preservation vs. clean-up Economic value of clean waterways for tourism, recreation, drinking water
    • Process Observations Provide accurate and timely information Engagement is impaired when process is evolving Misinformation management necessary but time-consuming Provide information customized for different sectors Plan on repetition and cyclic learning Allow time to build all the relationships Seek leaders from within interest groups Start by listening to each sector separately Tend the relationships between those guiding the process (steering committee members) Important to clarify roles when scarce resources are at stake
    • Moving to Phase II Local governments have targets to achieve but will need strong partnerships with SWCDs, PDCs, and watershed groups, including NGOs and economic partnerships One size does not fit all localities or regions but in Virginia, it may not be practical or effective to designate one entity across the state take the lead Local and regional planning should be matched to appropriate scale Fairfax County vs City of Charlottesville Identify and protect existing local healthy waters Provide specific and concrete assurance that existing local TMDLs will be implemented
    • Provide guidance and tools for Developing uniform accounting of existing practices and BMP efficiencies Establishing baseline conditions Understanding how the Bay Model relates to local water quality Evaluating different scenarios by local governments and partners Using the most current (local) data for Phase II WIP planning, implementation, and assessment Using (qualified) local water quality monitoring data in tracking progress