What is your Intellectual Property Worth? Methods for Determining Value
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

What is your Intellectual Property Worth? Methods for Determining Value

on

  • 2,006 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,006
Views on SlideShare
2,005
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
77
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://blackboard.ljmu.ac.uk 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

What is your Intellectual Property Worth? Methods for Determining Value What is your Intellectual Property Worth? Methods for Determining Value Presentation Transcript

  • What Is Your Intellectual Property Worth? Methods for Determining Value Presented by: Weston Anson CONSOR Intellectual Asset Management 800.454.9091 www.consor.com 25 th National CLE Conference Vail, Colorado January 5, 2008 ®
  • Understanding IP Value - Why Value? Transaction due diligence ROI assessment Impairment testing Litigation Transfer pricing Use as collateral Bankruptcy ®
  • Marketing Bundle Primary trademark Corporate name and logo Marketing umbrella Sub-brand names Core brand Copyrights Secondary trademarks Packaging design and copyrights Trade dress Characters ®
  • Technical Bundle Key patents Trade secrets Formulae Packaging technology and sources Shapes and sizes Process technology Design technology Proprietary test results Plant and production design Product specifications Operating platforms ®
  • IT Bundle Platform Software Data Warehouses Software Licenses Source Code Databases E-Commerce Sites Credit/Payment Systems Shrink Wrap Software Contracts Mask Works Data Mining Devices ®
  • Context of the Valuation IP Value is Context Specific: Brand/TM Patent/Technical IT/Software Joint Venture or Sale Litigation Internal Development Licensing External ®
  • Other Context Parameters Time specific parameters Current value - The value of the assets as they are currently employed Potential value - The value of the assets resulting from a new endeavor Historical value - The value of the assets at a certain point in the past ®
  • IP Valuation Tools and Methodologies Traditional Methodologies Market Approach Cost Approach Income Approach Proprietary Methodologies VALMATRIX® VALCALC® BVEQ™ ®
  • Lost Profits Disgorgement of Profits Reasonable Royalties Loss in Business Value Economic Damages ®
  • Economic Damages Damages Assessment 1 Plaintiff’s burden is to prove Defendant’s revenues stemming from the alleged infringement Defendant must identify all expenses associated with the alleged infringing sales activity Profit Calculation The court allows for a deduction of a portion of the defendant’s general expenses, such as overhead, operating expenses, and federal income taxes. This approach of interpreting “profits” is recognized in the Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits 2 1 15 U.S.C.§ 1117(a) Lanham Act. 2 Litigation Support Handbook, Russell Parr, p.192. ®
  • Case Study #1 After-market parts supplier Litigation Lost profits Disgorgement of profits Loss in business value Reasonable royalties Copyright infringement Revenue projections Discounted cash flows Income Approach Company: Context: Components: Cause: Approach: Concept of Value: ®
  • Case Study #1 (cont.) $ 25,000 NA Alternative reasonable royalties $ 450,000 $ 45,000,000 TOTAL DAMAGES 150,000 20,000,000 Loss in business value NA 10,000,000 Lost profits $ 300,000 $ 15,000,000 Disgorgement of profits Rebuttal Plaintiff Category ®
  • Case Study #2 Food Manufacturer Litigation Lost royalty income Brand valuation Trademark infringement Revenue projections Discounted cash flows Income Approach Relief from Royalty Company: Context: Components: Cause: Approach: Concept of Value: ®
  • Case Study #2 (cont.) $ 35,000,000 $ 38,250,000 4.5% $ 850,000,000 Retail Food $ 185,000,000 $ 50,000,000 BRAND VALUATION $ 52,875,000 $ 14,625,000 LOST ROYALTIES NA 1.5% Royalty rate $1,825,000,000 $ 975,000,000 Infringing sales Total Foodservice Category
  • Case Study #3 Auto parts manufacturer Litigation Lost profits Reasonable royalties Breach of contract Trademark infringement Revenue projections Discounted cash flows Income Approach Company: Context: Components: Cause: Approach: Concept of Value: ®
  • Case Study #3 (cont.) $ 1,415,000 635,000 0 $ 360,000 420,000 Plaintiff $ 695,000 1,250,000 (1,310,000) $ 540,000 215,000 Rebuttal $ 720,000 TOTAL DAMAGES (615,000 1,310,000 Unjust enrichment (post- termination) Less: mitigation $ (180,000) 205,000 Breach of contract Counterfeit units Lost Profits: Variance Category
  • Case Study #4 Conglomerate Litigation Valuation of stock distribution Valuation of dividend income Valuation of payments Valuation of retirement benefits Trademark infringement (Celebrity) Discounted cash flows Income Approach Enterprise Valuation Company: Context: Components: Cause: Approach: Concept of Value: ®
  • Case Study #4 (cont.) 10,000,000 Retirement benefits $ 325,000,000 TOTAL VALUE 85,000,000 Dividend income 30,000,000 Payments $ 200,000,000 Stock distribution Estimated Value Category ®
  • IP Valhalla Brands Oldsmobile Blatz Commodore Eastern Airlines Technology 5 ½ Floppy Disks 8 Track Cartridges Analog Cell Phones IBM Selectric ®