Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Science in the YouTube Age
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Science in the YouTube Age

1,990

Published on

A version of a presentation I am giving at the IWMW in Aberdeen on 22 July 2008.

A version of a presentation I am giving at the IWMW in Aberdeen on 22 July 2008.

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,990
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
22
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon
  • 2.  
  • 3.  
  • 4. ‘ If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’ Isaac Newton
  • 5. ‘ I never had an idea that couldn’t be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible…’ Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006) http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html
  • 6. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
  • 7.  
  • 8. What am I thinking?
  • 9. How do I justify this?
  • 10. How do I do this?
  • 11. What am I doing?
  • 12. What does it mean?
  • 13. What am I reading?
  • 14. Who can help me?
  • 15.  
  • 16. Lets go out!
  • 17. Best place to go?
  • 18. How do I justify this?
  • 19. Extract cash from parents
  • 20. Coordination
  • 21. Take photos/ video/audio
  • 22. Uploading photos/video
  • 23. Commenting on photos
  • 24. What did the others do?
  • 25. What was I thinking?
  • 26.  
  • 27.  
  • 28. What am I thinking?
  • 29. http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking? What does the data mean?
  • 30. What am I reading?
  • 31. What am I reading?
  • 32. http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading?
  • 33. What am I doing?
  • 34. http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing?
  • 35. http:// chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10 What am I doing?
  • 36. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
  • 37. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 … like a hole in the head
  • 38. David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
  • 39. <ul><li>Network size issues </li></ul><ul><li>Barriers to entry </li></ul><ul><li>No immediate benefit </li></ul><ul><li>Too many ‘me too’ sites </li></ul><ul><li>Fear of being ‘scooped’ </li></ul>
  • 40. Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins
  • 41. How do I justify this?
  • 42. <ul><li>Open call for participants on Blog </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs. </li></ul><ul><li>Concept to submitted proposal in five days </li></ul>http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/the-open-research-network-proposal-update-and-reflections/
  • 43. Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook
  • 44. Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised
  • 45. Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Jeremy Frey, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘The Open Science Collective’ Acknowledgements
  • 46.  

×