Catherine Raffaele - IP Event - Presentation Transcript
Catherine Raffaele
Senior Policy Officer – IT and Communications
Campaign for Fair Use
Australia has no “fair use” provision, we have a specific and weaker concept called “fair dealing”
CHOICE was been involved in campaigning for a “fair use” type right so that consumers are not viewed as infringers when they do socially acceptable acts such as tape a television program or transfer a CD to an MP3 player.
Fair Dealing Expanded But…
The Government introduced The Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 which gave Australians the right to (for domestic and private purposes):
Time Shift eg record programs to watch at a later date
Format Shift eg digitize your analogue files
Some extra but limited abilities to share copyright protected material
Australia/US Free Trade Agreement
May 2004, Australia signed a Free Trade Agreement with the US which required Australians to:
Extend Copyright protection from 50 years after author’s death to 70 years
Make many copyright infringements criminal (using unclear terminology that doesn’t safeguard consumers from being prosecuted)
And…
Took away Australians’ right to circumvent Technological Protection Measures.
So Australians cannot legally make use of their new fair dealing rights if it involves circumventing a technological protection measure (eg Digital Rights Management)
Free Trade Agreements - Growing patchwork of obligations
Very realistic chance of hamstringing future IP campaigns
Binding agreements limits the scope of change
Limited ability to review laws when society changes
Decentralised unlike International Treaties – a growing patchwork of agreements
Harder to know who to lobby, what to target
Difficult to know what can and can’t be changed
Rights should not be Tradeable
It should be inconceivable that we would allow our right to vote or freedoms of speech* to be modified on the negotiation table yet this is what we have allowed to happen with Intellectual Property rights – yet these rights or lack of rights influence our ability to exercise what many of what we would consider fundamental rights.
*For countries that have them.
Charters to Assert Consumers’ Rights
European Charter on the Rights of Energy Consumers (A World Consumers Energy Charter?)
EU Air Passenger Rights
Charter of Health Consumer Rights
A Charter of Communications Rights (Telecommunication Services)
Intellectual Property and Consumer Digital Rights Charters
Adelphi Charter (IP Rights)
BEUC’s Consumer Digital Rights Charter (6 rights)
Norwegian Consumer Council
CHOICE’s “Our Digital Rights” Charter
Lessons for the Future
We need to be more strategic
We need to be more proactive – the IP industry has shown how this works so well
We need to understand the big picture and what’s going on behind the scenes
0 comments
Post a comment