Three Decades of CSHGP Results:
A High Impact Partnership between PVOs,
Governments, Vulnerable Communities and
the Americ...
Outline of the Session and
Input Requested
 Topline messages we want the report to convey
 Outline for the report and so...
Overview & Take-Away Message
For almost three decades, a unique multi-
faceted partnership between the U.S.
government and...
Message 1
The partnership resulted in
demonstrated increases in
coverage of essential health
services and practices that s...
Message 2
The grantees by approaching the community
as a resource and partner, demonstrated
again and again that integrate...
Message 3
The program built the accountability of
government actors to address community-level
health needs, promoting cit...
Message 4
The partnership included strategic
technical assistance & facilitated learning
exchange (CORE) that
 helped doc...
Message 5
The program has advanced
global standards of
practice which now promote
packages of care that were
often piloted...
Message 6
While the policy climate shifted over the years
with different administrations/priorities, the
match requirement...
In conclusion – TBD…
Lessons learned through this program should continue to be
spread in programs , especially that:
 so...
Section 1: Historical Perspective on CSHGP
Evolution & Core Principles
A strategic investment of the US government built
o...
Section 2:
Contributions/Achievements
 Bang for the Buck
 Activating Communities as a
Resource rather than Recipient
 I...
Bang for the Buck:
Results of PVO programs suggest
impact, cost-effectiveness,
sustainability, leverage.
1. Poor performin...
Activating Communities as a
Resource rather than a Recipient
 Engagement of CH groups/women’s groups
(PLAN Cameroon)
 Co...
Innovation in the CSHGP
15
“Introducing and scaling up high impact
interventions through innovative
community oriented app...
Innovation to Practice
16
1. Helping to test, evaluate and introduce
innovative technologies and approaches;
2. Serving as...
Innovative Solutions that Advanced
the SOTA
Integrated CCM
 Pilots conducted in CSHGP project sites in Ethiopia &
Rwanda ...
Innovative Solutions for SBC
 Positive Deviance/Hearth
(need example application)
 CARE Groups
(World Relief, Food for t...
Modeling Effective Partnerships
 USG-PVOs, PVOs-US Public, USAID DC &
Missions, PVOs-Local Govts, Community
groups – loca...
Wider Influence of CSHGP on PVOs,
National Policy, and Global Health
 PVO capacity built – moving from receiving to
provi...
Your reactions/input welcome!
 Reactions to the messages
 Examples that you could share?
 Uses of such a document?
21
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The CSHGP Review_Mary Beth Powers_5.8.14

169 views
131 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
169
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Poorly performing district health systems and populations whose health indicators were worse than national averages were lifted to achieve greater coverage and better outcomes than national trends where the program partners were active.
  • Introduction of Zinc for diarrhea at the Community LevelORS sachets + Zinc included in CHW drug kits in Mali (Save the Children and Johns Hopkins University/USAID)Zinc introduced in Mozambique by Food for the Hungry and WHO collaboration (USAID Mission funding)
  • The CSHGP Review_Mary Beth Powers_5.8.14

    1. 1. Three Decades of CSHGP Results: A High Impact Partnership between PVOs, Governments, Vulnerable Communities and the American People Courtesy: HIP
    2. 2. Outline of the Session and Input Requested  Topline messages we want the report to convey  Outline for the report and some of the examples we will use to populate the report  Input needed  Your reactions to the messaging  Thoughts about examples that help explain the impact of the CSHGP 2 NOTE: THIS IS A DRAFT FOR THE OUTLINE/CONCEPTS FOR A PAPER – it is a working document seeking input
    3. 3. Overview & Take-Away Message For almost three decades, a unique multi- faceted partnership between the U.S. government and PVOs has developed and delivered results in terms of stronger health systems and better health outcomes. It has mobilized U.S. citizens, national and local governments and civil society, including vulnerable communities, in 60+countries around a common goal: to prevent child and maternal deaths. 3
    4. 4. Message 1 The partnership resulted in demonstrated increases in coverage of essential health services and practices that saved lives of vulnerable women and children while also strengthening the capacity of the health system and communities to sustain this impact over time. 4
    5. 5. Message 2 The grantees by approaching the community as a resource and partner, demonstrated again and again that integrated community- based primary health care is a low-cost and effective strategy for strengthening health systems in resource poor areas and improving population-level health. 5
    6. 6. Message 3 The program built the accountability of government actors to address community-level health needs, promoting citizen participation and democracy, while also holding PVOs to account by making all data open and available on a public website. 6
    7. 7. Message 4 The partnership included strategic technical assistance & facilitated learning exchange (CORE) that  helped document and disseminate effective MNCH programs  spread learning about how to best deliver and expand the reach of life saving interventions,  contributed to stronger health systems and social services through capacity building with local NGOs, governments and private sector partners Innovation in Programs Shared Learning via CORE TA& Capacity Bldg 7
    8. 8. Message 5 The program has advanced global standards of practice which now promote packages of care that were often piloted, documented and improved under the CSGHP, e.g., community- IMCI, iCCM, ENC, etc. 8
    9. 9. Message 6 While the policy climate shifted over the years with different administrations/priorities, the match requirement connected citizens with this foreign assistance priority: that is, that the United States remains a leader in reducing hunger and poor health among children and women around the world. 9
    10. 10. In conclusion – TBD… Lessons learned through this program should continue to be spread in programs , especially that:  social & behavior change is best achieved when interpersonal communication led by local change agents is at heart of the strategy;  ideas for health system strengthening can emerge from the district and sub-district health systems & influence the larger system;  results can be replicated across boundaries when technical assistance, program learning and exchange, and strong partnerships are built into program design  OTHERS? 10
    11. 11. Section 1: Historical Perspective on CSHGP Evolution & Core Principles A strategic investment of the US government built on a strong foundation:  PVO’s existing grassroots presence  Commitment to working in the hardest to work places with the most vulnerable populations  Commitment to Community-based Solutions and health system strengthening with an eye toward the gaps in the peripheral system  Partnership as a modality of implementation at all levels 11
    12. 12. Section 2: Contributions/Achievements  Bang for the Buck  Activating Communities as a Resource rather than Recipient  Innovative Solutions that contributed to SOTA  Modeling Effective Partnerships  Wider Influence on PVOs/GH Community 12
    13. 13. Bang for the Buck: Results of PVO programs suggest impact, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, leverage. 1. Poor performing areas exceed national averages 2. LiST analysis estimates impact 3. Cost-effectiveness 4. Sustainability 5. Leverage & match Examples: • World Relief/Cambodia • Concern Bangladesh 13
    14. 14. Activating Communities as a Resource rather than a Recipient  Engagement of CH groups/women’s groups (PLAN Cameroon)  Community HIS allowing for DDM (Curamericas CBIO)  Empowering CHWs (HKI Nepal)  Linking communities to Health services (Concern Rwanda)  Engaging community voices in regional/national dialogue (Future Generations Peru) 14
    15. 15. Innovation in the CSHGP 15 “Introducing and scaling up high impact interventions through innovative community oriented approaches/policy relevant practical evidence and lessons to address persisting bottlenecks in marginalized and underserved populations”
    16. 16. Innovation to Practice 16 1. Helping to test, evaluate and introduce innovative technologies and approaches; 2. Serving as a platform for amplifying, replicating state of the art technologies and approaches; 3. Through our in-country presence, serving as an informed and credible voice in our collective effort to inform and influence policy and practice.
    17. 17. Innovative Solutions that Advanced the SOTA Integrated CCM  Pilots conducted in CSHGP project sites in Ethiopia & Rwanda contributed to national policy shifts, with other in-country stakeholders Chlorhexidine  Nepal National MOH requested Plan to conduct a community-level delivery pilot to assess the acceptability of Chlorhexidine in CSHGP project site due to strong community engagement and partnerships with District MOH (complementing other MOH pilots with JSI) 17
    18. 18. Innovative Solutions for SBC  Positive Deviance/Hearth (need example application)  CARE Groups (World Relief, Food for the Hungry, Mozambique)  M-health applications (HAI- Timor Leste)  Others? 18
    19. 19. Modeling Effective Partnerships  USG-PVOs, PVOs-US Public, USAID DC & Missions, PVOs-Local Govts, Community groups – local MOH authorities  CORE Group –open source mentality allows for accelerated tool development, co-creation of solutions  Humanitarian Pandemic Preparedness 2007  Finalizing and disseminating CCM Essentials  Polio Eradication Initiative 19
    20. 20. Wider Influence of CSHGP on PVOs, National Policy, and Global Health  PVO capacity built – moving from receiving to providing TA (HKI but could use more examples)  PVO adoption of tools developed by TA providers for multi-sector use (KPC, LQAS – examples needed)  National policies embrace C-IMCI and iCCM (Plan Cameroon)  CCM Essentials used to create WHO/UNICEF guidance  Care Group methodology… 20
    21. 21. Your reactions/input welcome!  Reactions to the messages  Examples that you could share?  Uses of such a document? 21

    ×