Universities and File Sharing - Presentation Transcript
Universities and File Sharing Should the Feds intercede?
Overview
HR 4137:
"Develop a plan for offering alternatives"
"explore..deterrents to prevent such illegal activity"
S 1642:
" unauthorized distribution...may subject the students to...penalties"
Current Model
RIAA and prelitigation letters
In Jan. 2008, 407 letter to 18 universities.
Tracking down students
UNL estimated $11 per letter to match IP w/ student.
Stanford claims it requires almost 3 full-time staff members and is charging students who receive notices ($100-$500).
Other schools returning letters to RIAA.
Dynamic IP's make matching challenging.
No legal obligation to comply with RIAA's requests.
Option One: Block P2P Applications and Protocols
Technology challenges:
"tools fail to stop the majority of network infringement. Others bring about temporary peace, but only at the expense of limiting student access to critical resources and applications." - EFF
Darknets
Provide more anonymity and will grow if universities block access.
Ohio University as test case.
received over 1287 pre-litigation letters.
Rise of Darknets.
Options Two: Alternative Source
Examples: Napster, Ruckus
Cornell University: alumna covered more than $200,000 to provide Napster to entire student body. (2004)
Tennesse quoted $18 million dollars to cover all state universities.
Free service developed in 2007 by Ruckus.
In test at American University, almost half of the students did not use.
Lobbying for inclusion.
Conclusion
Alternatives too problematic for inclusion in federal student loan bill.
Technology is ever changing and research needs to continue.
Space needs for Universities to share best practices in handling copyright issues.
0 comments
Post a comment