The existing 156” coil design (1561 Rev 2) is not acceptable for packaging the AR-6410 into the Arthrex tray. The coil will need to open up to accomplish optimum fit into tray and minimal product height.
10 units of AR-6410 were assembled and packaged into 12892 Rev 7 tray. The 156” coil of this product was made to spec 1561 Rev 2. The fit and overall height was assessed and an improved coiling size was proposed.
Note: The 12892 Rev 7 is the AR-6430 tray, with a height of 2.16”. If a tray is used on AR-6410, the the only difference will be in the height: it will be <= 1.75”. It is cost-prohibitive to go taller than 1.75” for AR-6410 tray.
When assembled to the remainder of the AR-6410 product, the tallest component of the product, the drip chamber cap, rests directly onto the tubing coils.
The 4.5” tail/luer add-on does not comfortably tuck into the innermost coil.
Drip Chamber Cap = 1.38” When the AR-6410 is assembled, coiled and stacked, the drip chamber cap is the tallest component. Drip Chamber
1561 DWG Rev 2 Coil Optimum Coil -There is more space in the tray than is actually being used. -The 4.5”tail/luer doesn’t fit. It could possibly fit if it was changed to 3”. -Space is used well. The tail fits. -We don’t have to change the 4.5” tail to a 3”.
1561 DWG Rev 2 Coil Optimum Coil -Based on overall product height, we would not be able to use a 1.75” tray. Going deeper than 1.75” is cost-prohibitive and we are better off using the existing pouches. -Based on overall product height, we can use a tray that is 1.75”. Note: The spike components are sticking up in this photo and appear taller than the drip chamber. Ignore that; I did not configure the rest of the product so that they would be flat.