Flipping to open cohere 2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Flipping to open cohere 2013

on

  • 464 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
464
Views on SlideShare
191
Embed Views
273

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 273

http://cohere.ca 273

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Flipping to open cohere 2013 Flipping to open cohere 2013 Presentation Transcript

  • FLIPPING TO OPEN Brenda Ravenscroft, Queen’s University
  • Co-authors Ulemu Luhanga, research assistant  Bev King, Manager of Arts and Science Online @ Queen’s 
  • Flipping to Open How blended learning is changing the traditional lecture course How open resources and approaches are transforming blended courses How instructors and institutions are becoming less suspicious of openness
  • Flipping to Open How the principle of openness – and its associated values – is permeating the traditional closed culture and creating a cultural shift
  • Case Study: BL Project Large, introductory courses  400 -1,800 students per course  11 courses: 9,000 enrolments  Goals:  enhance student engagement improve student learning outcomes
  • Blended Learning Purposeful and complementary integration of face-to-face learning with online learning activities (Garrison & Vaughn, 2008)
  • “Flipped” Framework Focus on active and collaborative learning in classroom  Fundamental information through readings and online 
  • Tradition
  • The Sage on the Stage
  • Tradition Autonomy, independence – content, activities, assessment  Instructor evaluation  Seeking help = weakness  “Team”: sequential, coordination of grades 
  • The Door is Closed
  • BL Project  Change…
  • Departmental Discussion Proposal requires departmental endorsement  Memo of agreement – instructor, Department Head, Faculty Office 
  • Curriculum Review/Approval Department Curriculum Committee  Faculty Curriculum Committee  Students Instructors from other Departments
  • Team Development Instructor(s)  Instructional Designer  Educational Technologist  Faculty Office  Teaching Assistants 
  • Integrating Services Library  Copyright expert  Registrar’s office – timetabling, space  IT Services 
  • Consultation Expert colleagues  Student assistants  Subsequent courses 
  • Resources Public review - publisher presentations of e-resources  Inclusion of open resources  Student feedback  improved pedagogy 
  • Building Community Regular informal gatherings to share experiences and knowledge, discuss instructional methods, guest speakers  Opening course websites  Sharing articles on effective practices 
  • Evaluation CLASSE to measure student engagement  Report  debrief  changes in design  Publicize research 
  • Tradition vs Blended Teaching  learning  Spending  investing  Short-term  sustainable  Independence  interdependence  Solo  teamwork  Private  sharing, public 
  • The Future?