Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Herren - Paradigm Change for African Agriculture: why and how to make the transition
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Herren - Paradigm Change for African Agriculture: why and how to make the transition

3,291
views

Published on

Presentation delivered at the CIALCA international conference 'Challenges and Opportunities to the agricultural intensification of the humid highland systems of sub-Saharan Africa'. Kigali, Rwanda, …

Presentation delivered at the CIALCA international conference 'Challenges and Opportunities to the agricultural intensification of the humid highland systems of sub-Saharan Africa'. Kigali, Rwanda, October 24-27 2011.

Published in: Education, Technology

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,291
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Swedish International Agriculture Network Initiative (SIANI)Stockholm Environment InstituteMandated as an official input into Rio+20, the 64th UN DPI conference is one of the last chances to influence the food and agriculture paradigms being proposed for Rio+20. This workshop will discuss the draft submissions of key stakeholders - including leaders behind the groundbreaking IAASTD report - to the official Rio+20 negotiating document. Do their paradigms go far enough? Would they address inequity, resource depletion, food & nutrition insecurity, health and climate change? How would the barriers to their implementation be overcome?
  • Inspiration du rapport IAASTD and experience professionnel
  • Land degradation under all systems….
  • The transfer of externalities to the general society (at large and the future generations) has lead to cheap food and so wastage
  • Conventional system:Best ngnt practicesSoil conservation practicesIPMReduction of chemical inputsSystem in Transition to sustainability: substitution of external inputs with biological processesPeasant low input: state support to reach “substitutions etc…Indigenous traditional systems: state support to reach the substitutions….
  • Transcript

    • 1. Paradigm Change for AfricanAgriculture: why and how to makethe transitionCHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FORAGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION OF THEHUMID HIGHLAND SYSTEMS OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Hans R. Herren President www.millennium-institute.orgINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE KIGALI | President www.biovision.ch Co-Chair IAASTD www.agassessment.orgRWANDA | OCT. 24 - 27, 2011 Coordinator UNEP GER Agriculture Chapter
    • 2. KThe IAASTD Reports(www.agassessment.org)Co-Chairs: Hans R Herren & Judy WhakunguMulti-stakeholder: 400 authors, 52 countriesMulti-disciplinaryMulti-locational: Global / sub-Global Reports
    • 3. The green revolution approach to food production / security leaves key issues unresolved • Hunger and Poverty • Threatened rural livelihoods • Nutrition and Human Health • Environmental, Social, Equity and Sustainable Development problems …now what? More of the same? Quick symptom fixes and reductionist approaches, or ?
    • 4. Green Revolution: not the model for the futureGR bases is ecologically and economically unsustainable David Tilman et al. Science 2001
    • 5. Green Revolution: not the model form the future GR bases is ecologically and economically unsustainableLand degradation World map of severity of land degradation – GLASOD (FAO 2000)
    • 6. Understanding the consequences of unsustainable agric:Land and biodiversity loss
    • 7. Green Revolution: (big) part of the problem GR bases is also environmentally unsustainableGrain Unctad 2011
    • 8. Understanding the consequences of unsustainable agric:Temperature and water stresses 0% 2080 -50% -15% +15% +35%
    • 9. Green Revolution: can lead to waste of natural resourcesGR bases is also socially unsustainable
    • 10. The green revolution approach to food production / security leaves key issues unresolved • Hunger and Poverty • Threatened rural livelihoods • Nutrition and Human Health • Environmental, Social, Equity and Sustainable Development problems …now what? More of the same? Quick symptom fixes and reductionist approaches, or ?
    • 11. Main conclusions of the IAASTD et al…..“a fundamental shift in AKST and the linked agri-foodsystem policies, institutions, capacity development andinvestments”Paradigm change: Transition to sustainable / organic/ecological agri - culturei.e., addresses multifunctionality and resilienceneeds of the small-scale and family farms (social &economic: equity issue, farmer status, land ownership,empowerment, women), quality job creation (Edu at alllevels);• systemic and holistic approach (basic ecologicalprinciples); treat cause not symptoms; is part of thesolution to hunger, poverty, health, CC
    • 12. Agriculture the main solution: Multifunctionalityparadigm for sustainable development equitable livable sustainable viable
    • 13. New look at agriculture….. …it is all connected in a complex and dynamic system Land Loss & Food Production Flooding Health Catastrophes Land Loss Life Sustaining Energy Sector Biofuels Calories per Capita O Famines Production O S S Petroleum Use for O S Calorie S Fertilizer Habitat Gap S Conversion O S Human S Population R Fertilizer Human S Human R Calories per Demand B Births DeathsS Toxic Acres in Capita Residue O O Agriculture O Population Density Human S Soil S S O S Population Plant Capacity Soil Nutient B S Soil Nutrient Calories Consumption Plant Plant Productioin Production Consumption Migration Plant Calories for O Human Use S O S Droughts S S Soil Salinization S S S Exposure to a Higher Variation in Rainfall S Plant Calories for Standard of Living Pattern Meat Production Irrigation S S S Global Migration Temperature S Pursuit of 1st World Water S Demand Food Mix Methane S Production Fresh Water S Meat S S Meat Calories Meat Production Consumption Global Warming
    • 14. Agriculture the main solution: ….via a transition to sustainable, organic, agroecological, resilient, equitable agricultureHigh productivity Low productivity Un-sustainable Sustainable
    • 15. Making the right move: monocrop….or?
    • 16. …Economic-Social-Environmental resilience: multicrop, corridors,..
    • 17. The Green way ahead: agro-ecological approaches Organic Conventional In 1995 –drought year
    • 18. Green way ahead: Push-Pull approach……..using the gifts of nature, habitat management
    • 19. “Push – Pull” approach, makes ecological sense….
    • 20. “Push – Pull” approach, promotes ecosystem services….i.e., pest control
    • 21. “Push – Pull” approach, promotes ecosystem services….i.e., pollinationUsing natural systems to increase productivity and quality through wild pollination services
    • 22. “Push – Pull” approach closes the yield gap….
    • 23. “Push – Pull” approach, brings the animals back on thefarmIt isimperative toput theanimals backon farm:sanitation,health,carbon cycle,sustainability
    • 24. “Push – Pull” approach, is compatible with SRI (Rice, Tef,Sorghum, ….
    • 25. “Push – Pull” approach, would fit in agroforestrysystems
    • 26. “Push – Pull” approach, brings water and life back intothe soil…and carbon too Promoting soil health through maintenance or restoration of the soil flora and fauna through reduced agro- chemical use Realize yield gap, stop herbicide accumulation
    • 27. “Push – Pull” approach, can be mechanized and worksagainst drudgery
    • 28. “Push – Pull” makes economical sense too…. 3,000 a 2,500 Maize monocrop Maize + Des modium Maize + Des es modium + bean s ame hole bCurrency (US$)-(1US$/65 KES) per ha. Maize + Des modium + bean different hole 2,000 Maize + bean c d 1,500 a a b b c 1,000 d b b e a a a b c 500 b 0 Total labour costs Total variable costs Total gross revenue d Net benefits -500
    • 29. Green way ahead: Biotechnology and geneticengineering
    • 30. The way ahead: More diversity (plants & animalsand better nutrition-health and environment) Encouraging a wider genetic base in agriculture…trees , fruits, grains, vegetables, lost crops, animals for nutrition and health, cultural diversity, incomes, pest control, resilience to climate change Barilla, 2011
    • 31. Green way ahead: is knowledge intensive• Improve and expand extension services (ICT)• Introduce capacity building (ICT)• Agriculture is very localized = local solutionsExample: Biovision’s Farmer Communication Programwww.organicfarmermagazine.org & www.infonet-biovision.org http://www.biovision.ch
    • 32. ? Can it be done: The forward looking scenarios:Analysis and investmentsGlobal investments across sectors (1% and 2% ofGDP); 0.2% and 0.32% of GDP invested in AG andfisheries (50-50).- Pre harvest losses (training activities and effective bio-pesticide use)- Ag management practices (costs to transition from till tono till agriculture, training, access to small mechanization)- R&D (research on crop improvement (orphan crops), soilscience and agronomy, appropriate mechanization, and more)- Food processing (better storage and processing in ruralareas)
    • 33. Agriculture in a Green Economy (UNEP Report – 2011)Investing 0.1% or 0.16% of total GDP ($83-$141 Billion) / year
    • 34. Conclusions• Brown scenarios support growth but show increased pressure on natural resources, higher emissions and low economic resilience.• Green investments support social, economic and environmental growth (restoration): – Resource efficiency makes the economy more resilient; – Lower carbon development reduces energy costs and lowers risks related to climate change; – Jobs are both created and lost, transition strategies need to be designed and implemented;• Investments have to be carefully allocated and behavioral changes might be needed in support of public policies and private investments.
    • 35. In conclusion,cont’ndThe change that is needed will first start with each of us…….then as a group of like minded we need to:• take a medium and long, holistic, multifunctional and systemic view in addressing the challenges (treat the causes, not the symptoms)• invest more in research, education and examples• keep the focus on the finality of agriculture and food systems: health (4H), equity and cultural diversity• support changes in governance (be active in policy design toturn the table on perverse subsidies and favor a true foodpricing policy)……and yes it can be done, so lets do it NOW
    • 36. You cannot solve the problem with the same kind of thinking that created the problem Albert Einstein Thank youwww.millennium-institute.org & http://www.biovision.ch