Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laborat...
 
 
‘ If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’ Isaac Newton
‘ I never had an idea that couldn’t be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible…’ Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Dai...
Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
 
What am I thinking?
How do I justify this?
How do I  do this?
What am  I doing?
What does it mean?
What am  I reading?
Who can  help me?
 
Lets go  out!
Best place to go?
How do I justify this?
Extract cash  from parents
Coordination
Take photos/ video/audio
Uploading  photos/video
Commenting on photos
What did  the others do?
What was I thinking?
 
 
What am I thinking?
http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking? What does the data mean?
What am  I reading?
What am I reading?
http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading?
What am  I doing?
http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing?
http:// chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10 What am I doing?
Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 … like a hole in the head
David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,  Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprot...
<ul><li>Network size issues </li></ul><ul><li>Barriers to entry </li></ul><ul><li>No immediate benefit </li></ul><ul><li>T...
Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First,  Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05...
How do I justify this?
<ul><li>Open call for participants on Blog </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs. </li></ul><ul><li>Concep...
Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook
Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in cul...
Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Jeremy Frey, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pa...
 
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Science in the YouTube Age

2,014

Published on

A version of a presentation I am giving at the IWMW in Aberdeen on 22 July 2008.

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,014
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
22
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Science in the YouTube Age

  1. 1. Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon
  2. 4. ‘ If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’ Isaac Newton
  3. 5. ‘ I never had an idea that couldn’t be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible…’ Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006) http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html
  4. 6. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
  5. 8. What am I thinking?
  6. 9. How do I justify this?
  7. 10. How do I do this?
  8. 11. What am I doing?
  9. 12. What does it mean?
  10. 13. What am I reading?
  11. 14. Who can help me?
  12. 16. Lets go out!
  13. 17. Best place to go?
  14. 18. How do I justify this?
  15. 19. Extract cash from parents
  16. 20. Coordination
  17. 21. Take photos/ video/audio
  18. 22. Uploading photos/video
  19. 23. Commenting on photos
  20. 24. What did the others do?
  21. 25. What was I thinking?
  22. 28. What am I thinking?
  23. 29. http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking? What does the data mean?
  24. 30. What am I reading?
  25. 31. What am I reading?
  26. 32. http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading?
  27. 33. What am I doing?
  28. 34. http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing?
  29. 35. http:// chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10 What am I doing?
  30. 36. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
  31. 37. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 … like a hole in the head
  32. 38. David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
  33. 39. <ul><li>Network size issues </li></ul><ul><li>Barriers to entry </li></ul><ul><li>No immediate benefit </li></ul><ul><li>Too many ‘me too’ sites </li></ul><ul><li>Fear of being ‘scooped’ </li></ul>
  34. 40. Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins
  35. 41. How do I justify this?
  36. 42. <ul><li>Open call for participants on Blog </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs. </li></ul><ul><li>Concept to submitted proposal in five days </li></ul>http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/the-open-research-network-proposal-update-and-reflections/
  37. 43. Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook
  38. 44. Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised
  39. 45. Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Jeremy Frey, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘The Open Science Collective’ Acknowledgements
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×