Mp Sue Tr Policy

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Mp Sue Tr Policy - Presentation Transcript

    1. Repository policy at The University of Northampton Miggie Pickton NECTAR Repository Manager [email_address] SUETr Repository Policy Event National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth 18th February 2009
    2. Which came first: repository or policy?
      • Policy!
      • We started to think about ‘policy’ before any of these:
      • Project planning
      • Choosing software
      • Defining repository structure and organisation
      • Specifying operational details
      • And especially before gathering content
    3. Talking, talking, talking…
      • The NECTAR project Steering Group produced a ‘ briefing sheet ’ outlining the principles which we thought should govern the repository.
      • We talked to everyone:
      • Research leaders, research managers, research administrators, researchers, technical folk, metadata experts, copyright experts…
      • The university’s Research Committee
      • A Pro Vice Chancellor
      • A focus group of senior researchers
      • And (of course) our colleagues in the repository community
    4. OpenDOAR
      • With agreement on the principles, we turned to policy - and we discovered the OpenDOAR policy tool
      • The tool defines ‘minimum’ and ‘optimum’ policies for :
      • Metadata
      • Data
      • Content
      • Submission
      • Preservation
      • The Steering Group decided to try for the optimum policies, at least in the first instance.
    5. More talking, talking, talking…
      • We carried on talking:
      • Lots of committees and research groups:
        • University Research Committee
        • Research Degrees Committee
        • Readers and Professors Forum
        • E-Strategy Programme Board
        • School Research Groups…
      • … and we incorporated the research community’s views into our policy and our practice.
    6. Policy and practice
      • Of course translating our policies into practice hasn’t all been plain-sailing
      • We don’t have much full content yet (text or other) so much of our policy has yet to be put to the test
      • We struggle with the conflicting demands of repository users (e.g. researchers vs research managers)
      • Sometimes pragmatism wins over policy (especially in the case of metadata vs full text)
      • But…
      • Because of our practice of consulting widely and regularly, we do have the support of the research community (and every reason to suppose that this will continue).
    7. URLs
      • NECTAR http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/
      • NECTAR briefing sheet http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/NECTAR_briefing_sheet_200607.pdf
      • OpenDOAR policy tool http://www.opendoar.org/tools/en/policies.php
      • NECTAR policy http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/information.html#policies
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + CallieOCallieO Nominate

    custom

    125 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 125
      • 116 on SlideShare
      • 9 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 9 views on http://suetr-rp.wikispaces.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 9 views on http://suetr-rp.wikispaces.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories