• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Transilience map & analysis

Transilience map & analysis






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • {"3":"Conservative Scale: Solve Problems, Eliminate failures, attract customers\nRadical scale: impose new requirements, make obsolete, create new markets\n"}

Transilience map & analysis Transilience map & analysis Presentation Transcript

  • Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction W. Abernathy & K. Clark Carlos Hidalgo Radu Irava Aman Kalsi Ferry Ignasius Challenge the future 1
  • Content 1. Introduction 2. Transilience Map 3. Innovations 4. Users Inflluence 5. Management Relevance 6. Conclusions Challenge the future 2
  • Introduction • Conservative Scale • Innovations serve to enhance the value or applicability of the firm’s existing competence. • Radical Scale • The effect of innovation is disruptive and destructive. Challenge the future 3
  • Introduction • Technology/Production • Design • Production systems • Skills (labor, mangerial, technical) • Materials • Kowledge and experience • Market/Customer • • • • • Customer Relations Customer Applications Channels of distribution Customer knowledge Modes of commuication Challenge the future 4
  • Transilience Map • Consists of a composite transilience scales for each domain as the axes of a two-dimensional diagram Conserve Existing Competence Markets/Customer Create new linkages Technology/Production Disrupt/obsolete Conserve Existing linkages Challenge the future 5
  • Disrupt existing/ create new linkages Conserve / entrench existing competen ce Disrupt/ obsolete Technology/Production existing competen ce Conserve/ entrench existing linkages Challenge the future 6
  • Architectural • Creates new industries (ex: radio) / Reforms old industries (ex: photo typesetting) • Opens new markets • Defines basic configuration of product and process • Establishes technical and marketing agendas • Reveals the architecture and competition occurs • Ex: flywheel magneto, vanadium stell alloy Challenge the future 7
  • Market Niche • • • • • • • New market opportunities through existing technology Conserve and strengthen established designs “Sales maximization” (Utterback) Improved applicability Insuffiecient for long term advantage Timing and quick reaction are very important Ex: Ford Model A, fashion apparel, Sony Walkman Challenge the future 8
  • Regular • • • • • • Builds on established technology and existing customers Almost invisible, incremental change Ex: Rocket engines, Computers, Synthetic fibers Dramatic effect on product cost and performance Takes place over a significant period of time Ex: Model T: $1200 -> $290 (18 years), capital increased Challenge the future 9
  • Revolutionary • Disrupts established technology but applied to existing markets • Ex: Vacuum tubes, Mechanical calculators • Duel Ford (mass production) – GM(new concepts) • Ex: Closed steel body • New technology, higher costs • Not all have profound impact: fail market needs, production problems, poorly timed Challenge the future 10
  • Users Influence Sample Influence Welding Machine Moving assembling line + Reliable performance - Vulnerable to change + Easy supervision & Inv. Management - Limited experience - Rigid & limited for other change + Less training + Less inventory - Rise minimum economics scale Finish Coating Challenge the future 11
  • Users Influence Sample : 1.Ford model T Variety of machines - Versatility customers and users 2.Engine Mounting Low Power – less vibration Influence : Greater understandings Other improvements Challenge the future 12
  • Users Influence - New technical concept Changes from market demand Government policy Sample : CHRYSLER 1920 – 1939 : Focus on architecture & revolutionary innovation had passed Ford in Market share 1940s : Focus on regular & niche innovation its market share decline 1950-1960s : inefficient & not innovative Influence : Reversal development Challenge the future 13
  • Managerial Implication • • • • • New way of assessing different kinds of innovation is 'Transilience map‘ Architectural innovation – Creative synthesis about the user needs and new technological needs. Niche Creation - Timing is the essence of management. Regular Mode - Methodical planning and consistency to ensure technological progress, engineering improvements and continued process development. Revolutionary Innovation - There needs to be a technological push. Challenge the future 14
  • Conclusion Transilience map requires further study. The need to examine the impact of innovation on market structure during periods of transition. A balance between different innovations at the same firm. Challenge the future 15