Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
2 A Shah Comparative Testing
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

2 A Shah Comparative Testing

938

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
938
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. It is my privilege to welcome you all to this session on ‘Comparative Testing for Sustainable Lifestyles’ and compliment CI on having decided to focus on this subject. Will this session mark a major milestone for the consumer movement? Time will tell. Comparative testing for sustainable lifestyles, you would all agree, is A novel concept A new perspective A fascinating challenge I am not going into the “WHY” of sustainable lifestyles. We had a session in the morning on ‘Sustainable Consumption and Tackling Climate Changes’. We all know the importance of “WHY” we need to move towards sustainable lifestyles. Comparative testing (CT) has been a very important tool used by consumer groups, to empower consumers to make an informed choice in the market place and get value for money. Traditionally, consumer groups engaged in comparative testing have been testing products for their safety and performance. Since 1936, when Consumers Union started its testing with 1
  • 2. breakfast cereals and milk, comparative testing has come a long way. It has evolved in terms of the nature of products being tested, to test methodologies and parameters, to presentation of results to readers. And the evolution of comparative testing is still on. It has led to products becoming better and safer. After comparative testing became a successful tool for campaigning for quality products, consumer groups extended comparative testing to services. This helped to provide consumers with comparative data on services, which was, and still is, an issue of concern in most countries. After this, comparative testing has moved to include the rating and ranking of products on corporate ethics. VKI - Consumers Association of Austria was the first to do this. Such comparative corporate tests supplement the results of product tests. Consummentenbond - The Netherlands has also worked in this area, including corporate ethics tests with product tests. 2
  • 3. Having tracked in brief the movement of comparative testing, you would all agree that comparative testing is elastic, and keeps responding to the needs of society. So today we discuss, how we can look at comparative testing for sustainable lifestyles. If we look closely, product test reports in the last few years have been already expanded to include some aspects of sustainable lifestyles. If the product test report on water efficient showerheads by CHOICE, Australia indicates which brand consumes less water or the work done by CONSUMERS KOREA brings a halt, to the use of Endocrine disrupting chemicals, we have already walked in that direction. When INSIGHT magazine, brought out by CERC, India, published with its ‘Tea’ test report brandwise information on pesticide residues and heavy metals, it was a product test report looking at environmental criteria as well. We can conclude that the consumer movement has been tiptoeing into comparative testing for sustainable lifestyles. 3
  • 4. We therefore highlight in today’s session what has been the experience so far and what should be the methodology to follow. Most countries have an eco- labelling scheme and set criteria for a product to get an eco-label. Could we include these in the product testing reports for consumers? CERC, India and GTZ, Germany, are jointly doing a project on ‘Consumer Advisory for Environment Friendly Products’ wherein we have selected products, for testing, which fall under the voluntary eco-labelling scheme of India. E.g., we are testing Toothpastes, for lead and arsenic, and Food Mixers for energy consumption and noise over and above the usual performance tests. Another way would be to include the ‘Sustainability’ feature when testing and reporting, e.g. A test report on ‘Mobile Phones’ can also include brandwise information on how long the battery will last, for how many years the manufacturer will be able to provide a replacement battery, spares, etc. for that model. Often the only reason for which we have to change our mobile phone is the non-availability of ‘battery’, as most mobile phone manufacturers consider a model obsolete within a year. It is important to reduce this ‘USE AND THROW’ trend that is fast developing with many products. 4
  • 5. There are several ways to telescope sustainable lifestyle parameters into comparative testing. Comparative testing can help navigate consumers towards a more sustainable lifestyle. This session will also look into how readers would respond to such information. However, we all know that giving such information to consumers does not guarantee in itself a more sustainable consumption. This depends on various factors. Comparative testing for sustainable lifestyles cannot be fully successful unless consumer groups ensure that consumers have sound information and education on the environmental impacts of their buying decisions and lifestyle choices. But, by and large, we can expect a positive response from readers. Comparative testing for sustainable lifestyles has therefore a tremendous potential. In fact, in countries where products are becoming more and more similar and safer, it is a challenge for consumer groups and magazine editors to bring out the differences among brands tested. Hence adding the dimension of sustainable lifestyles to testing could be the way ahead. 5
  • 6. But there are some problems too, that we should not overlook. And one of them is when environmental values conflict with the traditional price quality ratios; it is not always that consumers are ready to pay more for environment friendly products. Also products may meet environmental criteria but not quality parameters and vice versa. ------------------ - --------------- ------------------- 6

×