Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Online Course Development and Delivery Reviews: An Interactive Approach <br />Carla R. BradleyOTC OnlineOzarks Technical C...
Words<br />
Words<br />Evaluation<br />Evaluator<br />Evaluator<br />Best practices<br />Problems<br />Rubric<br />Requirements<br />P...
Goals<br />Explain how OTC Online arrived at updated online review process.<br />Apply hints from other reviewers to onlin...
Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.<br />
Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.<br />
3 Resources<br />Quality Matters<br />Blackboard Exemplary Course<br />Chico State<br />
Quality Matters<br />      “The course review process is a collegial discussion between faculty peers committed to Continu...
Quality Matters<br />Course overview and introduction<br />Learning objectives<br />Assessment and measurement<br />Resour...
QM Example<br />Striving for Quality in Online Courses-J.J. Johnson-Pierce College in Washington State<br />Quality assura...
Blackboard Exemplary Course<br />“The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program began in 2000 with the goal of identifying and d...
Bb ECP Example<br />Excellence within our Grasp: Using Blackboard’s Exemplary Course Rubric- Mark Burris- University of Ar...
Chico State<br />Learner support and resources<br />Online organization and design<br />Instructional design and delivery<...
Chico State Example<br />Online Course Assessment (James West)- Missouri Baptist University<br />Peer evaluations results ...
Previous Online Review Document<br />Checklist and comments<br />Review document with “yes” or “no” that combined developm...
Unique to College<br />Navigation<br />Online syllabus template (current)<br />Instructor response time<br />Assessment da...
Pilot<br />Introduced in OTL 101 in fall 2011<br />Fall 2011 online instructors complete<br />Spring and summer 2011 onlin...
Approach to Online PD <br />
Review Document<br />Engage department and begin research<br />Separate development and delivery<br />Add pre-review comme...
Accessibility and Compliance<br />“Creates duplicate channels of information to benefit all learners.”<br />Planning will ...
Reminders<br />Research-based<br />Objective<br />Not a judgment of instructor (but of course  development and delivery)<b...
bradleyc@otc.edu<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach

466

Published on

How and why OTC Online updated review process

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
466
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Designed to certify the quality of online courses and online componentsFaculty-centered, peer review process“Effective practices” vs. “best practices”Learning outcomesHow students learnQM now has over 430 subscribers.Subscribing institutions are represented in North America, Australia, Bermuda, and Saudi Arabia.   More than 7,000 institutional faculty and staff have been trained by QM. Quality Matters Program. “QM Quick Facts.” Quality Matters News. July 2010.
  • Designed to certify the quality of online courses and online componentsFaculty-centered, peer review process“Effective practices” vs. “best practices”Learning outcomesHow students learnQM now has over 430 subscribers.Subscribing institutions are represented in North America, Australia, Bermuda, and Saudi Arabia.   More than 7,000 institutional faculty and staff have been trained by QM. Quality Matters Program. “QM Quick Facts.” Quality Matters News. July 2010.
  • Course meets universal design principles, section 508 standards, and W3C guidelines to ensure access to all students.508 “A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided.”508 “Equivalent alternative for any multimedia presentation shall be synchronized with the presentation.”W3C- World Wide Web ConsortiumGeorgia Tech Research on Accessible Distance Education (GRADE). CATEA Access E Learning. http://www.accesselearning.net/mod1/1_01.php
  • Transcript of "Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach"

    1. 1. Online Course Development and Delivery Reviews: An Interactive Approach <br />Carla R. BradleyOTC OnlineOzarks Technical Community Collegebradleyc@otc.edu<br />
    2. 2. Words<br />
    3. 3. Words<br />Evaluation<br />Evaluator<br />Evaluator<br />Best practices<br />Problems<br />Rubric<br />Requirements<br />Peer review<br />Coach<br />Mentor<br />Effective practices<br />Challenges<br />Guide<br />Consistency standards<br />
    4. 4. Goals<br />Explain how OTC Online arrived at updated online review process.<br />Apply hints from other reviewers to online reviews.<br />Evaluate an online course for development and delivery. *<br />* Practice review set needs to be completed by new online reviewers.<br />
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7. Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.<br />
    8. 8. Chasen, Michael. Blackboard World 2010.<br />
    9. 9. 3 Resources<br />Quality Matters<br />Blackboard Exemplary Course<br />Chico State<br />
    10. 10. Quality Matters<br /> “The course review process is a collegial discussion between faculty peers committed to Continuous quality improvement. It is not an evaluation. Centered in national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles designed to promote student learning. . . . And it’s not a win/lost or pass/fail test…… the rubric in the review process functions as a diagnostic tool to facilitate the continuous improvement of online courses.” <br />
    11. 11. Quality Matters<br />Course overview and introduction<br />Learning objectives<br />Assessment and measurement<br />Resources and materials<br />Learner engagement<br />Course technology<br />Learner support<br />Accessibility<br />
    12. 12. QM Example<br />Striving for Quality in Online Courses-J.J. Johnson-Pierce College in Washington State<br />Quality assurance team (of six):<br />Sensitive about academic freedom<br />Student feels comfortable- course layout<br />Anticipate questions<br />Student comfort (home page)- consistent interface<br />Measure of course design<br />Composed of instructors in diverse disciplines<br />Provide mentoring and coaching<br />Goal-<br />Go to the next level and tie to PD sessions<br />
    13. 13. Blackboard Exemplary Course<br />“The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program began in 2000 with the goal of identifying and disseminating best practices for designing engaging online courses.”<br />Course design<br />Interaction and collaboration<br />Assessment<br />Learner support<br />
    14. 14. Bb ECP Example<br />Excellence within our Grasp: Using Blackboard’s Exemplary Course Rubric- Mark Burris- University of Arkansas Little Rock and Sue Burris- National Park Community College<br />Goal 1: Promote instructional excellence across Arkansas through online student engagement principles, moving beyond “buttonology”<br />Goal 2: Promote academic collaboration through local and statewide community of practice<br />
    15. 15. Chico State<br />Learner support and resources<br />Online organization and design<br />Instructional design and delivery<br />Assessment and evaluation of student learning<br />Innovative teaching with technology<br />Faculty use of student feedback<br />
    16. 16. Chico State Example<br />Online Course Assessment (James West)- Missouri Baptist University<br />Peer evaluations results from spring 2005 to spring 2010 <br />High score has been consistent<br />Low score has had an upward trend<br />Mean has been upward<br />Consistent improvement over 5-year period<br />
    17. 17.
    18. 18. Previous Online Review Document<br />Checklist and comments<br />Review document with “yes” or “no” that combined development and delivery<br />Lacked extensive information on instructional content, technology, academic integrity, and accessibility.<br />
    19. 19. Unique to College<br />Navigation<br />Online syllabus template (current)<br />Instructor response time<br />Assessment data<br />
    20. 20. Pilot<br />Introduced in OTL 101 in fall 2011<br />Fall 2011 online instructors complete<br />Spring and summer 2011 online instructors complete (some courses reviewed)<br />Fall 2011 only online instructors reviewed complete<br />
    21. 21. Approach to Online PD <br />
    22. 22. Review Document<br />Engage department and begin research<br />Separate development and delivery<br />Add pre-review comment section<br />Organize by navigation<br />Pilot review documents and solicit feedback<br />Create team approach<br />Involve departments<br />Check with DSS<br />Invite feedback from OTC Online Committee<br />Meet online with Online Review Task Force Team<br />
    23. 23. Accessibility and Compliance<br />“Creates duplicate channels of information to benefit all learners.”<br />Planning will have a cost-savings rather than retrofitting.<br />Builds awareness.<br />Georgia Tech Research on Accessible Distance Education (GRADE). CATEA Access E Learning. http://www.accesselearning.net/mod1/1_01.php<br />
    24. 24.
    25. 25. Reminders<br />Research-based<br />Objective<br />Not a judgment of instructor (but of course development and delivery)<br />
    26. 26. bradleyc@otc.edu<br />
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×