• Save
Hardware Challenges for the IoT
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Hardware Challenges for the IoT

on

  • 2,810 views

Short presentation at the IoTSiliconValley about hardware challenges for the Internet of Things

Short presentation at the IoTSiliconValley about hardware challenges for the Internet of Things

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,810
Views on SlideShare
1,371
Embed Views
1,439

Actions

Likes
4
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 1,439

http://blog.buildinginternetofthings.com 1434
https://twitter.com 5

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Hardware Challenges for the IoT Hardware Challenges for the IoT Presentation Transcript

  • Hardware Challenges for the IoT Harry Doukas IoTango @BuildingIoT harry@iotango.com
  • Short info about me Information & Communication Systems Engineer PhD in Biomedical Informatics Author of: “Building Internet of Things with the Arduino”, ISBN: 978-1470023430 Community Evangelist for Flyport Technology Startup Entrepreneur - IoTango Expert in:  Sensor networks, cloud applications, wearable computing, sensor data mining
  • IoT applications
  • IoT for Makers ChallengesEasy to use - Cost learn H/W Power Communication Connectivity Plug n WiFi vs Play RF
  • IoT for Makers Numerous prototyping platforms: Arduino ioBridge Flyport (Stay for the Demo!) Libelium …
  • IoT for Makers Arduino for (Home) Prototyping: Comes with Plug n Play modules  Shields Supports various com. Interfaces  BT  WiFi  ZigBee (famous XBee modules)  3G  RF
  • IoT for Manufacturers Build from scratch option  Use a prototyping platform and save time  Microcontroller Family - I/Os  Arduino  Sensors  Flyport  Communication  Libelium  Power  ….  Design  Simulate / Prototyping
  • The Challenges!
  • Hardware Challenges Overview Networking Security Data (Communication) Resources (CPU/Microcontroller, Interoperability RAM) Power Consumption
  • The Networking Challenge From the networking perspective - Which RF technology?  Sure, Ethernet could be used in some cases
  • Questions to answer PROTOCOLRANGE SUPPORT POWER CONSUMPTIONDATA RATE SECURITY
  • The WiFi vs RF Debate WiFi pros: Internet gateways (i.e. WiFi access points) are already established  IoT devices can have direct connectivity to the Internet without the need for additional infrastructure (setup cost, maintenance cost, etc.). Almost every smartphone is WiFi enabled An established standard, supporting a full TCP/IP stack  Focus only on the application level programming for message and information exchange. Integrates security
  • The WiFi vs RF Debate WiFi cons: Cost (even the Electric Imp at 25$ is much more expensive than a pair of RF transceivers) Even low power WiFi has more power consumption than RF (and also the communication protocol introduces much unnecessary overhead) Low power has poor indoor performance
  • Attenuation: ‘real world’ problem thatneeds to be considered Source: http://www.wirevolution.com/category/wi-fi/
  • The WiFi vs RF Debate RF: Great benefits over WiFi in the context of M2M: Higher transmission range and better indoor performance Better price Standards like ZigBee and 6LoWPAN include security implementations and mechanisms for error corrections/retransmission, etc. so that developers can focus just on the application level as well.
  • WiFi vs RF: Who is the winner? Depends on the application / use case  For instance, if an IoT system relies on a limited number of devices and direct mobile communication, then WiFi currently looks the best solution. The Hybrid Solution  Use RF for sensors  Use a WiFi Enabled GW for Internet Connectivity
  • IoT Gateways
  • WiFi vs RF: Poll results WiFi vs RF for IoT: I would currently develop a product using: 1 RF WiFi 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
  • WiFi vs RF: Poll results WiFi vs RF for IoT: Which one will eventually win? Low Power WiFI 1 RF (existing) New RF for IoT 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
  • WiFi vs RF: Poll results ZigBee is almost dead, there is no way it will be used in future IoT products 1 Yes, ZigBee ZigBee, not... 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
  • The Power Consumption challenge Back to RF challenge! Some modules offer:  Hibernate / Sleep modes Consumption is Use case specific  Sensor monitoring  Information polling  Routing issues…
  • Security Issues Security isn’t just software  Key encryption  Where does key reside  How firmware is protected? Link encryption may be required to protect from eavesdropping and data tampering
  • Answers (?) No global solution Use Case – Specific  RF vs WiFi  Low/High Power  Security IoT Gateways can provide solution to  RF/Networking issue  Security issue
  • Is Standardization an answer?
  • The Flyport Prototyping Platform• The modules – WiFi – Ethernet• The basic features – FreeRTOS – PIC – Embedded Webserver – Multithreaded – Remote firmware upgrade – Re-mapable pins
  • The Flyport Prototyping Platform• Expansions • EnOcean Nest • MP3 Nest• Prices • 63$ WiFi Flyport • 50$ Flyport Ethernet• Libraries• Project examples / Community support
  • DEMO time!