Lessons learned from green infrastructure project experience in developing code requirements and community engagement

  • 870 views
Uploaded on

Seattle's decade of experience installing Green Infrastructure (GI) projects has provided a substantial knowledge base. Two key areas of growth will be discussed: 1) Key policy issues in the …

Seattle's decade of experience installing Green Infrastructure (GI) projects has provided a substantial knowledge base. Two key areas of growth will be discussed: 1) Key policy issues in the development of the Seattle's Stormwater Code requirement for use of GI to the “maximum extent feasible” for projects on private property and right-of-way, and 2) public engagement success, failures, and proposed approach in moving forward in installing GI in public and private places, including a look at using GI to assist with combined sewer overflows.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
870
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
23
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Preliminary - Subject to Revision Sounding Board Meeting 1, Version 3
  • Attorney-Client Work Product October 17, 2008 High Level CSO Assessment
  • Attorney-Client Work Product October 17, 2008 High Level CSO Assessment
  • Attorney-Client Work Product October 17, 2008 High Level CSO Assessment
  • Get out into the community early, ideally a minimum of two years before project design meetings begin, and often. Introduce the problem you are trying to solve, before you present the solution.
  • Sounding Board Meeting Jan 25, 2011

Transcript

  • 1. CWAA ― Urban Water Sustainability Leadership Conference October 4, 2011 Lessons Learned from Green Infrastructure (GI) Project Experience in Developing Code Requirements and Community Engagement
  • 2. Overview
    • Seattle and Seattle’s Green Infrastructure (GI) Program
    • GI in the Right-of-Way
    • Public Involvement to Maximize Success
    • Strategies for Multiple Benefits
  • 3. Presented by: Nancy Ahern, Deputy Director, Seattle Public Utilities Seattle Public Utilities and Seattle’s Green Infrastructure Program
  • 4.
    • Water Supply
  • 5.
    • Manage Solid Waste
  • 6.
    • Urban Drainage and Wastewater
  • 7. Seattle’s Drainage and Wastewater System
    • System Drivers:
      • Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) and Stormwater Permit Compliance
      • Sediment cleanup
      • Urban flooding
      • Water quality
      • Creek habitat
      • Climate change
  • 8. Green Stormwater Infrastructure
    • Integrating into Capital and O&M Programs
      • Analyzed cost/performance of parcel and ROW based strategies
      • Used that analysis in planning
      • Have retrofit 232-acres of Seattle’s creek watersheds to date
    • Incorporation into Code
      • New development must use GI
    • Incorporation into Rate Structure
      • Rate credits for impervious area managed
  • 9. Why Include GI in the Urban Drainage Strategy?
    • Citizen interest:
      • Alternative for right-of-way improvements for informal areas
      • Reducing environmental impacts on Seattle’s receiving water bodies
    • Providing ratepayers cost-effective solutions that maximize social and environmental benefits
    • Helps toward other City goals
      • 2030 Challenge
      • Seattle reLeaf
  • 10. Natural Drainage Systems Building GI Experience and Knowledge Project Project Drainage Area SEA Street #1 2.3 acres NW 110 th Cascade 28 acres Broadview Green Grid 32 acres Pinehurst Green Grid 49 acres High Point 129 acres
  • 11. SPU CSO System
    • 90 permitted CSO outfalls
      • 37 CSO outfalls do not meet CSO requirements
    • 35 CSO storage facilities (8.1 MG)
    • 100-200 million gallons CSO discharged annually
    • About 200 CSO discharge events annually
    • Integration with King County
  • 12. History Sets Context for CSO Control May 4, 2010 - Meeting No. 1
  • 13. CSO Control Approaches CSO Control Relative Cost Range per gallon
    • Green Stormwater Infrastructure
    $2.50 to $22
    • System Retrofits
    $1 to $2
    • Infiltration/Inflow
    $30 to $32
    • Flow Transfer
    site specific
    • Wet Weather Storage
    $12 to $40
    • Wet Weather Treatment
    $8 to $25
  • 14. CSO Reduction: Leading with Green
    • Private parcels: RainWise
    • Alleys: Retrofitted with permeable pavement
    • Roadways: Retrofitted with roadside rain gardens
    Photos Courtesy of T. Tackett (SPU)
  • 15. CSO Compliance with Anticipated Consent Decree Big Pipe Photo Solutions Grey Green
  • 16. Presented by: Tracy Tackett, Green Stormwater Infrastructure Program Manager, Seattle Public Utilities GI in the Right-of-Way
  • 17. Public Rights-of-Ways and Roadside Rain Gardens
  • 18. Potential Seattle & King County Joint GI Implementation Potential Right-of-way Bioretention or Permeable Pavement Seattle CSO Basins King County CSO Basins City Boundary *All KC and SPU uncontrolled basins are under consideration for RainWise
  • 19. Green is Not Always the Silver Bullet
  • 20. Public Sensitivities to Roadside Rain Gardens
    • Reduction in parking availability
    • Perceived safety issues
    • Change in neighborhood aesthetics
    • Resistance to any changes
    • O&M concerns
  • 21. Raingardens not exactly to scale. Parking: How big is a Rain Garden?
  • 22. Policy: Is Participation Voluntary vs. Mandatory?
  • 23. Sensitivities to GI Challenges with Developers or Other Departments
      • Competing needs for space
      • Change in desired aesthetic
      • Cost
  • 24. Citywide Policy
      • What is financial feasibility?
      • Is parking higher or lower priority than stormwater goals?
      • What is our risk tolerance?
  • 25. Has your agency had any push back for adoption of green practices in the ROW? Examples?
    • Discussion Question:
  • 26. Presented by: Jennifer Price, Program Manager, CH2M HILL Public Involvement to Maximize Success
  • 27.
    • Manage expectations
      • Show interim conditions
      • Schedule and adaptation
    • Community concerns are specific
      • Curb and gutter vs. unimproved
      • Importance of street character
      • Duration of residence matters
    • Don’t rely on community meetings alone
    Lessons Learned from the Ballard Community
  • 28. Getting to Informed Consent on GI Projects
    • Engage vs. inform
    • Early and often in process
      • Meaningful engagement for residents in siting and design
    • Transparent decision processes
    • Find common ground
    • Inform about O&M levels of service
  • 29.  
  • 30.
  • 31. Revised Public Involvement Process for GI Projects
    • Introduce CSO problem and solutions by leading with RainWise
    • Use design visualization to demonstrate why GI is a good solution
    • Identify all potential stakeholders
    • Maintain consistent communications
    • Engage stakeholders in multiple benefits
  • 32. GI Project Timeline Feasibility Analysis Internal Site Visits Identify Stakeholders and Policies Update Basin Specific Outreach Plan Field/Site Specific Feasibility Modeling and BMP Sizing
    • Interactive Workshop
    • Project purpose and need
    • Criteria for selection
    Finalize Communications Plan Concept Analysis And Scenario Building
    • Initial Communications
    • Community Briefings
    • Stakeholder Interviews
    • Personalized mailing
    • CSO Community Council
    2-3 months Project Initiation Preliminary Evaluation of Alternatives 3-4 months RainWise Marketing Project Management Public Communications
  • 33. GI Project Timeline Design Electronic or Mail Communication Revise Scenarios 5% Site Plan 2-3 Scenarios Status Updates
    • Interactive Workshop
    • Selected streets
    • Design input
    Electronic or Mail Communication CSO Community Council Meeting Council Briefing Select Option Project Approval Revisit Technical Feasibility as Needed 6 months minimum Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives Design One-on-one Outreach to address concerns On-Site Walks-and-Talks CSO Community Council Meeting
    • Interactive Workshop
    • Design input
    Communications Plan Update Project Management Public Communications 1+ years
  • 34. What strategies or approaches have you used to gain acceptance of a Green Infrastructure project?
    • Discussion Question:
  • 35. Presented by: Peg Staeheli, Principal, SvR Design Company Strategies for Multiple Benefits
  • 36. The quest: How to get more benefit from our public infrastructure investments
  • 37. Permitting Maintenance Finance Taxes/Bonds Local / State/ Federal Private Planning Policy Government Development Pattern Public/Private Delivery Public Crews Private Contract Volunteers Local State Federal Departmental Partners in Process Construction Traditional Alternative Involve Collaborate Communicate
  • 38. Multi-Benefit Solutions- Looking at the Systems
  • 39. GI for CSO Reduction and More Stormwater Goals via Stormwater Code CSO Reduction Bioretention/ Rain Garden Permeable Pavement Rainwater Harvesting/ Detention Cistern Trees Greenroofs
  • 40. Some Examples: How GI Gets You More
    • Significant reduction in total stormwater volume
    • Increased awareness about stormwater and impacts
    • Increased green space (increased walkability, increased habitat)
  • 41. Yale Street Private Development
  • 42.  
  • 43. Bell Street Park From SEAstreet to People Place Bringing it all Together
  • 44.  
  • 45. THREE MOVES: reclaim. elevate. mix. www.depave.org
  • 46. water section: down garden
  • 47.  
  • 48. Winslow Way, Bainbridge Island, WA
  • 49. Winslow Way, Bainbridge Island Strategies for the Multifunctional Street
  • 50.
    • Ensuring walkable space
    • Using Bioretention in several forms with enhanced landscape
    • Permeable pavement – strategic use
    • Manufactured systems when space is tight
    • Retaining mature tree canopy
    • Additional Trees
  • 51.  
  • 52. GI into Northgate Area Comprehensive Planning “ transforming the center’s underutilized, auto-oriented office/retail area into a higher intensity mix of office, retail, and housing … emphasis has been placed on creating new public plazas and parks, and on restoring degraded environmental features .”
  • 53.  
  • 54. Northgate Mall, Seattle WA 2007- 2011
  • 55. Seattle Public Utilities partnered with the Seattle Department of Planning & Development Result: Client Assistance Memo – CAM515 extending the strategy beyond a single project
  • 56. High Point Seattle High Point- SPU’s Successful GI Implementation 2001-2011
  • 57.  
  • 58. How does your agency involve other departments (from Planning through Inspection) in your planning and implementation for Green Infrastructure? Discussion Question:
  • 59. Thank You