On October 23rd, 2014, we updated our
By continuing to use LinkedIn’s SlideShare service, you agree to the revised terms, so please take a few minutes to review them.
Interactive Learning Games (teacher and student created, as well as purchased licenses)
Physical Learning Spaces
This will blended, meaning learning is happening at
Using Varied Instructional Approaches Used Simultaneously
3P Learning Model (Chatti, 2007)
Workshop Model (Keene & Zimmerman, 2007)
Instructional Design and Conceptual Model Theory Stance (Kim, 2011)
Learning by Doing, Project Based Learning (PBL)
Instructional Approaches Will
Hold true to a constructivist model
Meet needs of multiple intelligences
Accessible to all students
3P Learning Model
Classroom Arrangement must accommodate discussion, shared participation, and provide knowledge.
Students are encouraged to participate actively, make choices to personalize their learning (goal specific) and are responsible for pulling information from learning situations. (Chatti, 2010)
The Workshop Model is specific to literacy instruction.
Various technologies can be integrated into this setting.
Classroom organization consists of three main components: independent work space, a meeting space and a guided reading space.
(Keene & Zimmerman, 2007)
Workshop Model Continued
Laptops can be used for independent work and guided practice work.
Mobile devices and e-readers can be used for guided reading time.
Teachers are guiding instruction in a whole group format and a small group format and can integrate technology in the mini-lesson. (e.g. using a document camera, using an interactive whiteboard to map a story together).
Instructional Design and Conceptual Model Theory Stance
This theory is based on
conceptual knowledge formation
procedural knowledge development
Using technology is applicable to both elements of this theory.
Resources Consulted Alesandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teachers bridge to constructivism. The Clearing House, 75 (3), 8-22 Chatti, M. (Photographer). (2010). 3p model. [Print Photo]. Retrieved from http://mohmedamincchatti.blogspot.com/2007/09/3p- learning-model.html. Keene, E., & Zimmerman, C. (2007). Mosaic of thought: the power of comprehension strategy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Kim, K.W. (2011). Changes in Student Motivation during Online Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-23
Resources Consulted Roberts, S., Conn, C., Loir, L., Hunt, E., & Duffy, A. (2003). Not another id model. TechTrends , 47(4) Tennyson, R. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56 (1), 40-71.