Universities and File Sharing

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Universities and File Sharing - Presentation Transcript

    1. Universities and File Sharing Should the Feds intercede?
    2. Overview
        • HR 4137: 
          • "Develop a plan for offering alternatives"
          • "explore..deterrents to prevent such illegal activity"
        • S 1642:
          • " unauthorized distribution...may subject the students to...penalties"
    3. Current Model
        • RIAA and prelitigation letters
          • In Jan. 2008, 407 letter to 18 universities.
        • Tracking down students
          • UNL estimated $11 per letter to match IP w/ student.
          • Stanford claims it requires almost 3 full-time staff members and is charging students who receive notices ($100-$500).
          • Other schools returning letters to RIAA.
            • Dynamic IP's make matching challenging.
            • No legal obligation to comply with RIAA's requests.
    4. Option One: Block P2P Applications and Protocols
        • Technology challenges: 
          • "tools fail to stop the majority of network infringement. Others bring about temporary peace, but only at the expense of limiting student access to critical resources and applications." - EFF
        • Darknets
          • Provide more anonymity and will grow if universities block access.
        • Ohio University as test case.
          • received over 1287 pre-litigation letters.
          • Rise of Darknets.
    5. Options Two: Alternative Source
        • Examples: Napster, Ruckus
        • Cornell University: alumna covered more than $200,000 to provide Napster to entire student body. (2004)
        • Tennesse quoted $18 million dollars to cover all state universities.
        • Free service developed in 2007 by Ruckus.
          • In test at American University, almost half of the students did not use.
          • Lobbying for inclusion.
    6. Conclusion
        • Alternatives too problematic for inclusion in federal student loan bill.
        • Technology is ever changing and research needs to continue.
        • Space needs for Universities to share best practices in handling copyright issues.
        • RIAA needs to find a better tactic.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + CSTBCSTB Nominate

    custom

    71 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 71
      • 71 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories