Regional Consultation Workshop            on Developing Quality             Guidelines for OERProfessor Dr. Md. Abdul Mann...
OER and QA: Tensions/      Challenges Institutional conservatism vs Openness Individualism vs collectivism Expansion fo...
OER Development-Embryonic Stage Accessing information Liberalizing information Understanding OER and its benefits Open...
OER Development Evolving Stage OER – means of transforming education Beyond access- Open Learning Combining formal and ...
Scope- OER Categories Open Course Ware: the release of the core teaching  and learning materials at any level of educatio...
Role Players in OER Creators/Users Hosters: Regulators Validators Institutions
Transforming Education: Potential of OER Institutional level: Internal Quality Assurance Process Quality Assurance /Accr...
Institutional OER Quality Assurance: Challenges Integrate OER into institutional quality assurance policy and    practice...
Quality Assurance /Accreditation Bodies: Challenges National QA policy to support OER Accreditation bodies recognize rol...
Role of Quality Assurance /Accreditation Bodies Develop understanding of OER and its impacts on quality assurance and  re...
Validation Bodies Validated validation bodies Encourage user-centered quality mechanisms to allow community to  ensure q...
Developing Quality Guidelines for OER
Developing Quality Guidelines for OER
Developing Quality Guidelines for OER
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Developing Quality Guidelines for OER

306 views
238 views

Published on

Regional Consultation Workshop on Quality Guidelines for Open Educational Resources on 13-15 March 2013 at Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
306
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Developing Quality Guidelines for OER

  1. 1. Regional Consultation Workshop on Developing Quality Guidelines for OERProfessor Dr. Md. Abdul MannanVice ChancellorEuropean University of BangladeshandHonorary AdviserCommonwealth of LearningEmail: joyamannan@yahoo.com.au
  2. 2. OER and QA: Tensions/ Challenges Institutional conservatism vs Openness Individualism vs collectivism Expansion for Quantity vs openness for opportunity Print media vs electronic media. OER Movement vs Quality Development of OER and Quality
  3. 3. OER Development-Embryonic Stage Accessing information Liberalizing information Understanding OER and its benefits Open licensing and copyright Capacity building (technical know- how, infrastructure etc) Emphasis on availability of resources Tools and repositories
  4. 4. OER Development Evolving Stage OER – means of transforming education Beyond access- Open Learning Combining formal and informal learning construction + sharing External validation for quality improvement/assurance Change of educational culture as against availability of resources only OER – value added mechanism
  5. 5. Scope- OER Categories Open Course Ware: the release of the core teaching and learning materials at any level of education globally. Open Publishing: Publication of journal materials, text book etc. without the need to pay for license, access fee etc. Open Artifacts: Individual resources, images, libraries, data sets etc. Open support: Supporting materials and tools, for learning, methodological guide for QA, education practices and software etc.
  6. 6. Role Players in OER Creators/Users Hosters: Regulators Validators Institutions
  7. 7. Transforming Education: Potential of OER Institutional level: Internal Quality Assurance Process Quality Assurance /Accreditation Bodies Academic Recognition bodies
  8. 8. Institutional OER Quality Assurance: Challenges Integrate OER into institutional quality assurance policy and practices Internal process for validating quality of education materials Improving quality through peer review process Improving materials through peer review process Revise/remix for contextualization, personalization and localization; Choosing and integrating resources into teaching and learning activities CPD for creation and use of OER Engaging students for selection and adaptation of OER Sharing and collaborating externally Defining responsibility of assuring quality of any content use in teaching and learning Embedding creation and use of OER in the institutional culture
  9. 9. Quality Assurance /Accreditation Bodies: Challenges National QA policy to support OER Accreditation bodies recognize role of OER in qualification recognition Fostering QA and assessment of programs and institutional QA mechanisms Fostering use of OER and assessing educational resources produced, adapted and used
  10. 10. Role of Quality Assurance /Accreditation Bodies Develop understanding of OER and its impacts on quality assurance and recognition Develop copyright/Creative Commons License focusing around OER Include OER as good practice in QA and Recognition
  11. 11. Validation Bodies Validated validation bodies Encourage user-centered quality mechanisms to allow community to ensure quality (peer-review, commenting, rating). Assessment and certification of OER Assessment and certification of learning outcomes achieved through OER.

×