Anne SY Cheung Department of Law, University of Hong Kong [email_address] June 2008 Too Little Freedom or Too Much Speech? Cyber bullying of Chinese Netizens A Study of Online Defamation and Privacy Violations
Argument
Growing trend of cyber bullying in the area of defamation (reputation) and privacy infringement in China
Argues for a liability system on ISP
Cyber Bullying
Intentional, deliberate and targeted attack on private citizen
Abusive, threatening, harassing
Recurring or repeated
behaviour for a consistent period of time
By anonymous individual(s), which may amount to collective activity
Social Sanctions
Used to shame, humiliate, ridicule, entertainment, or private revenge
Law on Reputation Protection
Art. 38 of the PRC Constitution
“ personal dignity”, insult, libel, false charge or frame-up is prohibited
Article 101 and 120 of the Civil Law
Protects reputation, personality and honour
Criminal defamation under art. 246 of Criminal Law
Privacy
Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court 1988, 1993, 1998
One’s reputation could be damaged if there is unauthorized disclosure of private details, or as a result of insult or slander
Online Regulation
Internet users who insult or defame or infringe the lawful rights of others
ISPs have duty to remove unlawful materials, inform the authority and keep the record of violators
But…
Reputation/Defamation
Akin to common law
Gao Xiaosong v. Yahoo (2005)
Chen Tangfa v. Hangzhou Blogcn (2005)
Zhang Keke v. Tianya (2008)
Internet Scandal
What should one do?
Privacy
Egao 恶搞
Social Evil
Perceived Self-Justified Behaviour
Egao 恶搞
Malicious or reckless attack through visual, audio, video, textual forms
Amusement or entertaining
Little Fatty
Shanghai Lovers
Socially Reprehensible Acts?
Self-Justified Act?
Peaceful Demonstration?
ISPs Liability
Given large no. of netizens involved, most are anonymous
Europe: notice and take down once aware that information was unlawful
US: Communications Decency Act but
Delaware (Doe v. Cahill) ISP should disclose anonymous authors is the standard of a summary judgment is met
Washington (Doe v. 2TheMart.com), whether the claim could withstand a motion to dismiss and to file a discovery request
0 comments
Post a comment