• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Obesity by Center for the Greater Good
 

Obesity by Center for the Greater Good

on

  • 719 views

A white paper on Obesity by Center for the Greater Good.

A white paper on Obesity by Center for the Greater Good.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
719
Views on SlideShare
719
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Obesity by Center for the Greater Good Obesity by Center for the Greater Good Document Transcript

    • GREEN AND HEALTHY HOUSING Obesity in Low-Income Communities Written by Rachel Goldmanwww.CenterforGreaterGood.com | contact@centergg.com | 410 East State Street Eagle, ID 83616
    • The Cost of Obesity, and the Individuals it Targets It is no surprise that poor nutrition has become increasingly common in the United States; it isa fact that can be observed in the general population through obesity. What may come as a surpriseis the true cost of obesity, the underlying causes and the alarming rate at which it affects low-incomeindividuals when compared to their higher income counterparts. Weight-related medical costs areestimated to have reached $147 billion in 2008 (that’s 9.1 percent of all medical spending), and showno signs of subsiding. 1 Besides the obvious mobility disadvantage to being obese, it is known to causea series of physical and psychological ailments including: diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure,asthma, depression and anxiety. These are in addition to the social discrimination and stigmatizationone faces as an overweight or obese member of society.2 The effects of obesity are lethal, and together cause an estimated 300,000 deaths per yearin the United States.3 According to the National Institute of Health, obesity and being overweightare the second leading cause of preventable death in the United States4 Low-income individualsface a hardship when dealing with health issues because of their general lack of access to qualityhealth care, combined with a shortage of expendable income for medical expenditures andhigher deductibles. To make matters worse, low-income individuals are at higher risk of becomingoverweight or obese due to community infrastructure deficits such as the limited availability of fairlypriced produce and safe outdoor parks. In a 2010 study of more than 6,000 adults, BMI and incomewere found to have an inverse relationship. Those with lower incomes were statistically more likelyto have higher BMIs and vice versa.5 According to a 2007 national study of 40,000 children, childrenfrom lower income households had more than two times higher odds of being obese than childrenfrom higher income households.6 Rates of severe obesity were also 1.7 times higher among low-income children and adolescents nationwide.7 The mission for Center for the Greater Good is to eradicate poverty and create healthycommunities through: innovative financial investments, and distinctive strategies for communityenhancement. We have identified the following as contributing factors to the alarming poor health inlow-income communities: • Limited resources and lack of access to healthy, affordable foods, • Fewer opportunities for physical activity. Instead of simply treating the health conditions caused by poor nutrition, Center for theGreater Good is committed to solving the problem. Improved nutrition leading to reduced obesity isjust one of the many ways in which we are realizing our vision for healthy, stable communities in theUnited States.1 “Consequences of Adult Overweight and Obesity « Food Research & Action Center.” Food Research & Action Center. Web. 15 Nov. 2011. <http://frac.org/initiatives/hunger-and-obesity/what-are-the-consequences-of-adult-overweight-and-obesity/>.2 Consequences of Adult Overweight and Obesity3 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Overweight and obesity: a major public health issue. Prevention Report 2001;16.4 Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Executive summary. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, June 1998.5 “Relationship Between Poverty and Overweight or Obesity « Food Research & Action Center.” Food Research & Action Center. Web. 15 Nov. 2011. <http://frac.org/initiatives/hunger-and-obesity/are-low-income-people-at-greater-risk-for-overweight-or-obesity/>.6 Relationship Between Poverty and Overweight or Obesity7 Relationship Between Poverty and Overweight or Obesity 2
    • Poor Nutrition in Low-Income Communities Arguably, the main cause of disproportionate obesity in low-income communities in theUnited States is limited access to resources such as healthy, affordable foods. Often, low-incomecommunities lack high quality community infrastructure, including full-service grocery stores andfarmer’s markets.8 Residents are sometimes forced to shop for groceries in convenience stores andother small stores, which do not offer the wide variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and low-fat dairy products necessary to maintain a healthy diet.9 When healthy foods are offered, they areoften higher cost and lower quality than similar items in larger stores, because of their perishablenature.10 Due to the high cost and low quality of produce and dairy products at small grocerystores, households with limited resources are sometimes forced to rely on cheaper, more denselycaloric, non-perishable low-nutrition foods (such as products containing processed sugar, refinedgrains and added fats) in order to minimize and maximize caloric density.11 A 2009 study examiningneighborhood disparities in food access found that, “neighborhood residents with better access tosupermarkets and limited access to convenience stores tend to have healthier diets and reduced riskfor obesity”12 Low-income neighborhoods not only lack affordable sources of quality nutritious foods,they commonly contain disproportionate amount of fast food restaurants (sometimes twice asmany)13 which offer a low cost, convenient yet nutritionally void alternative to fresh, perishablefoods. According to a study conducted by UCLA, when asked, “46 to 49 percent of low-income teensreported eating fast food on the previous day, compared with 37 percent of more affluent teens.”14The scarcity of fresh, affordable, nutritious food makes it difficult for an individual with restrictedincome and limited transportation to maintain a healthy diet. Unfortunately, nutrition is only half thebattle in the war on obesity. Not only do low-income neighborhoods commonly lack community supporting retail suchas full-scale grocery stores, studies also show residents have less opportunity for physical activity. Inmiddle and upper class communities, it is easy to take for granted the presence of parks, trees, bikepaths and quality recreational facilities because they are abundantly available. In both urban andrural low-income communities, green space is hard to come by and trees are few and far between.When a park does exist, it is often ill equipped for safe inhabitance by children and even adults.Crime, traffic, unsafe playground equipment, visual signs of trash and disrepair, and noise15 are justsome of the factors driving individuals away from public parks. Such conditions make it difficult forthem to lead active lives16, and in turn contribute to obesity.17 With parks in a state of disrepair andthe absence of bike paths, people end up spending more time engaging in sedentary activities such asreading, watching TV, playing video games and using the computer.18 An excess of sedentary activities9 Beaulac , 20098 Beaulac, J., E. Kristjansson, and S. Cummins. 2009. A systematic review of food deserts, 1966–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease10 Andreyeva, Tatiana, Michael W. Long, and Kelly D. Brownell. “The Impact of Food Prices on Consumption: A Systematic Review of Research on the Price Elasticity of Demand for Food.” Government, Politics, and Law. American Journal of Public Health, Feb. 2010. Web. 15 Nov. 2011. <yaleruddcenter.org>.11 Drewnowski A. Barratt-Fornell A. Do healthier diets cost more? Nutrition Today 2004:39:161-168.12 Larson, N.I., M.T. Story, and M.C. Nelson (2009). “Neighborhood Environments: Disparities in Access to Healthy Foods in the U.S.,”13 Driscoll, Gwendolyn. “Obesity among State’s low-income Teens Nearly Triple That of More Affluent Peers / UCLA Newsroom.” Home / American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(1): 74-81.e10. UCLA Newsroom. Web. 15 Nov. 2011. <http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/obesity-among-california-s-low-72532.aspx>.14 Driscoll, Gwendolyn15 Neckerman, K.M., M. Bader, M. Purciel, and P. Yousefzadeh (2009). “Measuring Food Access in Urban Areas,” National Poverty Center16 Powell, Lisa M., Sandy Slater, and Frank J. Chaloupka. “The Relationship between Community Physical Activity Settings and Race, Working Paper, www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/index.php Ehtnicity and Socioeconomic Status.” Evidence-Based Preventative Medicine I.2 (2004): 135-44. Open Mind Journals. Web.17 Singh, G. K., Siahpush, M., & Kogan, M. D. (2010). Rising social inequalities in US childhood obesity, 2003-2007. Annals of Epidemiology,18 Singh, 2010 20(1), 40-52. 3
    • can be detrimental to the development of children and teens whom should be growing, learning andexploring, socializing, developing new skills and establishing healthy habits before transitioning intoadulthood. The same UCLA study also found that, “56 percent of low-income teens watch more thantwo hours of television per day, compared with 46 percent of more affluent teens.”19 Some mightargue a sedentary after school lifestyle is not alarming for a teen, especially if he or she attends publicschool with mandated Physical Education classes; but schools in low-income communities have beenreported to have less recess and lower-impact PE classes than other schools.20 In fact, of low-incometeens surveyed, nearly one fifth of them admitted to not getting at least 60 minutes of physicalactivity per week, as recommended by the Federal Dietary Guidelines for Americans.21 Schools inlow-income communities are often underfunded and do not offer the variety of after school sportsopportunities as one would find at an affluent school. Barely one third of low-income teens werereported to be active participants in school sports teams, when almost half of affluent teens doparticipate.22 The combination of poor quality food and sedentary lifestyles is leading to an epidemic ofobesity in low-income communities, causing children to become overweight and obese at an alarmingrate. As the children become teenagers and later adults, they lack the tools and education to helptheir own children achieve a higher level of physical health. Center for the Greater Good is committedto providing low-income individuals with the tools they need to improve their own unhealthy habits,as well as ensure the well being of generations to come.Center for the Greater Good Promotes Nutrition and Exercise for Residents Center for the Greater Good has multiple strategies for battling obesity and promotinghealth in low-income communities. We offer low interest loans for community revitalizationprojects, and we offer developer incentives for the creation of community support services andother improvements. One of our strategies is to invest in community infrastructure. The currenttax credit system encourages the development of low-income housing in prime locations, walkingdistance to destinations such as grocery stores, transit, parks and gyms. Housing ends up being builtin prime locations, often in middle to upper class communities, which is great for those areas and theresidents of the building. The trouble is, the system does nothing to improve communities that do notalready have the infrastructure in place. Center for the Greater Good invests in all kinds of communitybeneficial projects, such as providing low cost space in the community and incentives to bring grocerystores and other retailers to neighborhoods. Afterall, sometimes all it takes is one project to revitalizean entire area. Instead of moving people away, we let the market study and resident input dictatethe community’s needs, and deliver it to them to guarantee success! By bringing a neighborhood agrocery store, we are not only offering access to improved nutrition; we are also giving citizens theopportunity to be employed at the grocery store. This creates a cycle of benefits where the moneyinvested in your street, stays in your street instead of going to investments which only focus onfinancial returns. For projects built in infrastructure rich areas, Center for the Greater Good could potentiallyoffer bus passes to residents. Access to transit, in some cases, eliminates the need for a resident toown a car; saving time and money for the resident, and reducing the strain on roads due to wear,tear and traffic. Transit passes also allow residents to travel to grocery stores and recreation facilitiesif there aren’t any within walking distance, improving their chance to engage in healthy activities.Depending on the needs of individual communities, some housing projects contain a gym within their19 Driscoll, Gwendolyn20 Barros et al., 2009; UCLA Center to Eliminate Health Disparities, 2009.21 Driscoll, Gwendolyn22 Driscoll, Gwendolyn 4
    • facility, offering residents the most convenient, safe and cost effective access to the physical activityeverybody needs in order to live a healthy life. The most important solution to the issue of deteriorating health in low-income communitiesdue to poor nutrition and lack of exercise is the Center for the Greater Good’s commitment toresident education. Residents cannot be expected to change their habits if they are unaware of: theresources provided to them; the importance of exercise and nutrition; and how to use the gym andcook healthy, low cost meals. One of our main strategies for improved nutrition in our residents is theexistence of a community garden. A community garden is an education tool disguised as a hobby. Itcan be tended to and enjoyed by residents of all ages, and the food grown can be used in communitymeals. Residents can take pride in their own ability to grow and cook healthy foods.Education and Access to Infrastructure are key to Breaking the Cycle of Poor Nutrition The obesity epidemic in the United States is a growing concern in all communities, but low-income communities produce a disproportionate percentage of overweight and obese individuals.“Our neighborhoods are literally making us fat,” said Susan H. Babey, one of the authors of UCLA’spolicy brief. “We need better strategies and more thoughtful urban planning if we are going to makeour towns and cities livable, not just places where we live.”23 Fortunately, Center for the Greater Goodoffers an innovative financial model for community revitalization projects, bundled with communitysupport services to ensure success.23 Driscoll, Gwendolyn 5