Ca partner day - application lifecycle optimization - milano e roma

602 views

Published on

Sessione di approfondimento sulle soluzioni per eliminare i vincoli derivanti dallo sviluppo software tradizionale attraverso la virtualizzazione dei servizi.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
602
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
55
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ca partner day - application lifecycle optimization - milano e roma

  1. 1. Service  Virtualiza.on   CA  LISA  introduc.on   Gabriele  Provinciali         Partner  Day  Milano,  29  Maggio  Roma,  31  Maggio  
  2. 2. Innovate  or  die   §  The  Product  is  the  en.re  brand  and  customer  experience   §  Service  oriented  products  are  delivered  late,  over  budget   and  with  ques.onable  quality…WHY?   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  3. 3. Changes  in  soKware  development   Mainframe   Client/Server   Composite   (including  packaged   (Custom  Applica.ons,   Apps  such  as  SAP,     SOA,  Cloud)   Siebel,  Oracle…)     Constraints   Complexity   Costs   1980      …      1985        …      1990        …      1995        …      2000      …      2005      …      2010        …      2015            LISA     Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  4. 4. ITKO  customers  Health  Care   Telecom   Travel   Financial   Government   &  Retail   &  High  Tech   &  Energy   &  Insurance   &  Defense   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  5. 5. The  big  problem:  constraints   INCOMPLETE   DEVELOPMENT   ACCESS  FEES   SYSTEM   UNAVAILABLE   INVALID  DATA  “I  can’t  do  anything  un3l  I  have  everything…  and  I  never  have  everything!”   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  6. 6. Solu3on:  service  virtualiza3on   Problems  Solved:  1.  ShiK-­‐LeK   2.  Infrastructure  Availability   3.  Performance  Readiness   4.  Test  Scenario  Management   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  7. 7. Constraint:  schedule  dependencies  1-­‐  “ShiK-­‐LeK”  the  SDLC   Without  LISA   DevTest   Integra3on  Test   UAT   Uncertain  Delivery  Schedule  –  defects  persist  un3l  UAT   With  LISA   DevTest   Unit  Test   Regression   Integra3on   Reduc3on  in  SDLC   40%  Faster  Rollout   UAT   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  8. 8. Constraint:  infrastructure  availability  2-­‐  Infrastructure  requirements  reduc3on   BEFORE   AFTER   Test  1-­‐n   Integra3on  1-­‐n   §  Test  environments   §  Constrained   not  realis.c  and   mainframe  and   require  manual  data   complex  coordina.on   and  maintenance   cycles  stunted  agility   §  Eliminated  need  for  mainframe  in   most  tes.ng  scenarios   §  Avoided  $10M  infrastructure  cost  by   elimina.ng  a  mainframe  expansion   Dev  1-­‐n   Pre-­‐Prod  1-­‐n   §  Avoided  poten.al  millions  of  dollars   §  Conten.on  for  access   §  Mainframe   of  availability  fines   between  on-­‐shore   access  required   and  off-­‐shore  teams   for  any  tes.ng   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  9. 9. Constraint:  system  availability   3-­‐  Performance  readiness   BEFORE   AFTER   Shared   Mainframe   Service   Or  similar     heavy-­‐weight   implementa3on   environment  §  Constraints  effec.ng  load  and  performance   §  300%  more  tes.ng  with  increased  system   tes.ng  at  all  levels     availability  §  $700k  per  year  to  build  and  maintain  stubs   §  Avoided  $20+  million  in  new  infrastructure   with  only  limited  func.onality   investment   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  10. 10. Constraint:  data  vola3lity   4-­‐  Test  scenario  management     §  Test  data  complex   and  vola3le   §  Lengthy  test     set-­‐up  3mes     Many  dependent  data  sets   reduced  down  to  only  those   App4   §  Tes3ng  delayed  to   that  directly  connect   integra3on  and  UAT   App1   App5   App7  LISA  Users   App2   In-­‐Scope   Data   App6   System   App8   Input  Data   Under  Test   Out-­‐of-­‐Scope   Deal  with  the  data  at  the   applica3on  level,  not  the   Dependencies   Use  TTDM,  exis3ng  test   (cryp3c)  data  models.   tools,  or  LISA  to  manage   test  data  in  Excel  or  DB   §  30  day  sprints  for  this  implementa.on  were  reduced  by  15-­‐25  %   §  Date  setup  .me  reduced  by  68%  by  providing  smart  data   §  Automated  test  data  crea.on   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  11. 11. Best  Prac3ces:  addressing  labor,  change  and  complexity   Labor   Change   Complexity   1.  Automa3on  and  Collabora3on   2.  Con3nuous  Valida3on   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  12. 12. Problem:  manual  labor  required,  but  poor  coverage   “My  team  of  50  is  now  a  team  of  250  in  just  5  years     due  to  more  components  and  releases.”   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  13. 13. Solu3on:  automa3on  &  collabora3on   Achieve  and  maintain  85%-­‐95%  coverage  aKer  1st  test  cycle.   Reduced  “non-­‐reproducible”  defect  closure  by  >  66%   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  14. 14. Problem:  change  &  unintended  consequences   UPSET   CUSTOMERS   PRODUCTION   SERVICE   ISSUES   DOWN   “Too  many  things  go  into  produc3on  without  adequate  tes3ng”   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  15. 15. Solu3on:  con3nuous  valida3on   Reduced  problems  delivered  to  QA  to  <1%   and  took  5  months  off  integra3on  release  cycle   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  16. 16. Growing  pressures  of  applica3on  development  §  Composite  Applica3ons  §  More  Labor  Required  §  Missed  Deadlines  §  Produc3on  Failures  §  Increased     Infrastructure  Cost   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  17. 17. Value  delivered  with  LISA  §  Reduced     infrastructure  cost  §  Parallel  dev  and  test  §  Increased  quality  &   performance  §  Shorter  release  3mes   Copyright  ©  2012  CA.  All  rights  reserved.   Partner  Day  
  18. 18. Thank  you    

×