An Appreciative Inquiry Cameo


Published on

The livelihoods approach helps improve understanding of the livelihoods of the poor by organizing the factors that constrain or enhance opportunities and showing how they relate. Appreciative inquiry is the process of facilitating positive change. This presentation describes how the two approaches were used to formulate the ADB-assisted Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods Project in Cambodia.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

An Appreciative Inquiry Cameo

  1. 1. The views expressed in this presentation are the views of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The countries listed in this presentation do not imply any view on ADB's part as to sovereignty or independent status or necessarily conform to ADB's terminology. An Appreciative Inquiry Cameo Olivier Serrat 2011
  2. 2. Appreciative Inquiry "Problem solving" holds back analysis and understanding by focusing on problems, thereby limiting discussion of new organizational models. Appreciative Inquiry studies the positive attributes of organizations to create new conversations among people as they work together for organizational renewal. Appreciative Inquiry leverages the art and practice of asking questions to strengthen ability to apprehend, anticipate, and heighten positive renewal.
  3. 3. Appreciative Inquiry Appreciative Inquiry is based on two assumptions: • Organizations always move in the direction of the questions their members ask and the things they talk about. • Energy for positive change is created when organizations engage continually in remembering and analyzing circumstances when they were at their best rather than focusing on problems and how they can be solved.
  4. 4. Appreciative Inquiry • Discovery: People converse to (re)discover the times when their organization was at its best. • Dream: At a group conference facilitated by experts, personnel envisions that the peak moments identified in the Discovery phase have become the norm rather than the exception. • Design: A team is empowered to design ways to create the organization dreamed in the group conference. • Delivery: Teams are formed to deliver the dream and new designs, follow up on design elements, and continue the appreciative process. Appreciative Inquiry uses the 4-D Cycle:
  5. 5. The 4D Cycle of Appreciative Inquiry Affirmative Topic Choice Discovery— Appreciate the Best of What Is Dream— Imagine What Could Be Design— Determine What Should BeDelivery— Create What Will Be
  6. 6. Sustainable Livelihoods • People-centered • Responsive and participatory • Multilevel • Partner-friendly • Dynamic • Sustainable The Sustainable Livelihoods approach is a way of thinking about the objectives, scope, and priorities for development activities. The approach helps formulate development activities that are:
  7. 7. Sustainable Livelihoods The Sustainable Livelihoods approach: • Makes the connection between people and the overall enabling environment that influences the outcomes of livelihood strategies. • Brings attention to the inherent potential of people's skills, social networks, access to physical and financial resources, and ability to influence core institutions.
  8. 8. Human Social Physical Financial Natural Vulnerability Context • Shocks • Trends • Seasonalities Livelihood Strategies Policies & Institutions • Structures - Public Sector - Private Sector - Third Sector • Processes - Institutions - Laws - Policies - Culture Livelihood Outcomes •Sustainable use of natural resources •Income •Well-being •Resilience •Food security Capital Assets The Livelihoods Framework
  9. 9. Appreciative Inquiry for Sustainable Livelihoods Challenge To make a difference in poor peoples' lives. Tools From a sustainable livelihoods perspective, use appreciative inquiry to build on accomplishments. Emphasis Explore options with an eye to comparative advantages and opportunities.
  10. 10. Livelihoods Framework Attributes The Sustainable Livelihoods approach encourages thinking out of the box; it frees development practitioners from conventional approaches that are often restricted to identifying problems and finding solutions. The approach invites development practitioners to look at contexts and relationships so that development initiatives can become more process-oriented. The approach represents an important shift away from the conventional focus on project inputs and outputs and the assumed mechanical links between them.
  11. 11. Livelihoods Framework Attributes The Sustainable Livelihoods approach compels development practitioners to look for multiple entry points and to move beyond a homogenous "community" view and a narrow sectoral perspective. The approach stresses the importance of understanding institutions by mapping the institutional framework and linking the micro to the macro and the formal to the informal. The approach calls for a new style of appraisal that moves from universal prescriptions to context-specific approaches that allow alternative, local perspectives to reveal themselves.
  12. 12. Livelihoods Framework Assessment Strength Weakness The Sustainable Livelihoods approach seeks to understand changing combinations of modes of livelihood in a dynamic and historical context. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach underplays elements of the vulnerability context such as macroeconomic trends and conflict. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach explicitly advocates a creative tension between different levels of analysis and emphasizes the importance of macro and micro linkages. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach assumes that capital assets can be expanded in generalized and incremental fashion.
  13. 13. Livelihoods Framework Assessment Strength Weakness The Sustainable Livelihoods approach acknowledges the need to move beyond narrow sectoral perspectives and places emphasis on seeing the linkages between sectors. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach does not pay enough attention to inequalities of power. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach calls for investigation of the relationships between different activities that constitute livelihoods and draws attention to social relations. The Sustainable Livelihoods approach underplays the fact that enhancing the livelihoods of one group can undermine those of another.
  14. 14. The Tonle Sap at a Glance Item Characteristic Area •250,000–300,000 hectares (ha) in the dry season and 1.0–1.6 million ha in the wet season. •The flooded forest extended over more than 1 million ha originally, 614,000 ha in the 1960s, 362,000 ha in 1991, and about 20,000 ha in 1997. Hydrology •1–2 meters above mean sea level in the dry season and 8–12 meters above mean sea level in the wet season. •20% of the Mekong River's floodwaters are absorbed by the Tonle Sap. •62% of the Tonle Sap's water originates from the Mekong River and 38% of the Tonle Sap's water originates from the Tonle Sap basin. •The Tonle Sap is connected to the Mekong River by the 100-kilometer-long Tonle Sap River, which reverses its flow seasonally. Biology •The flooded forest contains about 200 plant species. •The Tonle Sap contains at least 200 species of fish, 42 species of reptiles, 225 species of birds, and 46 species of mammals. •Of the 500 fish species once found in Cambodia's wetlands, as many as 300 are now thought to have disappeared. Socio- economy •1.2 million people live in the area bordered by Highways No. 5 and No. 6. •The Tonle Sap yields about 230,000 tons of fish each year (about 50% of Cambodia's total freshwater capture fisheries production). •Rice production in the Tonle Sap's floodplains makes up about 12% of Cambodia's total.
  15. 15. Threats to the Tonle Sap Climate Change Cumulative Impact of Built Structures on the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin Deforestation in the Watersheds Agricultural Expansion Industrial and Urban Pollution Conversion of the Flooded Forest to Agriculture Overexploitation of Fisheries and Wildlife Resources Agricultural Runoff Mining Habitat Fragmentation Collection of Fuel Wood from the Flooded Forest Introduction of Non-Native Species
  16. 16. Entry Points for Sustainable Livelihoods Entry Point Purpose Potential Outcomes Establishing Village Development Funds • To provide a sustainable mechanism for communities to self-fund development activities, and provision of safety nets to the poor and vulnerable. • To set in motion innovative livelihoods improvement initiatives with a bias toward disadvantaged groups. • Enhanced human and social capital and reduced dependency on external agencies. • Enhanced human capital by directly developing the knowledge and skills of all groups to contribute to planning at the village level. • Improved physical capital in terms of local infrastructure. • Enhanced social capital through improvement in the internal functioning of groups. Strengthening Community-Based Management of Natural Resources • To generate transparency and equity into issues surrounding access t land and other natural resources that create conflict and dispute in villages. • To improve sound management of natural resources. • Direct impact on the stock of natural capital by enhancing sustainable measures to improve natural resource management. • Social capital can provide community-accepted leadership and management.
  17. 17. Entry Points for Sustainable Livelihoods Entry Point Purpose Potential Outcomes Improving Agronomic Practices and Small-Scale Irrigation • To achieve optimum production from local crop varieties, especially rice, particularly during favorable seasons. • To make agricultural output more reliable with the rehabilitation of existing or construction of new small-scale irrigation systems. • Improved natural and physical capital through the provision of inputs that ensure greater household food security. • Enhanced social capital through fostering Water User Groups and Pump User Groups. • Strengthened structures through involvement of the Ministry of Rural Development in cultural change leading to social capital wealth. • Increased coordination of activities that allows gaps in support of efforts to be closed.
  18. 18. Entry Points for Sustainable Livelihoods Entry Point Purpose Potential Outcomes Developing Post- School Literacy for Women • To provide women the opportunity to acquire greater literacy in the Khmer language and thereby increase capacity to seek information, lobby, and set up new groups for gender empowerment. • Enhanced social and human capital, especially for poor and vulnerable women from all three ethnic groups in the Tonle Sap region. • Enhanced social capital since women would become less economically dependent on men, leading to greater gender empowerment. • Lessening of social exclusion for many women groups, including ethnic minority women.
  19. 19. Entry Points for Sustainable Livelihoods Entry Point Purpose Potential Outcomes Supporting Self-Help Groups • To enable small groups (up to 20 members) to work with one another to pool savings toward a revolving credit fund or to access microfinance provider services. • Increased financial capital, especially for the poor and vulnerable. • Increased financial capital induced by the possibility of financial savings. • Enhanced social capital through improvement in group formation and structure. • Increased financial capital through income generation and scope to participate in external activities. Linking Villagers to the Private Sector • To enable the private sector to drive poverty reduction, for instance, in the livestock sector but also in other land and water-based enterprise sectors, through open and transparent linkages that are protected by appropriate legislation and practices of engagement. • Increased financial capital through enhanced market opportunities and subsector activities leading to the possibility of financial savings. • Enhanced natural capital, which will need sound management to prevent overexploitation.
  20. 20. Entry Points for Sustainable Livelihoods Entry Point Purpose Potential Outcomes Providing Post- Schooling Vocational Education • To compensate for the limited schooling of many in the Tonle Sap region • To equip a new labor force with basic know-how and experience to add value to local industry and other economic activities • To develop a "Living Skills" program related to labor and migrant workers' rights, economic development, and HIV/AIDS • Direct enhancement of human capital, from which economic growth potential can be realized • Reduced vulnerability of those in the workplace and workers' enhanced knowledge of rights and obligations to employers • A skilled labor force at the community level and from whom the community can also elicit advice Adding Value to Fish and Non-Timber Forest Products • To add value to fish by introducing appropriate training in post harvest practices, for instance, in the areas of fermenting and drying • To generate higher economic returns from non-timber forest products harvested which could have a significant economic value • Enhanced human capital through a reduction of vulnerability at times of low fish catch or flooding • Maximized returns to communities from natural capital
  21. 21. Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods Output 1 • Community-Driven Development is Supported (to absorb 90% of baseline costs). This entails: (i) establishing a community-livelihood fund; and (ii) designing and implementing livelihood investment packages. Output 2 • Core areas are Safeguarded (to absorb about 4% of baseline costs). This entails: (i) establishing an information base on core areas; (ii) instituting a management system for core areas; and (iii) instituting an improved network of fish sanctuaries. Output 3 • Skills and Awareness for Sustainable Livelihoods are Built (to absorb about 6% of baseline costs). This entails: (i) improving coordination for community- driven development; (ii) enhancing the skills base for community-driven development; and (iii) educating for protection of natural resources.
  22. 22. Tonle Sap Sustainable LivelihoodsOutputs Community- Driven Development is Supported Core Areas are Safeguarded Skills and Awareness for Sustainable Livelihoods are Built Outcome Increased access to assets in the five provinces that adjoin the Tonle Sap Impact Improved livelihoods
  23. 23. Life on the Tonle Sap
  24. 24. Further Reading • ADB. 2005. The Tonle sap Basin Strategy. Manila. • ——. 2005. Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods Project. Manila. livelihoods-project-rrp • ——. 2005. Sustaining Livelihoods on Cambodia's Tonle Sap. Manila. cambodias-tonle-sap • ——. 2008. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. Manila. • ——. 2008. Appreciative Inquiry. Manila.
  25. 25. Quick Response Codes @ADB @ADB Sustainable Development Timeline @LinkedIn @ResearchGate @Scholar @SlideShare @Twitter