Corporate Presentation
1
Disclaimer
Forward Looking Statements
This presentation contains forward looking statements concerning future revenues and...
Introduction
3
Management
David McPherson, Chief Executive Officer & President ‐ Former senior bank executive
with considerable experienc...
Board of Directors
R. David Russell ‐ Chairman Board of Directors ‐ Mr. Russell has over 33 years of experience in the min...
Capital Structure
Capital Structure (Millions)
Basic Common Shares 68.1
Stock Options 4.7
Warrants 0.0
Fully Diluted Commo...
Positive Outlook for Ni
7
Nickel Prices
Indonesia Bans Ore Exports in Push for Metal Smelting – Bloomberg News, January 13, 2014
“We have been bulli...
Nickel Prices
 Commencing in early January, nickel prices have risen gradually
 Upwards pressure appears to have emanate...
Nickel Prices
Ni prices are moving……..
10
Nickel Prices
Implications for  Pure Nickel:
 Over the past 5 years the number of Nickel focused junior exploration 
comp...
Canadian & Alaskan Exploration Portfolio
Large Nickel 
i li dMineralized Zone
Gold Discovery 
2.58m grading 29.1 
g/tAu, 1...
MAN Project
13
MAN Project – Location and Access
 Access via Richardson and Denali Access via Richardson and Denali 
Hwy’s
 Alaska Pip...
MAN Project – Recent Results
Eureka Zone – Drill Holes
Metal Values are reported in situ Ni Equivalent (Ni EQ)% 
using: US...
MAN Project – Recent Results
Eureka Zone ‐ Highlights
 Approximately 200m thick zone
of contact style disseminated Ni‐
Cu...
MAN Project – Recent Results
Initial Mineralization Model
Isometric View of the central Alpha segment of the Eureka Zone 
...
MAN Project – Nickel Deportment
Favourable Results
Non‐Silicates (%)
Ni‐Fe Sulphide 62.8
 75.3% of Ni is recoverable 
Ni ...
SALT CHUCK Project
19
SALT CHUCK Project – Location and Access 
 Prince of Wales Island, Southeastern 
Al k USAAlaska, USA
 Highly favorable j...
SALT CHUCK Project – North Pole Hill 
 Current focus area, 1.5 
miles west of Salt Chuckmiles west of Salt Chuck 
Mine
 ...
SALT CHUCK Project – Potential Mineralization 
 Soil anomalies may represent additionalSoil anomalies may represent addit...
SALT CHUCK Project – North Pole Hill 
 Drilling targeted coincident soil 
geochemical IP anomalies andgeochemical, IP ano...
WILLIAM LAKE Project
24
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Location and Access
 460 km north of Winnipeg
 235 south of Thompson
 Southern extension of Thom...
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ General Geology
 William Lake “Trend” portion of
property hosts numerous TNB‐type
nickel occurrenc...
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Current Focus
 William Lake occurrences re‐
l t d t ti l b lk tevaluated as potential bulk tonnage...
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Current Focus
 Potential for several 
large bulk tonnage low 
grade nickel deposits
 Significant ...
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Byproduct Metals
 Falconbridge assay sampling based on observation of Ni sulphide 
 A d b i 15 00...
WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Plans
 l ll 2 f C C d G Resample all W‐21 DDHs for Cu, Co and PGE
 Resample 50% of W‐22 holes fo...
TOWER Project
31
TOWER Project – Location and Access
 Located in southern extension of
the Thompson Nickel Beltthe Thompson Nickel Belt
 ...
TOWER Project – Resource Estimate
Rockcliff Resources filled a NI 43‐101 mineral resource estimate on T‐1 Deposit
(prepare...
Our Plans
1. Advance Salt Chuck
 Drill Salt Chuck
 Finalize Option if and when Finalize Option if and when 
appropriate...
Why Pure Nickel?
 Working capital to support projectsWorking capital to support projects
 Well positioned to take advant...
Pure Nickel Inc.
95 Wellington St. West, Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2N7
T 416 644 0066 F 416 644 0069T 416.64...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Pure Nickel Inc. TSXV: NIC April 2014

1,557 views

Published on

Pure Nickel Inc. (TSXV: NIC) is a mineral exploration company with a diverse collection of advanced multiple nickel sulphide and PGE projects in Canada and Alaska including William Lake and MAN Alaska.
* Partnered with international conglomerate on premier property
* Outstanding scientific, exploration and management teams
* Strong cash balance to support our projects through the coming years

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,557
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Jr. Gold explorcoStock rose on preliminary drill and grab sample results.
  • Jr. Gold ExplorcoStock reacts on news of drill results
  • Jr. Gold explorcoActivity and news over the past 3 months
  • Jr. Gold ExplorcoStock reacts on news of drill results
  • Jr. Gold ExplorcoStock reacts on news of drill results
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Advanced stage explorcoSolid drill results this summer
  • Pure Nickel Inc. TSXV: NIC April 2014

    1. 1. Corporate Presentation 1
    2. 2. Disclaimer Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward looking statements concerning future revenues andThis presentation contains forward looking statements concerning future revenues and expenses, results of operations, and environmental factors that are in some cases considered forward‐looking statements. These statements are based on numerous assumptions including commodity prices, exploration results, resource availability, and other assumptions that management believes are reasonable based on currently available information howevermanagement believes are reasonable based on currently available information, however management’s assumptions and the Company’s future performance are subject to a wide range of business risks and there is no assurance that these goals and projections can or will be met. This document does not constitute an Offering Memorandum and as such is not intended to solicit funds. Qualified Person’s Statement The information in this presentation that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled, reviewed or prepared by Jon Findlay, Ph.D, P.Geo. Dr. Findlay is a Qualified Person as 2 defined by National Instrument 43‐101, and has reviewed and approved the technical content of this presentation.
    3. 3. Introduction 3
    4. 4. Management David McPherson, Chief Executive Officer & President ‐ Former senior bank executive with considerable experience in regional economic development and corporate finance. Dr. Jon Findlay, Senior Geologist ‐ Professional Geologist with over 21 years experience in exploration and development on diverse deposit types. Dr. Dale Hull, Chief Operations Consultant ‐ Between 1984 and 2004, Mr. Hull was Di E i P li Mi l P li S f N l R C d (O )Director, Economic Policy, Mineral Policy Sector of Natural Resources Canada (Ottawa). Lisa Buchan, Corporate Secretary, Business Manager ‐ A chemical engineer and MBA, Ms Buchan has been with Pure Nickel since its inceptionMs. Buchan has been with Pure Nickel since its inception. Jennifer Scoffield, Chief Financial Officer ‐ A Chartered Accountant with over 18 years of experience in financial management and reporting in a variety of industriesof experience in financial management and reporting in a variety of industries. 4
    5. 5. Board of Directors R. David Russell ‐ Chairman Board of Directors ‐ Mr. Russell has over 33 years of experience in the mining industry. Mr. Russell is also Chairman of Fire River Gold, a director for General Molybdenum and a Director of Central Asia Minerals and Resources. Pre io sl Mr R ssell as the Fo nder President CEO and Director of the former Apollo Gold CorporationPreviously, Mr. Russell was the Founder, President , CEO and Director of the former Apollo Gold Corporation. David R. McPherson ‐ President and Chief Executive Officer ‐ Mr. McPherson has been President and CEO of Pure Nickel since December 2007. He is a former senior bank executive with considerable experience in regional economic development and corporate finance. Harry Blum ‐ Mr. Blum is Managing Partner, Collins Barrow and also serves as Senior Partner, Transaction Advisory Services. Collins Barrow has a significant presence in the resource sector serving as auditors for a number of junior mining and exploration companies. Mr. Blum is Chair of the Pure Nickel Audit Committee. Tom Kofman ‐ Mr. Kofman is Founder and Chairman of M Partners Inc., an independent full‐service investment bank. He has more than 25 years of experience in North American Capital markets as both issuer and banker. Mr. Kofman, is a Chartered Accountant. W. Steve Vaughan ‐ Mr. Vaughan is a leading expert on mining and natural resources law. He is a partner with Dorsey & Whitney LLP, a full service global firm. Mr. Vaughan is Pure Nickel’s chief counsel. Constantine Salamis ‐ Mr. Salamis, a mining engineer, has been involved in numerous mineral exploration and production companies throughout his 50 year career including Falconbridge Nickel, Inco Ltd., SOQUEM and Manicouagan Minerals, a public h f d d i 2004company he founded in 2004. 5
    6. 6. Capital Structure Capital Structure (Millions) Basic Common Shares 68.1 Stock Options 4.7 Warrants 0.0 Fully Diluted Common Shares 72.9 6
    7. 7. Positive Outlook for Ni 7
    8. 8. Nickel Prices Indonesia Bans Ore Exports in Push for Metal Smelting – Bloomberg News, January 13, 2014 “We have been bullish  on nickel since the start  of the year…… The price  rally predominantly  reflects the ongoingreflects the ongoing  Indonesian ore export  ban” and “concerns  about the potential  impact of any sanctions  on Russian commodity  exports.”  Jeff Currie,  analyst at Goldman Sachs. a a yst at Go d a Sac s. April 14, 2014 Scotiabank raises nickel price outlook in light of Indonesian t b k t i t i l t l f ll i 8 export ban ‐ a key component in stainless steel ‐‐ following an Indonesian export ban on unprocessed ore that took effect earlier this year. April 14, 2014
    9. 9. Nickel Prices  Commencing in early January, nickel prices have risen gradually  Upwards pressure appears to have emanated from Indonesia’s ban on the export of Upwards pressure appears to have emanated from Indonesia’s ban on the export of  nickel ore and a general sense of optimism about the state of the global economy  Forecasts for nickel prices vary: Company Date 2014 Ni Price US$/Ton 2014 Ni Price  Cdn$/Ton 2014 Ni Price US$/lb 2014 Ni Price  Cdn$/lb Deutsche Bank 14/01/14 $15,000 $16,566 $7.50 $8.28 Goldman Sachs 21/01/14 $16,000 $17,670 $8.00 $8.84 BMO 14/01/14 $13 200 $14 578 $6 60 $7 29BMO 14/01/14 $13,200 $14,578 $6.60 $7.29 UBS 17/01/14 $12,800 $14,136 $6.40 $7.07 Macquarie Bank 30/12/13 $15,500 $17,118 $7.75 $8.56 Barclays 09/09/13 $15,000 $16,566 $7.50 $8.28 9
    10. 10. Nickel Prices Ni prices are moving…….. 10
    11. 11. Nickel Prices Implications for  Pure Nickel:  Over the past 5 years the number of Nickel focused junior exploration  companies has reduced dramatically = less competition  Ultimately fewer projects that have had ongoing exploration activity  As Nickel prices increase, the value of active projects can be projected to  increase  For Pure Nickel this could mean improved access to capital and more  interest by large cap companies in our large projects 11
    12. 12. Canadian & Alaskan Exploration Portfolio Large Nickel  i li dMineralized Zone Gold Discovery  2.58m grading 29.1  g/tAu, 14.1 g/t Ag  and 0 79% Cuand 0.79% Cu Thomson Nickel Belt 12 Thomson Nickel Belt
    13. 13. MAN Project 13
    14. 14. MAN Project – Location and Access  Access via Richardson and Denali Access via Richardson and Denali  Hwy’s  Alaska Pipeline adjacent to  Richardson Hwy  Deepwater port at Valdez, Alaska,  300 km, via Richardson Hwyy  Exploration camp at Tangle River Inn  14,000 ha State claims, 100% NIC14,000 ha State claims, 100% NIC 14
    15. 15. MAN Project – Recent Results Eureka Zone – Drill Holes Metal Values are reported in situ Ni Equivalent (Ni EQ)%  using: US$1500/oz for Au, US$1500/oz for Pt, US$700/oz for  Pd, US$14/lb for Co, US$3.5/lb for Cu, US$9/lb for Ni,  US$20/oz for Ag 15
    16. 16. MAN Project – Recent Results Eureka Zone ‐ Highlights  Approximately 200m thick zone of contact style disseminated Ni‐ Cu‐PGE sulphide mineralization in the Alpha complex has beenin the Alpha complex has been identified  Intersected and mapped over a strike length of ~ 15km, may extend entire 33 km length of Alpha Complex  Significant tonnage appears possible and the project would compare favourably to other bulk tonnage projects 16
    17. 17. MAN Project – Recent Results Initial Mineralization Model Isometric View of the central Alpha segment of the Eureka Zone  showing topography, surface distribution and exploration model 5.7km N  5.7 km strike length trending 120° (central Alpha)   Dipping ~35° to the southwest  100m to 250m thick 100m to 250m thick   Open to depth, to the northwest and to the southeast 17
    18. 18. MAN Project – Nickel Deportment Favourable Results Non‐Silicates (%) Ni‐Fe Sulphide 62.8  75.3% of Ni is recoverable  Ni bearing minerals Ni‐Fe Alloy 12.5 FeMgSO Alteration 3.0 Chromite 0.6  Majority of Ni hosted by  potentially recoverable Ni‐ Fe sulphides and alloys Fe Sulphide 0.5 Silicates (%) p y  Important step forward in  our understanding of the  Silicates (%) Olivine 9.6 Serpentine 10.4 potential for economic  recovery of metals from  the Eureka Zone 18
    19. 19. SALT CHUCK Project 19
    20. 20. SALT CHUCK Project – Location and Access   Prince of Wales Island, Southeastern  Al k USAAlaska, USA  Highly favorable jurisdiction. US$278  million in state cap ex funding to 2million in state cap ex funding to 2  projects this years  64 km from Ketchikan (accessed by64 km from Ketchikan (accessed by  ferry, barge or light aircraft)  16 km by road southwest of Thorney Bay (paved highways and maintained  logging roads)  146 Federal Claims, 1,071 ha, 100% NIC 20
    21. 21. SALT CHUCK Project – North Pole Hill   Current focus area, 1.5  miles west of Salt Chuckmiles west of Salt Chuck  Mine  Coincident IP chargeability  and Au‐Cu‐Pd soil  geochemical anomalies  Anomalies coincident with Anomalies coincident with  inferred contacts between  Hybrid Gabbro/Pyroxenite  and Pyroxenite unitsy  Mineralization at Salt  Chuck Mine partially  l li d t t tlocalized at same contacts 21
    22. 22. SALT CHUCK Project – Potential Mineralization   Soil anomalies may represent additionalSoil anomalies may represent additional  structurally controlled mineralization  2 – 3 trends: southerly, southeasterly,  h lnortheasterly  Defined potential zones of mineralization  with total length of 4 kmwith total length of 4 km  Strike length limited by extent of surveys  Most significant anomalies remain Most significant anomalies remain  untested 22
    23. 23. SALT CHUCK Project – North Pole Hill   Drilling targeted coincident soil  geochemical IP anomalies andgeochemical, IP anomalies and  Pyroxenite‐Gabbro/Pyroxenite Hybrid unit contact  NPH‐12‐04 encountered 2.58m  (apparent width) grading 29.1 g/t  Au. 14.1 g/t Ag and 0.79% Cu  Hole NPH‐12‐09, 550m to the east,  encountered 5.49m (apparent  width) grading 1.2 g/t Au) g g g  Broad zones of anomalous Pd  concentrations occurred downhole from Au mineralizationfrom Au mineralization 23
    24. 24. WILLIAM LAKE Project 24
    25. 25. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Location and Access  460 km north of Winnipeg  235 south of Thompson  Southern extension of Thompson Nickel  Belt (TNB)  Access via Provincial Hwy 6 from  Thompson or Winnipeg  Network of secondary roads and trails Network of secondary roads and trails  provide property access 25
    26. 26. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ General Geology  William Lake “Trend” portion of property hosts numerous TNB‐type nickel occurrences  TNB is a Paleoproterozoic fold belt at the boundary of Churchill and SuperiorSuperior  Mineralization occurs in deformed ultramafic bodies and adjacent sedimentary rocks 26
    27. 27. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Current Focus  William Lake occurrences re‐ l t d t ti l b lk tevaluated as potential bulk tonnage  deposits in 2013  W‐21 and W‐22 have the best  potential for initial resource  definition and subsequent deposit  development  Ni grade shell models developed in  Gems for both prospects  Results indicate excellent potential  for bulk deposits having grade and  tonnage characteristics comparable  27 to Minago
    28. 28. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Current Focus  Potential for several  large bulk tonnage low  grade nickel deposits  Significant historic  drilling and exploration  can be leveraged tocan be leveraged to  target most  prospective areas  GemcomGEM v6.4.1 used to construct grade shell model for the W21 Prospect  Insufficient data to permit a compliant inferred resource estimate  Estimation of grade cutoffs allow development of an exploration resource model 28  Estimation of grade cutoffs allow development of an exploration resource model  as an aid to target evaluation
    29. 29. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Byproduct Metals  Falconbridge assay sampling based on observation of Ni sulphide   A d b i 15 000 Ni b l 3 000 C 300 Assay database contains ~15,000 Ni assays but only 3,000 Cu assays, 300  PGE assays, no Co assays  Re‐assay of a small sample of core in 2012y p  Limited data indicate significant added value possible through Cu‐Co‐PGE  byproducts Composite High Grade Sample Re‐assay Results, W‐22 prospect Ni % Cu % Co % Au g/t Pt g/t Pd g/t Rh g/t Os g/t Ir g/t Ru g/tNi % Cu % Co % Au g/t Pt g/t Pd g/t Rh g/t Os g/t Ir g/t Ru g/t Average  (n=14) 1.69 0.10 0.02 0.12 1.19 1.44 0.23 0.18 0.31 1.03 29 Max. 9.41 0.44 0.07 0.69 9.25 11.00 2.13 0.63 2.93 10.40
    30. 30. WILLIAM LAKE Project ‐ Plans  l ll 2 f C C d G Resample all W‐21 DDHs for Cu, Co and PGE  Resample 50% of W‐22 holes for Cu, Co and PGE  Re‐assess grade shell models with byproduct metals included  If total in situ metal value warrants, initiate drilling on either prospect to  complete initial resource estimatecomplete initial resource estimate  Complete internal PEA on resultant resource using published estimates for  economic variables from 2013 Minago Feasibility study 30
    31. 31. TOWER Project 31
    32. 32. TOWER Project – Location and Access  Located in southern extension of the Thompson Nickel Beltthe Thompson Nickel Belt  The property is strategically l t d l j H dlocated along a major Hwy and two sets of power lines  35 claims adjacent to Pure Nickel’s William Lake property  JV with Rockcliff Resources (50/50), Rockcliff may earn an additional 20% 32
    33. 33. TOWER Project – Resource Estimate Rockcliff Resources filled a NI 43‐101 mineral resource estimate on T‐1 Deposit (prepared by Caracle Creek for the T‐1 Copper Deposit  and press released on January 22, (p p y pp p p y , 2013 is detailed below) Mineral Resources Statement, T‐1 Copper Deposit, Manitoba Caracle Creek, December 2, 2012 Resource Category Tonnes Cu% Zn% Ag g/t Au g/t Contained Pounds‐Cu Indicated 1,084,186 3.73 1.05 17.28 0.55 88,968,303 Inferred 1,253,522 2.00 1.02 9.78 0.27 55,154,968Inferred 1,253,522 2.00 1.02 9.78 0.27 55,154,968 Notes: 1. CIM definitions were followed for the estimation of mineral resources.1. CIM definitions were followed for the estimation of mineral resources. 2. Mineral resources are estimated at a Cu cut‐off of 0.5% 3. Cut‐off grade was based on a copper price of US$3.63 per pound 4. Given the tonnage, grade and orientation of the deposit, Caracle Creek considers the T‐! Copper Deposit to be reasonably amenable to extraction  using underground mining methods 5. Specific Gravity measurement s were taken on a portion of the samples and where actual measurements were not available an average of 3.00 was  used 6. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability 33
    34. 34. Our Plans 1. Advance Salt Chuck  Drill Salt Chuck  Finalize Option if and when Finalize Option if and when  appropriate 2. Market MAN2. Market MAN  Complete incremental  metallurgy  work 3. Advance William Lake  34 Globe & Mail. March 7, 2014
    35. 35. Why Pure Nickel?  Working capital to support projectsWorking capital to support projects  Well positioned to take advantage of upwards momentum in Ni prices  1% NSR (capped at US $8.0 million) from asset sale expected to commence in 2014  Over $100 million has been spent on properties, the company has continued to advance our portfolio every year since 2007  New gold discovery in 2012  Significant upside available at today’s share price Significant upside available at today s share price 35
    36. 36. Pure Nickel Inc. 95 Wellington St. West, Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2N7 T 416 644 0066 F 416 644 0069T 416.644.0066 F 416.644.0069 info@purenickel.com CHF Investor Relations 90 Adelaide St. West, 6th floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3V990 de a de St est, 6t oo , o o to, O ta o, Ca ada 5 3 9 T 416.868.1079 cathy@chfir.com www.chfir.com or on twitter @CHF IR Disclaimer This document contains forward looking information. These statements are based on numerous assumptions including commodityThese statements are based on numerous assumptions including commodity prices, exploration results, resource availability, and other assumptions that management believes are reasonable based on currently available information, however management’s assumptions and the Company’s future performance are subject to a wide range of business risks and there is no assurance that these goals and projections can or will be met. This document does not constitute an Offering Memorandum and as such is not intended to solicit fundsconstitute an Offering Memorandum and as such is not intended to solicit funds. 36

    ×