Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
CPWF & TWG  presentation VBDC 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

CPWF & TWG presentation VBDC 2011

361

Published on

Presentation on CPWF global and on TWG communities of practices made at the Volta BDC project leaders' meeting held in Ouagadougou on 28-29 March 2011

Presentation on CPWF global and on TWG communities of practices made at the Volta BDC project leaders' meeting held in Ouagadougou on 28-29 March 2011

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
361
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Points to make (from Boru):Why our core principles? Learned from experience that:Partnership -- Research won’t be relevant nor research outputs put into use without partnership; networkingCapacity development -- Making change happen often requires changes in peoples’ knowledge, attitudes and skills, through capacity developmentAdaptive management -- Real world problems are complex and dynamic, goal post shift, opportunities emerge. Projects, BDCs and the Program must be able to learn, spot opportunity and take advantage of it to really make a differenceGender and diversity -- We work to benefit women, youth, socially excludedInterdisciplinary integration -- Real world problems are complex and multifaceted and unlikely to fall to single disciplinary researchAccountability – we ensure our accountability to our stakeholders while also working to improve accountability systems impacting on water productivity and livelihoods[Suggest don’t go through all, pick your top two]Linking research to impact:We carefully chose compelling basin development challenges to motivate people to get on the busWe then invest early-on in mapping out pathways to the desired outcomes and impact. These pathways, or road maps (for the bus) link the research we do, how we do it (guided by core principles) to changes in next user and end user knowledge, attitude, skills and practice. Agreeing these outcome pathways, and who needs to do what, when, helps ensure programmatic coherence and helps set priorities. The road map can change, indeed we expect it to change, once the journey begins (adaptive management). We manage our program to allow that to happen (part of what makes us different).We systematically seek insight across our projects and basins by:Being guided by conceptual frameworks the CPWF sees useful to guide practice and to which it seeks to help develop (e.g., Resilience, MUS, Innovation Systems)Setting up and supporting Topic Working Groups as a mechanism for doing 1)Setting up our 28 projects as experiments into how research does (and does not) foster innovation and developmental changeOther key elements to add (left in from Amanda) here by speaking to the slide (if not mentioned before)Projects contribute to achieving the BDC (hence should adhere to core principles)Basin focus but mechanisms in place to ensure cross basin learning (covered by the previous slide if needed)Team in place to make integrated process workAbility to scale up, replicate, influence and contribute to policy change
  • BL workshop tentatively 30. Nov., 1st – 2nd of Dec.
  • Transcript

    • 1. The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and FoodWhere it is, where it is going, why it is different
      Alain VIDAL, CPWF Director
    • 2. 2
      Re-greening the Uganda “Cattle Corridor”
      Community corralling of cattle for 2 weeks permits pasture establishment
      Local organizations invest in up-scaling of pasture regeneration
      Termites destroy any attempt to reseed degraded pasture
    • 3. Global food crisis: a poverty “countdown”
      3 billion poor below US$2.5/day
      2 billion suffer from malnutrition
      1 billion suffer from hunger
      • 75% of them are rural poor
      • 4. Alleviating hunger means reducing rural poverty
      Reducing rural poverty
      • Increase the income of the rural poor to enable food security and investment into productivity
      • 5. Ensure they can cope with short-term and long-term changes
      3
    • 6. The resilience challenge
      Food production communities and ecosystems should be able to cope with local and global changes (climate, economy, demography, migrations…), ie becomemore resilient
      • Achieved through improved water productivity (more food with less water) together with empowerment, equity, market access, health and ecosystemservices
      4
    • 7. Mobilize triggers for change between alternate resilient states
      5
      Manure applied through night corralling provides a preferred diet for the termites
      S
      Wet Season:
      Dry matter 4.5 T/ha
      9 species / m²
      S
      Water depletion, grazing pressure, loss of soil organic matter
      Wet Season:
      Dry matter 0 T/ha
      0 species / m²
    • 8. CPWF aims to increase the resilience of social and ecological systems through better water management for food production
      Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research that leads to impact on the poor and to policy change
      6
    • 9. CPWF Phase 2(2009-2014)Focusing on achievable impacts in 6 river basins
    • 10. Focusing the CPWF strategy
      Focusing on science content found most promising and with development impact within the 15 year CPWF time frame, and contributing to emerging CGIAR CRPs (CRP5 Land, Water & Ecosystems)
      Addressing 1-2 development challenges in specific parts of each basin
      1 basin development program = USD 5-6 million investment into 4-5 linked projects
      8
    • 11. Six basin development challenges
      Andes – Benefit-sharing mechanisms
      Mekong – Dams and livelihoods
      Nile – Rainwater management in Ethiopia
      Volta – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoods
      Limpopo – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoods
      Ganges – Floods and salt in the Delta
      9
    • 12. Operationalizing Phase 2 - BDCs
      Proposals approved
      Start May 2011
      Operational
      Operational
      Operational
      Operational
      2
      1
    • 13. Operationalizing Phase 2 - Program
    • 14. How we work
      Guided by core principles:
      • working in partnership
      • 15. adaptive management
      • 16. capacity development
      • 17. gender and interdisciplinary integration
      • 18. accountability
      Linking researchtoimpactthrough compelling basin development challenges and ‘outcome pathways’
      Seeking insightacross projects and basins
    • 19. In other words…
      Projects contribute to achieving the BDC - hence should adhere to core principles
      Basin focus but mechanisms in place to ensure cross basin learning - TWGs
      Our whole Program Team in place to make integrated process work
      Ability to scale up, replicate, influence and contribute to policy change
      13
    • 20. Topic Working GroupsThe example of resilience
    • 21. What are Topic Working Groups?
      Communities of practice that address specific, well-defined issues of water and food in several CPWF basins
      Aims
      Facilitate cross-basin learning through various interactive ways, including virtual communication
      Help build capacity of basin teams through sharing of experiences and mentoring
      Facilitate cross-basin research
      Produce topic-specific syntheses and other generic outputs
    • 22. Status of TWGs
      TWG on Multiple Use Systems - stand-by JP
      Met in Feb 2010 - Lead: Vacant
      TWG on Resilience – operational Alain
      Launched in March 2011 - Lead: Line Gordon and Elin Enfors, SEI/SRC
      TWG on Global Drivers Amanda
      To be launched soon - Lead: Simon Cook, former BFP coordinator
      TWG on Learning to Innovate (Basin Leaders) Funke
      Launched during BLs workshop, Vientiane, Jan 2011 - Lead: Boru Douthwaite, Innovation and Impact Director
      Other TWGs under discussion
      Spatial Analysis
      Modeling
      Research to Policy (Africa)
      Benefit-sharing Mechanisms
      Rainwater Management
    • 23. Resilience ?
      Ability to maintain functioning despite stress, shocks or disturbance
      Reflects ability of system to self-organize; build capacity for learning and adaptation
      17
    • 24. Resilience Analysis: looking at our BDCs with a “resilience lens”
      Describing the system
      Structure – scales, boundaries, governance/institutions
      Values/importance - goods and services, threats and shocks
      Historical profile – events and responses
      System dynamics
      Specified resilience
      Resilience of specific parts
      Thresholds, feedbacks
      Slow and fast drivers
      General resilience – system coping capacity
      Adaptive cycles
      Options for intervention
    • 25. Restoring ecosystem services in the Andes
      19
      Conservation agriculture and paramo restoration supported by revolving fund
      Annual net income:
      2,183/ha
      Farmers‘ insufficient gain and risk aversion: only 11% converted
      Revolving fund credit:
      +180 farmers /year
      Potato cropping, grazing pressure, degradation of paramo
      S
      Annual net income:
      US$ 1,870/ha
    • 26. Volta possible questions for the Resilience TWG
      What is the resilience ‘status’ of the Volta social-ecological system (SES)?
      Can resilience framing help us find ‘leveraging points’ in systems ex-ante? if so, how?
      If only find ex-post; can we collect information that can build generic knowledge of ‘leveraging points’? how do we do that?
      What scale is more relevant (basin, catchment, agroecozones, country, community, household?) especially for the CPWF basin goals and boundary partners?
      How can we improve and measure livelihood resilience?
    • 27. Thank you
      a.vidal@cgiar.org
      www.waterandfood.org
      www.slideshare.net/cpwf

    ×