• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Example of article presentation
 

Example of article presentation

on

  • 13,424 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
13,424
Views on SlideShare
13,395
Embed Views
29

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0

1 Embed 29

http://www.yutzu.com 29

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Example of article presentation Example of article presentation Presentation Transcript

    • Acquisition of the ArticleSemantics by Child and AdultL2-English Learners Tania Ionin, María Luisa Zubizarreta, Vadim Philippov (2009)
    • INTRODUCTIONQuestion:Do children and adults acquire a secondlanguage in the same way?
    • MAIN FOCUSTRADITIONALLY ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT •L2 learners that started learning the L2 during childhood (early learners) •L2 learners that started learning the L2 as adults (late learners) Conslusions so far: consensus •Early learners outperform the late learners on grammaticality judgement tasks in the L2 Conslusions so far: disagreement •The reason/explanation for this difference •Biological •Social •Input
    • MORE RECENTLY MAIN FOCUS PROCESSING •¿is the processing of an L2 simmilar in children and adults? •Do both, children and adults, learners of an L2 have access to UG? Conclusions so far (generativist) •Children – yes GU •Adults– debatable •Schwartz (1992, 2002, 2004) – while the L1 is kept constant, the adults’ acquisition process is simmilar to that of children – UG constrained
    • Articles, definiteness and specificity  Aside from definitness, articles also encode specificity.  In English, specificity is not morphologically marked.  In Samoan, specific and non specific objects are marked with two different articles.
    • ENGLISH vs. SAMOAN
    • Some definitions Definiteness: a presupposition of uniqueness  The speaker assumes that the hearer shares the presuposition of the existence of a unique individual in the set denoted by the NP. Specificity: a speaker’s intent to refer  The speaker intends to refer to a unique individual in the set denoted by the NP and considers this individual to possess some noteworthy property.
    • CLASSIFICATION & EXAMPLES [+definfinite, + specific] I want to talk to the winner of this race – she is a good friend of mine.[+definite, -specific] I want to talk to the winner of this race – whoever that happens to be.[-definite, +specific] Professor Robertson is meeting with a student from her class – my best friend Alice.[-definite, -specific] Professor Robertson is meeting with a student from her class – I don’t know which one.
    • ACQUISITION OF ARTICLES BY CHILDRENAND ADULTS (previous studies) ADULTS  L2 learners of English overuse “a” with non-specific definites [+definite, –specific]  L2 learners of English over use “the” in indefinite and specific contexts [- definite, +specific] CHILDREN  Child L2 learners of English overuse “the” in indefinite, specific contexts (like the adults)  Chlid L2 learners of English do not overuse “a” with non-specific definites (unlinke the adults)
    • Possible Explanations Children are egocentric and disregard the knowlede of the listener.Psychological It is difficult for children to separate the listeners’ assumptions by those of the speaker.Linguistic The association of “the” with specificity.
    • Current studyMOTIVATION:Explain the difference between children and adultsDetermine which explanation best explains the(mis)use of articles.
    • Participants26 adults, L1 Russina, L2 English58 children (10-12 yrs old) L1 Russian, L2 EnglishControl group L1 English (adults and children)
    • METHODOLOGYWRITTEN ELICITATION 60 short dialogues designed to elicit articlesCLOZE TEST (only for adult L2 English learners)
    • RESULTSL1 ENGLISH  High scores  Children made more mistakes (compared to the adults)  The few mistakes children made were in nonspecific indefinitesL2 ENGLISH  The two groups are statistically comparable  Clear influence of specificity (both groups)  Adults: influence of specificity is evident both, in definite contexts as well as indefinite contexts.  Children: influence of specificity is much more evident in indefinite contexts than it is in definite ones
    • CONCLUSIONQUESTION: Do children and adults of an article-less L1 acquire English articles in the same way?ANSWER:YES and NO
    • Explicit and implicit knowledge Learners have both, explicit and implicit knowledge about article use.  Implicit: takes the form of access to semantic universals  Explicit: takes the form of explicit strategy – overextends the semantic distinction to dfinites & indefinites. EVIDENCE:  performance on implicit tasks and differences among adult learners in different studies.  Ionin (2004) an implicit task for L1 Russians and L1 Korean learners of L2 English:  written narrative task (did not explicitly target articles) – targeted meaning, rather than form and did not encourage conscious awareness of linguistic rules – implicit task  article ellicitation task – explicit task