Decentralization and REDD in BrazilDecentralization and REDD in Brazil

739 views

Published on

Presentation by Fabiano Toni Center for Sustainable Development
Decentralization and REDD in Brazil.
Oaxaca Workshop Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean,
31 August – 03 September 2010, Oaxaca, Mexico.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
739
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Decentralization and REDD in BrazilDecentralization and REDD in Brazil

  1. 1. Decentralization and REDD in Brazil Fabiano Toni Center for Sustainable Development WORKSHOP ON FOREST GOVERNANCE, DECENTRALIZATION AND REDD+ IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Oaxaca, Mexico. Aug. 31-Sept. 3, 2010
  2. 2. Questions <ul><li>Do decentralization processes expand opportunities for REDD+? </li></ul><ul><li>Which subnational levels might be involved in REDD+ ? </li></ul><ul><li>What kind of involvement? </li></ul><ul><li>W ha t are the cross-scale coordination issues? </li></ul><ul><li>Impacts of REDD+ on livelihoods of forest dwellers? </li></ul>
  3. 3. Decentralization <ul><li>Transfer of powers and resources from central to democratically elected subnational governments </li></ul><ul><li>Advantages: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improves effectiveness of policies and efficiency of service delivery; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increases equity, local participation, and local democracy; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strengthens local governments. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Decentralization <ul><li>Risks: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Narrowing of the political agenda; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>E lite capture and exclusion of the powerless;  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Local governments lack incentives, capacity, and resources . </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Risks may offset advantages </li></ul>
  5. 5. REDD vs Decentralization <ul><li>REDD+ includes elements that call for both recentralisation and decentralisation; </li></ul><ul><li>Decentralization has advantages and disadvantages for REDD+: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Driving forces of deforestation operate at different scales (effectiveness and efficiency); </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Carbon accounting and leakage monitoring transaction costs (effectiveness and efficiency); </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Imposed vs . locally agreed rules (effectiveness, efficiency, equity). </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Coordination or competition. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Municipal Governments and Forests in LA Source: L a rson et al. , 2007 LAW Local Offices Permits/concessions Land owners BOL 1996 Forest in 110 mun. In Municipal Forests Mun. Forest Reserves BRA 2006 Some Envir. Not Yet Small areas GUA 1996 Forest in 1/3 Mun. No Ejidos HON 2008 Few Forest In ejidos Ejidos NIC 2003 Some envir. in Aut. Regions Small areas
  7. 7. Municipal Governments and Forests in LA Source: L a rson et al. , 2007 Revenues L ogging taxes Services Supervision BOL 12 -21% forest fees Yes, small scale loggers Yes in all mun. w ith forest offices BRA No In a few mun. agroforestry No GUA 50% Yes By agreement HON 1% Yes, by contract Only by contract NIC 25% - 35% in aut. regions Exceptionally In aut. R eg. o r by contract
  8. 8. <ul><li>Powers over resource allocation remain at the central level; </li></ul><ul><li>Varying capacities of local governments; </li></ul><ul><li>Involvements in forest activities limited – lack or powers, resources, and incentives. </li></ul>Municipal Governments and Forests in LA Source: L a rson et al. , 2007
  9. 9. Protected Areas in Amazonia Total in 2009 (HA)
  10. 10. Protected Areas Created between 2003-2009 in Amazonia (HA)
  11. 11. State protected areas created in Amazonia 2003-2009 (% of total, by state)
  12. 12. Conclusions <ul><li>Equity is as important as effectiveness and efficiency – imposed and unfair rules = broken rules; </li></ul><ul><li>Subnational governments increase effectiveness; </li></ul><ul><li>Subnational governments need incentives; </li></ul><ul><li>C oordination or competition determined by political/institutional factors; </li></ul><ul><li>Multiple governmental layers may protect interests of multiple actors. </li></ul>

×