Green To Blue Water Continuum SWWW09 Vidal Et Al

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Green To Blue Water Continuum SWWW09 Vidal Et Al - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Green-to-Blue Water Continuum:An approach to improve agricultural systems’ resilience to water scarcity
      Alain Vidal, Barbara van Koppen, David Love & David Blake
      CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
    2. An oldhistory of combinedrainfed and irrigated agriculture
      Sinceancient times, the reality of water dependency has inspired farmers to innovate
      Water stored, mobilized and applied to plants in different ways, depending on the nature of the resource available
      Farmers have alwaysdealtwith the green-to-blue water continuum to extract the best productive value - not only from crops, but fish, livestock, etc
    3. A recenthistory of opposedrainfed and irrigated agricultures
      Since the 60s, irrigation has almost doubled - from 160 to 300 Mha. Policies keep “poor” rainfed and “rich” irrigated agricultures separated, negating the green-to-blue water continuum
      New irrigation farmers were historically ‘rainfed’ farmers, if not breeders or fishers
      Almost half of today's irrigated surface is cultivated by farmers whose tradition is ‘rainfed’
    4. Green-blue water in agriculture
      From Hoff & Rockström, SEI
    5. Resilience concept
      Society and nature as truly inter-connected socio-ecological systems
      • Non-linear dynamics
      • Thresholds
      • Alternate stable states
      Basic continuity assumption
      Irrigated
      Productivity
      • PERSISTENCE absorb shocks, while maintaining structure and function
      • ADAPTABILITYability for learning, to cope with disturbance
      • TRANSFORMABILITYcapacity to reorganize, and create a new system
      Humid rainfed
      Dry rainfed
      Green water
      Blue water
      From Hoff & Rockström, SEI
    6. Which is the right one?
      Resilient
      Non resilient
      Resilient
      Non resilient
    7. Opposed (thus, less) resilient agricultures
      Rainfed systems are less resilient for external reasons
      • Green water is irregularly supplied and becomes scarcer
      • Lack of investment and markets for crop production
      Irrigated systems for internal reasons
      Irrigated crops less resistant to drought resulting from irregular blue water supply
      Irrigation may generate water excess that degrade soils and crop productivity
    8. CPWF aims to increase water productivity and to ensure more equitable use of water amongst users and the environment
    9. The green-to-blue water continuum…
      From David Molden, IWMI
    10. …a way to reconcileopposed agricultures
      Increasing water productivity and improving farmers’ livelihoods should be done along the existing green-to-blue water continuum
      Could significant progress be achieved by learning from each others’ resilience?
    11. Crossed lessonslearntfrom CPWF
      Green water dominated systems
      IWRM research for mitigating drought and improving livelihoods within the Limpopo Basin (water scarce)
      Improving Mekong Water Allocation in the Nam Songkhram Basin (endangered wetland)
      Blue water dominated systems
      Multiple Use water Systems (MUS) project in the (Andean, Nile,) Limpopo, Ganges and Mekong basins
    12. Lessons learnt from IWRM project
      Green water is the source of runoff and percolation of blue water
      Ways to improve access to green water:
      In-field soil water conservation techniques that increase the rate of infiltration and percolation, e.g. mulching
      Micro‐catchment or runoff farming and supplementary irrigation to capture overland flow from areas adjacent to fields
    13. How IWRM increases resilience
      Negotiation processes of users result in new institutions
      Resilience builds upon a multi-stakeholder approach and a combination of water management interventions
      Household crop income raised from US$200 to 600 per year
      IWRM in water scarce Southern Africa
      Productivity
      Resilience zone
      Green water
      Blue water
    14. Lessons learnt from Nam Songkhram Basin
      Highly contested waterscape
      Floods and droughts always presented as main obstacles to development, whereas flood pulse is main driver of wetland productivity
      Multiple actors, in complex context and history
      Threat of ‘Water Grid’ and other mega‐projects hangs over future of wetlands
      “paa boong paa thaam”
    15. How is Paa Boong Paa Thaam more resilientthan « development » ?
      Highlydiversified on-farm and off-farm green water productive uses
       Household income US$1100/y
      Rapid privatisation & land reform, coupled to continual pressure to build blue water control infrastructures, introduces disruptive changes
      Can PaaBoongPaaThaamsurvive transformation?
      Previous changes proved unsustainable
      Wetlands in the Mekong basin
      Wetland resilience zone
      Productivity
      Disruptive
      change
      Unstable zone
      Green water
      Blue water
    16. Lessons learnt from MUS Multiple Use water Systems
      Multiple use water systems are an effective way to fightpoverty by improvingaccess to agricultural water
      Experience shows that farmers use/re-use multiple (up to 9!) sources of water
    17. Domestic water: An ignored form of blue water
      Homestead-scale MUS gives high resilience against natural- and human-made volatility
      Especially for the poor and for women generates ‘more MDG per drop’
      Multiple-use water ladder, with household water-derived income ranging from US$40 to 300/year
      Costs for multiple-use supplies for homestead-based production typically repaid within 3 years, from the income gained, therefore cross-subsidize domestic uses
    18. How MUS increases resilience
      Ability to use multiple sources under various climatic conditions or as emergency provision, key for resilience
      Community-scale MUS allows building on what communities have been doing since time immemorial
      MUS - everywhere
      MUS resilience zone
      Productivity
      Single uses
      unstable zone
      Green water
      Blue water
    19. Multiple water uses, techniques and sources, together with resulting community organization do increase resilience
      Neglecting the green-to-blue water continuum createsunaffordable disruptive changes
      Multiple use/sources resilience
      Productivity
      Disruptive
      Change
      Rainfed humid
      Single uses
      unstable zone
      Rainfed dry
      Green water
      Blue water
      Resilience in the green-to-bluewater continuum: A synthesis
    20. Thankyou
      Alain Vidal, CPWF Directora.vidal@cgiar.org
      www.waterandfood.org
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Challenge Program on Water and FoodChallenge Program on Water and Food Nominate

    custom

    280 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    CPWF Program Director , Dr Alain Vidal, shows how i more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 280
      • 280 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories