VoIP and CALEA: Current Developments Tony Rutkowski V.P. for Regulatory Affairs VeriSign mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org tel:+1 703.948-4305 VoIP World Fall 2004 Washington DC 12 Nov 2004 Panel on CALEA and VoIP
Trusted Third Party service bureaus as complete independent solution
Safe harbor standards
Subscriber identity information
Stored traffic data
Compliance Extension Petitions
How should the FCC deal with the problem of evolving standards and their implementation?
Are any existing CALEA standards deficient?
What other steps could be adopted for effective enforcement?
Cost and Recovery
VeriSign and its NetDiscovery ™ Service
The new FCC CALEA proceeding 1990 1995 2000 2004 2005 2006 2007 Adopted 25 Oct 1994 Original CALEA Proceeding NPRM 10 Oct 1997 FNPRM 5 Nov 1998 R&O 15 Mar 1999 2ndR&O 31 Aug 1999 3rdR&O 31 Aug 1999 DCcir 15 Aug 2000 Recon Order 16 Apr 2001 Order 21 Sep 2001 Order 27 Sep 2001 Remand Order 11 Apr 2002 Docket 97-213 Docket 04-36 Omnibus IP-Enabled Services Proceeding NPRM 14 Feb 2004 Docket 04-295 Broadband-VoIP CALEA Proceeding RM-10865 12 Mar 2004 NPRM 9 Aug 2004 Comments 8 Nov 2004 Replies 7 Dec 2004 R&O Apr? 2005 Compliance Benchmark Notice Aug? 2005 Compliance Benchmark Deadline Jul? 2006 Congressional hearing 10 Sep 2004
Spectrum of filings http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi Enter: “04-295” in block 1 American Civil Liberties Union BellSouth CDT/ Public Interest Joint EarthLink, Inc. EDUCAUSE Coalition Electronic Frontier Foundation Global Crossing Level 3 Communications, LLC US Internet Service Provider Assn Yahoo! Inc. Largely No Problems Largely Opposed FiduciaNet NCTA New York Attorney General Nextel Communications, Inc. Satellite Industry Association Subsentio Texas Department of Public Safety United States Department of Justice USTA VeriSign Verizon AMA TechTel Communications CTIA Cingular Corr Coalition for Rural Broadband CALEA Motorola National Telecom Cooperative Association Nextel Nuvio OPASTCO Rural Telecommunications Group Rural Telecommunications Providers SBC Smithville T-Mobile USA, Inc. TIA Some Concerns Alternative: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ Click on “Search for Filed Comments”
Will generally follow safe harbor standards, exceptions
standards do not exist or are “deficient”
standards are not incorporated in network elements
standards versions change
Value added services
Authentication and trust systems
Legal analysis and verification of orders
Proof of performance
TTP Models for Broadband Internet Access Internal Adjunct External Local Access Point Premises LI Provider Premises Broadband Service Provider Premises Broadband Service Provider Premises LI Provider Premises Broadband Service Provider Premises To Law Enforcement Public Internet Public Internet Local Access Point Premises To Law Enforcement content traffic data control content traffic data control LI Provider Premises To Law Enforcement traffic data + content control traffic data + content control (Mixture of the above)
TTP Models for Managed/Mediated VoIP Services Internal Adjunct Managed/Mediated VoIP Provider Premises LI Provider Premises LI Provider Premises To Law Enforcement Public Internet Public Internet To Law Enforcement Managed/Mediated VoIP Provider Premises External Broadband Service Provider Premises LI Provider Premises To Law Enforcement content traffic data control content traffic data control (Mixture of the above) content traffic data control content traffic data control PSTN PSTN