George evaluation 7

77 views
61 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
77
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

George evaluation 7

  1. 1. Magazine Front covers • Looking back at my school magazine, it doesn’t look very professional. It has some aspects of magazine like the price and barcode. But apart from that it is terrible in comparison with my music magazine. The colour scheme is strange and the main photo appears to be floating around and doesn’t look like it’s part of the magazine story itself. However my music magazine front cover is much better. It has a better colour scheme, all of which compliment each other and none clash. The main photo looks like it belongs in the magazine and its frame. I’ve done this as I’ve learnt how to use Photoshop properly. Huge differences are evident as I’ve progressed with Photoshop. For example, the choice of fonts is a massive contrast.
  2. 2. Magazine Contents Pages • Looking back at my school magazine contents page I'm honestly embarrassed with it. It’s pretty much a grid. It shares very little aspects in common with a genuine magazine. It had article titles and page numbers. That’s basically all that can be seen hinting it is a magazine contents page. However looking at my music magazine, It’s much better. It looks like a genuine magazine contents page. It shows all the aspects of one: Masthead: realistic page numbers; pictures; Links and subscription info. I've achieved this, by eventually learning how to use Photoshop in a way that gives positive outcomes when using the tools. The page numbers are also unrealistic on my school contents page as 1) the only seem to go to 10 and 2) the layout is just strange. As well as this the school contents is missing a masthead and pictures.

×