Smokeless Tobacco Use and Periodontal Disease NYC in a Rural Male Population


Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Smokeless Tobacco Use and Periodontal Disease NYC in a Rural Male Population

  1. 1. Smokeless Tobacco Use and Periodontal Disease NYC in a Rural Male PopulationA study investigating smokeless tobacco use found that people who chew tobacco or retainit in their mouths display greater gingival recession prevalence and extent.Periodontal Disease NYC: Investigating the Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Use onOral HealthDespite the reported effects of smokeless tobacco (ST) on the periodontium (the soft tissuessurrounding and supporting the teeth), the incidence of periodontal disease NYC, and thehigh prevalence of ST use in rural populations and in men, studies on this specific topicare limited. With such a gap in the literature on this subject, it is the purpose of this cross-sectional investigation to evaluate the periodontal health status and incidence of periodontaldisease NYC in male ST users from a rural population. However, before the methodologyis explored, the term ‘smokeless tobacco’ needs elucidation. Smokeless tobacco, in thecontext of the United States and this research, generally refers to tobacco leaves that areplaced between the lower or upper lip and the gums, or alternatively chewed.Investigating Health and Periodontal Disease NYC and the Connection withSmokeless Tobacco Consumption: MethodologyThe study sample of this periodontal disease NYC study consisted of 73 adult male residentsof two rural Appalachian Ohio counties that were daily ST users and presented unilateralmandibular oral ST keratosis lesions. Keratosis legions generally take the form of a growthin the upper layer of soft tissue or gum. Subjects completed a questionnaire and receivedan oral examination in which the following variables were recorded: ● Teeth present (the number of missing teeth, if any) ● ST keratosis lesion, ● Plaque and gingival index (the severity of accumulation) ● Probing depth (PD) (to what extent the gingival can be separated from the tooth) ● Recession depth (RD) (to what extent the gum has receded from the tooth, exposing the root), and ● Attachment levelA Statistical analysis was conducted, which compared ST-site mandibular teeth (teethadjacent to the subjects unilateral ST keratosis lesion) to NST-site teeth (contralateralcorresponding teeth).Investigation of Periodontal Disease NYC in ST Users: ResultsOf the 73 ST users recruited for this analysis, the following results were obtained:
  2. 2. ● Recession prevalence is much greater in ST-site quadrants (36%) compared to NST- site quadrants (18%). ● Twice as many teeth had recession on ST-site (approximately 20%) than NST-site (approximately 10%). ● Average buccal (cheek-side) RD on ST-site teeth did not differ from that on the NST-site teeth. Although average buccal attachment loss is greater on ST-site teeth, the mean difference is <0.5 mm. ● When stratified by years of ST use, subjects using ST for 10 to 18 years exhibit the most differences between ST and NST sites, whereas subjects using ST for <10 years show no differences.From this analysis, the authors conclude that the results indicate that greater gingivalrecession prevalence and extent are associated with ST placement site in rural male STusers. The implications in terms of periodontal disease NYC remain to be investigated, butfrom these initial findings, it can be inferred that ST users are at a greater risk due to gumrecession and tooth root exposure.