• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Clad oct09 pchapman
 

Clad oct09 pchapman

on

  • 362 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
362
Views on SlideShare
180
Embed Views
182

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

3 Embeds 182

http://www.clad.ac.uk 92
http://martinmuir.com 87
http://carbonlandscapes.co.uk 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Clad oct09 pchapman Clad oct09 pchapman Presentation Transcript

    • water@leeds Mechanisms controlling DOC transport; Surface flow vs pipes vs groundwater Pippa Chapman, School of Geography University of Leeds
    • water@leeds• Sources of DOC in aquatic systems – Allochthonous sources – are derived outside of the stream from soil and vegetation within the catchment (terrestrial organic matter) – Autochthonous sources – are derived from in- stream biological production (e.g. algae and macrophytes)
    • water@leeds • DOC is produced during the decomposition of organic matter in soil • Peat soils contain most organic matter – Major source of DOC • Production of DOC is a biological process: – Increases with temperature and aeration – So more produced in summer From Hope et al., 1994
    • water@leeds Transport of DOC in peatlands Overland flow - typically saturation-excess driven. Micropore throughflow - typically close to the surface (top 5 cm). Macropore/tunnel/pipe ‘bypassing’ flow
    • water@leeds Role of throughflow There is a strong relationship between soil water DOC at 10 cm depth and stream water DOC (r2 = 0.47, P<0.001) at Cottage Hill Sike, Moor House, N Pennines (Clark et al., 2008). This is consistent with hydrological studies at this site that have shown most runoff originates from the top 5 cm (Holden and Burt, 2003). From Clark et al., 2008 Note: despite large fluctuations in discharge little variation in DOC
    • water@leedsRole of overland flow: based on Cottage Hill Sike from Clark et al., 2007 •DOC concentrations decreased during autumn storms •No relationship observed between DOC and flow •Flux calculation based on weekly ECN sampling was 16% greater than flux based on 4 hourly sampling. •Excluding storm events resulted in over-estimation of DOC flux •50% of DOC export is associated with the highest 10% of discharge values. Hinton et al (1997) reported similar findings for a catchment in central Ontario, Canada.
    • water@leeds North Charr Flume Brocky Burn From Hinton et al., 1997. Biogeochem. Soil Type Hill Peat Charr Peaty Podzol Countesswells Iron Podzol Alluvial Drumlasie Peaty Gley Strathgyle Peaty Gley Mundurno Peaty Gley Ranker 0 2.50 km 1: 50000Soil map of Glendye, NE Scotland (from Dawson)
    • Pipeflow runoff pathway coupling Saturation-excess overland flow and near-surface through flowRapid near-surface macropore and matrix infiltration Blanket peat Very limited deep matrix seepage ? Pipe network Mineral substrate Localised ephemeral interface flow
    • water@leeds Role of pipeflow
    • water@leeds Autosamplers – much more detail 60 1.2 50 DOC 1.0 DOC and POC (mg l -1 ) POC 40 0.8 Flow (l s -1) Flow 30 0.6 20 0.4 10 0.2 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 00 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 01 02P5 13 March 2008
    • water@leeds Importance of pipeflow in Cottage Hill SikeInitial calculations suggest that:• 20-30 % of stream flow originates from pipes• 53 % of the DOC originates from the pipes (typically ranges between 5-75 % depending on conditions)• Pipe probably tap deep/old carbon as well as new carbon (to be further tested with isotopic analysis)• Very variable carbon response between pipes and between storms• Chemistry of at least one pipe suggests that ground water feeds pipe at low flow
    • water@leeds Summary •DOC transported from peat to stream by a combination of overland flow, through flow and pipe flow •Response of stream water DOC to storm events dependent on number of source waters and location within the catchment with respect to soil distribution •Transport of DOC from peat and organo-mineral soils is not the same due to differences in hydrology and soil profile properties •Some streams fed by groundwater during low flow – low DOC, pH 6-7. •Largest loss of DOC (~50%) from peat and organo-mineral soils occurs in only 10% of time during high flow events
    • water@leeds• Acknowledgments – Jo Clark, Joe Holden, Richard Smart, Andy Baird, Mike Billett, Kerry Dinsmore – NERC- funded Jo Clark’s PhD (2000-2004) – NERC - funded Pipe project (2007-2010) – ECN – use of data – Natural England – use of Moor House NNR