CDE Conference 09/02/2009. W Morrison. Assessment and evaluation in UG Laws: new directions and old challenges - Presentation Transcript
CDE conference 9 February 2009
Assessment and evaluation in UG Laws:
new directions and old challenges
London LLB/Dip ‘classic’ picture
Long standing examination Board
Traditional assessment – unseen 3 hour examinations
Large syllabi
Very little guidance from London
Teaching conducted by third party, commercial institutions
Difficulty of communication
Process of redvelopment in to F&DL from 2001
Ist stage:
increase learning resources
cultural change both in EISA and Laws community to embrace ‘distance learning’ as governing description
Involvement of outside consultants
Work with private institutions, i.e. visit, lecture, attend convocations
Overall constraint
‘… that as far as possible practices on external programmes should reflect those in place for the internal programme’
But what if the internal programme carries particular conservative practices?
Most assessment in the Laws Schools is by unseen 3 hour examinations
Marking and progression is ‘by part’ and not modular
Have to pass ‘all’ the examinations taken in one go to progress
Not at all dl practices
numbers
Now c. 14,500 students
2007 marked 36,000 examination scripts
All double marked i.e. 72,000 markings
c. 5000 candidates in 1 st year
Only 50% of year 1 go to year 2
Only 60 % of year 2 go to year 3
Institutions ‘teaching’ to examination papers
Materials have developed BUT are they used? Still ‘classic assessment outcomes, e.g.
Answers that look like from script
Many similar answers (including same typos and grammatical mistakes
Are we assessing the student or the tutor?
The ‘jury question’ paradigm.
2005 onwards radical re-appriasal
In part due to external pressures (JASB revalidation) review of assessment to see
Fit with minimum levels of learning materials for QLD degree
Fit with ‘skills agenda’, both subject specific and transferable
outcomes
Division of degree: QLD and non-QLD ‘streams’ by student choosing to do add on skills activities (the Law Skills portfolio by pathway 1 or 2.
All students confront research activities in year 1 subject (CLRI)
If want QLD then choose one of the Skills pathways in final year
Other outcome
All questions on the table!
Importance of technology
New single sign on portal introduced in 2008 but ‘teething issues’
Difficulties of communication remain
Need effective academic guidance
Questions multiply
What is the reality of the immediate learning or not-learning environment?
Do students get practice and feedback on all major learning outcomes prior to final assessment?
Is feedback aligned with what London would do?
Is self-assessment incorporated into the learning of the course unit?
Academic guidance
Do student know how to understand what London expects?
Functional literacy (not literacy per se.)
Are students shown how to read messages and spot cues about criteria for attainment from the nature of the activities they are given?
Are there structured opportunities for students to discuss their learning with peers and benefit from peer feedback?
headings for a subject ‘guide’: part 1
These are the aims of this subject...
The reason for having this subject and for having it at this
level or point in the course is...
By the end of studying this subject you will be able to...
These are the main ways of learning and teaching which will
help you to achieve the learning outcomes...
This is how the learning outcomes will be assessed...
Headings for subject guide; part 2
This is how and at what points you will be given feedback
on your performance...
To achieve a pass you should...
These are examples of the content of the unit...
These are examples of the main learning resources you will use...
Aims (information – practice) Learning Outcomes What should the students be able to know, understand, do? Standards Learning and Teaching Strategy What methods will help students achieve the learning outcomes? Assessment Criteria On what basis will you judge if students have met the learning outcomes and how well? Assessment Strategy How will you assess if students have met the learning outcomes? (source: Rosie Bingham 2001)
Constructive alignment (easy in theory, but feedback loop is crucial)
Peer assessment
What opportunities for peer assessment exist?
Work with ‘teaching institutions’ and research shows complexity of relationship/context of operation
Research in Distance Education:
from present find more
Research in Distance Education:
from present findings to future agendas. Evaluation and Assessment strand presentation.
Dr Wayne Morrison
External Laws Programme less
0 comments
Post a comment