Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach

454

Published on

How and why OTC Online updated review process

How and why OTC Online updated review process

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
454
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Designed to certify the quality of online courses and online componentsFaculty-centered, peer review process“Effective practices” vs. “best practices”Learning outcomesHow students learnQM now has over 430 subscribers.Subscribing institutions are represented in North America, Australia, Bermuda, and Saudi Arabia.   More than 7,000 institutional faculty and staff have been trained by QM. Quality Matters Program. “QM Quick Facts.” Quality Matters News. July 2010.
  • Designed to certify the quality of online courses and online componentsFaculty-centered, peer review process“Effective practices” vs. “best practices”Learning outcomesHow students learnQM now has over 430 subscribers.Subscribing institutions are represented in North America, Australia, Bermuda, and Saudi Arabia.   More than 7,000 institutional faculty and staff have been trained by QM. Quality Matters Program. “QM Quick Facts.” Quality Matters News. July 2010.
  • Course meets universal design principles, section 508 standards, and W3C guidelines to ensure access to all students.508 “A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided.”508 “Equivalent alternative for any multimedia presentation shall be synchronized with the presentation.”W3C- World Wide Web ConsortiumGeorgia Tech Research on Accessible Distance Education (GRADE). CATEA Access E Learning. http://www.accesselearning.net/mod1/1_01.php
  • Transcript

    • 1. Online Course Development and Delivery Reviews: An Interactive Approach
      Carla R. BradleyOTC OnlineOzarks Technical Community Collegebradleyc@otc.edu
    • 2. Words
    • 3. Words
      Evaluation
      Evaluator
      Evaluator
      Best practices
      Problems
      Rubric
      Requirements
      Peer review
      Coach
      Mentor
      Effective practices
      Challenges
      Guide
      Consistency standards
    • 4. Goals
      Explain how OTC Online arrived at updated online review process.
      Apply hints from other reviewers to online reviews.
      Evaluate an online course for development and delivery. *
      * Practice review set needs to be completed by new online reviewers.
    • 5.
    • 6.
    • 7. Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.
    • 8. Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.
    • 9. 3 Resources
      Quality Matters
      Blackboard Exemplary Course
      Chico State
    • 10. Quality Matters
      “The course review process is a collegial discussion between faculty peers committed to Continuous quality improvement. It is not an evaluation. Centered in national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles designed to promote student learning. . . . And it’s not a win/lost or pass/fail test…… the rubric in the review process functions as a diagnostic tool to facilitate the continuous improvement of online courses.”
    • 11. Quality Matters
      Course overview and introduction
      Learning objectives
      Assessment and measurement
      Resources and materials
      Learner engagement
      Course technology
      Learner support
      Accessibility
    • 12. QM Example
      Striving for Quality in Online Courses-J.J. Johnson-Pierce College in Washington State
      Quality assurance team (of six):
      Sensitive about academic freedom
      Student feels comfortable- course layout
      Anticipate questions
      Student comfort (home page)- consistent interface
      Measure of course design
      Composed of instructors in diverse disciplines
      Provide mentoring and coaching
      Goal-
      Go to the next level and tie to PD sessions
    • 13. Blackboard Exemplary Course
      “The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program began in 2000 with the goal of identifying and disseminating best practices for designing engaging online courses.”
      Course design
      Interaction and collaboration
      Assessment
      Learner support
    • 14. Bb ECP Example
      Excellence within our Grasp: Using Blackboard’s Exemplary Course Rubric- Mark Burris- University of Arkansas Little Rock and Sue Burris- National Park Community College
      Goal 1: Promote instructional excellence across Arkansas through online student engagement principles, moving beyond “buttonology”
      Goal 2: Promote academic collaboration through local and statewide community of practice
    • 15. Chico State
      Learner support and resources
      Online organization and design
      Instructional design and delivery
      Assessment and evaluation of student learning
      Innovative teaching with technology
      Faculty use of student feedback
    • 16. Chico State Example
      Online Course Assessment (James West)- Missouri Baptist University
      Peer evaluations results from spring 2005 to spring 2010
      High score has been consistent
      Low score has had an upward trend
      Mean has been upward
      Consistent improvement over 5-year period
    • 17.
    • 18. Previous Online Review Document
      Checklist and comments
      Review document with “yes” or “no” that combined development and delivery
      Lacked extensive information on instructional content, technology, academic integrity, and accessibility.
    • 19. Unique to College
      Navigation
      Online syllabus template (current)
      Instructor response time
      Assessment data
    • 20. Pilot
      Introduced in OTL 101 in fall 2011
      Fall 2011 online instructors complete
      Spring and summer 2011 online instructors complete (some courses reviewed)
      Fall 2011 only online instructors reviewed complete
    • 21. Approach to Online PD
    • 22. Review Document
      Engage department and begin research
      Separate development and delivery
      Add pre-review comment section
      Organize by navigation
      Pilot review documents and solicit feedback
      Create team approach
      Involve departments
      Check with DSS
      Invite feedback from OTC Online Committee
      Meet online with Online Review Task Force Team
    • 23. Accessibility and Compliance
      “Creates duplicate channels of information to benefit all learners.”
      Planning will have a cost-savings rather than retrofitting.
      Builds awareness.
      Georgia Tech Research on Accessible Distance Education (GRADE). CATEA Access E Learning. http://www.accesselearning.net/mod1/1_01.php
    • 24.
    • 25. Reminders
      Research-based
      Objective
      Not a judgment of instructor (but of course development and delivery)
    • 26. bradleyc@otc.edu

    ×