Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Clad oct09 pquinn (nx_power_lite)

251

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
251
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Peatscapes: Monitoring of Hydrology and Water Quality at Geltsdale and Priorsdale Report of Phase 1: Nov 2007 – Mar 2009Dr Jennine Jonczyk, Dr Mark Wilkinson, Dr David Rimmer and Dr Paul Quinn
  • 2. Some of the features in the catchment Pilot pond Overland flow following gradient of slope Leaky stream gauge wooden barrier PILOT POND STREAM Overflow SPILL Woodland Leakage R1 stream Diversion gauge structure Belford Burn Roughly 200m 1.35km 1.15km 1.85kmR1 R2 R3 BEL Upper Belford Burn “Pilot pond” Features 1 to 3
  • 3. Some of the features in the catchment 1.35km 1.15km 1.85kmR1 R2 R3 BEL Upper Belford Burn “Pilot pond” Features 1 to 3
  • 4. Some of the features in the catchment 1.35km 1.15km 1.85kmR1 R2 R3 BEL Upper Belford Burn “Pilot pond” Features 1 to 3
  • 5. …but that was last week!Lower Lady’s well feature
  • 6. Outline1. Questions to answer2. Hydrology3. WQ4. Peatscapes II
  • 7. Questions to answerHow does grip blocking effect :-1. Water table2. Water colour (& Dissolved Organic Carbon; DOC)3. Suspended sedimentHOW are we investigating this?1. (Water table) using pressure transducers in the peat2. (Colour) grab samples taken from grips and downstream pts and measuring DOC and absorbance in lab.3. (SS) Filtering grab sample
  • 8. Working Hypothesis ARE grips like open drainage ditches? What happens when it rains?QWT
  • 9. Blocked Grip Generic Blocked Grip experimental Unblocked Grip Lay-out Unblocked GripDip-wells with pressure transducers upslope anddownslope of gripsDip-wells at mid-point between gripsWater quality sample from grips.
  • 10. Relative water level in grips (cms) 25 /0 9/ 20 07 00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 :0 0 14 /1 1/ 20 07 00 :0 0 03 /0 1/ 20 08 00 :0 0 22 /0 2/Grip 1 20 08 00 : 00 12 /0 4/ 20 08 00 :0 0Grip 2 (Blocked) 01 /0 6/ 20 08 00 :0 0rainfall 21 /0 7/ 20 08 Geltsdale Hydrology: Grips 00 :0 0 09 /0 9/ 20 08 00 : 00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 20.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 15-min rainfall (mm)
  • 11. Geltsdale Hydrology: Water table 25/09/2007 14/11/2007 03/01/2008 22/02/2008 12/04/2008 01/06/2008 21/07/2008 09/09/2008 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 0 -50Depth of water table from surface (cms) -100 -150 -200 -250 Downslope of grip1 Upslope of grip 1 Downslope of grip 2 Upslope of grip 2
  • 12. 09 / 03 Grip water level (cm) /2 00 8 09 00 /0 : 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 -5 0 5 3/ 00 2 00 8 10 16 /0 :1 3/ 5 20 08 11 08 /0 :3 3/ 0 20grip 3 08 11 00 /0 :4 3/ 5 20 08 12 17 /0 :0 3/ 0 20 08 13 09 /0 :1 3/ 5 20 08 13 01 /0 :3 E.g. Data anomalies 3/ 0 20 08grip 2 (blocked) 14 17 /0 :4 3/ 5 20 08 15 10 /0 :0 3/ 0 20 08 15 02 /0 :1 3/ 5 20 08 16 18 /0 :3 3/ 0 20 08 17 10 /0 :4 3/ 5 20 08Temp - 850mAoD (°C) 03 :0 0 0 1 2 3 4 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 Temperature (°C)
  • 13. 02 /0 5 /2 Relative water level in grips (cms) 00 8 00 :0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 0 07 /0 5 /2 00 8 00 :0 0 12 /0 5 /2 00 8 00 :0 0Grip 1 17 /0 5/ 20 08 00 : 00 22 /0 5/ 20 08Grip 2 (Blocked) 00 : 00 27 /0 5/ 20 08 00 :0rainfall 0 01 /0 6/ 20 08 00 :0 0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 Geltsdale Hydrology:- Response in grips in May 2008 15 min rainfall (mm)
  • 14. Geltsdale Hydrology: Water table response in May 2009 02/05/2008 00:00 07/05/2008 00:00 12/05/2008 00:00 17/05/2008 00:00 22/05/2008 00:00 27/05/2008 00:00 01/06/2008 00:00 0 -10Depth of water table from surface (cms) -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Downslope of grip 1 Upslope of grip 1 Downslope of grip 2 Upslope of grip 2
  • 15. 30 /0 Relative water level in grips (cms) 8/ 20 08 00 :0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 01 /0 9/ 20 08 00 :0 0 03 /0 9/ 20 08 00 : 00 05 /0 9/ 20Grip 1 08 00 : 00 07 /0 9/ 20 08 00 : 00 09 /0Grip 2 (Blocked) 9/ 20 08 00 : 00 11 /0 9/ 20 08Rainfall 00 : 00 13 /0 9/ 20 08 00 : 00 Geltsdale Hydrology: Response in grips during Sept 2008 8 6 4 2 0 20 18 16 14 12 10
  • 16. Geltsdale Hydrology:- response in water table during Sept 08 storm 30/08/2008 01/09/2008 03/09/2008 05/09/2008 07/09/2008 09/09/2008 11/09/2008 13/09/2008 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 0Depth of water table from surface (cms) -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 Downslope of grip 1 Upslope of grip 1 Downslope of grip 2 Upslope of grip 2
  • 17. Observations in unblocked gripsNo response in water table position - no matter where they areFlashy spiky flow in grips.
  • 18. Observations in blocked gripNice and smooth – less spiky and less flashy response in gripWater table position is again not responding to flow
  • 19. Working Hypothesis• Grips and Pipes are ‘off’ even though there may be a water table present• Small additions of percolating rain – connect all the pipes and grip together• What comes in goes out• When rain stops, flow stops and pipes empty Active flow paths in the acrotelm (top) layer pipes grip WT
  • 20. Water Quality
  • 21. Colour• Water colour is caused by the presence of dissolved organic compounds – predominantly humic and fulvic acids, which are the products of decomposition from organic soils.• Current EU Drinking water standard for Water colour is :- 20 Hazen• Colour of River Tees is: 60-120 Hazen
  • 22. ColourGeltsdale Colour (Hazen)Pre-blocking Unblocked Blocked All Grips 23/11/2007 165 147 156bc Priorsdale 15/01/2008 105 164 135bc Colour (Hazen) Blocked Unblocked All 07/02/2008 48 51 50de grips 25/03/2008 34 35 35e 27/11/2007 77.0 77.4 77.2abc 01/05/2008 34 118 76cde 15/01/2008 39.0 41.7 40.4bc 05/06/2008 185 216 200ab 07/02/2008 10.9 20.7 15.8c 01/07/2008 269 244 257a 25/03/2008 frozen * * 02/10/2008 146 149 148bcd 06/06/2008 218.5 83.8 151.2a 13/11/2008 168 125 146bc 01/07/2008 154.4 117.7 136.1ab 27/02/2009 97 139 118bcde 27/02/2009 123.5 57.0 90.3abc 25/03/2009 109 95 102cde 25/03/2009 62.5 29.0 45.8bcMean since blocking 121 122 122 Mean 98.0 61.1 79.5
  • 23. DOC• Dissolved Organic carbon is derived from organic matterand has a strong correlation with WATER COLOUR.•DOC is an important component of the carbon cycle instreams and a primary food source.•Evidence for upward trend in DOC concentrations relatedto atmospheric deposition changes. (Worrall et al, 2004;Evans et al, 2006)
  • 24. DOCGeltsdale DOC (mg/l)Pre-blocking Unblocked Blocked All grips 23/11/2007 35.1 32.9 34.0bc 15/01/2008 24.0 25.3 24.6cde Priorsdale DOC (mg/l)Post-blocking Blocked Unblocked All 07/02/2008 17.8 18.0 17.9e grips 25/03/2008 15.6 17.3 16.5e 27/11/2007 21.6 21.8 21.7ab 01/05/2008 15.6 27.7 21.7de 15/01/2008 15.6 16.2 15.9ab 05/06/2008 38.0 42.2 40.1ab 07/02/2008 12.4 13.2 12.8b 01/07/2008 51.1 46.8 49.0a 25/03/2008 02/10/2008 32.4 32.7 32.5bc 06/06/2008 43.8 22.8 33.3a 13/11/2008 36.6 29.3 33.0bc 01/07/2008 26.0 21.8 23.9ab 27/02/2009 24.3 31.5 27.9cd 27/02/2009 29.0 18.5 23.8ab 25/03/2009 26.5 24.2 25.4cdeMean since 25/03/2009 20.0 14.5 17.3bblocking 28.7 30.0 29.3 Mean 24.1 18.4 21.2
  • 25. E4/E6 ratio• Ratio of humic acid(E4) and fulvic acid(E6)• Used to represent the degree of humification in peatHumification is decomposition of vegetation…..• Ratio below 5 classified as humic above 5 classified as fulvic
  • 26. E4/E6 ratioGeltsdale E4/E6Pre-blocking Unblocked Blocked All grips 23/11/2007 8.90 3.60 6.25 15/01/2008 4.88 3.76 4.32 Priorsdale E4:E6Post-blocking 0.00 Blocked Unblocked All 07/02/2008 9.08 10.38 9.73 grips 25/03/2008 3.83 7.25 5.54 27/11/2007 13.5 9.7 11.6a 01/05/2008 3.83 58.00 30.92 15/01/2008 11.0 2.1 6.6ab 05/06/2008 9.54 10.40 9.97 07/02/2008 10.0 7.9 8.9ab 01/07/2008 13.09 15.06 14.07 25/03/2008 02/10/2008 6.02 6.70 6.36 06/06/2008 5.4 7.0 6.2ab 13/11/2008 3.29 3.03 3.16 01/07/2008 2.4 2.1 2.3b 27/02/2009 16.50 10.45 13.47 27/02/2009 6.2 10.0 8.1ab 25/03/2009 7.88 2.10 4.99 25/03/2009 4.1 5.5 4.8bMean since blocking 8.12 13.97 10.73 Mean 7.5 6.3 6.9
  • 27. Suspended Sediment• Some studies on IMPACTS of suspended sedimentsfrom peatlands(Holden 2005, 2006; Rothwell et al 2005; Yeloff et al2005; White et al 1996; Stewart 1963 )• Little data on erosion rates or supply to main channels(Holden 2007)• Ranges of SS from Holden 2007 at peak discharge wereUndisturbed catchment (1) - 2.5 mg/lGrips (3) - 25-14 mg/lBlocked grips (2) - 0.2- 0.14 mg/l
  • 28. Suspended sedimentsGeltsdale SS (mg/l)Pre-blocking Unblocked Blocked All grips Bridge SS (mg/l) 23/11/2007 Blocked Unblocked All Bottom 15/01/2008 2.0 11.0 6.5 9 Priorsdale grips slopePost-blocking 27/11/2007 6.5 77 41.75 1.00 07/02/2008 23.5 17.5 20.5 7 25/03/2008 12.0 27.0 19.5 3 15/01/2008 11.5 3 7.25 5.00 01/05/2008 07/02/2008 6 5.5 5.75 14.00 05/06/2008 25/03/2008 01/07/2008 06/06/2008 02/10/2008 9.0 1.0 5.0 4 01/07/2008 13/11/2008 3.0 14.5 8.8 1 27/02/2009 27/02/2009 25/03/2009 4.0 1.0 2.5 2 25/03/2009 8 63.5 35.75 1.00Mean since blocking 10.3 10.2 10.2 3 Mean 8 37.25 22.625 5.25
  • 29. Peatscapes IINew hydrological hypothesis Active flow paths in the acrotelm layer Pipes in the catotelm layer WT grip • Moving pressure transducers closer to the grip edge to see if there are any edge effects from unblocked grips • Mapping all observation sites to look at the effect of surface topography on the recorded depth to the water table • Putting pressure transducers in the shallow acrotelm layer to study the activity of runoff within the layer. The layer could be producing a temporary perched water table and the instruments will pick this up. • In Priorsdale we could move the flow gauge from one unblocked grip to the other to see if it has higher flow rates.
  • 30. Summary Hydrology• Unblocked grips respond rapidly to rainfall• RO smoothed in blocked grips• Some attenuation from blocked grip area and buffered by interaction withacrotelm area but still HIGH RO to main channels• New hypothesis- ON/OFF switch WQ• No clear effect of blocking on colour and DOC at either site YET• Increase of colour and DOC in blocked (like Worrall et al , 2007 and Dodd,2008)•Seasonality Peatscapes II• Moving some instrumentation to test new hypothesis

×