• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
A Guide to the Livelihoods Framework
 

A Guide to the Livelihoods Framework

on

  • 692 views

The sustainable livelihoods approach improves understanding of the livelihoods of the poor. It organizes the factors that constrain or enhance livelihood opportunities, and shows how they relate. It ...

The sustainable livelihoods approach improves understanding of the livelihoods of the poor. It organizes the factors that constrain or enhance livelihood opportunities, and shows how they relate. It can help plan development activities and assess the contribution that existing activities have made to sustaining livelihoods.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
692
Views on SlideShare
691
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    A Guide to the Livelihoods Framework A Guide to the Livelihoods Framework Presentation Transcript

    • A Guide to the Livelihoods Framework Olivier Serrat 2013 The views expressed in this presentation are the views of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The countries listed in this presentation do not imply any view on ADB's part as to sovereignty or independent status or necessarily conform to ADB's terminology.
    • The Livelihoods Approach A livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets, and activities required for a means of living. A livelihood is deemed sustainable when it can cope with and recover from stresses and shocks and maintain or enhance capabilities, assets, and activities, both now and in the future, without undermining the natural resource base.
    • The Livelihoods Approach The livelihoods approach is based on evolving thinking about poverty reduction, the way the poor and vulnerable live their lives, and the importance of structural and institutional issues; it suggests development activities that are people-centered, responsive and participatory, multilevel, conducted in partnership with both the public and private sectors, dynamic, and sustainable. The livelihoods approach helps organize factors that constrain or enhance livelihood opportunities and shows how they relate to one another; as such, it is more than an analytical framework.
    • Typology of Assets Financial capital includes savings, credit, remittances, and pensions. Human capital includes skills, aptitudes, knowledge, experience, ability to labor, and good health. Natural capital includes land, water, wildlife, and biodiversity as well as the services derived from these. Physical capital includes transport, shelter, water, energy, and communications. Social capital includes networks, groups, trust, mutual understanding, shared values, and access to institutions.
    • The Vulnerability Context Vulnerability is characterized as insecurity in the well-being of individuals, households, and communities in the face of changes in the external environment. People can move in and out of poverty: the concept of vulnerability captures the processes of change better than poverty line measurements. Vulnerability has two facets: (i) an external side of risks, shocks, and stresses; and (ii) an internal side of defenselessness caused by lack of ability and means to cope with damaging losses.
    • The Vulnerability Context The vulnerability context encompasses: • Shocks such as illnesses, disasters, conflict, floods, droughts, storms, and crop and livestock pests and diseases. • Stresses such as population growth, declining natural resource base, climate change, economic downturns, inflation, currency devaluation, structural unemployment, and poor governance. • Seasonalities such as changing prices and shifting employment opportunities.
    • Livelihood Strategies Livelihood strategies aim to achieve livelihood outcomes. Decisions on livelihood strategies may invoke: • Natural-resource based activities • Non-natural resource based and offfarm activities • Migration and remittances • Pensions and grants • Intensification versus diversification • Short-term versus long-term outcomes
    • Livelihood Outcomes Potential livelihood outcomes can include: • Improved food security • Higher income • Reduced vulnerability • Increased well-being • Protected rights of access • Recovered human dignity
    • Policies and Institutions Livelihood strategies and outcomes are not just dependent on assets or constrained by the vulnerability context: they are also determined by the environment of structures and processes. Structures are the public and private sector organizations that set and implement policy and legislation; deliver services; and purchase, trade, and perform all manner of other functions that affect livelihoods. Processes embrace the laws, regulations, policies, operational arrangements, agreements, societal norms, and practices that, in turn, determine the way in which structures operate.
    • Expanding Assets Human Capital Social Capital Physical Capital Natural Capital Financial Capital
    • The Livelihoods Framework Assets Human Social Physical Vulnerability Context • Shocks • Trends • Seasonalities Natural Financial Policies & Institutions • Structures - Government - Private Sector • Processes - Laws - Policies - Culture - Institutions Livelihood Outcomes • Sustainable use of natural resources • Income • Well-being • Vulnerability • Food security Livelihood Strategies
    • Livelihoods Framework Implications The livelihoods approach encourages thinking out of the box; it frees development practitioners from conventional approaches that are often restricted to identifying problems and finding solutions. The livelihoods approach invites development practitioners to look at contexts and relationships so that development initiatives can become more process-oriented. The livelihoods approach represents an important shift away from the focus on project inputs and outputs and the assumed mechanical links between them.
    • Livelihoods Framework Implications The livelihoods approach compels development practitioners to look for multiple entry points and to move beyond homogenous "community" views and narrow sectoral perspectives. The livelihoods approach underscores the importance of understanding institutions by mapping the institutional framework and linking the micro to the macro and the formal to the informal. The livelihoods approach calls for a new style of policy appraisal that moves from universal prescriptions to contextspecific approaches that allow alternative, local perspectives to reveal themselves in the policy framework.
    • Livelihoods Framework Assessment Strength • The livelihoods approach seeks to understand changing combinations of modes of livelihood in a dynamic and historical context. • The livelihoods approach explicitly advocates a creative tension between different levels of analysis and emphasizes the importance of macro and micro linkages. Weakness • The livelihoods approach underplays elements of the vulnerability context such as macroeconomic trends and conflict. • The livelihoods approach assumes that assets can be expanded in generalized and incremental fashion.
    • Livelihoods Framework Assessment Strength • The livelihoods approach acknowledges the need to move beyond narrow sectoral perspectives and places emphasis on seeing the linkages between sectors. • The livelihoods approach calls for investigation of the relationships between different activities that constitute livelihoods and draws attention to social relations. Weakness • The livelihoods approach does not pay enough attention to inequalities of power. • The livelihoods approach underplays the fact that enhancing the livelihoods of one group can undermine those of another.
    • Further Reading • ADB. 2008. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. Available: www.adb.org/publications/sustainable-livelihoods-approach • ADB. 2008. Appreciative Inquiry. Available: www.adb.org/publications/appreciative-inquiry • ADB. 2008. Culture Theory. Available: www.adb.org/publications/culture-theory • ADB. 2009. The Most Significant Change Technique. Available: www.adb.org/publications/most-significant-change-technique • ADB. 2009. Building Institutional Capacity for Development. Available: www.adb.org/publications/building-institutionalcapacity-development
    • Further Reading • ADB. 2011. Political Economy Analysis for Development Effectiveness. Available: www.adb.org/publications/politicaleconomy-analysis-development-effectiveness
    • Olivier Serrat Principal Knowledge Management Specialist Regional and Sustainable Development Department Asian Development Bank knowledge@adb.org www.adb.org/knowledge-management www.facebook.com/adbknowledgesolutions www.scribd.com/knowledge_solutions www.twitter.com/adbknowledge