Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Moving from Print to Electronic Journals: A Study of Libraries at Indiana Colleges and Universities, by Jo McClamroch, Indiana University
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Moving from Print to Electronic Journals: A Study of Libraries at Indiana Colleges and Universities, by Jo McClamroch, Indiana University

1,452

Published on

Thursday, November 4, 2010 …

Thursday, November 4, 2010
5:45 - 6:30 PM

Two decades ago when electronic journals were being considered by libraries, many librarians wondered if it was a format that would take off and be accepted by patrons. Not only did e-journals succeed, for many libraries one question that continues to be discussed is whether maintaining redundant print journal subscriptions is sustainable or necessary. Some of the factors evaluated by libraries are the costs of maintaining current and archival print subscriptions as well as the level of confidence in having perpetual access to electronic holdings. Drawing on a study of over seventy academic libraries in Indiana, this paper will examine the reasons why, in general, we are seeing academic libraries make an ongoing shift toward electronic journals and away from print journals. Using data collected from a survey as well as interviews with library administrators, the decision-making process at college and university libraries in Indiana will be discussed. The libraries in the study are both private and public and range from a seminary with an enrollment of 100 to ARL research institutions with enrollments of over 40,000. Drawing on the principles and practices of these libraries, attendees will learn about models to consider as they address this issue at their home institutions. There will be time for the audience to ask questions and to share their local practices.

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,452
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. MOVING FROM PRINT TO ELECTRONIC JOURNALS A STUDY OF LIBRARIES AT INDIANA COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES Jo McClamroch Indiana University Charleston Conference November 2010
  • 2. BRIEF HISTORY • Skepticism in the early days (1990’s) – Do users really want this format? – How “full” is full-text? – Fluidity of titles in aggregators – Permanent archival access • Growing acceptance (early 2000’s) – Demand and preference for electronic format increasing – Availability of remote access improving – More confidence that full-text is truly “full” – But… is the cost to support two formats sustainable?
  • 3. BRIEF HISTORY • Recognition that electronic is here to stay (mid-2000’s) – Increasing number of e-journals – Questions re sustainability of maintaining dual-format – Archival access ongoing concern • Now what about print? – Acceptance that use of electronic journals far surpasses use of print – Growth in electronic publishing; publishers phasing out print versions – Reliable archival access available via publishers, Portico, JSTOR
  • 4. DEMOGRAPHICS
  • 5. PRIVATE or PUBLIC 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Private Public
  • 6. FTE ENROLLMENT 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% Under 1,000 1,001 - 5,000 5,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 25,000 Over 25,000 Under 1,000 26.9% 1,001 - 5,000 42.3% 5,001 - 10,000 23.1% 10,001 - 25,000 3.8% Over 25,000 3.8%
  • 7. HIGHEST DEGREE OFFERED 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% Associate Bachelor Master Doctorate Associate Bachelor Master Doctorate Associate 8.3% Bachelor 20.8% Master 37.5% Doctorate 33.3%
  • 8. DATA
  • 9. TOTAL MATERIALS BUDGET 30.4% 17.4% 13.0% 17.4% 21.7% $250,001 - $500,000 Over $1,000,000 $100,001 - $250,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 Under $100,000
  • 10. EXPENDITURE – PRINT JOURNALS Under $50,000 $50,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 $250,001 - $500,000 54.5% 22.7% 9.1% 13.6% $100,001 - $250,000 $50,001 - $100,000 $250,001 - $500,000 Under $50,000
  • 11. CURRENT SUBSCRIPTIONS – PRINT 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Under 500 501 - 1,000 1,001 - 2,000 2,001 - 5,000
  • 12. EXPENDITURE FOR ELECTRONIC RESOURCES (INCLUDING E-JOURNALS) 27.3% 18.2% 22.7% 18.2% 9.1% 4.5% $250,001 - $500,000 Under $50,000 Over $1,000,000 $100,001 - $250,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $50,001 - $100,000 Under $50,000 $50,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 $250,001 - $500,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 Over $1,000,000 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
  • 13. DECISION MAKING – WHO
  • 14. CANCELLATION –PRINT JOURNALS 90.5% 52.4% 33.3% 14.3% 9.5% Library Committee Faculty Librarians Librarian/Faculty Committee Library Administrators
  • 15. CANCELLATION E-JOURNALS 95.2% 57.1% 33.3% 14.3% 4.8% Library Committee Faculty Librarians Librarian/Faculty Committee Library Administrators
  • 16. DECISION MAKING – WHY
  • 17. GENERAL CANCELLATION FACTORS 81.8% 18 81.8% 18 63.6% 14 54.5% 12 45.5% 10 40.9% 9 31.8% 7 27.3% 6 27.3% 6 27.3% 6 Redundancy Print used less than electronic Usage statistics Change in curriculum Subscription cost Space Faculty recommendation Electronic preferred by students Budget reduction Confidence in perpetual access
  • 18. CANCEL PRINT WHEN INCLUDED IN AGGREGATOR 81.8% 81.8% 72.7% 54.5% 45.5% 40.9% 31.8% 31.8% 27.3% 18.2% Subscription cost Space Faculty recommendation Budget reduction Confidence in perpetual access Electronic preferred by students Change in curriculum Redundancy Print used less than electronic Usage statistics
  • 19. SELECTED AGGREGATORS SUBSCRIBED 100.0% 90.5% 81.0% 81.0% 76.2% 71.4% 38.1% 33.3% 4.8% 4.8% PsycArticles JSTOR Education Index Full-Text Readers' Guide Full Text BioOne Business Source Premier Academic Search Premier ERIC Universal Database of Social Sciences and Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe
  • 20. SUMMARY • All libraries face the same issues and wrestle with the same concerns, “it’s just a matter of scale” • Primary decision-makers are the same across libraries – Librarians – Faculty – Library administrators • Cancellation decisions based on same criteria across libraries – Subscription cost – Electronic preferred by students – Redundancy – Budget cuts – Print used less than electronic
  • 21. FINAL THOUGHTS • Some concerns have not been resolved even after 20 years or more of discussion – Complete confidence in archival access – Perpetual access to content in titles previously available in aggregators – Cooperative collection development (either within or across consortia) • Enduring issues – Rising subscription costs outstrip budgets – Space for bound journals is shrinking • Need to repurpose library stack areas for new programs/initiatives • Not practical to keep building more and more off-site storage facilities • Future concerns?

×