Science in the YouTube Age
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Science in the YouTube Age

on

  • 2,690 views

A version of a presentation I am giving at the IWMW in Aberdeen on 22 July 2008.

A version of a presentation I am giving at the IWMW in Aberdeen on 22 July 2008.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,690
Views on SlideShare
2,681
Embed Views
9

Actions

Likes
4
Downloads
21
Comments
0

2 Embeds 9

http://jeremyspeller.wordpress.com 8
http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Science in the YouTube Age Science in the YouTube Age Presentation Transcript

    • Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon
    •  
    •  
    • ‘ If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’ Isaac Newton
    • ‘ I never had an idea that couldn’t be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible…’ Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006) http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html
    • Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
    •  
    • What am I thinking?
    • How do I justify this?
    • How do I do this?
    • What am I doing?
    • What does it mean?
    • What am I reading?
    • Who can help me?
    •  
    • Lets go out!
    • Best place to go?
    • How do I justify this?
    • Extract cash from parents
    • Coordination
    • Take photos/ video/audio
    • Uploading photos/video
    • Commenting on photos
    • What did the others do?
    • What was I thinking?
    •  
    •  
    • What am I thinking?
    • http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking? What does the data mean?
    • What am I reading?
    • What am I reading?
    • http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading?
    • What am I doing?
    • http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing?
    • http:// chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10 What am I doing?
    • Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
    • Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 … like a hole in the head
    • David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
      • Network size issues
      • Barriers to entry
      • No immediate benefit
      • Too many ‘me too’ sites
      • Fear of being ‘scooped’
    • Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins
    • How do I justify this?
      • Open call for participants on Blog
      • Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs.
      • Concept to submitted proposal in five days
      http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/the-open-research-network-proposal-update-and-reflections/
    • Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook
    • Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised
    • Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Jeremy Frey, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘The Open Science Collective’ Acknowledgements
    •