Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
CDE Conference 09/02/2009. M Oliver. From present findings to future agendas: communities and the Higher Education Academy Exchange
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

CDE Conference 09/02/2009. M Oliver. From present findings to future agendas: communities and the Higher Education Academy Exchange


Published on

Research in Distance Education: …

Research in Distance Education:
from present findings to future agendas. Closing keynote presentation.
Martin Oliver
Higher Education Academy Research Observatory

Published in: Education

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide
  • Transcript

    • 1. From present findings to future agendas: communities and the Higher Education Academy Exchange Martin Oliver London Knowledge Lab & Higher Education Academy
    • 2. …what happened to the Observatory?
      • “The project formerly known as…”
      • As of last week, it’s (currently) the Higher Education Academy Exchange
        • No substantive change to purpose, form, timescale etc
    • 3. The Higher Education Academy Exchange
      • A service promoting and exploring the use of practice- and research-based evidence to influence policy and practice in teaching and learning in Higher Education
        • Tools to enable access to evidence and syntheses of this evidence (e.g. prototype repository and syndicated search, wiki)
        • Spaces (real and virtual) to help communities explore evidence-based practice and its implications for students' learning
    • 4. Overview of development
      • August 07 – July 08 – “Phase 0”
        • Scoping the Observatory
        • Landscaping report for e-learning (exemplar area)
        • Generation of pilot resources and services
        • Proof of concept piloted at Academy conference
      • July 08 – June 09 – “Phase 1”
        • Development phase
        • Pilots focusing on community engagement
        • Promoted at Academy conference July 09
      • July 09 – “Phases 2, 3, etc ”
        • Adding functionality, broadening engagement, etc
      We’re here
    • 5. Landscaping evidence use in e-learning
      • Series of exploratory studies within e-learning
        • Beetham, Sharpe & Benfield
      • ‘ Landscaping’ consultation
      • Interviews with key informants
      • Survey (116 responses)
      • Follow-up interviews
    • 6. A resounding “Yes, but…”
      • Keen on single point of access; research reviewed, evaluated and synthesised
      • After that, great variability
      • “ The impossibility of categorising respondents as users, producers, policy makers or intermediaries for research is in itself is an important outcome.”
    • 7. Authority with the sector, not for it
      • Variability reflects differing questions and practices within the sector
      • Contrast with the dominant (caricatured) medical model
      • Valuing qualitative research, reflective practice, etc
      • Building of theories and narratives, rather than mathematical models
      • Politics of quality control: who’s allowed to write to it?
      • Evidence in e-learning of benefits arising from involving practitioners in research, rather than differentiating researchers from practitioners (the studied)
    • 8. The proposed approach
      • A social model of knowledge production and use
      • Expertise of the sector, not for the sector
      • A scalable approach (people can develop as many topics as they’re interested in)
      • A sustainable approach (not dependent on central budgets, subscriptions, administration and control, etc )
      • Sensitive to differences in evidence use, vocabulary, interest, etc .
      • Strategic (spotting emergent topics, identifying gaps, informing decision making, etc .)
    • 9. A theorisation
      • Wenger’s communities of practice model
      • Practice and Reification as necessary but fundamentally different (experience and abstraction)
      • Reifications received by communities and meaning negotiated in relation to practice
      • A social account of acceptable (policed) interpretation
      • This has implications for how we make sense of research
      • How big are these communities of practice? Any overlap with disciplines, institutions, departments, special interest groups…?
    • 10. Piloting community approaches
      • How do people produce, share and use evidence?
      • SIG site
      • Expert review
      • Community discussion of practice
      • Open peer commentary on published research
      • Review processes, to identify approaches that may have wider value
      • Feed these back to inform the development of the whole observatory
      • Currently, findings are mostly about problems…
    • 11. Building from this: e-Learning projects
      • Small grants for research
      • Historically: projects awarded, visited once, conclude by generating reports
      • New model
      • Projects awarded, brought together, given technical infrastructure (wiki, Ning)
      • Are visited, encouraged to use Web2.0, brought together mid-project and again at end
    • 12. Wiki for Academy-funded projects (& others)
    • 13. Understanding social use of evidence
      • Success will depend on documenting and understanding communities’ use of evidence
      • An evidence base for our work, as well as for others
      • Working with pilot groups
      • Special interest group, membership group focusing on professional role, etc .
      • Further projects building capacity for this
    • 14. Longer term vision
      • People can…
      • Look to see if there’s relevant evidence about their problems
      • Add their own evidence to existing reviews (community authoring)
      • Find other people interested in these issues
      • Form and support Special Interest Groups
      • Support events, e.g. through centralised calendar, document store, space to develop shared interpretations
      • Pose questions to the sector if they can’t find what they want, which might spur new work or groups
    • 15. And it’s happening here…
      • Centre for Distance Education
      • “ From present findings to future agendas” event
      • Research into practice publication
      • An example of the kind of process we want to see happen more often
      • How can this be sustained and built on?
    • 16. Towards 2012…
      • What can you do in three years?
      • One big project?
      • Two small projects?
      • One bit of development, implementation and evaluation?
      • Set up, run and possibly wind down a special interest group?
      • So… what’s the single issue you care about the most?
    • 17. What are the priorities for the CDE that can inform our services to learners? (challenge from this morning)
      • Understanding our students
        • Describing what they do (e.g. mobile use in Africa, studies of vet use of images in CoMo) – or letting them do this
        • Describing what they don’t do and why (e.g. ‘non-progressers’ and reasons for non-completion)
        • Asking what they like … but not taking this at face value (e.g. didn’t take up study skills modules even if they needed them)
        • Debunking “them and us” (e.g. “culture” as a proxy for variation)
        • Understanding how peoples’ use of technology varies (e.g. the Proteins students: richness & enhancement vs. accessibility)
        • Theorising what they need (Denise’s issue with feedback)
    • 18. And…
      • Teachers are learners too
        • …in the most constructive sense! (So they also need understanding…)
        • Giving time/space/support to relate this to practice
        • Supporting comparative and exploratory work (what happens elsewhere, and what can we do with this stuff…?) as an opportunity for learning
    • 19. Conclusions?
      • The Exchange/Observatory: less about what we should look at, more about how we should look at it
      • New round of project planned; emphasis on social processes
      • What can be learnt from the work here?
      • What can change our work with students?
      • What connects to wider debates or the concerns of other communities?
      • This will need support and encouragement: a few people will do it anyhow, but with the right environment, more will benefit
    • 20. Thanks!
      • Emails
        • - [email_address]
        • [email_address]
        • [email_address]
      • More information at:
      • Piloting site: